小尺度区域生态补偿标准的理论模型设计及测度

doi:10.18402/resci.2019.12.03

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the theory of environmental justice, this study examined the relationship between the odds ratio of land use transition and ecosystem service value to solve the problem of lack of socioeconomic statistics at a small scale. The results show that: (1) the theoretical model of payment for ecosystem services designed in this study can effectively solve the problem of lack of socioeconomic statistics at a small scale and determine the paying areas and receiving areas of payment for ecosystem services which are consistent with most parts of the key development areas and key ecological function areas in Hubei Province respectively. It verifies the reliability of model designed in this paper. (2) Ecological environment level is descending on the whole in the Hubei Province. The number of towns and total amount of payment for ecosystem services in Hubei Province showed an overall upward trend, while receiving towns’ are reverse. The total amount of payment for ecosystem services and reception of ecological compensation are RMB 1.725 billion yuan and 2.954 billion yuan, respectively, in Hubei Province in 2015. In addition, the spatial pattern of paying areas and receiving areas of payment for ecosystem services basically remains unchanged, but there are a little of changes in local areas.The theoretical model of payment for ecosystem services designed in this paper can provide a solution to the spatial ecological imbalance at small scale.

Key words: payment for ecosystem services, environmental justice, ecosystem service value, theoretical model, small scale, Hubei Province

DING Zhenmin, YAO Shunbo. Model and measurement of payment for ecosystem services at small scale[J].Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2182-2192.

Figures/Tables 5

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 2

References 32

[1]	李国平, 王奕淇, 张文彬 . 区域分工视角下的生态补偿研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2016,30(1):12-18.
	[ Li G P, Wang Y Q, Zhang W B . A study of ecological compensation from the perspective of regional division[J]. East China Economic Management, 2016,30(1):12-18.]
[2]	丁振民, 姚顺波 . 区域生态补偿均衡定价机制及其理论框架研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(9):99-108.
	[ Ding Z M, Yao S B . Research on the equilibrium pricing mechanism and theoretical framework of regional ecological compensation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(9):99-108.]
[3]	文兰娇, 张晶晶 . 国土空间管制、土地非均衡发展与外部性研究: 回顾与展望[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015,29(7):4-12.
	[ Wen L J, Zhang J J . Progress and trends of land spatial regulation, unbalanced development and spatial externalities[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(7):4-12.]
[4]	金贵, 邓祥征, 张倩 , 等. 武汉城市圈国土空间综合功能分区[J]. 地理研究, 2017,36(3):514-552.
	[ Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhang Q , et al. Comprehensive function zoning of national land space for Wuhan metropolitan region[J]. Geographical Research, 2017,36(3):514-552.]
[5]	国务院办公厅. 关于健全生态保护补偿机制的意见[EB/OL]. ( 2016- 05- 13) [2019-02-20]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/13/content_5073049.htm.
	[ General Office of the State Council. Opinions on Perfecting the Compensation Mechanism of Ecological Protection[EB/OL]. ( 2016- 05- 13) [2019-02-20]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/13/content_5073049.htm.]
[6]	中共中央国务院. 关于建立更加有效的区域协调发展新机制的意见[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 11- 18) [2019-02-20]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-11/29/content_5344537.htm.
	[ Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Views on the Establishment of a New Mechanism for More Effective Regional Coordinated Development[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 11- 18) [2019-02-20]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-11/29/content_5344537.htm.]
[7]	李国平, 李潇 . 国家重点生态功能区的生态补偿标准、支付额度与调整目标[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,37(2):1-9.
	[ Li G P, Li X . Ecological compensation standard, payment amount and adjustment target in national key ecological function areas[J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2017,37(2):1-9.]
[8]	Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S . Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):663-674. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
[9]	Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J , et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009,106(5):1305-1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106 pmid: 19179280
[10]	张成福, 聂国良 . 环境正义与可持续性公共治理[J]. 行政论坛, 2019,26(1):93-100.
	[ Zhang C F, Nie G L . Environmental justice and sustainable public governance[J]. Administrative Tribune, 2019,26(1):93-100.]
[11]	王泽琳, 张如良, 吴欢 . 跨流域调水的公正问题: 基于环境正义的分析视角[J]. 中国环境管理, 2019,11(2):101-105.
	[ Wang Z L, Zhang R L, Wu H . The justice of inter-basin water transfer based on environmental justice perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,11(2):101-105.]
[12]	Ferraro P J . Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):810-821. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029
[13]	刘春腊, 刘卫东, 陆大道 , 等. 2004-2011年中国省域生态补偿差异分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(12):1897-1910. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512004
	[ Liu C L, Liu W D, Lu D D , et al. China’s provincial eco-compensation difference in 2004-2011[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(12):1897-1910.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512004
[14]	潘竟虎 . 甘肃省区域生态补偿标准测度[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014,33(12):3286-3294.
	[ Pan J H . Regional eco-compensation standard in Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014,33(12):3286-3294.]
[15]	陈源泉, 高旺盛 . 基于生态经济学理论与方法的生态补偿量化研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007,27(4):165-170.
	[ Chen Y Q, Gao W S . How to determine the payment amount of ecological compensation: Based on the theories and methods of ecological economics[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2007,27(4):165-170.]
[16]	杨璐迪, 曾晨, 焦利民 , 等. 基于生态足迹的武汉城市圈生态承载力评价和生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017,26(9):1332-1341.
	[ Yang L D, Zeng C, Jiao L M , et al. Evaluation on ecological carrying capacity and ecological compensation of Wuhan urban agglomeration based on ecological footprint[J]. Resources and Environment in Yangtze Basin, 2017,26(9):1332-1341.]
[17]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 林静 , 等. 远程耦合视角下的土地利用/覆被变化解释[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(3):421-431. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201903002
	[ Ma E P, Cai J M, Lin J , et al. Explanation of land use/cover change from the perspective of tele-coupling[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):421-431.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201903002
[18]	Beh E, Tran D, Hudson I . A reformulation of the aggregate association index using the odds ratio[J]. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2013,68:52-65. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912500117 pmid: 31882445
[19]	陈强 . 高级计量经济学及Stata运用(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014.
	[ Chen Q. Advanced Econometrics and Stata Application (2nd Edition)[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014.]
[20]	Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J , et al. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2001,11(4):261-269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
[21]	Reid W V, Mooney H A, Cropper A , et al. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
[22]	丁振民, 姚顺波 . 陕西省耕地转移对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(6):1070-1081. doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.06
	[ Ding Z M, Yao S B . Effects of cultivated land transition on ecosystem service value in Shaanxi Province of China[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(6):1070-1081.] doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.06
[23]	Farley J, Costanza R . Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(11):2060-2068. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.026 pmid: 31593660
[24]	孙璇, 曾菊新, 陈四云 , 等. 顾及生态损益的生态补偿支付次序研究: 以湖北省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018,38(5):170-178.
	[ Sun X, Zeng J X, Chen S Y , et al. Ecological compensation payment order with considering the ecological profit and loss: The case of Hubei Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(5):170-178.]
[25]	湖北省人民政府. 关于建立健全生态保护补偿机制的实施意见[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 02- 12) [2019-06-30]. http://www.hubei.gov.cn/govfile/ezbf/201803/t20180306_1259441.shtml.
	[ People’s Government of Hubei Province. Implementation Opinions on Establishing and Improving the Compensation Mechanism for Ecological Protection[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 02- 12) [2019-06-30]. http://www.hubei.gov.cn/govfile/ezbf/201803/t20180306_1259441.shtml.]
[26]	Daily G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington: Island Press, 1997.
[27]	Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R , et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[28]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞 , 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
	[ Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X , et al. Expert knowledge-based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
[29]	熊鹰, 张方明, 龚长安 , 等. LUCC影响下湖南省生态系统服务价值时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018,27(6):1397-1408.
	[ Xiong Y, Zhang F M, Gong C A , et al. Spatial-temporal evolvement of ecosystem service value in Hunan Province based on LUCC[J]. Resources and Environment in Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(6):1397-1408.]
[30]	刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥 , 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(1):3-14. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401001
	[ Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X , et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(1):3-14.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201401001
[31]	中国知网. 全国农产品成本收益汇编[EB/OL]. ( 2015- 07- 30) [2019-06-30]. http://cyfd.cnki.com.cn/N2015100281.htm.
	[ CNKI. A Compilation of Costs and Benefits of Agricultural Products in China[EB/OL]. ( 2015- 07- 30) [2019-06-30]. http://cyfd.cnki.com.cn/N2015100281.htm.]
[32]	崔家兴, 顾江, 孙建伟 , 等. 湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018,32(8):67-73.
	[ Cui J X, Gu J, Sun J W , et al. The spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of the production, living and ecological space in Hubei Province[J]. China Land Science, 2018,32(8):67-73.]

生态系统服务	耕地	林地	草地	水域	未利用地
气体交换	1451.95	8711.71	3024.90	1028.46	120.99
气候调节	1956.10	8207.56	3145.89	4154.19	262.16
水源涵养	1552.78	8247.90	3065.23	37851.57	141.16
土壤形成与保护	2964.40	8106.73	4517.19	826.80	342.82
废物处理	2803.08	3468.55	2661.91	29946.50	524.31
生物多样性保护	2056.93	9094.86	3771.04	6916.93	806.64
食物生产	2016.60	665.48	867.14	1068.80	40.33
原材料	786.48	6009.46	725.97	705.81	80.67
娱乐休闲	342.82	4194.52	1754.44	54.32	483.99
生态价值系数（vc_k）	15931.13	56706.78	23533.71	82553.41	2803.07

变量	平均值	标准差	变量	平均值	标准差
生态系统服务价值/（元/hm²）	36209.8400	12162.3400	生态系统服务价值预测值/（元/hm²）	36209.8400	11888.3600
耕地?林地	0.0020	0.0076	水域?耕地	0.0013	0.0044
耕地?草地	0.0001	0.0011	水域?林地	0.0002	0.0014
耕地?水域	0.0049	0.0187	水域?草地	0.0001	0.0009
耕地?城乡建设用地	0.0067	0.0188	水域?城乡建设用地	0.0006	0.0072
耕地?未利用地	0.0001	0.0046	水域?未利用地	0.0004	0.0053
林地?耕地	0.0015	0.0049	城乡建设用地?耕地	0.0005	0.0017
林地?草地	0.0003	0.0024	城乡建设用地?林地	0.0001	0.0005
林地?水域	0.0005	0.0027	城乡建设用地?草地	0.0000	0.0003
林地?城乡建设用地	0.0014	0.0064	城乡建设用地?水域	0.0001	0.0017
林地?未利用地	0.0000	0.0001	城乡建设用地?未利用地	0.0000	0.0002
草地?耕地	0.0001	0.0011	未利用地?耕地	0.0001	0.0011
草地?林地	0.0004	0.0037	未利用地?林地	0.0000	0.0002
草地?水域	0.0001	0.0016	未利用地?草地	0.0000	0.0002
草地?城乡建设用地	0.0001	0.0015	未利用地?水域	0.0004	0.0051
草地?未利用地	0.0000	0.0002	未利用地?城乡建设用地	0.0000	0.0003

因变量（mesv）	耕地	林地	草地	水域	城乡建设用地	未利用地
耕地		36311.59***	8611.71***	53557.49***	-15046.09***	-9976.263***
		（820.44）	（2962.85）	（2165.607）	（414.65）	（168.49）
林地	-35915.70***		-30989.27***	28432.11***	-52957.22***	-25369.63
	（678.41）		（437.01）	（1591.90）	（626.46）	（24947.57）
草地	-5178.58***	29132.29***		53889.42***	-18243.26***	14013.88
	（1115.16）	（911.26）		（1698.02）	（2567.06）	（33226.39）
水域	-62367.20***	-23438.73***	-55290.88***		-61248.94***	-67807.95***
	（956.25）	（1095.85）	（3781.89）		（2660.60）	（2285.99）
城乡建设用地	17861.14***	61123.03***	20135.36***	75833.52***		4785.21
	（2765.41）	（5514.32）	（3532.27）	（1290.80）		（7973.45）
未利用地	13326.36***	51208.36***	21591.72***	66087.02***	-12238.34
	（1453.19）	（4978.31）	（4656.96）	（3067.86）	（10555.73）

Model and measurement of payment for ecosystem services at small scale

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SHAN Yuhong, WANG Linna. Path analysis of farming household differentiation on the diversification of farmland function supply [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1405-1415.
[2]	MENG Yangyang, HE Zhibin, LIU Bing, CHEN Longfei, LIU Bei. Changes of spatial distribution and ecosystem service value of oasis wetlands in arid areas: Taking three typical inland river basins as examples [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(10): 2022-2034.
[3]	ZHANG Liguo,WANG Zhanqi,WEI Chao,GAO Yunxiao. Rural revitalization strategy based on the perspective of rural multifunctions: A case of the mountainous areas in Yunyang District of Shiyan City,western Hubei Province [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1703-1713.
[4]	Yongliang BAI,Aoxing CHENG,Jinhua CHENG. Willingness of public participation in water ecological civilization construction:Based on questionnaire surveys from five pilot cities [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1427-1437.
[5]	Yongqing WANG,Laifeng WANG,Hongxing DENG,Kai DONG. Influencing factors and performance evaluation of green mining in Hubei Province [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1513-1525.
[6]	Fenni LI, Junbiao ZHANG, Ke HE. Impact of informal institutions and environmental regulations on farmers’ green production behavior: Based on survey data of 1105 households in Hubei Province [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1227-1239.
[7]	Wenxiong WANG, Zhiqiang LIU. Differences in farming households’ cognition of ownership adjustment benefits in rural land consolidation and causes [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1329-1338.
[8]	Yiqi WANG, Guoping LI, Buqing YAN. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1013-1023.
[9]	Zhenmin DING, Shunbo YAO. Effects of cultivated land transition on ecosystem service value in Shaanxi Province of China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1070-1081.
[10]	Lihong YU. Effects of rural pro-poor tourism on farming households’ income: A study based on the PSM-DID method [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 955-966.
[11]	Luyi TONG, Shougeng HU. Multi-level urban land expansion characterization using spatiotemporal statistics for Hunan, Hubei and Jiangxi [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(6): 1175-1185.
[12]	Weizhen YU, Xiaofeng LUO, Rongrong LI, Longfei XUE, Lei HUANG. The paradox between farmer willingness and their adoption of green technology from the perspective of green cognition [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(8): 1573-1583.
[13]	Chengxiang ZHANG, Jinhua SUN, Wei WANG, Zhe ZHANG. Ecosystem service values and ecological costs of urban road green space in Yongjia County under different management modes [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(3): 522-532.
[14]	Yuhong SHAN, Feng ZHU, Mengjiao LIU. Structural regulation countermeasures of planting industry production factors for counties in Hubei according to three-stage DEA modeling [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(2): 367-377.
[15]	HAN Guosheng,LI Hui. Community reactions to tourism development：a review of theoretical models [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(9): 1643-.