Resources Science ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 2406-2418.doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.12.12
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Ling(), CHANG Hsiao-Tung(
)
Received:
2019-09-11
Revised:
2020-01-23
Online:
2020-12-25
Published:
2021-02-25
Contact:
CHANG Hsiao-Tung
E-mail:761945017@qq.com;changht4613@gmail.com
YANG Ling, CHANG Hsiao-Tung. Aged city built environment friendliness:Taking Taipei and New Taipei Cities as examples[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2406-2418.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Evaluation index system of aged city built environment friendliness"
领域 | 指标 | 说明 | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|
公共环境 | 公园和绿地面积/(m2/人) 公园和绿地适老性改造率/% | 拥有的各类公园和绿地数量 公园、绿地、滨水区、广场、步行街等公共活动空间的适老性改造比例 | [27] [28] |
医疗设施 | 医疗设施数量/(个/千人) 医疗设施便利性/个 | 拥有的各类医疗设施数量 医疗设施(除诊所外)周边500 m步行区域内拥有公共交通站点数量 | [27] [29] |
养老服务设施 | 安养及养护设施数量/(床/千老人) 安养及养护设施便利性/个 | 拥有的安养及照护(公/私)设施数量 从养护设施(开车5 min内)可达的医疗设施数量(除诊所外) | [15] [26] |
交通设施 | 人行道面积/(m2/人) 公共交通站点500 m居住率/% 公共交通站点数量/(个/千人) 公共交通车辆方便使用率/% | 拥有的人行道面积 步行可达公交车站/捷运站(500 m内)的居住用地面积占总用地面积的比例 拥有的公交站点/捷运站点数量 具有老年人或者残疾人专用座位的公交车/捷运(地铁)比例 | [13] [15] [30] [13] |
老年社区服务 | 餐饮服务设施数量/(个/千老人) 社区照护设施数量/(个/千老人) 休闲娱乐服务设施数量/(个/千老人) 社区及住房适老性改造率/% | 拥有的供餐、送餐、营养餐服务点数量 拥有的社区服务点(日照中心等)数量 拥有的休闲娱乐服务点(银发俱乐部等)数量 社区及住房适老性改造比例 | [26] [26] [15] [15] |
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of evaluation indicators of aged city built environment friendliness in Taipei and New Taipei Cities"
领域 | 指标 | 个数 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均数 | 中位数 | 方差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公共环境 | 公园和绿地面积/(m2/人) | 1505 | 0 | 97 | 18 | 0.3 | 4.8 |
公园和绿地适老性改造率/% | 1505 | — | — | — | — | — | |
医疗设施 | 医疗设施数量/(个/千人) | 1505 | 0 | 13 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 |
医疗设施便利性/个 | 1505 | 0 | 268 | 165 | 169 | 23.3 | |
养老服务设施 | 安养及养护设施数量/(床/千老人) | 1505 | 0 | 1210 | 14 | 0.4 | 68.6 |
安养及养护设施便利性/个 | 1505 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.3 | |
交通设施 | 人行道面积/(m2/人) | 1505 | 0 | 257 | 58 | 15 | 17.2 |
公共交通站点500 m居住率/% | 1505 | 0 | 100 | 91 | 100 | 21.4 | |
公共交通站点数量/(个/千人) | 1505 | 0 | 230 | 15 | 7 | 22.9 | |
公共交通车辆方便使用率/% | 1505 | — | — | — | — | — | |
老年社区服务 | 餐饮服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 1505 | 0 | 5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
社区照护设施数量/(个/千老人) | 1505 | 0 | 11 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | |
休闲娱乐服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 1505 | 0 | 28 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.1 | |
社区及住房适老性改造率/% | 1505 | — | — | — | — | — |
Table 3
K-Means cluster analysis of evaluation indicators of aged city built environment friendliness in Taipei and New Taipei Cities — center of final clusters"
指标 | 集群 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
老龄化程度 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
公共交通站点数量/(个/千人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
公共交通站点500 m居住率/% | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.38 |
医疗设施数量/(个/千人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
医疗设施便利性/个 | 0.229 | 0.047 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.012 |
人行道面积/(m2/人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
公园和绿地面积/(m2/人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
安养及养护设施数量/(床/千老人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
安养及养护设施便利性/个 | 0.375 | 0.019 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.006 |
餐饮服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
社区照护设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
休闲娱乐服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4
Average values of evaluation indicators for different levels of aged city built environment friendliness in Taipei and New Taipei Cities"
指标 | 集群 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1类 | 第2类 | 第3类 | 第4类 | 第5类 | 总和 | |
老龄化程度 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.42 |
公共交通站点数量/(个/千人) | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
公共交通站点500 m居住率/% | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.38 | 0.90 |
医疗设施数量/(个/千人) | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
医疗设施便利性/个 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
人行道面积/(m2/人) | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
公园和绿地面积/(m2/人) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
安养及养护设施数量/(床/千老人) | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
安养及养护设施便利性/个 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
餐饮服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
社区照护设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
休闲娱乐服务设施数量/(个/千老人) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
[1] | 韩家彬, 刘淑云, 张书凤, 等. 农业劳动力老龄化对土地规模经营的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(12):2284-2295. |
[ Han J B, Liu S Y, Zhang S F, et al. Influence of aging of agricultural labor force on large-scale management of land[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2284-2295.] | |
[2] | 许菲, 张彩萍, 白军飞. 收入增长与老龄化对城镇居民食物消费水足迹的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(1):104-116. |
[ Xu F, Zhang C P, Bai J F. Impact of income growth and aging on the water foot print of food consumption in urban China[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(1):104-116.] | |
[3] | 金巍, 章恒全, 张洪波, 等. 城镇化进程中人口结构变动对用水量的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(4):784-796. |
[ Jin W, Zhang H Q, Zhang H B, et al. The influence of population structural change on water consumption in urbanization[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(4):784-796.] | |
[4] | 许昕, 赵媛, 夏四友, 等. 中国分县城乡人口老龄化时空差异与机理[J]. 经济地理, 2020,40(4):164-174. |
[ Xu X, Zhao Y, Xia S Y, et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics and mechanism of urban and rural population ageing in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2020,40(4):164-174.] | |
[5] | 邱俊杰, 任倩, 余劲. 农业劳动力老龄化、农业资本投入与土地利用效率: 基于鲁豫皖三省固定农户跟踪调查[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(11):1982-1996. |
[ Qiu J J, Ren Q, Yu J. Aging of agricultural labor, agricultural capital investment and land use efficiency: Based on a longitudinal survey of farmers in Shandong, Henan and Anhui[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(11):1982-1996.] | |
[6] | 吴媛媛, 宋玉祥. 中国人口老龄化空间格局演变及其驱动因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020,40(5):768-775. |
[ Wu Y Y, Song Y X. The evolution of China’s population aging spatial pattern and its driving factors[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(5):768-775.] | |
[7] | WHO. Global Age Friendly Cities: A Guide[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007. |
[8] | Rowe J W, Kahn R L. Successful aging: The gerontologist[J]. 1997,37(4):433-440. |
[9] | WHO. Declaration of Alma-Ata[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1978. |
[10] | WHO. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. |
[11] | 刘鉴, 杨青山, 张郁, 等. 东北三省县级尺度人口老龄化空间格局演变及类型划分[J]. 地理科学, 2020,40(6):918-927. |
[ Liu J, Yang Q S, Zhang Y, et al. Spatial patterns evolution and classification of population aging in the three provinces of Northeast China based on the county scale[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(6):918-927.] | |
[12] | 周榕, 庄汝龙, 黄晨熹. 中国人口老龄化格局演变与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(10):2163-2177. |
[ Zhou R, Zhuang R L, Huang C X. Pattern evolution and formative mechanism of aging in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(10):2163-2177.] | |
[13] | WHO. Measuring the Age-Friendliness of Cities: A Guide to Using Core Indicators[R]. Kobe: World Health Organization, 2015. |
[14] | Alley D, Liebig P, Pynoos J, et al. Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society[J]. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 2007,49(1):1-18. |
[15] |
Orpana H, Chawla M, Gallagher E, et al. Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: Process and results[J]. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, 2016,36(10):214-223.
doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.10.02 pmid: 27768558 |
[16] | 胡淑贞, 林宛仪, 黄咏柔, 等. 台湾“高龄友善环境-乡镇市区层级区位数据库”之建置介绍[J]. 健康科技, 2018, (S1):71-79. |
[ Hu S Z, Lin W Y, Huang Y R, et al. Introduction to the establishment of “eldrly friendly environment-township and urban level location database” in Taiwan, China[J]. Health Sciences, 2018, (S1):71-79.] | |
[17] | Jia W Y, Wang X R. Research review on evaluation index for age-friendly community: A case study of Tianjin City[J]. Advances in Engineering Research, 2017, DOI: 10.2991/iceep-17.2017.18. |
[18] |
Wang Y, Gonzales E, Howell N M. Applying WHO’s age-friendly communities framework to a national survey in China[J]. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 2017,60(2):1-17.
doi: 10.1080/01634372.2017.1286866 |
[19] |
Fatmah F, Dewi V P, Priotomo Y. Developing age-friendly city readiness: A case study from Depok City, Indonesia[J]. SAGE Open Medicine, 2019, DOI: 10.1177/2050312119852510.
doi: 10.1177/2050312120974168 pmid: 33282304 |
[20] | Wong M, Yu R, Woo J. Effects of perceived neighbourhood environments on self-rated health among community: Dwelling older Chinese[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017,14(6):614-614. |
[21] |
Xie L L. Age-friendly communities and life satisfaction among the elderly in urban China[J]. Research on Aging, 2018,40(9):883-905.
pmid: 29566592 |
[22] |
Nieboer A P, Cramm J M. Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s well-being[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s10902-017-9923-5.
pmid: 24778574 |
[23] |
Paiva N M D, Daniel F, Silva A G D, et al. Age-friendly Coimbra City, Portugal, perception and quality of life in a sample of elderly persons[J]. Ciencia and Saude Coletiva, 2019,24(4):1473-1482.
pmid: 31066849 |
[24] |
John D H, Gunter K. Engage in community: Using mixed methods to mobilize older people to elucidate the age-friendly attributes of urban and rural places[J]. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2016,35(10):1095-1120.
doi: 10.1177/0733464814566679 pmid: 25608869 |
[25] | Kano M, Rosenberg P E, Dalton S D. A global pilot study of age-friendly city indicators[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2018,138(3):1205-1227. |
[26] | 谢楠. 台湾年龄友好城市建设经验及主要特色: 以台湾嘉义市为例[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2017,5(10):24-32. |
[ Xie N. The main experience and characteristic of Taiwan Province aged-friendly city building: Take Chiayi City as an example[J]. Scientific Research on Aging, 2017,5(10):24-32.] | |
[27] | 胡庭浩, 沈山, 刘雅萍. 老年友好型城市建设评价体系探析[J]. 江苏城市规划, 2014, (12):10-13. |
[ Hu T H, Shen S, Liu Y P. An analysis of the evaluation system for the construction of old friendly cities[J]. Jiangsu Urban Planning, 2014, (12):10-13.] | |
[28] | Zhai Y, Li K K, Liu J J. A conceptual guideline to age-friendly outdoor space development in China: How do Chinese Seniors use the urban comprehensive park? A focus on time, place, and activities[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(10):3678-3678. |
[29] | 张建军, 高峰, 金锋淑, 等. 基于操作性原则的沈阳养老设施规划模式探索[J]. 城市规划, 2016,40(1):34-42. |
[ Zhang J J, Gao F, Jin F S, et al. Exploration on the planning mode for Shenyang’s elderly-care facilities based on the operational principle[J]. City Planning Review, 2016,40(1):34-42.] | |
[30] | Shiau T A, Huang W K. User perspective of age-friendly transportation: A case study of Taipei City[J]. Transport Policy, 2014,36:184-191. |
[31] | 赵东霞, 韩增林, 任启龙, 等. 市域人口老龄化空间特征与养老资源匹配关系研究: 以东北三省为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(9):1773-1786. |
[ Zhao D X, Han Z L, Ren Q L, et al. Study on the relationship between the spatial feature of urban population aging and the pension resources matching: Take the three provinces of the Northeast China as an example[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(9):1773-1786.] |
|