生活垃圾污染感知、社会资本对农户垃圾分类水平的影响——基于陕西1374份农户调查数据

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.12.09

Abstract

Abstract:

Farming households are the main agents of rural domestic waste sorting. Their level of sorting directly relates to the effectiveness of rural domestic waste sorting and the success or failure of beautiful countryside construction. Based on the micro-data of farmers’ waste sorting behavior, this study combined individual level and collective level factors to analyze the influencing mechanism of farmers’ domestic waste pollution perception and social capital on waste sorting, and used the ordered probit model to conduct an empirical test on the data from the survey of 1374 farming households in the rural areas of Shaanxi Province. The results show that the pollution perception of domestic waste at the individual level played obvious roles in improving waste sorting the stronger the farmers’ perceive the pollution and impacts caused by randomly stacked and unsorted domestic waste on the ecological environment, community environment, and physical and mental health, the higher the waste sorting levels. Social networks, trust on institutions, social participation, and social norms as social capital at the collective level had significant positive impacts on waste sorting, but interpersonal trust had no significant effect on the level of sorting, which indicates that the farmers who had higher frequency of social interactions, higher degree of trust in institutions, more active participation in the public affair of rural waste management, and believed that village waste management is satisfactory tend to exhibit a higher level of domestic waste sorting behavior. In addition, females had higher levels of domestic waste sorting than males, and low-income families had higher levels of waste sorting than high-income families. Therefore, to achieve sustainable sorting and treatment of rural domestic waste and the comprehensive construction of an ecologically livable new countryside, we need not only to promote waste sorting by strengthening farmers’ pollution perception, but also to build a good community environment. Through network communication and information sharing to strengthen farmers’ communication frequency, improve farmers’ trust in institutions and their participation in public affairs, and strengthen the community self-discipline mechanism, farmers’ domestic waste sorting levels can be improved.

Key words: rural domestic waste, farmers' level of waste sorting, perception of domestic waste pollution, social capital, Ordered Probit model

JIA Yajuan, ZHAO Minjuan. Impact of domestic waste pollution perception and social capital on the farming households’ sorting of waste: Based on the survey of 1374 farming households in Shaanxi Province[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2370-2381.

Figures/Tables 7

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 42

[1]	贾亚娟, 赵敏娟, 夏显力, 等. 农村生活垃圾分类治理模式与建议[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(2):338-351.
	[ Jia Y J, Zhao M J, Xia X L, et al. Mode of classified treatment of rural domestic wastes and development suggestions[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(2):338-351.]
[2]	崔亚飞, Bluemling B. 农户生活垃圾处理行为的影响因素及其效应研究: 基于拓展的计划行为理论框架[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018,32(4):37-42.
	[ Cui Y F, Bluemling B. Research on the influencing factors and effects of household waste disposal behavior: Based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018,32(4):37-42.]
[3]	唐林, 罗小锋, 张俊飚. 社会监督、群体认同与农户生活垃圾集中处理行为: 基于面子观念的中介和调节作用[J]. 中国农村观察, 2019,146(2):20-35.
	[ Tang L, Luo X F, Zhang J B. Social supervision, group identity and farmers’ domestic waste centralized disposal behavior: An analysis based on mediation effect and regulation effect of the face concept[J]. China Rural Survey, 2019,146(2):20-35.]
[4]	中国新闻网. 习近平主持召开中央财经领导小组第十四次会议[EB/OL]. (2016-12-31) [2020-05-22]. https://www.chinanews.com/gn/2016/12-21/8100967.shtml.
	[ Chinanews.com. Xi Jinping Chaired the 14th Meeting of the Central Leading Group for Financial and Economic Affairs[EB/OL]. (2016-12-31) [2020-05-22]. https://www.chinanews.com/gn/2016/12-21/8100967.shtml.]
[5]	中共中央, 国务院. 关于抓好“三农”领域重点工作确保如期实现全面小康的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-02-05) [2020-05-22]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-02/05/c_1125535347.htm.
	[ The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, The State Council. On the Key Work in Agriculture, Rural Areas and Farmers to Ensure a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects on Schedule[EB/OL]. (2020-02-05) [2020-05-22]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-02/05/c_1125535347.htm.]
[6]	曾小溪, 曾福生. 农村居民参与环境保护的困境与出路[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,13(2):27-31.
	[ Zeng X X, Zeng F S. Difficulties and prospect for rural residents participating in environmental protection[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2012,13(2):27-31.]
[7]	李丽丽, 李文秀, 栾胜基. 中国农村环境自主治理模式探索及实践研究[J]. 生态经济, 2013, (11):166-169.
	[ Li L L, Li W X, Luan S J. Exploration and empirical study on Chinese self-governance pattern of rural environment[J]. Ecological Economy, 2013, (11):166-169.]
[8]	贾亚娟, 赵敏娟. 环境关心和制度信任对农户参与农村生活垃圾治理意愿的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(8):1500-1512.
	[ Jia Y J, Zhao M J. The influence of environmental concern and institutional trust on farmers’ willingness to participate in rural domestic waste treatment[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(8):1500-1512.]
[9]	曲英. 城市居民生活垃圾源头分类行为的理论模型构建研究[J]. 生态经济, 2009, (12):135-141.
	[ Qu Y. The study on establishing theoretical framework of resident’s behavior for source separation of household waste[J]. Ecological Economy, 2009, (12):135-141.]
[10]	俞国良, 王青兰, 杨治良. 环境心理学[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2000.
	[ Yu G L, Wang Q L, Yang Z L. Environmental Psychology[M]. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 2000.]
[11]	彭建, 周尚意. 公众环境感知与建立环境意识: 以北京市南沙河环境感知调查为例[J]. 人文地理, 2001,16(3):21-25.
	[ Peng J, Zhou S Y. Environmental perception and awareness building of Beijing citizens: A case study of Nansha River[J]. Human Geography, 2001,16(3):21-25.]
[12]	郭利京, 黄振英, 仇焕广. 农户生活垃圾无害化处理行为的动力机制研究: 基于江苏1028个农户的实证[J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,17(5):34-41.
	[ Guo L J, Huang Z Y, Qiu H G. Study on the dynamic mechanism of pro-environment behavior in household garbage disposal: Taking 1028 farmers in Jiangsu Province as an example[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2018,17(5):34-41.]
[13]	Putnam R D. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life[J]. American Prospect, 1993,4(13):35-42.
[14]	Krishna B A, Uphoff N. Mapping and Measuring Social Capital through Assessment of Collective Action to Conserve and Develop Watersheds in Rajasthan, India[M]. Washington: The World Bank, Social Development Department, 1999.
[15]	Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms[J]. Journal of Economic Perspective, 2000,14(3):137-158.
[16]	祁毓, 卢洪友, 吕翅怡. 社会资本、制度环境与环境治理绩效: 来自中国地级及以上城市的经验证据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015,25(12):45-52.
	[ Qi Y, Lu H Y, Lv C Y. Social capital, institutional environment and environmental governance performance: Evidence from Chinese cities[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015,25(12):45-52.]
[17]	王学婷, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 农村居民生活垃圾合作治理参与行为研究: 基于心理感知和环境干预的分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(2):459-468.
	[ Wang X T, Zhang J B, He K, et al. Study on participation behavior of rural residents living garbage cooperative governance: An analysis based on psychological perception and environmental intervention[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(2):459-168.]
[18]	许增巍, 姚顺波, 苗珊珊. 意愿与行为的悖离: 农村生活垃圾集中处理农户支付意愿与支付行为影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016,30(2):1-6.
	[ Xu Z W, Yao S B, Miao S S. The paradox between willingness and behavior: Factors influencing the households’ willingness to pay and real payment behavior on rural domestic garbage centralized treatment[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016,30(2):1-6.]
[19]	贾亚娟, 赵敏娟. 农户生活垃圾分类治理意愿及行为研究: 基于陕西试点与非试点地区的比较[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020,34(5):44-50.
	[ Jia Y J, Zhao M J. Willingness and behavior of household rural household garbage classification and treatment: Based on the comparison of pilot and non-pilot areas in Shaanxi[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(5):44-50.]
[20]	康佳宁, 王成军, 沈政, 等. 农民对生活垃圾分类治理的意愿与行为差异研究: 以浙江省为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018,34(12):1726-1730.
	[ Kang J N, Wang C J, Shen Z, et al. Empirical analysis on differences between the willingness and behaviors of farmers’ participation in garbage classification: A case study of Zhejiang Province[J]. Resource Development and Market, 2018,34(12):1726-1730.]
[21]	王玉君, 韩冬临. 经济发展、环境污染与公众环保行为: 基于中国CGSS2013数据的多层分析[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2016,30(2):79-92.
	[ Wang Y J, Han D M. Economic development, environmental pollution and public pro-environmental behavior: A multi-level analysis of the 2013 Chinese general social survey[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2016,30(2):79-92.]
[22]	Dalton R J. The greening of the globe? Cross-national levels of environmental group membership[J]. Environmental Politics, 2005,14(4):441-459.
[23]	何可, 张俊飚, 张露, 等. 人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿: 以农业废弃物资源化为例[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (5):75-88.
	[ He K, Zhang J B, Zhang L, et al. Interpersonal trust, institutional trust and farmers’ willingness to participate in environmental governance: A case study of agricultural waste resources[J]. Management World, 2015, (5):75-88.]
[24]	蔡起华, 朱玉春. 社会信任、收入水平与农村公共产品农户参与供给[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015,15(1):41-50.
	[ Cai Q H, Zhu Y C. Social trust, income level and farmers participating in provision of rural public goods[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015,15(1):41-50.]
[25]	史雨星, 李超琼, 赵敏娟. 非市场价值认知、社会资本对农户耕地保护合作意愿的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, (4):94-103.
	[ Shi Y X, Li C Q, Zhao M J. The impact of non-market value cognition and social capital on farmers’ willingness in farmland protection cooperation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, (4):94-103.]
[26]	史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 等. 社会资本对农户参与流域生态治理行为的影响: 以黑河流域为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018, (1):34-45.
	[ Shi H T, Sui D C, Wu H X, et al. The influence of social capital on farmers’ participation in watershed ecological management behavior: Evidence from Heihe Basin[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (1):34-45.]
[27]	蔡起华, 朱玉春. 社会信任、关系网络与农户参与农村公共产品供给[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015, (7):57-69.
	[ Cai Q H, Zhu Y C. Social trust, relationship network and farmers’ participation in the supply of rural public goods[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2015, (7):57-69.]
[28]	Granovetter M S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1984,19(3):481-510.
[29]	Gutiérrez S S M. Trust, satisfaction, relational norms, opportunism and dependence as antecedents of employee organizational commitment[J]. Contaduría Y Administración, 2013,58(2):11-38.
[30]	Herb S, Hartmann E. Opportunism risk in service triads: A social capital perspective[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2014,44(3):242-256.
[31]	罗必良. 现代农业发展理论[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009.
	[ Luo B L. Modern Agricultural Development Theory[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2009.]
[32]	王昕, 陆迁. 小型水利设施建设中农户支付行为的影响因素分析: 基于社会资本视角[J]. 软科学, 2014,28(3):135-139.
	[ Wang X, Lu Q. Influencing factors of farmers’ payment behaviour on small water conservancy facilities construction: From the perspective of social capital[J]. Soft Science, 2014,28(3):135-139.]
[33]	Lyon F. Trust, networks and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana[J]. World Development, 2000,28(4):663-681.
[34]	Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000,14(3):137-158.
[35]	Cohen M A. Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1998, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.120108.
[36]	Sheoli P, Hemamala H, Manjula S, et al. Formal and informal regulation of industrial pollution: Comparative evidence from Indonesia and the United States[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 1997,11(3):433-450.
[37]	陕西省统计局. 陕西统计年鉴2018[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
	[ Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shaanxi Statisical Yearbook 2018[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018.]
[38]	邬兰娅, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹. 环境感知、制度情境对生猪养殖户环境成本内部化行为的影响: 以粪污无害化处理为例[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, (5):28-35.
	[ Wu L Y, Qi Z H, Huang W H. The influence of environmental perception and institutional context on pig farmers’ internalization of environmental cost behavior: An example of waste disposal[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5):28-35.]
[39]	Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy[J]. The World Bank Research Observer, 2000,15(2):225-249.
[40]	史恒通, 赵伊凡, 吴海霞. 社会资本对多维贫困的影响研究: 来自陕西省延安市513个退耕农户的微观调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019, (1):86-99.
	[ Shi H T, Zhao Y F, Wu H X. Research on the influence of social capital on multidimensional poverty: Evidence from 513 farmer households in Yan’an City[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019, (1):88-99.]
[41]	张苙芸, 谭康荣. 制度信任的趋势与结构“多重等级评量”的分析策略[J]. 台湾社会学刊, 2005, (5):45-66.
	[ Zhang L Y, Tan K R. The trend and structure of institutional trust: An analytical strategy of “multiple ratings”[J]. Taiwan Society Journal, 2005, (5):45-66.]
[42]	邹宇春, 敖丹, 李建栋. 中国城市居民的信任格局及社会资本影响: 以广州为例[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012, (5):131-148.
	[ Zou Y C, Ao D, Li J D. Trust pattern of urban Chinese citizens and the impact of social capital: A case study of Guangzhou City[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2012, (5):131-148.]

变量	模型1	模型2	模型3	模型4	模型5	模型6
生活垃圾污染感知社会网络人际信任制度信任社会参与社会规范性别	0.1629*** （0.0299）	0.1719*** （0.0304） -0.1162* （0.0655）	00633* （0.0303） 0.0386 （0.0317） 0.0492 （0.0300） 0.3176* （0.0627） 0.2135* （0.0362）	0.0591* （0.0320） 0.0251 （0.0326） 0.0443 （0.0303） 0.3497* （0.0648） 0.2107* （0.0367） -0.1503** （0.0659）	0.1922* （0.0310） 0.0948* （0.0308） 0.0420 （0.0317） 0.0815 （0.0305） 0.3291* （0.0628） 0.2041*** （0.0363）	0.1957* （0.0313） 0.0873* （0.0324） 0.0275 （0.0326） 0.0756* （0.0308） 0.0357* （0.0649） 0.2042* （0.0368） -0.1496** （0.0661）
年龄		0.0014 （0.0030）		0.0017 （0.0030）		0.0010 （0.0030）
受教育年限		0.0100 （0.0097）		-0.0029 （0.0098）		-0.0001 （0.099）
是否党员或村干部		0.0193 （0.0717）		-0.0280 （0.0749）		-0.0234 （0.0751）
家庭人口数		0.0300 （0.0196）		0.0120 （0.0198）		0.0186 （0.0199）
家庭年收入		-0.0642***（0.0237）		-0.0506**（0.0239）		-0.0552** （0.0240）
关中		0.0392 （0.0747）		0.0234 （0.0750）		0.0030 （0.0753）
陕北		0.1050 （0.0820）		0.1086 （0.0829）		0.1382 （0.0833）
对数似然值 LR chi²（1）	-1671.2839 29.80***	-1663.5905 45.19***	-1650.0116 72.35***	-1642.0504 88.27***	-1630.6847 111.00***	-1622.3086 127.75***
Pseudo R²	0.0088	0.0134	0.0215	0.0262	0.0329	0.0379
样本数	1374

变量	水平1	水平2	水平3	水平4
生活垃圾污染感知社会网络	-0.0694* （0.0108） -0.0309* （0.0114）	0.0130* （0.0028） 0.0058 （0.0023）	0.0181* （0.0031） 0.0081 （0/0031）	0.0382* （0.0063） 0.0170* （0.0063）
人际信任	-0.0098 （0.0116）	0.0018 （0.0021）	0.0026 （0.030）	0.0054 （0.0064）
制度信任	-0.0268** （0.0109）	0.0050** （0.0022）	0.0070** （0.0029）	0.0148** （0.0060）
社会参与社会规范性别年龄受教育程度是否党员或村干部家庭人口数家庭收入关中地区陕南地区	-0.1261* （0.0225） -0.0724* （0.0128） 0.0530 （0,0233） -0.0004 （0.0011） 0.0001 （0.0035） -0.0083 （0.0266） -0.0066 （0.0070） 0.0196 （0.0085） -0.0011 （0.0267） -0.0049 （0.0295）	0.0237* （0.0055） 0.0136* （0.0031） -0.0099 （0.0046） 0.0011 （0.0002） -0.0001 （0.0007） 0.0016 （0.0050） 0.0012 （0.0013） -0.0037 （0.0017） 0.0002 （0.0050） 0.0092 （0.0057）	0.0330* （0.0064） 0.0189* （0.0036） -0.0139 （0.0062） 0.0001 （0.0003） -0.0001 （0.0009） 0.0022 （0.0069） 0.0017 （0.0018） -0.0051 （0.0023） 0.0003 （0.0070） 0.0128 （0.0078）	0.0694* （0.0130） 0.0399* （0.0074） -0.0292 （0.0130） 0.0002 （0.0006） -0.0002 （0.0019） 0.0046 （0.0147） 0.0036 （0.0039） -0.0108 （0.0047） 0.0006 （0.0148） 0.0270 （0.0163）

变量	农户生活垃圾分类水平
变量	系数	标准误
生活垃圾污染感知社会网络人际信任制度信任社会参与社会规范性别	0.3341* 0.0839 0.0465 0.1273 0.5639* 0.3555* -0.2736	0.0540 0.0544 0.0439 0.0530 0.1094 0.0641 0.1108
年龄受教育年限	0.0026 -0.0039	0.0051 0.0165
是否党员或村干部家庭人口数	-0.0281 0.0349	0.1254 0.0326
家庭年收入关中地区陕北地区	-0.0918** 0.0210 0.2448	0.0404 0.1273 0.1420
LR chi²(1)	110.61***
对数似然值	-1626.8787
Pseudo R²	0.0352
样本数	1374

Impact of domestic waste pollution perception and social capital on the farming households’ sorting of waste: Based on the survey of 1374 farming households in Shaanxi Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 42

Related Articles 9

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG Nan, YANG Hongqiang. Property rights change and management organization of timberland investment in European and North American countries [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1361-1371.
[2]	DUAN Wei, OUYANG Bo. Impacts of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of surrounding rural households:Analysis of the intermediary effect based on social capital [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1074-1086.
[3]	Yajuan JIA,Minjuan ZHAO. The influence of environmental concern and institutional trust on farmers’ willingness to participate in rural domestic waste treatment [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1500-1512.
[4]	Jing ZHANG, Yuchun ZHU. An empirical analysis of the targeted poverty alleviation of scientific and technical correspondent enterprises from the perspective of social capital [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 352-361.
[5]	LI Dongxuan, LIU Pingyang. Willingness and influencing factors of innovation and entrepreneurship of new agribusiness entities [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(11): 2071-2082.
[6]	Liu YANG, Yuchun ZHU, Yang REN. Influence of social trust and organizational support on the performance of farmers' participation in the management and maintenance of small-scale farmland water conservancy [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(6): 1230-1245.
[7]	Teng HUANG, Jiajia ZHAO, Juan WEI, Tianjun LIU. Cognition of irrigation water-saving techniques, adoption intensity and income effects in Gansu, China [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(2): 347-358.
[8]	Yaqing HAN, Yanqiang DU, Shipeng SU, Yuanzhu WEI. Social capital and farmer willingness for forest carbon sequestration management in underdeveloped regions of Fujian [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(7): 1371-1382.
[9]	XU Lang,LUO Dongling,LIU Aijun. Effects of social capital on farmers’ willingness to participate in irrigation management reform [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(6): 1287-1294.