基于生态系统服务评估的农地生态补偿机制研究进展

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.11.16

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to promote the ecological protection and restoration, the Party Central Committee has put forward new guidelines for the construction of ecological compensation system, and has carried out practice in key areas. However, the misalignment of supply and demand of ecosystem service leads to the uncertain participants and the inconsistent ecological compensation standards hinder the stable operation of the mechanism, which affects the implementation effect of the ecological compensation mechanism. Therefore, this paper analyzes the concept of ecosystem service supply and demand, summarizes the relationship between them, analyzes the definition and transport process of ecosystem service flow, introduces the main modeling methods of ecosystem service, and summarizes the current situation of farmland ecological compensation mechanism, compensation standards and identification of participants. Based on these, the shortcomings and future directions of ecosystem services assessment are pointed out, and the development trend of modeling methods of ecosystem services is summarized. Furthermore, this paper proposes feasible directions and ideas for the design and improvement of agricultural land ecological compensation mechanisms. According to the analysis, the main research progress is as follows: (1) The current ecosystem service assessment focuses on the function and potential, and ignores the intermediate process of ecosystem service delivery; (2) The modeling methods of ecosystem services are constantly improved, the technical threshold is raising, and more attention is paid to the integration of diversification and cross-discipline; (3) The scheme design of farmland ecological compensation mechanism needs to be improved in combination with spatial flow attributes. Therefore, to reasonably improve the agricultural land ecological compensation mechanism, the ecological compensation standard can be measured according to the spatial flow distribution of the agricultural land ecosystem service flow, and the participants can be determined by identifying the recipients of the ecosystem service benefits.

Key words: farmland, ecosystem service evaluation, ecosystem service supply, ecosystem service demand, ecosystem service flow, ecological compensation mechanism

LI Shuang, NIE Xin, ZHANG Anlu. Research progress on farmland ecological compensation mechanism based on ecosystem service evaluation[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2251-2260.

Figures/Tables 4

References 60

[1]	杨清, 南志标, 陈强强. 国内草原生态补偿研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(7):2489-2495.
	[ Yang Q, Nan Z B, Chen Q Q. Ecological compensation for grassland in China: A review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(7):2489-2495.]
[2]	国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于健全生态保护补偿机制的意见[J]. 中华人民共和国国务院公报, 2016, (15):19-22.
	[ General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Opinions on improving the compensation mechanism of ecological protection[J]. Gazette of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2016, (15):19-22.]
[3]	刘桂环. 探索中国特色生态补偿制度体系[N]. 中国环境报, 2019-12-17(03).
	[ Liu G H. Making Energetic Effort to Explore the Eco-Compensation System with Chinese Characteristics[N]. China Environment News, 2019-12-17(03).
[4]	Lin Y S, Dong Z F, Zhang W, et al. Estimating inter-regional payments for ecosystem services: Taking China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region as an example[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020,168:106514.
[5]	谢余初, 张素欣, 林冰, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的广西县域国土生态修复空间分区[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(1):217-229.
	[ Xie Y C, Zhang S X, Lin B, et al. Spatial zoning for land ecological consolidation in Guangxi based on the ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(1):217-229.]
[6]	丁振民, 姚顺波. 小尺度区域生态补偿标准的理论模型设计及测度[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(12):2182-2192.
	[ Ding Z M, Yao S B. Model and measurement of payment for ecosystem services at small scale[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2182-2192.]
[7]	牛志伟, 邹昭晞. 农业生态补偿的理论与方法: 基于生态系统与生态价值一致性补偿标准模型[J]. 管理世界, 2019,35(11):133-143.
	[ Niu Z W, Zou Z X. Theory and method of agricultural ecological compensation: Based on compensation standard model based on the ecosystem and ecological value[J]. Management World, 2019,35(11):133-143.]
[8]	2019年10月31日中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议通过. 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定[N]. 人民日报, 2019-11-06(01).
	[ Adopted by the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 31, 2019. Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Upholding and Improving the Socialist System with Chinese Characteristics and Promoting the Modernization of National Governance System and Governance Capacity[N]. People’s Daily, 2019-11-06(01).]
[9]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al. Mapping supply, demand and budgets of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,21:17-29.
[10]	严岩, 朱捷缘, 吴钢, 等. 生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(8):2489-2496.
	[ Yan Y, Zhu J Y, Wu G, et al. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(8):2489-2496.]
[11]	伏润民, 缪小林. 中国生态功能区财政转移支付制度体系重构: 基于拓展的能值模型衡量的生态外溢价值[J]. 经济研究, 2015,50(3):47-61.
	[ Fu R M, Miao X L. A new financial transfer payment system in ecological function areas in China: Based on the spillover ecological value measured by the expansion emergy analysis[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015,50(3):47-61.]
[12]	Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, et al. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification[J]. Landscape Online, 2014,34(1):1-32.
[13]	Schulp C J E, Lautenbach S, Verburg P H. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:131-141.
[14]	胡伟艳, 魏安奇, 赵志尚, 等. 农地多功能供需错位与协同作用研究进展及趋势[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017,31(3):89-96.
	[ Hu W Y, Wei A Q, Zhao Z S, et al. Literature review on mismatch of demand and supply, and synergies of multifunctional agricultural land[J]. China Land Science, 2017,31(3):89-96.]
[15]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(3):643-653.
[16]	Xu J, Yu X, Xie G D, et al. Computing payments for wind erosion prevention service incorporating ecosystem services flow and regional disparity in Yanchi County[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019,674:563-579. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.361 pmid: 31022546
[17]	管青春, 郝晋珉, 许月卿, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的农业生态管理分区[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(7):1359-1373. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.07.16
	[ Guan Q C, Hao J M, Xu Y Q, et al. Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(7):1359-1373.]
[18]	Semmens D J, Diffendorfer J E, Bagstad K J, et al. Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.002
[19]	Qin K Y, Liu J Y, Huang H J, et al. Integrating ecosystem services flows into water security simulations in water scarce areas: Present and future[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019,670:1037-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.263 pmid: 31018419
[20]	Villa F, Voigt B, Erickson J D. New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities[J]. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 2014,369(1639):20120286.
[21]	Wu X T, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,72:303-312.
[22]	Benoit O, Benedetto R, Reinout H, et al. An improved life cycle impact assessment principle for assessing the impact of land use on ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,693:133374.
[23]	Schirpke U, Candiago S, Vigl L E, et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,651:928-941.
[24]	Li D L, Wu S Y, Liu L B, et al. Evaluating regional water security through a freshwater ecosystem service flow model: A case study in Beijing-Tianjian-Hebei region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,81(10):159-170.
[25]	Zheng H, Li Y F, Robinson B E, et al. Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2016,14(10):527-532.
[26]	Serna-Chavez H M, Schulp C J E, van Bodegom P M, et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,39(4):24-33.
[27]	Nemec K, Raudsepp-Hearne C. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2012,22(1):1-15.
[28]	刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 丁圣彦. 人类活动对生态系统服务流的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(10):3232-3242.
	[ Liu H M, Liu L Y, Ding S Y. The impact of human activities on ecosystem services flow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(10):3232-3242.]
[29]	Olander L P, Johnston R J, Tallis H, et al. Benefit relevant indicators: Ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,85:1262-1272.
[30]	李婷, 吕一河. 生态系统服务建模技术研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(15):5287-5296.
	[ Li T, Lv Y H. A review on the progress of modeling techniques in ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(15):5287-5296.]
[31]	王嘉丽, 周伟奇. 生态系统服务流研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(12):4213-4222.
	[ Wang J L, Zhou W Q. Ecosystem service flows: Recent progress and future perspectives[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(12):4213-4222.]
[32]	冯晓玙, 黄斌斌, 李若男, 等. 生态系统服务流特征及量化方法研究进展[J]. 环境保护科学, 2019,45(6):29-38.
	[ Feng X Y, Huang B B, Li R N, et al. Research progress on characteristics and quantification methods of ecosystem service flow[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2019,45(6):29-38.]
[33]	Bagstad K. J, Johnson G W, Voigt B, et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4:117-125.
[34]	Bagstad K J, Semmens D J, Waage S, et al. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,5:27-39.
[35]	王奕淇, 李国平, 延步青. 流域生态服务价值横向补偿分摊研究[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(6):1013-1023.
	[ Wang Y Q, Li G P, Yan B Q. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(6):1013-1023.]
[36]	陈登帅, 李晶, 张渝萌, 等. 延河流域水供给服务供需平衡与服务流研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, (1):1-11.
	[ Chen D S, Li J, Zhang Y M, et al. Quantification and simulation of supply, demand and flow of water provision service in the Yanhe watershed, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, (1):1-11.]
[37]	国家发展改革委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组. 地区间建立横向生态补偿制度研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2015, (3):13-23.
	[ Institute of Spatial Planning and Regional Economy, National Development and Reform Commission P. R. C. The research on ecological compensation between the regions[J]. Macroeconomics, 2015, (3):13-23.]
[38]	欧维新, 王宏宁, 陶宇. 基于土地利用与土地覆被的长三角生态系统服务供需空间格局及热点区变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.
	[ Ou W X, Wang H N, Tao Y. A land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.]
[39]	柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山. 生态保护补偿的分析框架研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(2):380-392.
	[ Liu D, Hu Z T, Jin L S. Review on analytical framework of eco-compensation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(2):380-392.]
[40]	吴乐, 孔德帅, 靳乐山. 生态补偿对不同收入农户扶贫效果研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018, (5):134-144.
	[ Wu L, Kong D S, Jin L S. Can eco-compensation contribute to poverty alleviation? A heterogeneity analysis at farmer level[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018, (5):134-144.]
[41]	刘晋宏, 孔德帅, 靳乐山. 生态补偿区域的空间选择研究: 以青海省国家重点生态功能区转移支付为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(1):53-62.
	[ Liu J H, Kong D S, Jin L S. Research on spatial selection of ecological compensation areas: Using the transfer payment of national key ecological function areas of Qinghai Province as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(1):53-62.]
[42]	张涛, 杨高升, 张晓婧. 基于空间异质性的水源地精准补偿研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2019,35(2):168-174.
	[ Zhang T, Yang G S, Zhang X J. Research on precision compensation model of water source based on spatial heterogeneity[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2019,35(2):168-174.]
[43]	杨丽雯, 董丽青, 张立伟, 等. 固碳服务供需平衡和服务流量化评估: 以引黄入晋南干线为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(3):557-571.
	[ Yang L W, Dong L Q, Zhang L W, et al. Quantitative assessment of carbon sequestration service supply and demand and service flows: A case study of the Yellow River Diversion Project South Line[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(3):557-571.]
[44]	Cai W B, Gibbs D, Zhang L, et al. Identifying hotspots and management of critical ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta Region, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017,191:258-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.003 pmid: 28119168
[45]	Schaefer M, Goldman E, Bartuska A M, et al. Nature as capital: Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2015,112(24):7383-7389.
[46]	Haozhi P, Brian D, Georgia D, et al. Socio-hydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3106. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2595 pmid: 30393450
[47]	Yang T, Pan H, Hewings G, et al. Understanding urban sub-centers with heterogeneity in agglomeration economies: Where do emerging commercial establishments locate[J]. Cities, 2019,86:25-36.
[48]	Goldenberg R, Kalantari Z, Cvetkovic V, et al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017,593:599-609.
[49]	Zhan J Y, Zhang F, Chu X, et al. Ecosystem services assessment based on emergy accounting in Chongming Island, Eastern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,105:464-473.
[50]	Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, et al. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4:104-116.
[51]	Fridman D, Kissinger M. An integrated biophysical and ecosystem approach as a base for ecosystem services analysis across regions[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:242-254.
[52]	Li Y Y, Tan M H, Hao H G. The impact of global cropland changes on terrestrial ecosystem services value, 1992-2015[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(3):323-333.
[53]	Xu C, Haase D, Pauleit S, et al. The impact of different urban dynamics on greenspace availability: A multiple scenario modeling approach for the region of Munich, Germany[J]. Ecological Indicators , 2018,93:1-12.
[54]	Deal B, Pan H, Pallathucheril V, et al. Urban resilience and planning support systems: The need for sentience[J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2017,24(1):29-45.
[55]	Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R, et al. Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:231-241.
[56]	Roces-Díaz J V, Vayreda J, Banqué-Casanovas M, et al. Assessing the distribution of forest ecosystem services in a highly populated Mediterranean region[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,93:986-997.
[57]	Liu J G, Hull V, Batistella M, et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(2):344-365.
[58]	Waage S, Hwang L, Armstrong K. The Quiet (R)Evolution in Expectations of Corporate Environmental Performance. San Francisco: BSR’s Ecosystem Services Working Group, 2012.
[59]	Pan H Z, Zhang L, Cong C, et al. A dynamic and spatially explicit modeling approach to identify the ecosystem service implications of complex urban systems interactions[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,102:426-436.
[60]	Keesstra S D, Nunes J P, Novara A, et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018,610:997-1009.

Research progress on farmland ecological compensation mechanism based on ecosystem service evaluation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 60

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XIE Xianxiong, DENG Yue, LIU Jiyao, LU Weinan, ZHAO Minjuan. Impact of fallow on off-farm employment of farmers [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 280-292.
[2]	Abudureheman· Abudikeranmu, SHI Xiaoping, RAO Fangping, ZHOU Yuepeng, MA Xianlei. Tenure integrity, security, and farmland transfer under the background of “three rights separation”: Based on farmers’ perception of land tenure [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1643-1656.
[3]	HAN Jing, CHEN Zexiu, LU Xinhai. Spatiotemporal change of China’s overseas investment in farmlands and influencing factors [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1715-1727.
[4]	SHAN Yuhong, WANG Linna. Path analysis of farming household differentiation on the diversification of farmland function supply [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1405-1415.
[5]	LIU Qiong, XIAO Haifeng. The impact of farmland management scale and fiscal policy for supporting agriculture on agricultural carbon emission [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1063-1073.
[6]	WEI Hao, XIA Ying, LI Yun, LV Kaiyu, WANG Haiying. Effects of farmers’ credit demand rationing on the adoption of agricultural technologies that improve cultivated land quality：An analysis based on the moderating effect of farmer differentiation [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 217-231.
[7]	WANG Zhenhua, LI Mengmeng, WANG Canglin. Impact of contract stability on farming households’ inter-temporal technology adoption:An analysis based on the data of 2271 plots [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2237-2250.
[8]	LI Hanbing,JIN Xiaobin,YANG Xuhong,XU Weiyi,ZHOU Yinkang. Meta-analysis of the effects of different farmland management measures on soil carbon intensity [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1630-1640.
[9]	Jian LUAN,Yijun HAN. Impacts of drought disasters and farmland irrigation on wheat production technical efficiency [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1387-1439.
[10]	Man CHEN,Chenlin GAN,Yun MEI,Yinrong CHEN. Farmland transfer performance and obstacles from the perspective of farmers’ livelihood:Based on rural household survey of greater Wuhan Metropolitan Area [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1551-1562.
[11]	CAO Hui, ZHAO Kai. Farmland scale and farmers’ pro-environmental behavior：Verification of the inverted U hypothesis [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 740-752.
[12]	GE Yujuan, ZHAO Yuluan. Improvement of farmland fragmentation measurement model based on road network analysis [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 766-774.
[13]	WANG Qing, CHEN Zhigang. Impact of urban-rural gap on illegal farmland conversion in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2274-2283.
[14]	JIANG Yu, PU Lijie, ZHU Ming, HUANG Sihua, LIU Rongjuan. Progress and review of the research of farmland requisition-compensation balance in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2342-2355.
[15]	LI Xingguang,LIU Jundi,HUO Xuexi. Effects of farmland registration and confirmation on the choice of farmers’ livelihood strategy:Evidence from apple growers [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(10): 1923-1934.