“三权分置”视域下产权完整性与安全性对农地流转的影响——基于农户产权认知视角

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.09.01

Abstract

Abstract:

Subdivision of rights-based land tenure reform aims at improving the integrity and security of land right bundles. This study theoretically and empirically investigated the impacts of both integrity and security of farmland on renting activities under the “three rights separation” institutional background. Data used in the study were collected from a survey in Liaoning Province that covered 811 households. The results show that: (1) Major influencing effects of tenure integrity and security on households’ decision making of farmland transfer are the transaction cost reduction effect and the value enhancement guarantee effect. The strength of influence depends mainly on whether tenure integrity and security can be transferred from the leaser to the tenant. (2) Households’ perception of integrity of different land rights has significantly different impact on households’ decision making of farmland transfer. Specifically, households with higher level of perceived integrity are more likely to participate in land renting activities. Households with a higher level of perceived tenure integrity of mortgage right are more likely to rent in land but less likely to rent out land. In contrast, households with higher level of perceived integrity of inheritance right are more likely to rent out land but less likely to rent in land. (3) Households’ perception of tenure security of different land rights has significant positive impact on households’ decision making of farmland transfer. Specifically, households who perceive land certificate to be crucial in protecting land rights are more likely to participate in land renting activities. Households who perceive high possibilities of land adjustment in the future are less likely to engage in land renting activities. To construct a feasible synergistic property rights governance system that integrates formal state property rights governance rules and informal village governance is necessary in order to promote the development of farmland rental market within the “three rights separation” land tenure reform institutional framework. From the state’s perspective, the right division rationale of land tenure reform and construction of relevant right protection system at the legislation level should be continued. At the village level, it is crucial to take actions to guarantee the fulfillment of land rental related contracts in addition to constructing the right protection system, and to relax constraints on channels for the right bundles transfer from the leaser to the tenant.

Key words: “three rights separation”, land tenure, farmland transfer, perception of land tenure, tenure integrity, tenure security, Double-Hurdle model, Liaoning Province

Abudureheman· Abudikeranmu, SHI Xiaoping, RAO Fangping, ZHOU Yuepeng, MA Xianlei. Tenure integrity, security, and farmland transfer under the background of “three rights separation”: Based on farmers’ perception of land tenure[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1643-1656.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 1

References 44

[1]	郜亮亮, 黄季焜, 冀县卿. 村级流转管制对农地流转的影响及其变迁[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014, (12):18-29.
	[ Gao L L, Huang J K, Ji X Q. The impact of village level transfer control on rural land transfer and its changes[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014, (12):18-29.]
[2]	罗必良. 产权强度、土地流转与农民权益保护[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2013.
	[ Luo B L. Property Right Intensity, Land Circulation and Protection of Farmers’ Rights and Interests[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2013.]
[3]	李宁, 陈利根, 孙佑海. 现代农业发展背景下如何使农地“三权分置”更有效: 基于产权结构细分的约束及其组织治理的研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016,37(7):11-26.
	[ Li N, Chen L G, Sun Y H. Under the background of modern agricultural development, how to make the “three power division” of agricultural land effective: Research on constraint and organization governance based on the subdivision of property right structure[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2016,37(7):11-26.]
[4]	Zhou Y P, Ma X L, Ji D Y, et al. Does property rights integrity improve tenure security? Evidence from China’s forest reform[J]. Sustainability, 2018, DOI: 10.3390/su10061956. pmid: 29350212
[5]	吴一恒, 徐砾, 马贤磊. 农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施: 基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018, (8):46-63.
	[ Wu Y H, Xu L, Ma X L. The potential risks and improvement measures of “three rights separation” system reform of arable land: From the perspectives of property rights allocation and the public domain[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (8):46-63.]
[6]	Wang H, Tong J E, Su F B, et al. To reallocate or not: Reconsidering the dilemma in China’s agricultural land tenure policy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,28(4):805-814. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.006
[7]	Ma X L, Heerink N, Feng S Y, et al. Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,42(1):293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.020
[8]	何欣, 蒋涛, 郭良燕, 等. 中国农地流转市场的发展与农户流转农地行为研究: 基于2013-2015年29省的农户调查数据[J]. 管理世界, 2016, (6):79-89.
	[ He X, Jiang T, Guo L Y, et al. Research on the development of China’s farmland transfer market and the behavior of farmers’ farmland transfer: Based on the survey data of 29 provinces in 2013-2015[J]. Management World, 2016, (6):79-89.]
[9]	张建, 冯淑怡, 诸培新. 政府干预农地流转市场会加剧农村内部收入差距吗? 基于江苏省四个县的调研[J]. 公共管理学报, 2017,14(1):104-116.
	[ Zhang J, Feng S Y, Zhu P X. Does government intervention on farmland rental market lead to rural income inequality? Based on the research of four counties in Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2017,14(1):104-116.]
[10]	Macours K, Swinnen J F M. Patterns of agrarian transition[J]. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 2002,50(2):365-394.
[11]	Deininger K, Jin S. Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China’s rural land contracting law[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009,70(1):22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.001
[12]	仇童伟, 石晓平, 马贤磊. 农地流转经历、产权安全认知对农地流转市场潜在需求的影响研究: 以江西省丘陵地区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(4):645-653.
	[ Qiu T W, Shi X P, Ma X L. The impact of farmland transfer experience and tenure security cognition on the potential demand of land rental market: Evidence from the hilly area of Jiangxi[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(4):645-653.]
[13]	韩家彬, 张书凤, 刘淑云, 等. 土地确权、土地投资与农户土地规模经营: 基于不完全契约视角的研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(10):2015-2028. doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.10.10
	[ Han J B, Zhang S F, Liu S Y, et al. Land entitlement, land investment, and farmer land scale management: From an incomplete contract perspective[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(10):2015-2028.]
[14]	马贤磊, 石晓平, Heerink N, 等. 农村土地产权制度与农业绩效: 基于三维产权安全视角[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2018.
	[ Ma X L, Shi X P, Heerink N, et al. Farmland Property Rights System and Agricultural Performance: Based on the Perspective of Three-Dimensional Property Rights Security[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2018.]
[15]	Ma X L, Heerink N, Ierland E V, et al. Land tenure insecurity and rural-urban migration in rural China[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2014,95(2):383-406. doi: 10.1111/pirs.v95.2
[16]	Ho P. Institutions in transition: Land ownership, property rights and social conflict in China[J]. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2010,20(2):84-85.
[17]	Rao F P, Spoor M, Ma X L, et al. Land Tenure (in) security and crop-tree intercropping in rural Xinjiang, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016,50:102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.001
[18]	Zhou Y P, Shi X P, Ji D Y, et al. Property rights integrity, tenure security and forestland rental market participation: Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Natural Resources Forum, 2019,43(2):95-110. doi: 10.1111/narf.2019.43.issue-2
[19]	Besley T. Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1995,103(5):903-937. doi: 10.1086/262008
[20]	Kung K S. Common property rights and land reallocations in rural China: Evidence from a village survey[J]. World Development, 2000,28(4):701-719. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00148-5
[21]	Bouquet E. State-led land reform and local institutional change: Land titles, land markets and tenure security in Mexican communities[J]. World Development, 2009,37(8):1390-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.015
[22]	Brasselle A S, Gaspart F, Platteau J P, et al. Land tenure security and investment incentives: Puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2002,67(2):373-418. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00190-0
[23]	Williamson O E. Transaction cost economics[J]. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 2012,1(1):41-65.
[24]	陈朝兵. 农村土地“三权分置”: 功能作用、权能划分与制度构建[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016,26(4):135-141.
	[ Chen C B. “Division of three rights” of rural land: The function, right content and system construction[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016,26(4):135-141.]
[25]	李宁, 何兴邦, 王舒娟. 地权结构细分视角下中国农地产权制度变迁与改革: 一个分析框架的构建[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017, (2):2-14.
	[ Li N, He X B, Wang S J. Institutional changes of China’s farmland property rights from the perspective of property rights structure subdivision: Constructing a framework of analysis[J]. China Rural Survey, 2017, (2):2-14.]
[26]	罗兴, 马九杰. 不同土地流转模式下的农地经营权抵押属性比较[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017,38(2):22-32.
	[ Luo X, Ma J J. Comparison of montage effect of the right to use farmland under different kind of land transfer modes[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017,38(2):22-32.]
[27]	朱小静, 张红霄, 何文剑. 林权改革、产权结构与农户林地流转决策: 基于7个重点林业县林改政策及21个村415户调研数据[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2014, (4):170-187.
	[ Zhu X J, Zhang H X, He W J. Forest right reform, property right structure and forest land transfer decision of farmers: Based on forest reform policies of 7 key forestry counties and survey data of 415 households in 21 villages[J]. Research of Institutional Economics, 2014, (4):170-187.]
[28]	中国人民银行, 中国银行业监督管理委员会, 中国保险监督管理委员会, 等. 农村承包土地的经营权抵押贷款试点暂行办法[EB/OL]. (2016-03-15) [2020-06-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-05/24/content_5076149.htm.
	[ The People’s Bank of China, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Insurance Regulatory Commission, et al. Interim Measures for Mortgage Loan Pilot of Management Right of Rural Contracted Land[EB/OL]. (2016-03-15) [2020-06-15]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-05/24/content_5076149.htm.]
[29]	Yi Z J. A probe into the mortgage rates of land contract management rights based on unified annual output value[J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2013, (9):49-52.
[30]	黄少安. 制度经济学研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2010.
	[ Huang S A. Institutional Economics Research[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2010.]
[31]	Brandt L, Rozelle S, Turner M A. Local government behavior and property right formation in rural China[J]. Journal of Institutional & Theoretical Economics, 2004,160(4):627-662.
[32]	Lang H R, Ma X L, Shi X P, et al. Tenure Security and Land Rental Market Development in Rural China: Actual Versus Perceived Security[C]. Yangling: The 6th CAER-IFPRI Annual International Conference, 2014.
[33]	Vranken L, Swinnen J. Land rental markets in transition: Theory and evidence from Hungary[J]. World Development, 2006,34(3):481-500. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.017
[34]	Rahman S. Determinants of agricultural land rental market transactions in Bangladesh[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010,27(3):957-964. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.009
[35]	Xie Y, Gong P C, Han X, et al. The effect of collective forestland tenure reform in China: Does land parcelization reduce forest management intensity?[J]. Journal of Forest Economics, 2014,20(2):126-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.03.001
[36]	Cragg J G. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods[J]. Econometrica, 1971,39(5):829-844. doi: 10.2307/1909582
[37]	吉登艳, 马贤磊, 石晓平. 林地产权对农户林地投资行为的影响研究: 基于产权完整性与安全性: 以江西省遂川县与丰城市为例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2015, (3):54-61.
	[ Ji D Y, Ma X L, Shi X P. The impact of forest property rights on forestland investments: from the perspective of property rights integrity and security: A case from Suichuan and Fengcheng of Jiangxi Province[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2015, (3):54-61.]
[38]	Garcia B. Implementation of a double-hurdle model[J]. Stata Journal, 2013,13(4):776-794. doi: 10.1177/1536867X1301300406
[39]	Ma X, Heerink N, Ierland E V, et al. Land tenure insecurity and rural-urban migration in rural China[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2014,95(2):383-406. doi: 10.1111/pirs.v95.2
[40]	Mullan K, Grosjean P, Kontoleon A. Land tenure arrangements and rural-urban migration in China[J]. World Development, 2011,39(1):123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.009
[41]	Boucher S R, Guirkinger C, Trivelli C. Direct elicitation of credit constraints: Conceptual and practical issues with an application to Peruvian agriculture[J]. Economic Development and Culture Change, 2009,57(4):609-640. doi: 10.1086/598763
[42]	张龙耀, 杨军. 农地抵押和农户信贷可获得性研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2011, (11):60-64.
	[ Zhang L Y, Yang J. Agricultural land mortgage and farmer credit availability research[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2011, (11):60-64.]
[43]	Zhou Y P, Chand S. Regression and matching estimates of the effects of the land certification program on rural household income in China[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2013,272(11):7106-7113. pmid: 9054404
[44]	Xu J, Yi Y, Kohlin G, et al. Property rights, tenure security and forest investment incentives: Evidence from China’s collective forest tenure reform[J]. Environment & Development Economics, 2014,19(1):48-73.

产权状态		交易成本减少效应	增值保障效应	综合效应
完整性	入股权	转出：+ 转入：+	转出：+ 转入：+	转出：+ 转入：+
	抵押权	转出：+ 转入：+	转出：+/- 转入：+/-	转出：+/- 转入：+/-
	继承权	转出：+ 转入：no	转出：- 转入：-	转出：+/- 转入：-
安全性	证书重要性认知	转出：+ 转入：+	转出：+ 转入：+	转出：+ 转入：+
	发生调整认知	转出：- 转入：-	转出：- 转入：-	转出：- 转入：-

变量名称	决策模型		规模模型
变量名称	系数	标准误	系数	标准误
产权完整性
入股权	0.923***	0.124	0.551***	0.056
抵押权	-0.358***	0.124	-0.199***	0.059
继承权	0.317**	0.137	0.089	0.063
产权安全性
调整预期	-0.157	0.169	-0.117	0.079
证书重要性	0.284*	0.159	0.139*	0.075
户主特征
性别	-0.068	0.207	-0.029	0.103
年龄	0.015**	0.006	0.007**	0.003
党员	0.256*	0.146	0.183	0.132
村干部	-0.463*	0.266	-0.370*	0.218
受教育程度	-0.008	0.023	-0.003	0.011
家庭特征
富裕程度(对数)	-0.122*	0.071	-0.064*	0.034
家庭非农劳动力数(村级)	0.256	0.249	0.020	0.114
土地特征
承包地面积(对数)	-0.056***	0.013	-0.008	0.005
承包地块数	0.004	0.021	-0.007	0.010
村级特征
村距乡镇的距离	0.021	0.014	0.011*	0.007
村庄事务公开度	-0.016	0.117	0.046	0.056
地区虚拟变量	-1.276***	0.136	-0.586***	0.063
常数项	-1.189**	0.591	0.193	0.285
观测值	811
Log likelihood	-934.621
Mean VIF	1.36

变量名称	决策模型		规模模型
变量名称	系数	标准误	系数	标准误
产权完整性
入股权	2.126***	0.557	2.119***	0.483
抵押权	1.093**	0.555	0.958*	0.493
继承权	-3.321***	0.950	-3.593***	0.796
产权安全性
调整预期	-0.253***	0.091	-0.270***	0.082
证书重要性	0.189**	0.094	0.151*	0.086
户主特征
性别	0.479**	0.224	0.356**	0.177
年龄	-0.019***	0.006	-0.019***	0.005
党员	0.256*	0.146	0.183	0.132
村干部	-0.463*	0.266	-0.370*	0.218
受教育程度	-0.004	0.022	0.007	0.019
家庭特征
富裕程度(对数)	0.181***	0.066	0.232***	0.058
家庭非农劳动力数(村级)	-0.852***	0.259	-0.609***	0.221
土地特征
承包地面积(对数)	0.026***	0.009	0.035***	0.009
承包地块数	-0.011	0.023	-0.026	0.021
村级特征
村距乡镇的距离	0.001	0.016	-0.007	0.014
村庄事务公开度	-0.129	0.107	-0.158*	0.096
地区虚拟变量	-0.277	0.172	-0.205	0.145
常数项	0.526	1.292	2.308**	1.142
观测值	811
Log likelihood	-426.959
Mean VIF	1.62

Tenure integrity, security, and farmland transfer under the background of “three rights separation”: Based on farmers’ perception of land tenure

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 44

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Yuge, MENG Quanxing, CHEN Bingpu. Impact of forest land tenure security on the circulation of ecological forest land:From the perspective of endowment effect and security perception [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(1): 161-170.
[2]	WANG Zhenhua, LI Mengmeng, WANG Canglin. Impact of contract stability on farming households’ inter-temporal technology adoption:An analysis based on the data of 2271 plots [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2237-2250.
[3]	Man CHEN,Chenlin GAN,Yun MEI,Yinrong CHEN. Farmland transfer performance and obstacles from the perspective of farmers’ livelihood:Based on rural household survey of greater Wuhan Metropolitan Area [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1551-1562.
[4]	HE Wenjian, WANG Yuyang, JIANG Minxing. A review on the collective forestland tenure reform and changes in forest resources [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(11): 2083-2093.
[5]	CAO Yongqiang,LIU Mingyang,LI Yuanfei,XIAO Chunliu. Applicability of six potential evapotranspiration estimation methods in Liaoning Province [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(10): 1780-1790.
[6]	Xianxiong XIE, Xiaoping LI, Minjuan ZHAO, Hengtong SHI. How does capital endowment affect herdsman to reduce livestock? ——an empirical analysis based on 372 herdsmen in Inner Mongolia [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(9): 1730-1741.
[7]	Peiling LIAO, Jian ZHAO, Xianli XIA. Welfare changes and disparities among farmers before and after renting out farmland with government-dominated farmland transfer in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Zone [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(7): 1354-1364.
[8]	Wenqing ZHU, Liqin ZHANG. The impact of confirming collective forest land property rights to households on the forest land circulation behavior of farmers [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(7): 1407-1417.
[9]	Fangfang JIN, Liangjie XIN. Spatial distribution and impact factors of farmland abandonment [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(4): 719-728.
[10]	Xueqi WANG, Wei ZOU, Gaoli ZHU, Tieyi CAO. The impact of local government-dominated farmland transfer on farmer’s transfer scale and grain yield in five cities in Jiangsu [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(2): 326-334.
[11]	Chenlin GAN, Lu CHEN, Yinrong CHEN, Miao ZHANG. Analysis on the factors that affect the farmland transfer performance based on farmers′ satisfaction—— a typical survey in Wuhan and Ezhou [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(11): 2225-2235.
[12]	Xu ZHAO, Jiaqi XIAO, Yuefang DUAN. Relocation, farmland transfer and livelihood transformation of reservoir resettlement [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 1954-1965.
[13]	Zhen CHEN, Jie GUO, Minghao OU. Characterization of the differences between farmers' intentionfor farmland transfer and their circulation behavior [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 2039-2047.
[14]	Jinwen WU, Longyu SUN, Ruipeng JI, Rui FENG, Wenying YU, Yushu ZHANG. Intraday evaluation modeling of climatic suitability for rice in Liaoning Province [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(8): 1605-1613.
[15]	Baodi SUN, Lijuan CUI, Wei LI, Xiaoming KANG, Manyin ZHANG, Xu PAN, Yunmei PING. Evaluation on leisure tourism in coastal wetlands in Liaoning Province based on travel cost interval analysis [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(6): 1160-1170.