Resources Science ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1338-1347.doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.07.10
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Jingmei1,2(), SHAN Jingzhu1(
), DENG Yuncheng3, XU Handuo1,2
Received:
2019-04-25
Revised:
2019-07-08
Online:
2020-07-25
Published:
2020-09-25
Contact:
SHAN Jingzhu
E-mail:jingmeili66@163.com;oucshanjingzhu@126.com
LI Jingmei, SHAN Jingzhu, DENG Yuncheng, XU Handuo. Uncertainty bias and its correction in contingent valuation method: A case study of marine biodiversity valuation in Pingtan County[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1338-1347.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
An example of contingent valuation method (CVM) valuation questions"
选项A:确切金额 | 选项B:大致范围 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
最低值 | 最高值 | ||||
□0元 | □50元 | □0元 | □50元 | □0元 | □50元 |
□5元 | □100元 | □5元 | □100元 | □5元 | □100元 |
□10元 | □200元 | □10元 | □200元 | □10元 | □200元 |
□15元 | □300元 | □15元 | □300元 | □15元 | □300元 |
□20元 | □400元 | □20元 | □400元 | □20元 | □400元 |
□30元 | □500元 | □30元 | □500元 | □30元 | □500元 |
□40元 | □其他金额: | □40元 | □其他金额: | □40元 | □其他金额: |
Table 2
Definition of variables and description"
变量名 | 变量含义 | 赋值方法 |
---|---|---|
YEAR | 在平潭当地居住年限/年 | YEAR=居住年限 |
FRE | 去海边频率 | 经常=4,偶尔=3,很少=2,从不=1 |
KNOW | 对海洋生物多样性了解程度 | 非常了解=5,比较了解=4,一般=3,不太了解=2,完全不了解=1 |
CONCERN | 对海洋生物多样性保护关注程度 | 非常关心=5,比较关心=4,一般=3,不太关心=2,完全不关心=1 |
CONTRI | 是否同意居民应当为保护生物多样性贡献力量,如支付一定费用 | 非常同意=5,比较同意=4,一般=3,不太同意=2,完全不同意=1 |
SEX | 性别 | 男=1,女=0 |
AGE | 年龄/岁 | 20以下=1,20~30=2,31~45=3,46~60=4,61以上=5 |
EDU | 受教育情况 | 初中及以下=1,职高/高中=2,大专=3,本科=4,研究生及以上=5 |
INC | 年收入/万元 | 2以下=1,2~5=2,5~10=3,10~20=4,20以上=5 |
Table 3
Parameter estimation of the determinants of uncertainty"
变量 | Probit模型 | OLS模型 | Ordered Probit模型 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
系数 | 标准差 | 系数 | 标准差 | 系数 | 标准差 | |||
常数项 | 3.272*** | 0.700 | 0.883*** | 0.148 | ||||
YEAR | -0.018** | 0.008 | -0.004** | 0.002 | -0.020*** | 0.007 | ||
FRE | 0.037 | 0.130 | 0.026 | 0.029 | 0.048 | 0.114 | ||
KNOW | -0.368*** | 0.128 | -0.063** | 0.026 | -0.281** | 0.112 | ||
CONCERN | -0.170* | 0.101 | -0.050** | 0.022 | -0.213** | 0.088 | ||
CONTRI | 0.006 | 0.115 | 0.008 | 0.025 | 0.039 | 0.098 | ||
SEX | -0.164 | 0.185 | -0.043 | 0.041 | -0.186 | 0.161 | ||
AGE | -0.188 | 0.135 | -0.020 | 0.030 | -0.039 | 0.117 | ||
EDU | -0.030 | 0.080 | 0.006 | 0.017 | 0.033 | 0.068 | ||
INC | -0.453*** | 0.095 | -0.095*** | 0.019 | -0.412*** | 0.084 | ||
Log likelihood | -140.673 | -245.937 | ||||||
McFadden R2 | 0.206 | 0.125 | ||||||
F-statistic | 8.077 | |||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.199 | |||||||
N | 258 | 258 | 258 |
[1] | 游巍斌, 何东进, 洪伟, 等. 基于条件价值法的武夷山风景名胜区遗产资源非使用价值评估[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(9):1880-1888. |
[ You W B, He D J, Hong W, et al. The non-use value of heritage resources in Wuyishan Scenery District using the contingent valuation method[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(9):1880-1888.] | |
[2] | 单菁竹, 李京梅, 许志华, 等. CVM中的抗议性响应: 动机与影响: 以胶州湾浒苔治理支付意愿为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(3):626-638. |
[ Shan J Z, Li J M, Xu Z H, et al. The protest response in contingent valuation method: Motivation and impact: A case study of willingness to pay for the governance of green tides in Jiaozhou Bay[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(3):626-638.] | |
[3] | 刘亚萍, 赫雪姣, 金建湘, 等. 基于二分式诱导技术的WTP值测算与偏差分析: 以广西北部湾经济区滨海生态环境保护为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014,36(1):156-165. |
[ Liu Y P, He X J, Jin J X, et al. An application of dichotomous induction technology in WTP estimate and deviation analysis for coastal resource protection in the Guangxi Beibu Gulf economic zone[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(1):156-165.] | |
[4] |
刘佳, 刘宁. 浒苔绿潮影响下滨海旅游环境价值损失及影响因素: 以青岛市海水浴场为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(2):392-403.
doi: 10.18402/resci.2018.02.15 |
[ Liu J, Liu N. Evaluating the environmental value loss of coastal tourism and influencing infactors under the influence of Enteromorpha prolifera disasters at the bathing beaches in Qingdao[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(2):392-403.] | |
[5] |
王朋薇, 韩丽荣, 周睿, 等. 协商式CVM 在资源非使用价值评估中的应用研究: 以内蒙古达赉湖自然保护区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(5):902-910.
doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.05.10 |
[ Wang P W, Han L R, Zhou R, et al. Application of the deliberation contingent valuation method to the non-use value of resources in the Dalai Lake Protected Area[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(5):902-910.] | |
[6] | 肖建红, 高雪, 胡金焱, 等. 群岛旅游地海洋旅游资源非使用价值支付意愿偏好研究: 以山东庙岛群岛、浙江舟山群岛和海南三亚及其岛屿为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(8):168-176. |
[ Xiao J H, Gao X, Hu J Y, et al. A study on the preferences in the public’s willingness to pay for conserving the non-use values of marine tourism resources in archipelago tourism destinations: Based on cases of Miaodao Archipelago of Shandong, Zhoushan Archipelago of Zhejiang, and Sanya and its islands of Hainan[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(8):168-176.] | |
[7] | 李京梅, 丁中贤, 许婉婷, 等. 基于双边界二分式CVM的国家公园门票定价研究: 以胶州湾国家海洋公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2020,42(2):232-241. |
[ Li J M, Ding Z X, Xu W T, et al. National park ticket pricing based on double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation method for the Jiaozhou Bay National Marine Park[J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(2):232-241.] | |
[8] | Shaikh S L, Sun L, Kooten G C V. Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparison of empirical treatments[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,62(1):115-125. |
[9] | 苏红岩, 王华. 意愿调查法中的偏好不确定性研究综述[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(12):2327-2341. |
[ Su H Y, Wang H. A review of preference uncertainty in contingent valuation method[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2327-2341.] | |
[10] | Li C Z, Mattsson L. Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 1995,28(2):256-269. |
[11] | Loomis J, Ekstrand E. Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: The case of the Mexican spotted owl[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,27(1):29-41. |
[12] | Hanley N, Kristrom B, Shogren J. Coherent arbitrariness: On value uncertainty for environmental goods[J]. Land Economics, 2009,85(1):41-50. |
[13] | Mahieu P A, Riera P, Giergiczny M. The influence of cheap talk on willingness-to-pay ranges: Some empirical evidence from a contingent valuation study[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 2012,55(6):753-763. |
[14] | Champ P A, Bishop R C. Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001,19(4):383-402. |
[15] | Hanemann W M, Kriström B, Li C. Nonmarket Valuation under Preference Uncertainty: Econometric Models and Estimation[C]. Umea: The Annual Meeting of the European Association of Environmental & Resource Economists, 1995. |
[16] | Ready R C, Whitehead J C, Blomquist G C. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 1995,29(2):181-196. |
[17] | Voltaire L, Pirrone C, Bailly D, et al. Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013,88(3):76-85. |
[18] | Akter S, Bennett J, Akhter S. Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,67(3):345-351. |
[19] |
Wang H, He J, Kim Y, et al. Willingness-to-pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: An empirical test on the ordering effects of multiple-bounded discrete choices[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013,131:256-269.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.034 pmid: 24184528 |
[20] | Voltaire L, Donfouet H P P, Pirrone C, et al. Respondent uncertainty and ordering effect on willingness to pay for salt marsh conservation in the brest roadstead[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017,137:47-55. |
[21] | 张明军, 孙美平, 姚晓军, 等. 不确定性影响下的平均支付意愿参数估计[J]. 生态学报, 2007,27(9):3852-3859. |
[ Zhang M J, Sun M P, Yao X J, et al. Parameter estimation of average willingness to pay under uncertainty effect[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,27(9):3852-3859.] | |
[22] | 李国平, 赵媛, 邓广凌, 等. “引汉济渭”受水区居民支付意愿研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,38(2):1-10. |
[ Li G P, Zhao Y, Deng G L, et al. The households’ willingness-to-pay for Hanjiang-to-Weihe River valley water diversion project[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2018,38(2):1-10.] | |
[23] | 池源, 石洪华, 孙景宽, 等. 城镇化背景下海岛资源环境承载力评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(8):1374-1384. |
[ Chi Y, Shi H H, Sun J K, et al. Evaluation on island resources and environment carrying capacity under the background of urbanization[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(8):1374-1384.] | |
[24] | 平潭综合实验区管理委员会. 平潭综合实验区养殖水域滩涂规划[EB/OL]. ( 2017- 12- 27) [2019-04-25]. http://www.pingtan.gov.cn/jhtml/ct/ct_2927_68379. |
[ Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Area Administration Committee. Plans for the Use of Water Areas and Designates Water Areas and Tidal Flats[EB/OL]. ( 2017- 12- 27) [2019-04-25]. http://www.pingtan.gov.cn/jhtml/ct/ct_2927_68379. ] | |
[25] | Lyssenko N, Martínez-Espiñeira R. Respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: The case of whale conservation in Newfoundland and Labrador[J]. Applied Economics, 2012,44(15):1911-1930. |
[26] | Kobayashi M, Rollins K, Evans M D R. Sensitivity of WTP estimates to definition of ‘Yes’: Reinterpreting expressed response intensity[J]. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 2010,39:37-55. |
[27] | 徐大伟, 常亮, 侯铁珊, 等. 基于WTP和WTA的流域生态补偿标准测算: 以辽河为例[J]. 资源科学, 2012,34(7):1354-1361. |
[ Xu D W, Chang L, Hou T S, et al. Measure of watershed ecological compensation standard based on WTP and WTA: A case study in Liaohe River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2012,34(7):1354-1361.] | |
[28] | 黄勤, 林能锋, 游华, 等. 建立平潭中国鲎保护区刻不容缓[J]. 福建环境, 2002,19(6):14-16. |
[ Huang Q, Lin N F, You H, et al. Fujian Pingtan horseshoe crab special reserve highly demanded[J]. Fujian Environment, 2002,19(6):14-16.] | |
[29] | Welsh M P, Poe G L. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 1998,36(2):170-185. |
[30] | 平潭综合实验区统计局. 平潭综合实验区2017年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 05- 23) [2019-04-25]. http://www.pingtan.gov.cn/jhtml/ct/ct_2971_70795. |
[ Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Area Statistics Bureau. Pingtan Economy and Society Developed Statistical Bulletin 2017[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 05- 23) [2019-04-25]. http://www.pingtan.gov.cn/jhtml/ct/ct_2971_70795. ] |
|