创新实践地区农户参与农田保护补偿政策成效的生计禀赋影响——苏州及成都的实证比较
|
谢晋, 蔡银莺
|
The impacts of farmer livelihood endowment on participation effectiveness in farmland conservation compensation policy:Chengdu and Suzhou as typical innovational practice areas
|
XIE Jin,CAI Yinying
|
|
表4 受访农户的典型相关分析结果 |
Table 4 Canonical correlation analysis results of rural households |
|
| 检验值 | 典型载荷 | 农业经营户 | <0.001 0 | X | 0.829 7* | 0.480 9 | -0.151 0 | -0.159 5 | -0.041 7 | | | Y | 1.025 5 | -1.204 2* | 0.486 8 | - | - | 兼业经营户 | <0.001 0 | X | -0.247 7 | 0.568 8* | 0.310 1 | -0.549 9 | 0.559 5* | | | Y | 0.923 7* | 0.142 0 | -0.760 9 | - | - | 非农经营户 | <0.001 0 | X | -0.137 7 | 0.736 2* | 0.346 7 | -0.406 2 | 0.261 1 | | | Y | 0.866 1* | -0.775 8 | 0.256 5 | - | - | 成都市受访农户 | <0.001 0 | X | 0.255 7 | 0.634 7* | -0.087 1 | 0.608 7* | 0.093 2 | | | Y | 0.938 1* | -0.743 9 | 0.524 9 | - | - | | 0.037 6 | X | -0.090 3 | -0.100 5 | 1.037 4* | -0.290 1 | 0.167 5 | | | Y | -0.043 9 | 0.478 0 | 0.576 6* | - | - | 苏州市受访农户 | <0.001 0 | X | 0.432 5 | -0.454 3 | 0.555 9* | 0.459 3 | -0.278 0 | | | Y | 0.907 2* | -0.017 4 | -0.751 9 | - | - | | 0.042 8 | X | 0.291 4 | 0.350 0 | 0.397 3 | 0.622 0* | 0.615 3* | | | Y | -0.178 7 | 1.590 1* | -1.465 8 | - | - |
|
|
|