流域生态补偿分担模式研究——以九洲江流域为例

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.02.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态补偿分担比例是流域生态补偿实践中面临的重要问题。依据流域生态治理阶段,针对跨省重要水源地生态补偿,提出试行阶段、修复阶段、稳定阶段等3个阶段分担比例确定的思路。试行阶段以污染控制和水质改善为目标,补偿资金由流域上游、下游、国家三方共同分担,且在3年期间国家分担比例逐渐降低;修复阶段以生态资源保护为主,补偿目标是水质与水量同时达标,分担比例以上游、下游水量分配作为依据,双方共同承担;稳定阶段以上下游互利双赢、绿色发展为目标,以机会成本的宏观经济指标作为分担依据。通过对九洲江流域鹤地水库生态补偿的实证研究,补偿资金在3年试行阶段上游广西、下游广东、国家三方承担的比例分别为：第一年25.00%、25.00%、50.00%,第二年28.50%、28.50%、43.00%,第三年33.30%、33.30%、33.30%。修复阶段广西、广东、国家分担比例为39.30%、53.60%、7.1%;稳定阶段广西、广东分担比例为48.60%、51.40%。本文为确定九洲江流域生态补偿分担比例提供参考,并可为建立流域生态补偿长效机制提供依据。

关键词: 流域, 水源地, 生态补偿, 分担模式, 九洲江

Abstract:

Determining the proportion of shared responsibility is the most significant issue in the practice of watershed ecological compensation. According to the stages of river pollution control and ecological restoration, a model of three stages watershed ecological compensation responsibility sharing is proposed, which involves the trial stage, the restoration stage, and the stabilization stage. In the trial stage, the goal is pollution control and water quality improvement. Cost is shared by the upstream area, the downstream area, and the central government, and the proportion afforded by the central government will decline in three years. In the restoration stage, the goal is ecological conservation and restoration, and water quality and quantity should meet the requirements at the same time. Cost is shared by the upstream area and the downstream area according to the amount of water allocation. In the stabilization stage, the goal is to achieve a win-win situation and green development of the upstream and downstream areas. The proportion of compensation responsibility is determined by the opportunity costs of the upstream area. A case study of watershed ecological compensation in Jiuzhoujiang River basin shows that, in the trial stage, the proportion of shared responsibility of the upstream Guangxi Province, the downstream Guangdong Province, and the central government in the first year is 25.00%, 25.00%, and 50.00%, in the second year is 28.50%, 28.50%, and 43.00%, and in the third year is 33.30%, 33.30%, and 33.30%. In the restoration stage, the proportion of shared responsibility of the upstream area, the downstream area, and the central government is 39.30%, 53.60%, and 7.10%. In the stabilization stage, the proportion of shared responsibility of the upstream and the downstream governments is 48.60% and 51.40%. The results can contribute to the discussion of long-term watershed ecological compensation system, and it can also be a reference for the ecological compensation responsibility sharing of the Jiuzhoujiang River basin.

Key words: river basin, water source area, ecological compensation, sharing model, Jiuzhoujiang River Basin

王西琴, 高佳, 马淑芹, 刘子刚. 流域生态补偿分担模式研究——以九洲江流域为例[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(2): 242-250.

WANG Xiqin, GAO Jia, MA Shuqin, LIU Zigang. A model of shared responsibility of watershed ecological compensation: A case study of the Jiuzhoujiang River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 242-250.

图/表 3

参考文献 29

[1]	王军锋, 侯超波 . 中国流域生态补偿机制实施框架与补偿模式研究: 基于补偿资金来源的视角[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(2):23-29.
	[ Wang J F, Hou C B . Study on implementation framework and compensation pattern of basin ecological compensation mechanism in China: From the perspective of compensation funds source[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013,23(2):23-29.]
[2]	王金南, 王玉秋, 刘桂环 , 等. 国内首个跨省界水环境生态补偿: 新安江模式[J]. 环境保护, 2016,44(14):38-40.
	[ Wang J N, Wang Y Q, Liu G H , et al. The first eco-compensation demonstration for crossing provinces of downstream and upstream in China: A model of Xinanjiang River[J]. Environmental Protection, 2016,44(14):38-40.]
[3]	崔树彬, 李杰, 严黎 . 珠江水系东江流域上下游生态补偿机制[J]. 水资源保护, 2015,31(6):27-31.
	[ Cui S B, Li J, Yan L . Upstream and downstream ecological compensation mechanism in Dongjiang River Basin in Pearl River water system[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2015,31(6):27-31.]
[4]	张捷, 傅京燕 . 我国流域省际横向生态补偿机制初探: 以九洲江和汀江-韩江流域为例[J]. 中国环境管理, 2016,8(6):19-24.
	[ Zhang J, Fu J Y . Study on the interprovincial horizontal ecological service payment of basin: The case of Guangdong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,8(6):19-24.]
[5]	陈国鹰, 李巍, 王佳 , 等. 引滦入津上下游横向生态补偿机制试点进展与建议[J]. 环境保护, 2017,45(7):24-27.
	[ Chen G Y, Li W, Wang J , et al. Progress on eco-compensation mechanism pilot between upstream and downstream of Luanhe River[J]. Environmental Protection, 2017,45(7):24-27.]
[6]	吕明权, 王继军, 周伟 . 基于最小数据方法的滦河流域生态补偿研究[J]. 资源科学, 2012,34(1):166-172.
	[ Lv M Q, Wang J J, Zhou W . Payments for water provision service for the Luanhe River Basin based on a minimum-data approach[J]. Resources Science, 2012,34(1):166-172.]
[7]	中共中央国务院. 生态文明体制改革总体方案(2015)[EB/ OL]. (2015-09-21)[2017-01-10]. .
	[ The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council. The Overall Plan of Ecological Civilization System Reform(2015)[EB/OL]. (2015-09-21) [2017-01-10]. .]
[8]	史淑娟, 李怀恩, 林启才 , 等. 跨流域调水生态补偿量分担方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 2009,40(3):268-273.
	[ Shi S J, Li H E, Lin Q C , et al. Study on method for calculating eco-compensation fund sharing in inter-basin water transfer projects[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009,40(3):268-273.]
[9]	周晨, 丁晓辉, 李国平 , 等. 南水北调中线工程水源区生态补偿标准研究: 以生态系统服务价值为视角[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(4):792-804.
	[ Zhou C, Ding X H, Li G P , et al. Ecological compensation standards in the water source area of the middle route project of the South-North water transfer project[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(4):792-804.]
[10]	李国平, 王奕淇, 张文彬 . 南水北调中线工程生态补偿标准研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(10):1902-1911.
	[ Li G P, Wang Y Q, Zhang W B . Study on South-to-North water transfer middle route project ecological compensation standard[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(10):1902-1911.]
[11]	朱九龙 . 南水北调中线水源区生态补偿标准与资金分配方式[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017,35(4):157-160.
	[ Zhu J L . Study on standard and allocation of ecological compensation in water source area of middle route project of South-to-North water transfer project[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2017,35(4):157-160.]
[12]	白景锋 . 跨流域调水水源地生态补偿测算与分配研究: 以南水北调中线河南水源区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2010,30(4):657-661.
	[ Bai J F . Study on eco-compensation fund calculating and allocating in inter-basin water diversion projects: A case study of the water source region (Henan Province) on middle line of South-to-North water diversion[J]. Economic Geography, 2010,30(4):657-661.]
[13]	黎元生, 胡熠 . 闽江流域区际生态受益补偿标准探析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2007,28(3):327-329.
	[ Li Y S, Hu Y . On regional ecological benefit compensation standard in Minjiang River Basin[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2007,28(3):327-329.]
[14]	孔凡斌 . 江河源头水源涵养生态功能区生态补偿机制研究: 以江西东江源区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2010,30(2):299-305.
	[ Kong F B . Eco-compensation mechanism for ecological function conservation zones in the headwaters: A case study of Dongjiang riverhead region in Jiangxi Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2010,30(2):299-305.]
[15]	郑海霞 . 关于流域生态补偿机制与模式研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010,42(5):54-60.
	[ Zheng H X . Eco-compensation mechanism and mode for the river valley area[J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2010,42(5):54-60.]
[16]	王思凯, 张婷婷, 高宇 , 等. 莱茵河流域综合管理和生态修复模式及其启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018,27(1):215-224.
	[ Wang S K, Zhang T T, Gao Y , et al. Comprehensive management of the Rhine River Basin and its experiences[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(1):215-224.]
[17]	余辉 . 日本琵琶湖流域生态系统的修复与重建[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016,29(1):36-43.
	[ Yu H . Ecosystem restoration and regeneration of Lake Biwa Basin in Japan[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016,29(1):36-43.]
[18]	王品文, 陈晓飞, 张斌 , 等. 调水工程生态补偿的分阶段推进战略[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012,35(7):90-95.
	[ Wang P W, Chen X F, Zhang B , et al. Ecological compensation strategy on different phases of water transfer project[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012,35(7):90-95.]
[19]	巩芳, 长青, 王芳 , 等. 内蒙古草原生态补偿标准的实证研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011,25(12):151-155.
	[ Gong F, Chang Q, Wang F , et al. Empirical study on compensation standard for grassland ecology in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011,25(12):151-155.]
[20]	李芬, 李文华, 甄霖 , 等. 森林生态系统补偿标准的方法探讨: 以海南省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(5):735-745.
	[ Li F, Li W H, Zhen L , et al. Estimating eco-compensation requirements for forest ecosystem conservation: A case study of Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010,25(5):735-745.]
[21]	肖建红, 王敏, 于庆东 , 等. 海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准方法体系的构建与应用[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(2):448-462.
	[ Xiao J H, Wang M, Yu Q D , et al. Research on ecological compensation standards for island tourist destinations: The construction and application of methodology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(2):448-462.]
[22]	穆贵玲, 汪义杰, 李丽 , 等. 水源地生态补偿标准动态测算模型及其应用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(7):2658-2664.
	[ Mu G L, Wang Y J, Li L , et al. Development and application of the dynamic calculation model for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(7):2658-2664.]
[23]	温宗国, 周静, 岳昆 . 基于水环境的生态文明建设模式研究: 以合肥市巢湖流域为例[J]. 中国工程科学, 2019,21(5):113-119.
	[ Wen Z G, Zhou J, Yue K . Mode of ecological civilization construction based on water environment: Case study of Hefei City and Chaohu Lake Basin[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019,21(5):113-119.]
[24]	段丽茜 . 京冀签订密云水库上游潮白河流域水源涵养区横向生态保护补偿协议[EB/OL].(2018-11-09) [2019-01-02].
	[ Duan L Q . Beijing and Hebei Signed a Compensation Agreement for Transverse Ecological Protection in the Water Conservation Area of Chaobai River Basin in the Upper Reaches of Miyun Reservoir[EB/OL]. (2018-11-09) [2019-02-02]. .]
[25]	刘菊, 傅斌, 王玉宽 , 等. 关于生态补偿中保护成本的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015,25(3):43-49.
	[ Liu J, Fu B, Wang Y K , et al. Study on protection cost of payment for ecosystem service[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015,25(3):43-49.]
[26]	段靖, 严岩, 王丹寅 , 等. 流域生态补偿标准中成本核算的原理分析与方法改进[J]. 生态学报, 2009,30(1):221-227.
	[ Duan J, Yan Y, Wang D Y , et al. Principle analysis and method improvement on cost calculation in watershed ecological compensation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009,30(1):221-227.]
[27]	李芬, 朱夫静, 翟永洪 , 等. 基于生态保护成本的三江源区生态补偿资金估算[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017,30(1):91-100.
	[ Li F, Zhu F J, Zhai Y H , et al. Estimating ecological compensation payments in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on environmental protection cost[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017,30(1):91-100.]
[28]	聂伟平, 陈东风 . 新安江流域(第二轮)生态补偿试点进展及机制完善探索[J]. 环境保护, 2017,45(7):19-23.
	[ Nie W P, Chen D F . The progress and mechanism improvement of the second round eco-compensation implementation in Xin’an River Basin[J]. Environmental Protection, 2017,45(7):19-23.]
[29]	中央全面深化改革领导小组. 关于健全生态保护补偿机制的意见(2016) [EB/OL]. (2016-05-13) [2017-01-10].
	[ The Central Committee Deepened the Reform Leading Group. Opinions on Perfecting Ecological Compensation Mechanism(2016)(2016-05-13)[2017-01-10]. .]

阶段	补偿内容	分担比例确定依据	上游、下游、中央分担比例/%	上游、下游、中央分担金额/亿元	补偿金额/亿元
试行阶段（3年）	污染控制成本	参考新安江第二轮分担比例,三方承担,国家逐渐减少	第一年： 25.00、25.00、50.00 第二年： 28.50、28.50、43.00 第三年： 33.30、33.30、33.30	第一年：2.66、2.66、5.31 第二年：3.03、3.03、4.57 第三年：3.54、3.54、3.54	合计27.84 运行成本每年1.34
修复阶段（5年）	生态与资源保护成本	上下游水量分配	39.30、53.60、7.10	每年：3.54、4.82、0.64	合计38.20 运行成本每年1.36
稳定阶段（长期）	经济发展差距保持稳定	上下游人均GDP	48.60、51.4、0.00	每年：21.56、22.81、0.00	每年44.37