基于农户发展受限视角的江夏区基本农田生态补偿标准测算

doi:10.18402/resci.2017.06.18

Abstract

Abstract:

In China,farmland performs fundamental economic,social and ecological functions. Farmland restriction laws and regulations have been applied in China to guarantee national food security and social stability. This shift caused serious economic and social welfare “wipeout” and “windfalls” to relevant stakeholders in farmland protection,leading to the degradation of farmland ecological systems,and threatening social fairness and environmental justice. Ever since improving the ecological civilization level was put forward by the 12^thFive Year Plan on National Economical and Social Development,developed cities such as Chengdu in Sichuan province,Foshan in Guangdong province,Suzhou in Jiangsu province and Minhang in Shanghai,began to explore their own ways of implementing farmland compensation policy. How to construct a farmland ecological compensation system that can meet the practical needs of social development is of urgent need in China. Based on the nine restriction rules in the Regulations of Prime Farmland Protection and face-to-face questionnaire surveys,the expected utility function and factor revision methods were employed to estimate prime farmland ecological compensation criteria by taking Jiangxia （one distract in Wuhan）as an example. We found that the residents’ cognition degree for rules of the Regulations of Prime Farmland Protection require improvement. Despite the fact that farmland protection policies have been well advertised in China over the past 20 years,more than 64.48% of farmers have not awared the nine restrictions clearly;nearly half of the farmers are unfamiliar with specific restrictions. Farmers’ restrictive loss from obeying the prime farmland protection policies is 9116.47 CNY/hm² by applying the expected utility function. Whether farmers have combined occupations and agricultural income level significantly impact on their restrictive loss amount. Farmland ecological compensation in Jiangxia is settled based on farmers’ prime farmland development restrictive loss,which is 9116.47 CNY/hm².

Key words: prime farmland development restriction, restrictive loss, farmland ecological compensation criteria, Jiangxia District of Wuhan City

Xin YANG, Jingjing ZHANG, Xin GAO, Yinying CAI, Anlu ZHANG. Estimation of prime farmland ecological compensation criteria based on the development restrictive loss of farmers in Jiangxia District of Wuhan City[J].Resources Science, 2017, 39(6): 1194-1201.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 23

[1]	陈利根. 土地用途管制制度研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2000.
	[Chen L G.On Land Use Regulation Institution[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University,2000.]
[2]	杨欣,蔡银莺,张安录,等. 农田生态盈亏空间差异与跨区域均衡机制[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(12):57-64.
	[Yang X,Cai Y Y,Zhang A L,et al.Spatial differences of farmland eco-surplus /deficit and its regional equilibrium mechanism[J]. China Population,Resource and Environment,2013,23(12):57-64.]
[3]	Gardner B D.The economics of agricultural land preservation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1977,59(1):1027-1036.
[4]	张伟,刘毅,刘洋. 国外空间规划研究与实践的新动向及对我国的启示[J]. 地理科学进展,2005,24(3):79-90.
	[Zhang W,Liu Y,Liu Y.The new trends of spatial planning research and practice in developed countries and their inspirations to China[J]. Process in Geography,2005,24(3):79-90.]
[5]	Seto K C,Güneralp B,Hutyra L R.Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2012,109(40):16083-16088.
[6]	Swinton S M, Lupi F, Robertson G P,et al.Ecosystem services and agriculture:Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,64(2):245-252.
[7]	杨欣,蔡银莺,张孝宇,等. 基于生态账户的农田生态补偿空间转移研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(2):197-207.
	[Yang X,Cai Y Y,Zhang X Y,et al.Measurement of farmland eco-compensation and its spatial transfer[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(2):197-207.]
[8]	Drake L.The non-market value of Swedish agricultural landscape[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics,1992,19(3):351-364.
[9]	蔡银莺,张安录. 基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算[J]. 自然资源学报,2011,26(2):177-189.
	[Cai Y Y,Zhang A L.Agricultural land’s ecological compensation criteria based on the producers’ willingness to accept:A case study of farmer households in Wuhan[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2011,26(2):177-189.]
[10]	马爱慧,蔡银莺,张安录. 基于选择实验法的耕地生态补偿额度测算[J]. 自然资源学报,2012,27(7):1154-1163.
	[Ma A H,Cai Y Y,Zhang A L.A emprical study of cultivated land ecological compensation based on choice experiments method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2012,27(7):1154-1163.]
[11]	杨欣,Michael Burton,张安录. 基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):158-168.
	[YangX,Burton M,Zhang A L. Estimation of farmland eco-compensation criteria based on latent class model[J]. China Population,Resource and Environment,2016,26(7):158-168.]
[12]	杨欣,蔡银莺,张安录. 发展受限视角下的武汉城市圈跨区域农田生态补偿额度测算[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,33(4):92-97.
	[Yang X,Cai Y Y,Zhang A L.Farmland' ecological compensation in Wuhan Metropolitan Area from prospective of farmland development restriction[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition),2014,33(4):92-97.]
[13]	蔡银莺,张安录. 规划管制下农田生态补偿的研究进展分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2010,25(5):868-880.
	[Cai Y Y,Zhang A L.Researching progress and trends of agricultural land's ecological compensation under land use planning control[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2010,25(5):868-880.]
[14]	Harvey M J.Debates in rural land planning policy:A twentieth century history from New York state[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1989,5(2):137-148.
[15]	Hanna K S.Regulation and land-use conservation:A case study of the British Columbia agricultural land reserve[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,52(3):166-170.
[16]	谢晋,蔡银莺. 创新实践地区农户参与农田保护补偿政策成效的生计禀赋影响—苏州及成都的实证比较[J]. 资源科学,2016,38(11):2082-2094.
	[Xie J,Cai Y Y.The impacts of farmer livelihood endowment on participation effectiveness in farmland conservation compensation policy:Chengdu and Suzhou as typical innovational practice areas[J]. Resources Science,2016,38(11):2082-2094.
[17]	中华人民共和国国土资源部. 基本农田保护条例[EB/OL].(1998-12-27)[2016-09-13].
	[Ministry of Land and Resources of People’s Republic of China. Population of China [EB/OL].(1998-12-27)[2016-09-13]..]
[18]	武汉市统计局. 武汉统计年鉴2014[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2014.
	[Statistics Bureau of Wuhan. Statistical Yearbook 2014[M]. Beijing:China Statistical Press,2014. ]
[19]	湖北省国土资源厅. 全省2014年度土地利用变更调查主要数据成果[EB/OL].(2016-01-07)[2016-09-13].
	[Department of Land and Resources of Hubei Province. The 2014 Annual Land Use Change Survey Data of Hubei Province[EB/OL].(.]
[20]	Yang X,Burton M,Cai Y,et al.Exploring heterogeneous preference for farmland non-market values in Wuhan,Central China[J]. Sustainability,2016,8(1):1-12.
[21]	蔡银莺,余元. 基本农田规划管制下农民的土地发展权受限分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(9):76-82.
	[ Cai Y Y,Yu Y.The restriction of farmers’ land development rights under prime farmland planning control[J]. China Population,Resource and Environment,2012,22(9):76-82.]
[22]	余亮亮,蔡银莺. 中、东部地区基本农田规划管制农户福利损失及区域差异分析[J]. 中国土地科学,2014,28(1):33-29.
	[ Yu L L,Cai Y Y.Farmers’ welfare loss and regional difference:The impact of primary farmland planning control in central and eastern China[J]. China Land Science,2014,28(1):33-29.]
[23]	Power A G,Trans R.Ecosystem services and agriculture:Tradeoffs and synergies[J]. Review Ecosystem Services,2010,36(8):2960-2969.

变量名称	变量定义	比例/%	变量名称	变量定义	比例/%
性别	男	58.33	兼业	是	45.96
	女	41.67		否	54.04
年龄/岁	<20	0.35	农户基本农田	<0.07	50.87
	20~30	7.66	经营面积/hm²	0.07~0.20	7.27
	30~40	8.01		0.20~0.33	13.84
	40~50	22.48		0.33~0.47	9.00
	50~60	22.48		>0.47	19.03
	>60	39.02	一年中务农时间/月	0~3	39.09
文化程度	未受教育	28.82		3-6	14.23
	小学	16.72		6~9	15.82
	初中	39.97		9~12	30.86
	高中	14.49	农业收入/万元	<1	47.49
本村村民	是	92.68		1~2	16.83
	否	7.32		2~3	10.43
承包权	是	93.77		3~4	6.95
	否	6.23		>4	6.56

项目	是	否
是否听说过基本农田?	35.52	64.48
是否知道我国实行基本农田保护区制度?	20.07	79.93
是否知道村集体/村委会签订过基本农田保护责任书?	8.97	91.03
自己是否与村集体/村委会之间签订过基本农田保护责任书?	5.52	94.48
是否知道基本农田征收仅有国务院才有权限?	7.93	92.07
是否知道自家农田有没有纳入基本农田保护区?	10.03	89.97

管制项目	是	否	不清楚
管制1	5.90	88.89	5.21
管制2	9.76	86.06	4.18
管制3	2.79	89.20	8.01
管制4	2.78	89.24	7.99
管制5	5.23	86.76	8.01
管制6	6.27	86.41	7.32
管制7	39.58	54.52	5.90
管制8	55.05	37.63	7.32
管制9	48.96	43.40	7.64

变量名称	系数	标准差	t值	P值	95% 置信区间
兼业	212.28	83.44	2.54	0.01***	47.27,377.30
农业收入	0.01	0.00	1.98	0.05**	0.00, 0.02
常数项	517.61	31.52	16.42	0.00***	455.27,579.94

Estimation of prime farmland ecological compensation criteria based on the development restrictive loss of farmers in Jiangxia District of Wuhan City

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 23

Related Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0