生态创新对资源型城市产业结构与工业绿色效率的影响

doi:10.18402/resci.2021.01.08

Abstract

Abstract:

The impact of technological innovation on urban economic transformation has received great attention, but few existing studies have focused on the impact of ecological innovation on the economic transformation of resource-based cities. This study used data of 115 resource-based prefecture-level cities in China from 2009 to 2017 to test the impact of ecological innovation on resource-based cities, including the upgrading of industrial structure and industrial green efficiency. It was found that the economic transformation of China’s resource-based cities is still at an early stage. Although the industrial green efficiency of resource-based cities has improved, the upward trend of the industrial structure upgrading was very weak. Resource-based cities are spatially differentiated in their economic transformation capabilities. The cities with high performance are concentrated in Shaanxi Province, Shanxi Province, southern Inner Mongolia, and western Shandong Province. The empirical results show that ecological innovation has a significant positive effect on improving the level of industrial structure upgrading in resource-based cities, and this effect is more pronounced in mature and regenerative cities. But the impact of ecological innovation on improving industrial green efficiency is not significant. We suggest that innovation policies need to be tailored according to the characteristics of different cities.

Key words: ecological innovation, resource-based city, industrial structure, industrial green efficiency, urban transformation

ZENG Gang, LU Linyi, HE Jinliao. Impact of ecological innovation on the economic transformation of resource-based cities[J].Resources Science, 2021, 43(1): 94-103.

Figures/Tables 8

Figure 1

Table 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 25

[1]	赵洋. 我国资源型城市产业绿色转型效率研究: 基于地级资源型城市面板数据实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019, (7):94-101.
	[ Zhao Y. Research on the efficiency of industrial green transformation of resource-based cities in China: An empirical analysis based on panel data of prefecture-level resource-based cities[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2019, (7):94-101.]
[2]	孙晓华, 郑辉. 资源型地区经济转型模式: 国际比较及借鉴[J]. 经济学家, 2019, (11):104-112.
	[ Sun X H, Zheng H. Economic transformation mode in resource-based regions: International comparison and reference[J]. Economist, 2019, (11):104-112.]
[3]	James P, Fussler C. Driving Eco-innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability[M]. London: Pitman Pub, 1996.
[4]	Kesidou E, Demirel P. On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005
[5]	Rennings K. Redefining innovation: Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000,32(2):319-332. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
[6]	Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F, et al. Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy[J]. Journal of World Business, 2008,43(2):131-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012
[7]	OECD. Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-innovation[M]. Paris: OECD, 2009.
[8]	蒋秀兰, 沈志渔. 基于波特假说的企业生态创新驱动机制与创新绩效研究[J]. 经济管理, 2015,37(5):190-199.
	[ Jiang X L, Shen Z Y. Research on driving mechanism and performance of enterprises’ ecological innovation based on porter hypojournal[J]. Economic Management, 2015,37(5):190-199.]
[9]	Costantini V, Crespi F, Martini C, et al. Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(3):577-595. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011
[10]	Ghisetti C, Quatraro F. Green technologies and environmental productivity: A cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017,132:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.003
[11]	李青青. 区域异质性视角下环境规制的生态创新效应研究: 以长江经济带为例[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2019.
	[ Li Q Q. Ecological Innovation Effect of Environmental Regulation from the Perspective of Regional Heterogeneity: A Case Study of Yangtze River Economic Belt[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2019.]
[12]	郑紫颜, 仇方道, 张春丽, 等. 再生性资源型城市功能转型异质性及其工业结构解析[J]. 资源科学, 2020,42(3):570-582.
	[ Zheng Z Y, Qiu F D, Zhang C L, et al. Heterogeneity of functional transformation of renewable resource-based cities in China and analysis of their industrial structure[J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(3):570-582.]
[13]	Mirata M, Emtairah T. Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005,13(10):993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.010
[14]	陈守强. 绿色技术创新对产业结构升级作用机理探析[J]. 黑龙江对外经贸, 2011, (10):54-55.
	[ Chen S Q. Analysis on the mechanism of green technology innovation on industrial structure upgrading[J]. Heilongjiang Foreign Economic Relations & Trade, 2011, (10):54-55.]
[15]	Fethi S, Rahuma A. The role of eco-innovation on CO₂ emission reduction in an extended version of the environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from the top 20 refined oil exporting countries[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019,26(29):30145-30153. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05951-z pmid: 31418148
[16]	Fethi S, Rahuma A. The impact of eco-innovation on CO₂ emission reductions: Evidence from selected petroleumcompanies[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2020,53:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.01.008
[17]	刘晓红. 空间关联下绿色创新的雾霾污染效应研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019,33(10):48-57.
	[ Liu X H. Study on haze pollution effect of green innovation under spatial correlation[J]. East China Economic Management, 2019,33(10):48-57.]
[18]	何小钢. 能源约束、绿色技术创新与可持续增长: 理论模型与经验证据[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2015, (4):30-38.
	[ He X G. The constraint of energy, green technology innovation and sustainable growth: Theoretical model and empirical evidence[J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2015, (4):30-38.]
[19]	高远东, 张卫国, 阳琴. 中国产业结构高级化的影响因素研究[J]. 经济地理, 2015,35(6):96-101.
	[ Gao Y D, Zhang W G, Yang Q. The factors influencing of industrial structure upgrade in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2015,35(6):96-101.]
[20]	Sun Y M, Lu Y L, Wang T Y, et al. Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008,75(7):1032-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.004
[21]	Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2010,45:133-155.
[22]	付宏, 毛蕴诗, 宋来胜. 创新对产业结构高级化影响的实证研究: 基于2000-2011年的省际面板数据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013, (9):56-68.
	[ Fu H, Mao Y S, Song L S. Empirical analysis on the effect of innovation on advancement of industrial structure process: Based on panel datas of provinces from 2000 to 2011[J]. China Industrial Economy, 2013, (9):56-68.]
[23]	李敏, 孙佳佳, 张婷婷. 人力资本结构高级化对产业结构升级的影响研究: 基于中国省级面板数据[J]. 工业技术经济, 2020,39(8):72-77.
	[ Li M, Sun J J, Zhang T T. Research on the impact of human capital structure upgrading on industrial structure upgrading: Based on provincial panel data[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2020,39(8):72-77.]
[24]	徐敏, 姜勇. 中国产业结构升级能缩小城乡消费差距吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015,32(3):3-21.
	[ Xu M, Jiang Y. Can the China’s industrial structure upgrading narrow the gap between urban and rural consumption?[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2015,32(3):3-21.]
[25]	严太华, 胡尧. 基于资源脱钩视角的资源型城市分类[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(12):2172-2181.
	[ Yan T H, Hu Y. Classification of resource-based cities from the perspective of resource decoupling[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2172-2181.]

变量名	样本量	平均值	标准差	最小值	最大值
ih	1495	6.31	0.46	4.97	8.01
ep	1495	8762.24	769.66	601.25	5999.52
ei	1492	55.97	119.41	0.00	1418.00
pgdp	1495	34067.71	28527.26	99.00	256877.00
rp	1495	4002.67	5859.60	100.00	110000.00
gov	1495	69.81	26.10	0.00	113.00
fdi	1400	25677.60	37399.12	3.00	269864.00

变量	模型1 logih	模型2 logih	模型3 logih	模型4 logep	模型5 logep	模型6 logep
l.logih	0.9098*** （0.2211）	1.0432*** （0.0908）	1.0050*** （0.0761）
l.logep				0.5455*** （0.0672）	0.3768*** （0.1247）	0.4402*** （0.0788）
logei	0.0008 （0.0008）	0.0040** （0.0015）	0.0031*** （0.0009）	0.0017 （0.0071）	0.0084 （0.0203）	0.0059 （0.0074）
loggdp	0.0104*** （0.0038）	0.0054 （0.0091）	0.0048 （0.0036）	0.3067*** （0.0774）	0.8356*** （0.1777）	0.4775*** （0. 0893）
logrp	0.0005 （0.0016）	0.0002 （0.0039）	-0.0003 （0.0024）	0.0090 （0.0075）	-0.0417 （0.0388）	-0.0275 （0.0431）
loggov	-0.0009 （0.0022）	-0.0004 （0.0047）	-0.0008 （0.0006）	0.0157* （0.0196）	0.0002* （0.0352）	0.0010* （0.0038）
logfdi	-0.0002 （0.0011）	-0.0006 （0.0005）	0.0006 （0.0027）	0.0052 （0.0077）	-0.0037 （0.0044）	0.0285 （0. 0177）
常数项	0.0583 （0.4073）	-0.0267 （-0.0267）	-0.0608 （0.1419）	3.9370*** （0.3941）	1.5623* （0.8651）	4.0718*** （0.4248）
P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000

变量	模型1 成长型城市	模型2 成熟型城市	模型3 衰退型城市	模型4 再生型城市
l.logih	0.9694** （0.0172）	0.8795*** （0.1093）	0.9938*** （0.0090）	0.9500*** （0.0324）
logei	0.0017** （0.0008）	0.0032** （0.0012）	0.0015*** （0.0005）	0.0021*** （0.0007）
loggdp	0.0001 （0.0024）	0.0113*** （0.0037）	0.0002 （0.0015）	0.0022 （0.0027）
logrp	-0.00005 0.0018	-0.0009 （0.0007）	-0.0005 （0.0014）	0.00008 （0.0011）
loggov	0.00717 （0.0073）	0.0023 （0.0036）	-0.0001 （0.0006）	-0.0007 （0.0005）
logfdi	-0.00003 （0.0010）	-0.0007 （0.0005）	0.0021 （0.0017）	0.0118** （0.0052）
常数项	0.0220 （0.0394）	0.0993 （0.1906）	0.0031 （0.0193）	0.0663 （0.0574）
P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000

变量	模型1 成长型城市	模型2 成熟型城市	模型3 衰退型城市	模型4 再生型城市
l.logep	0.7761*** （0.0901）	0.5291*** （0.0848）	0.8516*** （0.0531）	0.95812*** （0.0244）
logei	-0.0245*** （0.0056）	0.0077 0.0091	-0.0014 （0.0088）	0.0008 （0.0128）
loggdp	0.1293** （0.0706）	0.4029*** （0.0037）	0.0184 （0.0405）	-0.0209 （0.0197）
logrp	0.0662 （0.0468）	-0.0195 （0.0438）	0.0446 （0.0289）	-0.0218 （0.0157）
loggov	-0.1073** （0.0495）	-0.0181 （0.0348）	-0.0112 （0.0129）	-0.1579* 0.0925
logfdi	0.0094 （0.0123）	-0.0031 （0.0036）	0.0388*** （0.0092）	0.0265*** （0.0101）
常数项	2.2565*** （0.62991）	0.655*** （0.5527）	1.555*** （0.5252）	1.618*** （0.5742）
P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000

变量	模型1 logstru	模型2 logwater	模型3 logso	模型4 logsolid
l.logstru	0.9788*** （0.0171）
l.logwater		0.3969*** （0.0227）
l.logso			0.9220*** （0.0128）
l.logdust				0.3967*** （0.0169）
logei	0.0045*** （0.0003）	-0.1091 *** （0.0139）	-0.0613*** （0.0066）	-0.1353 *** （0.0104）
loggdp	-0.0053** （0.0011）	-0.5692*** （0.0499）	-0.2650*** （0.0295）	-0.3708*** （0.0513）
logrp	0.0055*** （0.0015）	0.0707 ** （0.0338）	-0.1217*** （0.0234）	0.2274*** （0.0463）
loggov	0.0003 （0.0008）	-0.0899*** （0.0336）	-0.0155 （0.0120）	-0.0194 （0.0235）
logfdi	-0.0011*** （0.0002）	0.0676*** （0.0099）	0.0045*** （0.0076）	0.0435*** （0.0089）
常数项	0.0268 （0.0183）	6.2282*** （0.5072）	1.6978*** （0.2747）	3.9979*** （0.5520）
P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000

Impact of ecological innovation on the economic transformation of resource-based cities

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HONG Jingke, LI Yuanchao, CAI Weiguang. Simulating China's carbon emission peak path under different scenarios based on RICE-LEAP model [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(4): 639-651.
[2]	ZHOU Di, LUO Dongquan. Green taxation, industrial structure transformation, and carbon emissions reduction [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(4): 693-709.
[3]	CHEN Lin, XIAO Qianbing, LAN Shujing. Pollution control effects of environmental policies based on threshold effect model of industrial structure: Taking the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan as an example [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 341-356.
[4]	ZHU Xuehong, PENG Ting, CHEN Jinyu. Impact of strategic and critical metals trade network characteristics on the upgrading of industrial structures [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(8): 1489-1503.
[5]	GENG Pei, CHEN Wen, YANG Jin, YANG Liuqing. Obstacles and paths for local implantation of rural ecological innovation technologies： A case of implementing natural agricultural technology in Chenzhuang Village [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1298-1310.
[6]	TANG Yudi, ZHU Daolin, CHENG Jian, Li Yaoyao, SONG Yang. Impact of differential pricing strategy of land supply on the upgrading of industrial structure:A study based on the empirical analysis of 277 cities in China [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 548-557.
[7]	ZHENG Ziyan, QIU Fangdao, ZHANG Chunli, LI Xue, LI Cai, YIN Pengxing. Heterogeneity of functional transformation of renewable resource-based cities in China and analysis of their industrial structure [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 570-582.
[8]	Bo WANG, Guojiang NI, Limin HAN. Impact of the evolution of industry structure on the economic fluctuation of marine fishery [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 289-300.
[9]	Zeyu WANG, Jing XU, Yanxi WANG. Factor decomposition and spatio-temporal difference analysis in marine resource consumption intensity in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 301-312.
[10]	YAN Taihua, HU Yao. Classification of resource-based cities from the perspective of resource decoupling [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2172-2181.
[11]	Shanshan LIANG, Danhui YANG. A review of mineral resource consumption and industrial structure evolution [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(3): 535-546.
[12]	Jinhua CHENG, Yongguang ZHU, Deyi XU, Anjian WANG, Zhe YOU, Jun SHEN. Impact of industrial structural change on mineral resource demand [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(3): 558-566.
[13]	Bo WANG, Limin HAN. Impacts of marine industrial structure changes on marine economic growth for 11 coastal provinces in China [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(6): 1182-1193.
[14]	Jinsheng HUANG, Ligen CHEN, Yaoyu ZHANG, Aidong ZHAO. The relationship between industrial land price and industrial structure change [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(4): 585-596.
[15]	Xiaowei MA, Xiuqing SHI, Yinghui WANG, Hua LIAO. Impacts of industrial structural change on energy intensity in China [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(12): 2299-2309.