国际能源价格波动与中国碳税政策的协同模拟分析
|
钟帅, 沈镭, 赵建安, 孙艳芝, 武娜
|
Collaborative simulation analysis on international energy price volatility and China’s carbon tax policy
|
Shuai ZHONG, Lei SHEN, Jian'an ZHAO, Yanzhi SUN, Na WU
|
|
表6 不同价格情景中化石能源消费和减排效果相对于基准情景的变化 |
Table 6 Changes in fossil energy consumption and emission reduction results within six price scenarios in comparison to baseline scenarios (%) |
|
情景 年份 | GDP 变化 | 一次化石能源 消费变化 | 一次化石能源 强度变化 | 碳排放 变化 | 碳强度 变化 | 减排效果 (是否实现目标) | BHPUS | 2020 | -3.47 | -16.26 | -13.25 | -17.58 | -14.62 | -18.43 | | 2025 | -5.56 | -30.39 | -26.29 | -32.65 | -28.68 | -37.00 | | 2030 | -5.88 | -41.88 | -38.25 | -44.75 | -41.30 | -53.11(否) | BMPUS | 2020 | -3.45 | -16.24 | -13.25 | -17.56 | -14.62 | -18.68 | | 2025 | -5.48 | -30.32 | -26.28 | -32.58 | -28.67 | -37.48 | | 2030 | -5.69 | -41.74 | -38.22 | -44.63 | -41.29 | -53.72(否) | BLPUS | 2020 | -3.43 | -16.22 | -13.24 | -17.54 | -14.61 | -18.91 | | 2025 | -5.40 | -30.25 | -26.27 | -32.52 | -28.67 | -37.96 | | 2030 | -5.50 | -41.60 | -38.20 | -44.51 | -41.28 | -54.33(否) | BHPDS | 2020 | 3.67 | 20.87 | 16.60 | 23.79 | 19.41 | 14.07 | | 2025 | 6.43 | 46.89 | 38.02 | 56.65 | 47.20 | 30.02 | | 2030 | 9.24 | 78.20 | 63.12 | 102.56 | 85.43 | 48.13(否) | BMPDS | 2020 | 3.65 | 20.84 | 16.59 | 23.77 | 19.41 | 13.73 | | 2025 | 6.36 | 46.76 | 37.98 | 56.58 | 47.21 | 29.04 | | 2030 | 9.17 | 77.84 | 62.90 | 102.50 | 85.49 | 46.24(否) | BLPDS | 2020 | 3.63 | 20.82 | 16.59 | 23.74 | 19.41 | 13.41 | | 2025 | 6.30 | 46.63 | 37.93 | 56.51 | 47.23 | 28.06 | | 2030 | 9.10 | 77.47 | 62.67 | 102.44 | 85.56 | 44.32(否) |
|
|
|