基于联盟利益分配的宅基地退出增值收益共享研究——以浙江省典型县市为例

doi:10.18402/resci.2021.07.07

Abstract

Abstract:

Developing a scientific and fair income distribution mechanism is an effective way to mobilize all parties in order to promote homestead withdrawal This study constructed a contribution-based increment income distribution model of homestead withdrawal under the alliance interest distribution mechanism. It also measured the typical counties and cities in Zhejiang Province and discussed the spatial differences of the contribution and distribution proportion of increment income of each party in homestead withdrawal. Important results are as follows: (1) Based on the opportunity cost of farmers and collective economic organizations and the capitalized cost of governments, the theoretical distribution proportions of increment income in homestead withdrawal are close to local policy standards and typical cases in practice. (2) The contribution of each party in the increment income of homestead withdrawal has significant regional differences and exhibits an urban-rural gradient. The contributions of farmers and collective economic organizations show the pattern of Cixi > Yiwu > Jiaxing > Taishun > Yunhe and a trend of village in the city > suburban village > exsuburb village > remote villages. The contributions of increment income of the governments show the pattern of Jiaxing > Cixi > Yiwu > Taishun > Yunhe. (3) Different regions and village locations correspond to different homestead withdrawal increment income distribution patterns. At the regional level, the distribution proportions of of increment income farmers are relatively high in Jiaxing, Cixi, and Yiwu, and the distribution proportions of governments and collective economic organizations are relatively high in Taishun and Yunhe. At the village level, the distribution proportions of increment income of farmers and collective economic organizations are relatively high in villages in the city and suburban villages, and the distribution proportions of governments and farmers are relatively high in exsuburb villages and remote villages. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a distribution mechanism of homestead withdrawal increment income following the principle of allocation fairness and efficiency, according to the location differences and the interest loss of all parties.

Key words: homestead withdrawal, increment income distribution, alliance benefit distribution mechanism, land development right, sample belt, Zhejiang Province

YUAN Shaofeng, GAN Xinyi, TANG Yiyu. Increment income sharing of rural homestead withdrawal based on alliance interest distribution: A case of typical counties and cities in Zhejiang Province[J].Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1361-1374.

Figures/Tables 13

Figure 1

Figure 2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Figure 3

References 29

[1]	杨慧琳, 袁凯华, 陈银蓉, 等. 农户分化、代际差异对宅基地退出意愿的影响: 基于宅基地价值认知的中介效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9):1680-1691.
	[ Yang H L, Yuan K H, Chen Y R, et al. Effect of farmer differentiation and generational differences on their willingness to exit rural residential land: Analysis of intermediary effect based on the cognition of the homestead value[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9):1680-1691.]
[2]	梁发超, 袁立虎. 土地发展权视角下农村宅基地退出机制的构建[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2014, 30(6):722-726.
	[ Liang F C, Yuan L H. Establishment on exit mechanism for rural residential land under perspective of land development rights theory[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2014, 30(6):722-726.]
[3]	朱从谋, 苑韶峰, 李胜男, 等. 基于发展权与功能损失的农村宅基地流转增值收益分配研究: 以义乌市“集地券”为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(7):37-44.
	[ Zhu C M, Yuan S F, Li S N, et al. Study on incremental revenue distribution of rural residential land based on land development right and function loss: Taking the “land coupons” in Yiwu as an example[J]. China Land Science, 2017, 31(7):37-44.]
[4]	余慕溪, 王林秀, 袁亮, 等. 资源型城市矿区土地增值收益分配影响因素研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019, (4):152-159.
	[ Yu M X, Wang L X, Yuan L, et al. The influence factor of abandoned mine land value increment distribution[J]. China Soft Science, 2019, (4):152-159.]
[5]	魏子博, 颜玉萍, 石晓平, 等. 城市棚户区改造土地增值收益分配机理研究: 基于吉林省松原市的改造案例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(8):24-31.
	[ Wei Z B, Yan Y P, Shi X P, et al. Research on the land revenue distribution in the transformation of urban shanty towns: A case of Songyuan in Jilin Province[J]. China Land Science, 2017, 31(8):24-31.]
[6]	张军, 郑循刚. 基于使用权的农村土地增值收益分配改革思路[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(1):66-73.
	[ Zhang J, Zheng X G. Approach to the distribution reform of rural land valve-added income based on the right to use[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(1):66-73.]
[7]	姜海, 陈乐宾. 土地增值收益分配公平群体共识及其增进路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(2):33-40.
	[ Jang H, Chen L B. Group consensus and its approaches to fairness of land incremental revenue distribution[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(2):33-40.]
[8]	苑韶峰, 李威, 彭文敏. 宅基地退出收益测算及分配策略研究综述[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 38(2):43-52.
	[ Yuan S F, Li W, Peng W M. A review of the research on homestead exit income calculation and distribution strategy[J]. Journal of Guizhou University (Social Sciences), 2020, 38(2):43-52.]
[9]	胡银根, 余依云, 王聪, 等. 基于成本收益理论的宅基地自愿有偿退出有效阈值: 以改革试点区宜城市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6):1317-1330.
	[ Hu Y G, Yu Y Y, Wang C, et al. The effective threshold of compensation for the voluntary withdrawal from rural homestead: Empirical research based on the reform of pilot city in Yicheng City[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(6):1317-1330.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190616
[10]	苑韶峰, 李威, 李胜男, 等. 应用多主体复杂适应系统理论的宅基地退出补偿定价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(3):263-270.
	[ Yuan S F, Li W, Li S N, et al. Compensation pricing of rural residential land exit based on multi-agent complex adaptive system theory[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(3):263-270.]
[11]	王兆林, 谢晶, 林长欣. 基于动态联盟利益分配模型的宅基地退出增值收益分配研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(11):1300-1305.
	[ Wang Z L, Xie J, Lin C X. Study on increment income distribution of rural homestead exit based on dynamic alliance profit distribution model[J]. Resource Development& Market, 2017, 33(11):1300-1305.]
[12]	曹昭煜, 洪开荣. 基于博弈论的集体建设用地入市联盟利益分配机制研究[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2015, (5):143-146.
	[ Cao Z Y, Hong K R. Research on the interest distribution mechanism of collective construction land into the market alliance based on game theory[J]. Social Sciences in Hunan, 2015, (5):143-146.]
[13]	何芳, 龙国举, 范华, 等. 国家集体农民利益均衡分配: 集体经营性建设用地入市调节金设定研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, (6):67-76.
	[ He F, Long G J, Fan H, et al. The balanced value distribution among state, collectives and farmers: A study on adjustment funds of collective construction land transaction[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019, (6):67-76.]
[14]	徐进才, 徐艳红, 庞欣超, 等. 基于“贡献—风险”的农地征收转用土地增值收益分配研究: 以内蒙古和林格尔县为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(3):28-35.
	[ Xu J C, Xu Y H, Pang X C, et al. Study on land incremental value distribution based on contribution-risk analysis of farmland acquisition[J]. China Land Science, 2017, 31(3):28-35.]
[15]	付文凤, 郭杰, 欧名豪, 等. 基于机会成本的农村宅基地退出补偿标准研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(3):60-66.
	[ Fu W F, Guo J, Ou M H, et al. Research on compensation standard of quitting rural residential land based on opportunity cost[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(3):60-66.]
[16]	姚艳, 徐田田, 张雅婷, 等. 农村居民点整治中的土地发展权运作体系: 以宁波市余姚最良村村庄整治项目为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(11):209-217.
	[ Yao Y, Xu T T, Zhang Y T, et al. The operation system of land development rights in rural residential area consolidation: A case study of the consolidation project of Zuiliang Village in Yuyao, Ningbo[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(11):209-217.]
[17]	张磊, 曾雪莹, 孙琳. 城镇化背景下村庄土地发展权的形成机制分析: 基于关系产权视角[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2021, 10(2):91-101.
	[ Zhang L, Zeng X Y, Sun L. Exploring residential land development right in urbanizing villages: From relational perspective of property right[J]. Public Administration and Policy Review, 2021, 10(2):91-101.]
[18]	王艳西. 宅基地发展权的均等化配置与市场化转移[J]. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 24(3):11-20.
	[ Wang Y X. The equal allocation and market-based transfer of homestead development right[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021, 24(3):11-20.]
[19]	张安录, 胡越. 试论城乡建设用地增减挂钩中土地增值收益均衡分配: 以湖北省襄阳市尹集乡为例[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 30(4):91-98.
	[ Zhang A L, Hu Y. Research on equal distribution of land value increment in the balancing between increase and decrease of urban and rural construction land: A case study of demonstration in Yinji of Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2016, 30(4):91-98.]
[20]	苑韶峰, 张晓蕾, 李胜男, 等. 基于地域和村域区位的宅基地价值测算及其空间分异特征研究: 以浙江省典型县市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(2):31-40.
	[ Yuan S F, Zhang X L, Li S N, et al. Measurement and spatial differentiation of rural residential land value based on region and village location: A case of typical counties and cities in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(2):31-40.]
[21]	杨丽霞, 李胜男, 苑韶峰, 等. 宅基地多功能识别及其空间分异研究: 基于嘉兴、义乌、泰顺的典型村域分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(2):49-56.
	[ Yang L X, Li S N, Yuan S F, et al. Multi-functional recognition and spatial differentiation of rural residential land: A case of typical rural area analysis in Jiaxing, Yiwu and Taishun[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(2):49-56.]
[22]	宋戈, 徐四桂, 高佳. 土地发展权视角下东北粮食主产区农村宅基地退出补偿及增值收益分配研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(11):1883-1891.
	[ Song G, Xu S G, Gao J. Value-added income distribution of homestead exit compensation in major grain producing areas in northeast China from the perspective of land development right[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(11):1883-1891.]
[23]	顾大松. 论我国房屋征收土地发展权益补偿制度的构建[J]. 法学评论, 2012, 30(6):17-25.
	[ Gu D S. On the construction of compensation system for land development in China[J]. Law Review, 2012, 30(6):17-25.]
[24]	刘义. 城乡建设用地增减挂钩背景下农村宅基地退出补偿价格与周转指标价格评估研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2014.
	[ Liu Y. Study on the Countryside Homestead Exit Compensation Value and Flow Index Price Evaluation under the Background of Increase or Decrease Link on Urban and Countryside Construction Land[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2014.]
[25]	Plantinga A J, Miller D J. Agricultural land values and the value of rights to future land development[J]. Land Economics, 2001, 77(1):56-67. doi: 10.2307/3146980
[26]	陈维肖, 李春妍, 彭宏杰, 等. 基于土地发展权的征地补偿价格研究: 以河南省周口市为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2016, 35(3):119-122.
	[ Chen W X, Li C Y, Peng H J, et al. Research on land requisition compensation price based on land development right: A case study of Zhoukou City, Henan Province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2016, 35(3):119-122.]
[27]	徐小峰. 城乡建设用地增减挂钩区农村宅基地退出补偿研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2012.
	[ Xu X F. Study on Exit Mechanism for Rural Homestead Land in the District of Increase or Decrease Link on Urban and Countryside construction Land[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2012.]
[28]	殷意晗, 刘刚, 唐建平. 土地还原利率确定的方法初探: 以湖南省永州市为例[J]. 北京农业, 2010, (3):40-43.
	[ Yin Y H, Liu G, Tang J P. The land to restore the rate-setting at the beginning of the method searches in Yongzhou City[J]. Beijing Agriculture, 2010, (3):40-43.]
[29]	浙江大学, 义乌市自然资源局. 改革中的农村土地增值收益分配关系重构: 以浙江省义乌市为例[J]. 中国土地, 2019, (2):15-17.
	[ Zhejiang University, Yiwu Municipal Natural Resources Bureau. The reconstruction of the distribution relationship of rural land appreciation income in the reform: Takes Yiwu City, Zhejiang Province as an example[J]. China Land, 2019, (2):15-17.]

	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	4399.2	4102.0	4406.8	3383.2	3114.8
近郊型	3299.4	3076.5	3305.1	2537.4	2336.1
远郊型	2199.6	2051.0	2203.4	1691.6	1557.4
边远型	1099.8	1025.5	1101.7	845.8	778.7

房屋结构	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
钢混结构	-	1215	1715	1200	1061
砖混结构	1000	863	1092	960	850
砖木结构	770	633	643	600	614
泥木结构	-	613	543	-	494
简易结构	378	295	303	-	140

村庄类型	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	850.00	793.05	928.20	816.00	722.50
近郊型	850.00	793.05	928.20	816.00	722.50
远郊型	850.00	793.05	928.20	733.20	650.75
边远型	850.00	793.05	928.20	733.20	650.75

	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	338.75	301.88	307.61	265.71	248.20
近郊型	349.19	328.27	321.40	328.65	338.05
远郊型	422.55	433.85	420.00	421.94	453.33
边远型	421.82	425.00	478.71	382.86	361.03

村庄类型	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	1152.51	1205.75	1221.32	917.84	915.67
近郊型	771.59	765.17	798.70	497.59	453.46
远郊型	351.34	318.95	327.91	215.79	190.00
边远型	65.14	60.16	39.14	27.94	33.67

Increment income sharing of rural homestead withdrawal based on alliance interest distribution: A case of typical counties and cities in Zhejiang Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 29

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

村庄类型	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	37.09	47.59	47.86	68.48	38.53
近郊型	35.98	43.77	45.81	55.36	28.29
远郊型	29.74	33.12	35.05	43.12	21.09
边远型	29.79	33.80	30.75	47.52	26.49

	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
单位面积城镇建设用地出让价值V_ucl	1058.12	1762.37	1174.66	697.88	416.78
单位面积土地取得费用C_la	112.30	116.59	96.00	72.00	99.30
单位面积土地前期开发费用C_pd	185.00	185.00	185.00	185.00	185.00
单位面积宅基地旧房拆除费用C_od	32.50	10.00	8.05	6.00	4.23
资金的利息C_fi	11.27	10.41	9.34	8.10	9.31
单位面积宅基地的土地发展权价值V_dr	717.05	1440.36	876.27	426.79	118.94

	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	96.98	82.83	30.49	29.37	41.86
近郊型	96.76	75.70	51.93	24.21	21.73
远郊型	96.98	82.11	55.05	63.47	66.39
边远型	85.14	96.04	89.66	23.21	45.66

村庄类型	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	2768.10	4043.82	3015.41	2058.40	1748.77
近郊型	2235.65	3308.77	2412.47	1604.86	1267.11
远郊型	1703.13	2569.00	1800.44	1215.93	845.95
边远型	1167.12	1839.28	1177.92	806.90	409.53

村庄类型	嘉兴	慈溪	义乌	泰顺	云和
城中村	83.04	121.31	90.46	61.75	52.46
近郊型	67.07	99.26	72.37	48.15	38.01
远郊型	51.09	77.07	54.01	36.48	25.38
边远型	35.01	55.18	35.34	24.21	12.29

[1]	WANG Zhaolin, WANG Min. Influencing factors of farmers’ homestead withdrawal decision based on the technology acceptance model and perceived risk：Evidence from Chongqing [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1335-1347.
[2]	SHI Peng, YU Jin. Impact of risk expectation, citizenization perception, and farmers’ cognition on the relocated rural households’ homestead withdrawal [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1387-1402.
[3]	GAO Yuan, SUN Pengfei, ZHAO Kai. The influence path of farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior in poor areas:From the family life cycle perspective [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1403-1418.
[4]	CHEN Ming. Compensation preference and heterogeneity sources of homestead withdrawal of farming households: Based on choice experiment method [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1467-1478.
[5]	ZHANG Bailin, ZHANG Fengrong, QU Yanbo, JIANG Guanghui, XIE Zhen, CAI Weimin. Research hotspots and prospects of homestead withdrawal and reuse [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1277-1292.
[6]	QU Yanbo, CHAI Yifan, ZHU Weiya, PING Zongli, ZONG Haining, WANG Sen. Archetype analysis of rural homestead withdrawal patterns based on the framework of “diagnosis-design-outcome” [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1293-1306.
[7]	LV Xiao, XUE Ping, NIU Shandong, PENG Wenlong. Comparative study on policy tools and practice of homestead withdrawal at the county level [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1307-1321.
[8]	ZHOU Yajuan, LIN Aiwen, ZHANG Ershen. Rural homestead value reconstruction and withdrawal compensation pricing based on marginal opportunity cost [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1428-1439.
[9]	Chengxiang ZHANG, Jinhua SUN, Wei WANG, Zhe ZHANG. Ecosystem service values and ecological costs of urban road green space in Yongjia County under different management modes [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(3): 522-532.
[10]	ZHU Zhen,HUANG Chenmin,XU Zhigang,SHEN Yueqin,BAI Jiangdi. How risk attitude of farmers influences the supply willingness of forest carbon sequestration in Zhejiang Province [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(3): 565-.
[11]	BAI Yongping, WANG Peian. Agglomerative Economies'Effects on Resources Allocation in Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2012, 34(3): 510-519.
[12]	BIAN Qijuan, WANG Yuxia, YI Xiaoyan, ZHOU Shudong. Analysis on Status, Characteristics and Regional Variation of Farmland Transfer: An Example of Zhejiang Province [J]. , 2011, 33(2): 308-314.
[13]	REN Yansheng, ZHANG Anlu, ZOU Xiuqing. Estimating Compensation Standards for Farmland Development Rights over Restricted Development Areas [J]. , 2010, 32(4): 743-751.
[14]	Frank van Schoubroeck, Mary Jane Dela Cruz, Liang Luohui, Min Qingwen, Sun Yehong. The GIAHS -Rice- Fish Culture:China Project Framework [J]. , 2009, 31(1): 10-20.
[15]	CHENG Shengkui, JIAO Wenjun, MIN Qingwen, ZHANG Dan. Ecological Capacity of a Traditional Agricultural Area based on Ecological Footprint [J]. , 2009, 31(1): 63-68.