畜禽养殖废弃物资源化的纵向关系选择研究——基于北京市养殖场户视角
|
舒畅, 乔娟, 耿宁
|
The vertical relationship selection of livestock and poultry breeding waste recycling based on the perspective of farmers in Beijing
|
Chang SHU, Juan QIAO, Ning GENG
|
|
表3 多变量 Probit模型估计结果 |
Table 3 The estimate the results of the multivariate Probit model |
|
自变量
因变量 | 自家还田Y1 | 赠予给周边种植户Y2 | 销售给周边种植户Y3 | 销售给粪污经销商Y4 | 估计系数(Z值) | 估计系数(Z值) | 估计系数(Z值) | 估计系数(Z值) | 养殖场户负责人个人特征 | 年龄(X1)/岁 | -0.022 (-1.39) | -0.011 (-0.96) | 0.005 (0.41) | -0.036** (-2.29) | 文化程度(X2) | 0.256 (1.50) | 0.035 (0.27) | 0.087 (0.68) | -0.018 (-0.12) | 加入农民专业合作社(X3) | 0.542** (2.05) | -0.098 (-0.55) | 0.042 (0.23) | -0.188 (-0.85) | 养殖废弃物治理培训(X4) | 0.789*** (2.97) | -0.325* (-1.73) | -0.049 (-0.26) | -0.287 (-1.29) | 养殖场户负责人感知特征 | 经济收入感知(X5) | 0.015 (0.16) | -0.127* (-1.77) | -0.000 96 (-0.01) | 0.103 (1.19) | 政策感知(X6) | -0.451* (-1.76) | 0.470** (2.52) | -0.012 (-0.06) | -0.324 (-1.46) | 监管力度感知(X7) | -0.120 (-1.04) | -0.169** (-1.99) | 0.084 (0.96) | -0.129 (-1.35) | 养殖场户生产经营特征 | 养殖年限(X8) | 0.031* (1.69) | -0.016 (-1.20) | -0.016 (-1.23) | 0.049*** (3.00) | 养殖收入占家庭总收入比重(X9) | -0.645 (-1.57) | -0.060 (-0.20) | 0.220 (0.71) | -0.235 (-0.64) | 养殖规模(年出栏)(X10) | -0.000 18** (-2.17) | 0.000 06 (1.19) | -0.000 08 (-1.58) | -0.000 02 (-0.25) | 养殖场户员工数(X11) | 0.046 (1.03) | -0.039 (-1.16) | 0.069** (2.06) | -0.026 (-0.62) | 从事种植业生产(X12) | 2.966***(10.34) | -0.445***(-2.62) | -0.634*** (-3.70) | -0.582***(-2.77) | 畜禽粪污无害化处理设施等级(X13) | 0.332*** (2.85) | 0.069 (0.86) | 0.110 (1.33) | 0.043 (0.43) | 养殖场户自然环境特征 | 距周边农田距离(X14) | -0.000 04 (-0.42) | -0.000 09 (-1.12) | 0.000 16** (2.12) | 0.000 10* (1.69) | 养殖场户社会环境特征 | 获得养殖废弃物治理补贴(X15) | -0.385 (-1.22) | 0.420* (1.86) | -0.079 (-0.35) | 0.207 (0.69) | 周边种植户施用粪肥积极性(X16) | -0.118 (-0.97) | 0.028 (0.33) | 0.242*** (2.66) | -0.196** (-2.08) | 系数 | -0.830 (-0.64) | 1.443 (1.54) | -2.215** (-2.36) | 1.634 (1.47) | Wald chi 2(64)=217.59 Prob >chi 2= 0.000 0 | legend:* p<0.1;**p<0.05;***p<0.01 |
|
|
|