灾后恢复重建规划实施评估研究进展

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.04.06

Abstract

Abstract:

With intensified human activities, natural disasters have become more frequent, and post-disaster recovery and reconstruction have received widespread attention. Recovery and reconstruction planning is an essential public policy to guide post-disaster recovery and reconstruction, and the evaluation of its implementation will help ensure the efficient implementation and the sustainable development of disaster areas. This article reviewed the current status of research by analyzing the progress in the assessment of the implementation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction planning and provides a basis for the construction of comprehensive assessment techniques. Combined with the analysis of theories, contents, and methods of the implementation evaluation of Chinese and international recovery and reconstruction planning, the authors compared and then summarized the experiences and deficiencies of various types of implementation evaluation. The results show that the current planning and implementation evaluations are mainly based on traditional planning, such as urban planning and land-use planning. Due to the characteristics of frequent natural disasters and social and economic fragility in disaster areas, implementation evaluation faces more challenges. Existing assessment methods mostly use traditional assessment theories and need to be integrated with theories of sustainable development and disaster economics to improve their theoretical systems. The evaluation content focuses more on infrastructure, ecological environment, and other physical aspects, but it needs to pay attention to social equity, cultural protection, and so on. During the evaluation phase, current ways pay more attention to the results rather than the process and impact. Furthermore, there are differences in the evaluation methods at various stages. Therefore, qualitative and quantitative methods need to be comprehensively applied. In the future, we need to design a full-stage evaluation process, build a comprehensive evaluation system, and conduct post-disaster sustainability assessments to improve the scientific nature of assessments. Comprehensively examining the results of the implementation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction planning will play an essential role in ensuring the recovery and reconstruction of disaster areas.

Key words: natural disaster, disaster prevention and reduction, post-disaster recovery and reconstruction plan, evaluation, sustainable development

ZHAO Liang, HE Fanneng. Research progress on the evaluation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction plan implementation[J].Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 661-671.

Figures/Tables 3

References 78

[1]	姚玉璧, 张强, 李耀辉 , 等. 干旱灾害风险评估技术及其科学问题与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2013,35(9):1884-1897.
	[ Yao Y B, Zhang Q, Li Y H , et al. Drought risk assessment technological progresses and problems[J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(9):1884-1897.]
[2]	邱建, 蒋蓉 . 关于构建地震灾后恢复重建规划体系的探讨: 以汶川地震为例[J]. 城市规划, 2009, ( 7):11-15.
	[ Qiu J, Jiang R . Exploration of building a planning system of post-earthquake reconstruction: A case study of Wenchuan earthquake[J]. City Planning Review, 2009, ( 7):11-15.]
[3]	汤青, 徐勇, 董晓辉 , 等. 芦山地震灾后重建地区土地资源安全评价[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(4):650-663.
	[ Tang Q, Xu Y, Dong X H , et al. Appraisal of land resources security in the post-earthquake reconstruction area of Lushan earthquake[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(4):650-663.]
[4]	Fan Z, Jian Q, Xiao H . The planning, organization and management of post-disaster reconstruction of the Lushan earthquake based on the local as the main body[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2016,30(1):131-144.
[5]	Lu Y, Xu J . The progress of emergency response and rescue in China: A comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes[J]. Natural Hazards, 2014,74(2):421-444.
[6]	沈山, 林立伟, 江国逊 . 城乡规划评估理论与实证研究[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2012.
	[ Shen S, Lin L W, Jiang G X. Theoretical and Empirical Research on Urban and Rural Planning Evaluation[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2012.]
[7]	王向东, 龚健 . “多规合一”视角下的中国规划体系重构[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2016, ( 2):88-95.
	[ Wang X D, Gong J . The reconstruction of the planning system in the perspective of “Multiple Plan Integration” in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2016, ( 2):88-95.]
[8]	和海霞 . 第二届多灾种预警大会: 从框架到行动[J]. 中国减灾, 2019, ( 21):60-63.
	[ He H X . The second multi-disaster warning conference: From framework to action[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2019, ( 21):60-63.]
[9]	范一大 . 我国灾害风险管理的未来挑战: 解读《2015-2030年仙台减轻灾害风险框架》[J]. 中国减灾, 2015, ( 4):18-21.
	[ Fan Y D . Future challenges of disaster risk management in China: Interpretation of 《The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030》[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2015, ( 4):18-21.]
[10]	Platt S, So E . Speed or deliberation: A comparison of post-disaster recovery in Japan, Turkey, and Chile[J]. Disasters, 2017,41(4):696-727.
[11]	Lu Y, Xu J P . Comparative study on the key issues of post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction planning: Lessons from the United States, Japan, Iran, and China[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2015, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000172.
[12]	王岱, 张文忠, 余建辉 , 等. 国外重大自然灾害区域重建规划的理念和启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010,29(10):1153-1161.
	[ Wang D, Zhang W Z, Yu J H , et al. Concept and inspiration from the plans of restoration and reconstruction in foreign countries for areas affected by large-scale natural disasters[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010,29(10):1153-1161.]
[13]	吴吉东 . 经济学视角的自然灾害损失评估理论与方法评述[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2018,27(3):190-198.
	[ Wu J D . Critical review on theory and method of natural disaster losses estimation: An economic perspective[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018,27(3):190-198.]
[14]	杨浩, 陈光燕, 庄天慧 , 等. 气象灾害对中国特殊类型地区贫困的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(4):676-689.
	[ Yang H, Chen G Y, Zhuang T H , et al. The effects of meteorological disaster on poverty in special areas of China[J]. Resources Science, 2016,38(4):676-689.]
[15]	黄承伟, 彭善朴 . 《汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划》实施社会影响评估[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2010.
	[ Huang C W, Peng S P. An Evaluation of the Social Impact of the Implementation of the Overall Plan for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2010.]
[16]	陈静, 杨旭光, 王静爱 . 巨灾后幸存者心理恢复力初步探究: 以1976年唐山地震为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2008,17(1):86-91.
	[ Chen J, Yang X G, Wang J A . Preliminary study on psychological resilience of survivor after a catastrophe: A case study of 1976 Tangshan earthquake[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2008,17(1):86-91.]
[17]	陈升, 罗桂连 . 汶川地震灾区受灾群众重建意愿实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010,20(1):55-60.
	[ Chen S, Luo G L . Disaster-affected population rebuilding-will and influencing factors Wenchuan earthquake[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010,20(1):55-60.]
[18]	张俊, 付业勤 . 国外灾后恢复重建的研究[J]. 聊城大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, ( 4):78-86.
	[ Zhang J, Fu Y Q . Review on study of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction in western countries[J]. Journal of Liaocheng University (Social Science Edition), 2013, ( 4):78-86.]
[19]	Haas J E, Kates R W, Bowden M J. Reconstruction Following Disaster[M]. Cambridge: MIT University Press, 1977.
[20]	Quarantelli E L. The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know and Do Not Know from Research[EB/OL].(2016-08-01) [2019-06-27]. http://dspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/309/PP%20286.pdf?sequence=1&is%20Allowed=y.
[21]	李程伟, 张永理 . 自然灾害类突发事件恢复重建政策体系研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2009.
	[ Li C W, Zhang Y L. Research on the Policy System of Natural Disaster Emergency Recovery and Reconstruction[M]. Beijing: China Society Press, 2009.]
[22]	Bryson K M, Millar H . Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,141(3):679-688.
[23]	谢盈盈 . 对汶川县灾后重建规划评估的思考[J]. 北京规划建设, 2012, ( 3):121-126.
	[ Xie Y Y . Reflections on planning and evaluation of post-disaster reconstruction in Wenchuan County[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2012, ( 3):121-126.]
[24]	张风华, 谢礼立, 范立础 . 城市防震减灾能力评估研究[J]. 地震学报, 2004,26(3):318-329.
	[ Zhang F H, Xie L L, Fan L C . Study on evaluation of cities ability reducing earthquake disasters[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2004,26(3):318-329.]
[25]	林立伟, 沈山, 江国逊 . 中国城市规划实施评估研究进展[J]. 规划师, 2010,26(3):14-18.
	[ Lin L W, Shen S, Jiang G X . Evaluating urban planning implementation: A research review[J]. Planners, 2010,26(3):14-18.]
[26]	Lindell M K . Recovery and reconstruction after disaster[J]. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, 2013,8:812-824.
[27]	Mejri O, Menoni S, Matias K , et al. Crisis information to support spatial planning in post disaster recovery[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017,22:46-61.
[28]	张兴 . 国内外规划评估理论与方法[J]. 中国土地, 2018, ( 11):49-50.
	[ Zhang X . Theories and methods of planning evaluation at home and abroad[J]. China Land, 2018, ( 11):49-50.]
[29]	吴江, 王选华 . 西方规划评估: 理论演化与方法借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 2013,37(1):90-96.
	[ Wu J, Wang X H . Western planning assessment: Evaluation of theory and methods for reference[J]. City Planning Review, 2013,37(1):90-96.]
[30]	Alexander E R . Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post postmodernist perspective[J]. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 2000,19(3):242-256.
[31]	Lichfield D. Community Impact Assessment and Planning. The Role of Objectives in Evaluation Design[A]. Voogd H. Recent Developments in Evaluation[M]. Groningen: Geo Press, 2001.
[32]	Healey P. The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implication for Spatial Strategy Formation[A]. Fischer F, Forester J. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Durham[C]. London: Duke University Press, 1993.
[33]	Enshassi A, Chatat T, Von Meding J , et al. Factors influencing post-disaster reconstruction project management for housing provision in the Gaza strip, occupied Palestinian territories[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017,8(4):402-414.
[34]	Faludi A. A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987.
[35]	Fan M F . Disaster governance and community resilience: Reflections on Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2015,58(1):24-38. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2013.839444
[36]	Faludi A, Korthals W . Evaluation Communicative Planning[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.
[37]	Miller D, Patassini D. Introduction: Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation[A]. Miller D, Patassini D. Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis, Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2005.
[38]	Horney J, Dwyer C, Aminto M , et al. Developing indicators to measure post-disaster community recovery in the United States[J]. Disasters, 2016, DOI: 10.1111/disa.12190.
[39]	Howes M, Tangney P, Reis K , et al. Towards networked governance: Improving interagency communication and collaboration fordisaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2015,58(5):757-776.
[40]	Peiser R . Does it pay to plan suburban growth?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1984,50(4):19-33.
[41]	冯健, 刘玉 . 中国城市规划公共政策展望[J]. 城市规划, 2008,32(4):33-40.
	[ Feng J, Liu Y . Prospect on public policy of urban planning in China[J]. City Planning Review, 2008,32(4):33-40.]
[42]	徐耀玲, 唐五湘, 吴秉坚 . 科技评估指标体系设计的原则及其应用研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2000, ( 2):48-51.
	[ Xu Y L, Tang W X, Wu B J . Design principle and application of S&T evaluation index system[J]. China Soft Science, 2000, ( 2):48-51.]
[43]	Mackee J, Haugen Askland H, Askew L . Recovering cultural built heritage after natural disasters[J]. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2014,5(2):202-212.
[44]	Khakee A . Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts[J]. Town Planning Review, 1998,69(4):359-374.
[45]	Berke P, Kaiser E. Urban Land Use Planning[M]. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2006.
[46]	Treasury H M. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government[M]. London: OGL Press, 2003.
[47]	Rossi P H, Freeman H E . Evaluation: A Systematic Approach[M]. Newbury Park: Sage, 1993.
[48]	Foley P, Hutchinson J, Fordham G . Managing the challenge: Winning and implementing the single regeneration budget fund[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 1998,13(1):63-80.
[49]	Ahmed I, Charlesworth E R . An evaluation framework for assessing resilience of post-disaster housing[J]. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2015,6(3):300-312.
[50]	Platt S, So E . Speed or deliberation: A comparison of post-disaster recovery in Japan, Turkey, and Chile[J]. Disasters, 2016, DOI: 10.1111/disa.12219.
[51]	杜静 . 对汶川震后恢复重建项目后评价工作的探讨[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009,26(21):156-159.
	[ Du J . Research on the post evaluation of restoring and reconstruction projects after Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2009,26(21):156-159.]
[52]	杨月巧, 迟宝明, 宴金旭 . 地震灾后恢复重建的综合后评价框架体系及实证分析: 以芦山县为例[J]. 地震, 2014,34(3):149-159.
	[ Yang Y Q, Chi B M, Yan J X . Empirical study of post-earthquake reconstruction evaluation frame: The case of Lushan County[J]. Earthquake, 2014,34(3):149-159.]
[53]	吴江, 王选华 . 西方规划评估: 理论演化与方法借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 2013,37(1):90-96.
	[ Wu J, Wang X H . Western planning assessment: Evaluation of theory and methods for reference[J]. City Planning Review, 2013,37(1):90-96.]
[54]	Lu R, Dudensing R M . Post-Ike economic resilience along the Texas coast[J]. Disasters, 2015,39(3):493-521. doi: 10.1111/disa.2015.39.issue-3
[55]	黄建文, 王东, 张瑞 , 等. 基于Euclid理论的震后恢复重建民用建筑工程质量评价[J]. 灾害学, 2016,31(1):11-16.
	[ Huang J W, Wang D, Zhang R , et al. Quality evaluation for post-earthquake civil building reconstruction based on gray Euclid theory[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2016,31(1):11-16.]
[56]	赵颖 . 四川灾区小城镇灾后恢复重建规划研究: 以彭州市通济镇、青川县乔庄镇为例[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2010.
	[ Zhao Y . Study on the Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Planning of Small Towns in Sichuan Province-Take the Tongji in Penzhou, Qiaozhuang in Qingchuan As the Examples[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2010.]
[57]	Nakamura H . Political and environmental attitude toward participatory energy and environmental governance: A survey in post-Fukushima Japan[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017,201:190-198.
[58]	Lebowitz A J . Cross-sectional data within 1? Year of the Fukushima meltdown: Effect-size of predictors for depression[J]. Community Mental Health Journal, 2015,52:94-101.
[59]	徐玖平, 吴敏, 马艳岚 . 汶川八级地震灾后新建社区现状分析与政策建议[J]. 软科学, 2008,22(11):76-80.
	[ Xu J P, Wu M, Ma Y L . The analysis of status quo and the political suggestions for the newly constructions of communities in Wenchuan post-earthquake[J]. Soft Science, 2008,22(11):76-80.]
[60]	刘利雄 . 汶川震后恢复重建城市公共空间规划设计研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015.
	[ Liu L X . A Study on the Planning of Public Space in Wenchuan’s Post-Earthquake Reconstruction[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2015.]
[61]	Guba E G, Lincoln Y S . Fourth Generation Evaluation[M]. Newburry Park: Sage Pubns, 1989.
[62]	Bobrow D B, Dryzek J S. Policy Analysis by Design[M]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987.
[63]	Faludi A, Korthals W . Evaluation Communicative Planning[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.
[64]	Faludi A . The performance of spatial planning[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 2000,15(4):299-318.
[65]	Talen E . After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1996,16:79-91.
[66]	Vahanvati M, Mulligan M . A new model for effective post-disaster housing reconstruction: Lessons from Gujarat and Bihar in India[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2017,35(5):802-817.
[67]	谢鑫 . 基于价值影响的历史文化村镇保护实施效果评估研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017.
	[ Xie X . Research on Value Influence-Based Implementation Effect Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Towns and Villages Conservation[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017.]
[68]	Tong Z, Zhang Q . Urban planning implementation evaluation: a multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach[J]. Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2016,10(1):200-211. doi: 10.2174/1874149501610010200
[69]	Taleai M, Mansourian A . Using Delphi-AHP method to survey major factors causing urban plan implementation failure[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2008,8(15):2746-2751.
[70]	Nilsson H, Nordstrom E, Ohman K , et al. Decision support for participatory forest planning using AHP and TOPSIS[J]. Forests, 2016,7(5):1-17.
[71]	周珂慧, 姜劲松 . 西方城市规划评估的研究述评[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2013, ( 1):104-109.
	[ Zhou K H, Jiang J S . A review of urban planning evaluation in the west[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2013, ( 1):104-109.]
[72]	Alterman R, Hill M . Implementation of urban land use Plan[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1978,33(3):274-285.
[73]	Calkins W . The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1979,11(7):745-758.
[74]	Boswell M R, Siembieda W J, Topping K C . Post-disaster assessment of the performance of hazard mitigation projects: The California SMART approach[J]. Journal of Disaster Research, 2010,5(2):172-179.
[75]	王卓 . 论参与式灾后重建的作用和影响[J]. 社会科学研究, 2018, ( 3):119-126.
	[ Wang Z . Discuss the role and impact of participatory post-disaster reconstruction[J]. Social Science Research, 2018, ( 3):119-126.]
[76]	张明阳, 王克林, 陈洪松 . 基于RS和GIS的喀斯特区域水土流失动态监测与分析: 以广西环江县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2007,29(3):124-131.
	[ Zhang M Y, Wang K L, Chen H S . Dynamic monitoring and analysis of water and soil erosion in the Karst region based on RS and GIS: A case study in Huanjiang County, Guangxi Province[J]. Resources Science, 2007,29(3):124-131.]
[77]	王劲峰, 葛咏, 李连发 , 等. 地理学时空数据分析方法[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(9):1326-1345.
	[ Wang J F, Ge Y, Li L F , et al. Spatiotemporal data analysis in geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(9):1326-1345.]
[78]	朱婧, 孙新章, 何正 . SDGs框架下中国可持续发展评价指标研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(12):9-18.
	[ Zhu J, Sun X Z, He Z . Research on China’s sustainable development evaluation indicators in the framework of SDGs[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(12):9-18.]

类型	评估阶段				评估属性
方法层面	①实施过程评估方法	②实施结果评估方法	③实施影响评估方法	④实施全程评估方法	①定量评估方法	②定性评估方法
操作层面	①指标对比法 ⑤层次分析法	②指标对比法 ⑥空间叠置法	③层次分析法 ⑦PIE方法	④德尔菲法 ⑧模糊评价法	①空间校核法 ③规划监控法	②自然反馈法 ④德尔菲法

Research progress on the evaluation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction plan implementation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 78

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YANG Ding, YANG Zhenshan. Ecological poverty and its influencing factors in an alpine area: Case study of the Selinco area [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 293-303.
[2]	LIU Jianhua, HUANG Liangchao, ZUO Qiting. Evaluation of harmonious development of economy-population-resource-environment in the lower reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 412-422.
[3]	SHAO Liuguo, LAN Tingting. Review of the by-product critical minerals resource security research and prospects [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(8): 1452-1463.
[4]	DONG Juan, ZHENG Minggui, ZHONG Changbiao. Effect of government financial support on the development of China’s rare earth industry and influencing factors [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(8): 1551-1565.
[5]	XU Xuegong, LIANG Ze, ZHOU Xin. Land and sea coordination for sustainable development in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 424-432.
[6]	LIU Shuguang, XU Yujie, WANG Jiayi. Relationship between river basin economic system opening-up and sustainable development:International experiences and implications for the Yellow River Basin high-quality development [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 433-445.
[7]	HE Zongfei, YU Jia, CHEN Yun, WEN Jiahong, YIN Zhan’e. Potential ecological suitability evaluation of urban construction land: A case study in Baoshan District, Shanghai [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 558-569.
[8]	CAO Jing, ZHANG Wenzhong, LIU Junjie. Delimiting urban development boundaries in metropolitan fringe with economic and ecological perspectives:A case study of Panyu District, Guangzhou City [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 262-273.
[9]	YU Haozhe, LI Lijuan, LI Jiuyi. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on quantity-quality-water bodies-flow [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 358-371.
[10]	YOU Zhen, FENG Zhiming, YANG Yanzhao, SHI Hui, LI Peng. Evaluation of human settlement environmental suitability in Tibet based on gridded data [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 394-406.
[11]	YANG Ling, CHANG Hsiao-Tung. Aged city built environment friendliness:Taking Taipei and New Taipei Cities as examples [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2406-2418.
[12]	LI Shuang, NIE Xin, ZHANG Anlu. Research progress on farmland ecological compensation mechanism based on ecosystem service evaluation [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2251-2260.
[13]	XU Hui, SHI Nuo, WU Lingling, ZHANG Dawei. High-quality development level and its spatiotemporal changes in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 115-126.
[14]	XIONG Chenran,WANG Limao,ZHANG Chao,QU Qiushi,XIANG Ning. Evaluation on energy geo-economics cooperation relations of Russia with China and Japan [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1665-1674.
[15]	ZHANG Liguo,WANG Zhanqi,WEI Chao,GAO Yunxiao. Rural revitalization strategy based on the perspective of rural multifunctions: A case of the mountainous areas in Yunyang District of Shiyan City,western Hubei Province [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1703-1713.