经济转型背景下城市工业用地利用效率——以长江经济带城市为例

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.09.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国工业用地长期存在着粗放、低效、无序利用的状态,探究经济转型背景下城市工业用地利用效率及其作用机制具有重要意义。本文通过构建随机前沿生产函数模型测度了2007—2016年长江经济带城市工业用地利用效率,利用空间统计模型分析其时空格局演变特征,并采用面板数据回归模型探究了经济转型背景下工业用地利用效率的主要影响因素。研究结果表明：①2007—2016年,长江经济带工业用地利用效率水平处于中等水平,表现出稳定上升的态势;②研究区工业用地利用效率区域差异显著,空间分布呈现东北高—西南低的集聚特征,工业用地利用效率热点区域存在显著的空间极化现象;③经济转型背景下,全球化通过外商投资的增加而促进了长江经济带工业用地利用效率的提升;土地市场化的提高也对工业用地利用效率产生积极的提升作用;分权化则对城市工业用地利用效率具有负向作用。基于此提出如下建议：长江经济带城市应当因地制宜,提高外商投资利用效率;进一步推进工业用地市场化改革;实施差别化的工业用地供应政策。

关键词: 经济转型, 工业用地利用效率, 时空演变, 影响因素, 长江经济带

Abstract:

In China’s industrial development, land elements have long been used in a disorderly, extensive, and inefficient manner. In the context of economic transformation, it is of great significance to explore the mechanism of globalization, marketization, and decentralization in the use efficiency of urban industrial land. In this study, urban industrial land use efficiency was measured by a stochastic frontier production function model for the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2007 to 2016. Also, spatial statistical method was used to explore the spatial heterogeneity of urban industrial land use efficiency. This study analyzed the influence of economic globalization, marketization, and decentralization on the use efficiency of industrial land under the background of economic transformation. The results of the study show that: from 2007 to 2016, urban industrial land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was relatively low, but showed an upward trend. The spatial distribution of urban industrial land use efficiency in the region presented a agglomeration trend, with the high is in the northeast and the low in the southwest, showing obvious spatial non-equilibrium. Industrial land use efficiency hot spots showed a significant spatial polarization phenomenon. The regression results show that under the background of economic transformation, globalization has promoted the improvement of industrial land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic belt through the increase of foreign investment.Through the improvement of land marketization, it also has a positive effect on the industrial land use efficiency. Decentralization has a negative effect on the industrial land use efficiency. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward: Cities along the Yangtze River Economic belt should adjust measures to local conditions and improve the utilization efficiency of foreign investment,promote the market-oriented reform of industrial land and implement differentiated policies for the supply of industrial land.

Key words: economic transformation, urban industrial land use efficiency, spatiotemporal pattern, influencing factors, Yangtze River Economic Belt

张立新, 毕旭, 黄志基. 经济转型背景下城市工业用地利用效率——以长江经济带城市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9): 1728-1738.

ZHANG Lixin, BI Xu, HUANG Zhiji. Urban industrial land use efficiency under the background of economic transformation in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1728-1738.

图/表 6

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

表2

参考文献 36

[1]	张清勇, 杜辉, 钟晓萍. 日本、韩国和我国台湾地区的工业用地政策: 变迁与启示[J]. 财经智库, 2019,4(5):103-114.
	[ Zhang Q Y, Du H, Zhong X P. Industrial land policy in Japan, South Korea and China Taiwan: Changes and enlightenment[J]. Financial Minds, 2019,4(5):103-114.]
[2]	全国国土规划纲要(2016-2030年)[J]. 中华人民共和国国务院公报, 2017, (6):35-64.
	[ The outline of the national land plan (2006-2030)[J]. Communique of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2017, (6):35-64.]
[3]	刘书畅, 叶艳妹, 肖武. 基于随机前沿分析的中国城市土地利用效率时空分异研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020,34(1):61-69.
	[ Liu S C, Ye Y M, Xiao W. Spatial-temporal differentiation of urban land-use efficiency in China based on stochastic frontier analysis[J]. China Land Science, 2020,34(1):61-69.]
[4]	严思齐, 彭建超, 吴群. 中国工业用地利用效率收敛特征[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(6):1163-1174.
	[ Yan S Q, Peng J C, Wu Q. The convergence characteristics of industrial land use efficiency in China[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(6):1163-1174.]
[5]	朱孟珏, 庄大昌, 李涛. 基于环境约束的中国矿业城市工业用地效率评价[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018,32(10):59-66.
	[ Zhu M Y, Zhuang D C, Li T. Evaluation on industrial land use efficiency of mining cities in China based on environmental constraints[J]. China Land Science, 2018,32(10):59-66.]
[6]	罗能生, 彭郁. 中国城市工业用地利用效率时空差异及地方政府竞争影响[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016,30(5):62-70.
	[ Luo N S, Peng Y. The space-time analysis of urban industrial land use and the effects of the local government competition in China[J]. China Land Science, 2016,30(5):62-70.]
[7]	谢花林, 王伟, 姚冠荣, 等. 中国主要经济区城市工业用地效率的时空差异和收敛性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(8):1327-1338.
	[ Xie H L, Wang W, Yao G R, et al. Spatial and temporal differences and convergence of China’s main economic zones[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(8):1327-1338.]
[8]	陈伟, 彭建超, 吴群. 中国省域工业用地利用效率时空差异及影响因素研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(10):2046-2056.
	[ Chen W, Peng J C, Wu Q. Spatial and temporal differences in industrial land use efficiency in China[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(10):2046-2056.]
[9]	Chen W, Shen Y, Wang Y N, et al. How do industrial land price variations affect industrial diffusion? Evidence from a spatial analysis of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,71:384-394.
[10]	郭贯成, 彭紫新, 周志伟. 工业企业类型对工业用地利用效率的影响研究: 基于企业类型宏观视角的分类[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(2):241-249.
	[ Guo G C, Peng Z X, Zhou Z W. Impact of industrial enterprise type of macro perspective on industrial land use efficiency[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(2):241-249.]
[11]	严思齐, 彭建超. 财政分权对工业用地利用效率影响的门槛效应: 基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(1):118-129.
	[ Yan S Q, Peng J C. The threshold effect in the impact of fiscal decentralization on industrial land use efficiency: Empirical research based on provincial-level panel data[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019,19(1):118-129.]
[12]	赵爱栋, 马贤磊, 曲福田. 市场化改革能提高中国工业用地利用效率吗?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016,26(3):118-126.
	[ Zhao A D, Ma X L, Qu F T. Does market reform increase industrial land use efficiency in China?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016,26(3):118-126.]
[13]	贺灿飞, 王俊松. 经济转型与中国省区能源强度研究[J]. 地理科学, 2009,29(4):461-469.
	[ He C F, Wang J S. Economic transition and energy intensity in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2009,29(4):461-469.]
[14]	Wu C Y, Wei Y D, Huang X J, et al. Economic transition, spatial development and urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Habitat International, 2017,63:67-78.
[15]	贺灿飞. 经济转型地理研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2017.
	[ He C F. Geographical Research of Transitional Economic in China[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2017.]
[16]	Wei Y D. Decentralization, marketization, and globalization: The triple processes underlying regional development in China[J]. Asian Geographer, 2001,20(1-2):7-23.
[17]	Huang Z J, Wei Y D, He C F, et al. Urban land expansion under economic transition in China: A multi-level modeling analysis[J]. Habitat International, 2015,47:69-82.
[18]	Gao J L, Wei Y D, Chen W, et al. Economic transition and urban land expansion in provincial China[J]. Habitat International, 2014,44:461-473.
[19]	田文佳, 余靖雯, 龚六堂. 晋升激励与工业用地出让价格: 基于断点回归方法的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2019,54(10):89-105.
	[ Tian W J, Yu J W, Gong L T. Promotion on incentives and industrial land leasing prices: A regression discontinuity design[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019,54(10):89-105.]
[20]	陶然, 袁飞, 曹广忠. 区域竞争、土地出让与地方财政效应: 基于1999-2003 年中国地级城市面板数据的分析[J]. 世界经济, 2007, (10):15-27.
	[ Tao R, Yuan F, Cao G Z. Regional competition, land sale and fiscal effect of local government: Based on panel data of cities in China between 1999 and 2003[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2007, (10):15-27.]
[21]	屠帆, 胡思闻, 邹双玲. 从路径依赖到路径突破: 中国工业用地政策演化的制度经济学分析[J]. 科技与经济, 2019,32(5):86-90.
	[ Tu F, Hu S W, Zou S L. From path dependence to path breakthrough: An institutional economics analysis of the evolution of industrial land use policy in China[J]. Science & Technology and Economy, 2019,32(5):86-90.]
[22]	崔新蕾, 赵燕霞. 资源型城市工业用地利用效率及影响因素研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2018,35(3):1-14.
	[ Cui X L, Zhao Y X. On the utilization efficiency and influencing factors of industrial land in resource-oriented cities[J]. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2018,35(3):1-14.]
[23]	张英浩, 陈江龙, 高金龙, 等. 经济转型视角下长三角城市土地利用效率影响机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(6):1157-1170.
	[ Zhang Y H, Chen J L, Gao J L, et al. The impact mechanism of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of economic transition[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(6):1157-1170.]
[24]	张立新, 朱道林, 杜挺, 等. 长江经济带土地城镇化时空格局及其驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017,26(9):1295-1303.
	[ Zhang L X, Zhu D L, D T, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern evolvement and driving factors of land urbanization in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017,26(9):1295-1303.]
[25]	Aigner D J, Lovell C K, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 1977,6(1):21-37.
[26]	Battese G E, Coelli T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992,3:153-169.
[27]	王良健, 李辉, 石川. 中国城市土地利用效率及其溢出效应与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(11):1788-1799.
	[ Wang L J, Li H, Shi C. Urban land- use efficiency, spatial spillover, and determinants in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(11):1788-1799.]
[28]	张立新. 基于资源配置理论的城市土地合理利用研究[D]. 中国农业大学, 2018.
	[ Zhang L X. Research on the Urban Land Rational Utilization Based on the Resource Allocation Theory[D]. China Agriculture University, 2018.]
[29]	张立新, 朱道林, 杜挺, 等. 基于DEA模型的城市建设用地利用效率时空格局演变及驱动因素[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(3):418-429.
	[ Zhang L X, Zhu D L, Du T, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern evolvement and driving factors of urban construction land use efficiency using data envelopment analysis[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(3):418-429.]
[30]	宋洋, 朱道林, 张立新, 等. 2000年以来黄河流域土地市场化时空格局演变及驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(4):799-813.
	[ Song Y, Zhu D L, Zhang L X, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of land marketization in the Yellow River Basin since 2000[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(4):799-813.]
[31]	罗遥, 吴群. 城市低效工业用地研究进展: 基于供给侧结构性改革的思考[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(6):1119-1129.
	[ Luo Y, Wu Q. Research progress on inefficient urban industrial land based on supply side structural reform[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(6):1119-1129.]
[32]	Liu S C, Ye Y M, Li L L. Spatial-temporal analysis of urban land-use efficiency: An analytical framework in terms of economic transition and spatiality[J]. Sustainability, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/su11071839. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29100.edlr pmid: 29350212
[33]	国家统计局. 中国城市统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008- 2017.
	[ National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China City Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House, 2008- 2017.]
[34]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2008- 2017.
	[ National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. Statistical Yearbook of China[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House, 2008- 2017.]
[35]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 中国城市建设统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2007-2016.
	[ Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House, 2007-2016.]
[36]	国土资源年鉴编辑部. 中国国土资源年鉴[M]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国土资源部, 2008-2017.
	[ The Editorial Staff of China Land & Resources Almanac. China Land & Resources Almanac[M]. Beijing: Ministry of Land and Resources the People’s Republic of China, 2008-2017.]

解释变量	变量简称	定义
外商投资水平	rfdi	FDI/城市人口,单位：万美元/人	连续变量
土地市场化水平	lmark	城市一级市场招拍挂面积/总出让面积,单位：%	连续变量
财政分权程度	fedec	城市人均财政支出/（城市人均财政支出 + 省人均财政支出 + 中央政府人均财政支出）, 单位：%	连续变量
产业结构优化程度	idu	第二产业产值/第三产业产值,单位：%	连续变量
工业企业集聚程度	secdes	工业企业总个数/城市建设用地面积,单位：个/km²	连续变量
	peodes	行业从业人数总人数/城市建设用地面积,单位：人/km²	连续变量
地区经济水平	agdp	GDP/城市人口,单位：元/人	连续变量

含义	变量名	全域	下游	中游	上游
	C	0.5188***	0.7758***	0.4803***	0.2570***
全球化	rfdi	0.8701***	1.8661***	-0.1508	1.0555***
市场化	lmark	0.0163***	0.0367**	-0.0009	-0.0411
分权化	fedec	-0.1324***	0.5894***	0.1152***	-0.1970***
产业结构	idu	-0.0081**	-0.0824	0.0206***	0.0606***
工业企业集聚程度	secdes	0.0016**	0.0012***	0.0038***	0.0011
	peodes	-0.0015	0.2944***	-0.0889***	-0.0020
经济水平	agdp	0.0011***	0.0310***	-0.0117	0.0327***
R²		0.9881	0.7977	0.9745	0.7884
F值		696.977	19.617	248.398	26.089
样本数		1020	240	490	290