国际能源价格波动与中国碳税政策的协同模拟分析
|
钟帅, 沈镭, 赵建安, 孙艳芝, 武娜
|
Collaborative simulation analysis on international energy price volatility and China’s carbon tax policy
|
Shuai ZHONG, Lei SHEN, Jian'an ZHAO, Yanzhi SUN, Na WU
|
|
表8 不同碳税情景下化石能源消费和减排效果相对于基准情景的变化 |
Table 8 Changes in fossil energy consumption and emission reduction results within three carbon tax scenarios in comparison to baseline scenarios (%) |
|
情景 年份 | GDP变化 | 一次化石能源消费变化 | 一次化石能源强度变化 | 碳排放 变化 | 碳强度 变化 | 减排效果 (是否实现目标) | BHCS | 2020 | 0.54 | -12.02 | -12.49 | -14.22 | -14.68 | -18.49 | | 2025 | 1.12 | -27.91 | -28.71 | -31.13 | -31.89 | -39.84 | | 2030 | 1.93 | -54.86 | -55.71 | -60.07 | -60.82 | -68.70(是) | BMCS | 2020 | 0.53 | -11.91 | -12.38 | -14.11 | -14.57 | -18.63 | | 2025 | 1.08 | -27.06 | -27.84 | -30.26 | -31.00 | -39.52 | | 2030 | 1.82 | -53.15 | -53.98 | -58.20 | -58.95 | -67.64(是) | BLCS | 2020 | 0.53 | -11.78 | -12.25 | -13.98 | -14.43 | -18.74 | | 2025 | 1.03 | -26.15 | -26.90 | -29.32 | -30.04 | -39.15 | | 2030 | 1.71 | -51.27 | -52.09 | -56.17 | -56.90 | -66.48(是) |
|
|
|