Resources Science ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 893-901.doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.05.09
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qin GAO1(), Changlin AO1, Biqi MAO1, Yuxuan LU2
Received:
2016-09-18
Revised:
2017-02-08
Online:
2017-05-20
Published:
2017-05-20
Qin GAO, Changlin AO, Biqi MAO, Yuxuan LU. Analysis of willingness to pay for ecosystem services and influence factors based on the TPB[J].Resources Science, 2017, 39(5): 893-901.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Wetland attributes and management levels used in the CE"
属性 | 管理水平 | 解释 |
---|---|---|
湿地面积 | 恶化 | 放任其恶化,湿地面积减少 |
维持 | 维护现状不变 | |
生物多样性 | 恶化 | 放任其恶化,物种减少 |
维持 | 维护现状不变 | |
改善 | 取得良好的管理效果,物种恢复 | |
水源涵养 | 恶化 | 放任其恶化,水质污染,水量降低 |
维持 | 维护现状不变 | |
改善 | 取得良好的管理效果,水质改善,水源丰富 | |
自然景观 | 恶化 | 放任其恶化,环境破坏,污染严重 |
维持 | 维护现状不变 | |
改善 | 取得良好的管理效果,景观优美 | |
支付保护 价格/元 | 0、50、100、 150、200 | 每人每年支付的费用 |
Table 3
Social,economic characteristics of the respondents"
变量 | 描述 | 定义 | 样本比例/% |
---|---|---|---|
性别 | 男 | SEX=0 | 47.72 |
女 | SEX=1 | 52.28 | |
年龄/岁 | 18以下 | AGE=1 | 7.11 |
18~25 | AGE=2 | 17.77 | |
26~39 | AGE=3 | 37.56 | |
40~59 | AGE=4 | 28.42 | |
60以上 | AGE=5 | 9.14 | |
受教育程度 | 小学及以下 | EDU=1 | 7.61 |
初中 | EDU=2 | 23.86 | |
高中 | EDU=3 | 33.50 | |
大学 | EDU=4 | 30.46 | |
研究生及以上 | EDU=5 | 4.57 | |
个人月收入/万元 | 0.5以下 | INC=1 | 36.55 |
0.5~1 | INC=2 | 12.18 | |
1~3 | INC=3 | 25.89 | |
3~5 | INC=4 | 14.21 | |
5~10 | INC=5 | 7.61 | |
10以上 | INC=6 | 3.55 |
Table 4
MNL model assessment"
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
系数 | 标准误 | z值 | p值 | 系数 | 标准误 | z值 | p值 | 系数 | 标准误 | z值 | p值 | |
湿地面积 | 0.343 3** | 0.142 3 | 2.41 | 0.015 9 | 0.798 1*** | 0.285 1 | 2.80 | 0.005 1 | 0.270 9*** | 0.162 9 | 1.66 | 0.006 5 |
生物多样性 | 0.219 6** | 0.096 9 | 2.46 | 0.014 0 | 0.408 3** | 0.207 1 | 1.97 | 0.048 7 | 0.211 9** | 0.114 9 | 1.84 | 0.045 2 |
水源涵养 | 0.470 6*** | 0.102 2 | 4.61 | 0.000 0 | 1.259 4*** | 0.329 6 | 3.82 | 0.000 1 | 0.455 0*** | 0.119 2 | 3.82 | 0.000 1 |
自然景观 | 0.238 2** | 0.104 9 | 2.09 | 0.036 3 | 0.654 9*** | 0.215 1 | 3.04 | 0.002 3 | 0.248 8*** | 0.124 9 | 2.64 | 0.002 1 |
ASC1 | -0.777 9* | 0.429 8 | -1.81 | 0.070 3 | -1.267 5* | 0.664 3 | -1.91 | 0.056 4 | -1.101 5*** | 0.576 9 | -2.60 | 0.009 3 |
性别 | 0.742 1** | 0.345 9 | 2.14 | 0.032 0 | 0.966 3*** | 0.353 9 | 2.73 | 0.006 3 | ||||
年龄 | -0.003 6 | 0.196 7 | -0.02 | 0.985 6 | 0.235 4 | 0.177 4 | 1.33 | 0.184 5 | ||||
教育程度 | 0.354 6** | 0.178 3 | 1.99 | 0.046 7 | 0.710 5*** | 0.164 2 | 4.33 | 0.000 0 | ||||
收入 | 0.464 7*** | 0.163 9 | 2.83 | 0.004 6 | 0.104 9*** | 0.126 1 | 0.83 | 0.004 1 | ||||
行为态度 | 1.145 2*** | 0.170 2 | 6.73 | 0.000 0 | ||||||||
主观规范 | 0.887 9*** | 0.186 2 | 4.77 | 0.000 0 | ||||||||
知觉行为控制 | 0.276 8* | 0.163 7 | 1.69 | 0.090 8 | ||||||||
支付价格 | -.004 9*** | 0.001 2 | -4.24 | 0.000 0 | -0.011 1*** | 0.002 8 | -3.91 | 0.000 1 | -0.004 6*** | 0.001 4 | -3.32 | 0.000 9 |
Log likelihood | -534.247 0 | -521.301 4 | -389.883 7 | |||||||||
Pseudo-R2 | 0.088 1 | 0.184 0 | 0.264 8 | |||||||||
AIC/N | 1.859 0 | 1.828 0 | 1.733 7 |
[1] | Bai Y,Zhuang C,Ouyang Z,et al.Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed[J]. Ecological Complexity,2011,8(2):177-183. |
[2] | 冯磊,敖长林,焦扬,等. 三江平原湿地非使用价值支付意愿的影响因素[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2012,42(1):59-67. |
[Feng L,Ao C L,Jiao Y,et al.Influencing factors of the willingness to pay for non-use value evaluation of Sanjiang Wetland[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2012,42(1):59-67.] | |
[3] | 敖长林,高丹,毛碧琦,等. 空间尺度下公众对环境保护的支付意愿度量方法及实证研究[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(11):2288-2298. |
[Ao C L,Gao D,Mao B Q,et al.Methods for measuring public willingness to pay for environmental conservation and empirical research under spatial scale[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(11):2288-2298.] | |
[4] | 佟锐,敖长林,焦扬,等. 基于廉价磋商的CVM 假想偏差修正研究[J]. 资源科学,2016,38(3):501-511. |
[Tong R,Ao C L,Jiao Y,et al.A correction study of CVM hypothetical bias based on cheap talk for the Songhua River Basin[J]. Resources Science,2016,38(3):501-511.] | |
[5] | Birol E,Koundouri P,Karousakis K.Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes:The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece[J]. Ecological Economics,2006,60(1):145-156. |
[6] | 徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,等. 额济纳旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(9):1841-1850. |
[ Xu Z M,Zhang Z Q,Long A H,et al.Comparison and application of different contingent valuation methods in measuring total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner 's ecosystem services[J]. Ecologica Sinica,2003,23(9):1841-1850.] | |
[7] | 许丽忠,陈芳,杨净,等. 基于计划行为理论的公众环境保护支付意愿动机分析[J]. 福建师范大学学报:自然科学版,2013,29(5):87-93. |
[Xu L Z,Cheng F,Yang J,et al.Motivation behind contingent valuation in the context of the planned behavior theory[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2013,29(5):87-93.] | |
[8] | Sauer U,Fischer A.Willingness to pay,attitudes and fundamental values-on the cognitive context of public preferences for diversity in agricultural landscapes[J]. Ecological Economics,2010,70(1):1-9. |
[9] | 高琴,敖长林,陈红光,等. 基于居民生态认知的非使用价值支付意愿空间分异研究-以三江平原湿地为例[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(7):1851-1859. |
[Gao Q,Ao C L,Chen H G,et al.Spatial differentiation research of non-use value WTP based on the residents of ecological cognition:Taking the Sanjiang Plain as a case[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(7):1851-1859.] | |
[10] | 敖长林,陈瑾婷,焦扬,等. 生态保护价值的距离衰减性-以三江平原湿地为例[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(16):5109-5117. |
[Ao C L,Chen J T,Jiao Y,et al.The effect of distance on the ecological conservation value:A case study of Sanjiang Plain Wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(16):5109-5117.] | |
[11] | 敖长林,刘芳芳,焦扬,等. 三江平原湿地生态价值属性选择分析[J]. 农业技术经济,2012,(7):87-93. |
[Ao C L,Liu F F,Jiao Y,et al.Analysis on the ecological value attribute selection of Sanjiang plain wetland[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2012,(7):87-93.] | |
[12] | 敖长林,董育宁,焦扬,等. 基于双栏模型的三江平原湿地生态保护价值评估[J]. 资源科学,2016,38(5):929-938. |
[Ao C L,Dong Y N,Jiao Y,et al. Ecological value evaluation of the Sanjiang Plain Wetland based on the double-hurdle mode[J]. Resources Science,2016,38(5):929-938.] | |
[13] | 敖长林,王静,高琴,等. CVM数据分析中的半参数模型及实证研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2014,(9):2332-2338. |
[Ao C L,Wang J,Gao Q,et al.The semi-parametric model and empirical research in CVM[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory &Practice,2014,(9):2332-2338.] | |
[14] | Ajzen I.Understanding the Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior[M]. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1980. |
[15] | Hanley N,Wright R E,Alvarez-Farizo B.Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments:An application to the water framework directive[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2006,78(2):183-193. |
[16] | 李京梅,陈琦,姚海燕. 基于选择实验法的胶州湾湿地围垦生态效益损失评估[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(1):68-75. |
[Li J M,Chen Q,Yao H Y,et al.Valuing the loss of ecological benefits from wetland reclamation in Jiaozhou Bay based on choice experiments[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(1):68-75.] | |
[17] | Lancaster K J.A new approach to consume theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1966,74(2):132-157. |
[18] | Cherchi E, Ortúzar J D D. Can mixed logit reveal the actual data generating process? Some implications for environmental assessment[J]. Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment,2010,15(7):428-442. |
[19] | Wallmo K,Lew D K.Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species:An application of stated preference choice experiments[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92(7):1793-1801. |
[20] | Hanemann M,Loomis J,Kanninen B.Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1991,73(4):1255-1263. |
[21] | Chen M F.Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people's energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan-moral obligation matters[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112(3):1746-1753. |
[22] | López-Mosquera N,García T,Barrena R.An extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict willingness to pay for the conservation of an urban park[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2014,135(4):91-99. |
|