基于Context-dependent DEA方法的碳排放减额分配策略
|
|
朱卫未, 缪子阳, 淦贵生
|
Carbon emission reduction allocation strategy based on the context-dependent DEA method
|
|
ZHU Weiwei, MIAO Ziyang, GAN Guisheng
|
|
表6 不同分配方法的减排额对比
|
Table 6 Comparison of emission reductions by different allocation methods
|
|
| 层次 | 地区 | 分层分配 | | 全国分配 | | Yang等[30] | | Kong等[31] | | 减排额/百万t | 减排额/百万t | 减排额/百万t | 减排额/百万t | | 1 | 北京 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | -75.12 | | -74.37 | | 天津 | 2.68 | | 2.68 | | -0.64 | | -61.81 | | 上海 | 5.01 | | 5.01 | | -60.01 | | -51.69 | | 江苏 | 15.19 | | 15.19 | | -122.84 | | 28.92 | | 浙江 | 7.63 | | 7.63 | | -99.14 | | -29.37 | | 广东 | 10.49 | | 10.49 | | -164.25 | | -39.27 | | 海南 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | -3.08 | | -79.54 | | 青海 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 10.24 | | -73.32 | | 宁夏 | 3.53 | | 0.00 | | 36.90 | | -40.43 | | 2 | 内蒙古 | 17.30 | | 17.30 | | 141.95 | | 164.91 | | 辽宁 | 10.72 | | 10.72 | | 60.99 | | 54.51 | | 吉林 | 5.92 | | 5.92 | | -0.40 | | 7.72 | | 福建 | 4.71 | | 4.71 | | -66.60 | | -35.54 | | 江西 | 4.42 | | 0.00 | | -6.40 | | -22.91 | | 山东 | 23.41 | | 23.41 | | 48.33 | | 164.51 | | 湖北 | 8.52 | | 8.52 | | -41.87 | | -11.51 | | 广西 | 0.22 | | 0.00 | | -7.92 | | -32.46 | | 重庆 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | -24.87 | | -54.10 | | 四川 | 8.33 | | 8.33 | | -4.21 | | -32.78 | | 甘肃 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 23.27 | | -7.42 | | 新疆 | 11.81 | | 11.81 | | 89.70 | | 81.94 | | 3 | 河北 | 10.87 | | 10.87 | | 92.13 | | 78.25 | | 黑龙江 | 6.24 | | 6.24 | | 55.07 | | 32.00 | | 安徽 | 9.54 | | 9.54 | | 26.15 | | 20.04 | | 河南 | 11.64 | | 11.64 | | 34.83 | | 27.29 | | 湖南 | 7.35 | | 7.35 | | 12.01 | | -23.23 | | 贵州 | 5.27 | | 12.22 | | 45.57 | | 33.17 | | 云南 | 4.21 | | 4.04 | | 4.30 | | -17.46 | | 陕西 | 13.99 | | 13.99 | | 58.02 | | 58.27 | | 4 | 山西 | 10.99 | | 12.38 | | 157.87 | | 155.68 | | 公平性 | 基尼系数 | 0.179 | | 0.173 | | 0.260 | | 0.060 |
|
|
|