环境关心和制度信任对农户参与农村生活垃圾治理意愿的影响

doi:10.18402/resci.2019.08.10

Abstract

Abstract:

Rural domestic waste treatment is an important part of the overall improvement of rural living environment, and its effectiveness is closely related to the participation of the waste producer and direct beneficiary of the governance effect - farmers. Based on the household survey data of rural areas in Shaanxi Province, this study used the double-column model (DHM) to analyze and investigate the influence of environmental concern on the farmers’ willingness to participate in treatment (willingness to participate and willingness to pay) in rural domestic waste treatment. Using hierarchical regression analysis, the moderating effect of institutional trust on the relationship between environmental concern and farmers’ willingness to pay was studied. The results show that environmental concern has a significant positive effect on farmers' willingness to participate and pay;institutional trust not only significantly promotes the willingness to participate and pay of farmers, but also has a significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between environmental concern and payment willingness to pay of farmers. For farmers with high institutional trust, environmental concern plays a stronger role in promoting their participation. In addition, years of education and the number of family members positively affect the willingness of farmers to participate, and the willingness to participate in waste treatment of families with higher income is relatively stronger. Therefore, improving farmers’ awareness of environmental issues, adjusting regulations to increase their acceptance by farmers, and creating a good environment of institutional trust will facilitate promoting rural domestic waste treatment.

Key words: rural domestic waste treatment, willingness to participate, willingness to pay, environmental concern, institutional trust, moderating effect, Shaanxi Province

Yajuan JIA,Minjuan ZHAO. The influence of environmental concern and institutional trust on farmers’ willingness to participate in rural domestic waste treatment[J].Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1500-1512.

Figures/Tables 5

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 2

References 61

[1]	搜狐网. 既有困境又有前景农村垃圾处理提振乡村振兴[EB/OL]. ( 2018 -10-19) [2019-03-12]. https://www.sohu.com/a/2700 22172_233642.
	[ Sohu Net Both Plight and Prospects of Rural Garbage Treatment to Boost Rural Revitalization[EB/OL]. ( 2018 -10-19) [2019-03-12]. https://www.sohu.com/a/2700 22172_233642.]
[2]	贾亚娟, 赵敏娟, 夏显力 , 等. 农村生活垃圾分类处理模式与建议[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(2):338-351.
	[ Jia Y J, Zhao M J, Xia X L , et al. Mode of classified treatment of rural domestic wastes and development suggestions[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(2):338-351.]
[3]	崔亚飞 , Bluemling B. 农户生活垃圾处理行为的影响因素及其效应研究: 基于拓展的计划行为理论框架[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018,32(4):37-42.
	[ Cui Y F, Bluemling B . Research on the influencing factors and effects of household waste disposal behavior: Based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018,32(4):37-42.]
[4]	中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中央农办、农业农村部等18部门关于印发《农村人居环境整治村庄清洁行动方案》的通知[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 12- 29) [2019-01-29]. http://www.cpad.gov.cn/art/2019/1/29/art_50_93521.html.
	[ Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Office of the Central Leading Group for Rural Work Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and other 18 Departments Issued a Notice of the Ministry on the Issuance of the Action Plan on Village Cleaning for the Improvement of Rural Living Environment [EB/OL]. ( 2018- 12- 29) [2019-01-29]. http://www.cpad.gov.cn/art/2019/1/29/art_50_93521.html.]
[5]	曾小溪, 曾福生 . 农村居民参与环境保护的困境与出路[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,13(2):27-31.
	[ Zeng X X, Zeng F S . Difficulties and prospect for rural residents participating in environmental protection[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Science), 2012,13(2):27-31.]
[6]	李丽丽, 李文秀, 栾胜基 . 中国农村环境自主治理模式探索及实践研究[J]. 生态经济(中文版), 2013, ( 11):166-169.
	[ Li L L, Li W X, Luan S J . Exploration and empirical study on Chinese self-governance pattern of rural environment[J]. Ecological Economy, 2013, ( 11):166-169.]
[7]	苗珊珊 . 社会资本多维异质性视角下农户小型水利设施合作参与行为研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(12):46-54.
	[ Miao S S . Farmers’ small-scale irrigation facilities participative behavior under multi-dimensional social capital perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(12):46-54.]
[8]	李冰冰, 王曙光 . 农村公共品供给、农户参与和乡村治理: 基于12省1447农户的调查[J]. 经济科学, 2014,36(6):116-128.
	[ Li B B, Wang S G . Rural public goods supply, peasant household participation and rural governance: Based on a survey of 1447 peasant households in 12 provinces[J]. Economic Science, 2014,36(6):116-128.]
[9]	汪旭, 刘桂芝 . 农户参与农村公共产品供给: 方式、前提条件与实现路径[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2014,28(5) : 61-66.
	[ Wang X, Liu G Z . Farmers’ participation in the supply of rural public goods: Ways, preconditions and realization paths[J]. Huxiang Forum, 2014,28(5):61-66.]
[10]	蔡起华, 朱玉春 . 农户参与农村公共产品供给意愿分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, ( 3):45-51.
	[ Cai Q H, Zhu Y C . An analysis of farmers’ supplying willingness to participate rural public goods[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2014, ( 3):45-51.]
[11]	钱文荣, 应一逍 . 农户参与农村公共基础设施供给的意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014, ( 11):39-51.
	[ Qian W R, Ying Y D . An analysis of farmers’ supplying willingness to participate in rural public infrastructure supply and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014, ( 11):39-51.]
[12]	季湘铭 . 发达地区农户参与农民专业合作社的意愿及满意度的影响因素分析: 以浙江省温州市为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010.
	[ Ji X M . A Study on the Influence of Farmers’ Participation Desire and Satisfaction in Farmer Specialized Cooperatives in Developed Areas: A Case of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010.]
[13]	蔡荣, 韩洪云 . 农户参与合作社的行为决策及其影响因素分析: 以山东省苹果种植户为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2012, ( 5):32-40.
	[ Cai R, Han H Y . An analysis on the behavioral decision-making of farmers’ participation in cooperatives and its influencing factors: A case study of apple farmers in Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Rural Survey, 2012, ( 5):32-40.]
[14]	吴昭雄 . 农业机械化投资行为与效益研究: 以湖北省为例[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
	[ Wu Z X . Study on Investment Behavior and Benefit of Agricultural Mechanization: The Case Study of Hubei Province[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013.]
[15]	罗小娟, 冯淑怡, 石晓平 , 等. 太湖流域农户环境友好型技术采纳行为及其环境和经济效应评价: 以测土配方施肥技术为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(11):1891-1902. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.11.006
	[ Luo X J, Feng S Y, Shi X P , et al. Farm households’ adoption behavior of environment friendly technology and the evaluation of their environmental and economic effects in Taihu Basin: Taking formula fertilization by soil testing technology as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(11):1891-1902.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.11.006
[16]	汪文雄, 杨海霞 . 农地整治权属调整中农户参与的行为机理研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, ( 5):108-116.
	[ Wang W X, Yang H X . Study on the behavior mechanism of farmers’ participation in property right adjustment in land consolidation[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, ( 5):108-116.]
[17]	Dunlap R E, Robert E J. Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues[M]. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2002.
[18]	杨曙辉, 宋天庆, 陈怀军 , 等. 中国农村垃圾污染问题试析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010,115(20):405-408.
	[ Yang S H, Song T Q, Chen H J , et al. The analysis of garbage pollution in rural China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010,115(20):405-408.]
[19]	何可, 张俊飚, 张露 , 等. 人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿: 以农业废弃物资源化为例[J]. 管理世界, 2015, ( 5):75-88.
	[ He K, Zhang J B, Zhang L , et al. Interpersonal trust, institutional trust and farmers’ willingness to participate in environmental governance: A case study of agricultural waste resources[J]. Management World, 2015, ( 5):75-88.]
[20]	王莎, 马俊杰, 赵丹 , 等. 农村生活垃圾问题及其污染防治对策[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014, ( 1):148-151.
	[ Wang S, Ma J J, Zhao D , et al. Problems of rural household waste and countermeasures for controlling their pollution[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, ( 1):148-151.]
[21]	吴高辉 . 合作治理视角下的农村垃圾问题研究: 以麻城市夫子河镇村组为例[J]. 中山大学研究生学刊 (人文社会科学版), 2015,36(4):114-126.
	[ Wu G H . Study on rural garbage problems under the perspective of cooperative governance: Taking villages of Confucius town in Macheng as an example[J]. Journal of the Graduates Sun Yat-Sen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2015,36(4):114-126.]
[22]	马文斌 . 循环经济视域下我国西部农村生活垃圾处理相关问题探析[J]. 唐山师范学院学报, 2016,38(3) : 112-116.
	[ Ma W B . The household garbage disposal problems in western rural areas from the perspective of circular economy[J]. Journal of Tangshan Normal University, 2016,38(3):112-116.]
[23]	李莹, 白墨, 张巍 , 等. 改善北京市大气环境质量中居民支付意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2002,12(6):125-128.
	[ Li Y, Bai M, Zhang W , et al. Analysis on the influence factors of residents’ willingness to pay for improving air quality in Beijing[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2002,12(6):125-128.]
[24]	蔡志坚, 张巍巍 . 南京市公众对长江水质改善的支付意愿及支付方式的调查[J]. 生态经济(中文版), 2007, ( 2):116-119.
	[ Cai Z J, Zhang W W . On the willingness to pay for water quality improvement of Yangtze River and payment mechanism in Nanjing Area[J]. Ecological Economy (Chinese Version), 2007, ( 2):116-119.]
[25]	池上新, 陈诚, 许英 . 环境关心与环保支付意愿: 政府信任的调节效应: 兼论环境治理的困境[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,17(5):72-79.
	[ Chi S X, Chen C, Xu Y . Environmental concern and willingness to pay for environmental protection: Moderating effects of governmental trust: Concurrent discussions on environmental governance dilemma[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 2017,17(5):72-79.]
[26]	Choi M S, Kim Y . Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern and PCE[J]. Advances in Consumer Research, 2005,32(1):592-599.
[27]	刘贤伟, 吴建平 . 大学生环境价值观与亲环境行为: 环境关心的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013,11(6):780-785.
	[ Liu X W, Wu J P . Environmental values and pro-environmental behaviors of college students: Mediating role of environmental concern[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013,11(6):780-785.]
[28]	盛光华, 庞英, 张志远 . 生态红线约束下环境关心对绿色消费意图的传导机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2016,30(4):85-88.
	[ Sheng G H, Pang Y, Zhang Z Y . Research on environmental concern’s transmission mechanism to green consumption intention under restrictions of ecological red line[J]. Soft Science, 2016,30(4):85-88.]
[29]	洪学婷, 张宏梅 . 国外环境责任行为研究进展及对中国的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(12):1459-1471.
	[ Hong X T, Zhang H M . Progress of environmentally responsible behavior research and its enlightenment to China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(12):1459-1471.]
[30]	Santos G, Fraser G . Road pricing: Lessons from London[J]. Economic Policy, 2006,21(46):263-310.
[31]	Diepen A V, Voogd H . Sustainability and planning: Does urban form matter?[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2001,4(1):59-74.
[32]	王建明 . 资源节约意识对资源节约行为的影响: 中国文化背景下一个交互效应和调节效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2013, ( 8):77-90.
	[ Wang J M . The influence of resource conservation consciousness on resource conservation behavior: A model of interaction effect and adjustment effect under the background of Chinese culture[J]. Management World, 2013, ( 8):77-90.]
[33]	Guangnano G A, Stern P C, Dietz T . Influences of attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling[J]. Environment & Behavior, 1995,27(5):699-718.
[34]	李佳, 杨燕绥 . “新农保”制度信任机制构建的社会治理研究[J]. 社会保障研究, 2018, ( 1):3-12.
	[ Li J, Yang Y X . The research on social governance of the trust mechanism of “the new rural pension insurance system”[J]. Social Security Studies, 2018, ( 1):3-12.]
[35]	Ajzen I . The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1991,50(2):179-211.
[36]	Schwartz S H . Normative influences on altruism 1[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1977,10:221-279.
[37]	Stern P C, Dietz T, Kalof L , et al. Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1995,25(18):1611-1636.
[38]	Dunlap R E , Liere K D V, Mertig A G, et al. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2000,56(3):425-442.
[39]	Steg L, Viek C . Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009,29(3):309-317.
[40]	Hawcroft L J, Milfont T L . The use(and abuse)of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010,30(2):143-158.
[41]	Catton J, William R, Dunlap R E . Environmental sociology: A new paradigm[J]. American Sociologist, 1978,13(1):41-49.
[42]	Chung S, Poon C . The attitudes of Guangzhou citizens on waste reduction and environmental issues[J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 1999,25(1):35-59.
[43]	Stern P C . New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2002,56(3):407-424.
[44]	洪大用 . 环境关心的测量: NEP量表在中国的应用评估[J]. 社会, 2006,26(5):71-92.
	[ Hong D Y . Measurement of environmental concern: Application evaluation of NEP scale in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2006,26(5):71-92.]
[45]	洪大用, 晨阳 . 环境友好的社会基础:中国市民环境关心与行为的实证研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
	[ Hong D Y, Chen Y. The Social Basis of Environmental Friendliness: An Empirical Study of Environmental Concerns and Behaviors of Chinese Citizens[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2012.]
[46]	洪大用, 叶超, 晨阳 . 检验环境关心量表的中国版(CNEP): 基于CGSS2010数据的再分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2014, ( 4):49-72.
	[ Hong D Y, Ye C, Chen Y . Examining the Chinese version of the environmental concern (CNEP): Based on the reanalysis of CGSS2010 data[J]. Sociological Studies, 2014, ( 4):49-72.]
[47]	张苙芸, 谭康荣 . 制度信任的趋势与结构“多重等级评量”的分析策略[J]. 台湾社会学刊, 2005, ( 35):75-126.
	[ Zhang L Y, Tan K R . The trend and structure of institutional trust: An analytical strategy of “multiple ratings”[J]. Taiwan Society Journal, 2005, ( 35):75-126.]
[48]	Sonia S M G . Trust, satisfaction, relational norms, opportunism and dependence as antecedents of employee organizational commitment[J]. Contaduría Y Administración, 2013,58(2):11-38.
[49]	Herb S, Hartmann E . Opportunism risk in service triads: A social capital perspective[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2014,44(3):242-256.
[50]	Musso J A, Weare C . From participatory reform to social capital: Micro-motives and the macro-structure of civil society networks[J]. Public Administration Review, 2015,75(1):150-164.
[51]	Letki N . Investigating the roots of civic morality: Trust, social capital, and institutional performance[J]. Political Behavior, 2006,28(4):305-325.
[52]	陕西省统计局. 陕西统计年鉴2018[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
	[ Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook 2018[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2018.]
[53]	颜廷武, 张童朝, 何可 , 等. 作物秸秆还田利用的农民决策行为研究: 基于皖鲁等七省的调查[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017,38(4):39-48.
	[ Yan T W, Zhang T C, He K , et al. Study on farmers’ decision behavior of crop straw recycling of returning to field: Based on farmers’ survey of seven provinces[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017,38(4):39-48.]
[54]	徐志刚, 张炯, 仇焕广 . 声誉诉求对农户亲环境行为的影响研究: 以家禽养殖户污染物处理方式选择为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016,26(10):44-52.
	[ Xu Z G, Zhang J, Qiu H G . Effects of reputation demands on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior: Taking the farmers’ disposal behavior of poultry waste as an example[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016,26(10):44-52.]
[55]	郭利京, 赵瑾 . 非正式制度与农户亲环境行为: 以农户秸秆处理行为为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(11):69-75.
	[ Guo L J, Zhao J . Informal institutions and farmers pro-environmental behavior: As an example of the farmers’ straw processing behavior[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(11):69-75.]
[56]	史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞 , 等. 社会资本对农户参与流域生态治理行为的影响: 以黑河流域为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018, ( 1):34-45.
	[ Shi H T, Sui D C, Wu H X , et al. The influence of social capital on farmers’ participation in watershed ecological management behavior: Evidence from Heihe Basin[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, ( 1):34-45.]
[57]	Cragg J G . Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods[J]. Econometrica, 1971,39(5):829-844.
[58]	谢先雄, 李晓平, 赵敏娟 , 等. 资本禀赋如何影响牧民减畜: 基于内蒙古372户牧民的实证考察[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(9):1730-1741.
	[ Xie X X, Li X P, Zhao M J , et al. How does capital endowment affect herdsman to reduce livestock: An empirical analysis based on 372 herdsmen in Inner Mongolia[J]. Resources Science, 2018,40(9):1730-1741.]
[59]	温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷 . 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报, 2005,37(2):268-274.
	[ Wen Z L, Hou J T, Zhang L . A comparison of moderator and mediator their applications[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2005,37(2):268-274.]
[60]	中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅. 农村人居环境整治三年行动方案[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 02- 05) [2019-01-28]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-02/05/content_5264056. htm.
	[ General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Three-year Action Plan for Improving the Living Environment in Rural Areas[EB/OL]. ( 2018- 02- 05) [2019-01-28]. http://www. gov. cn/zhengce/2018-02/05/content_5264056. htm.]
[61]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部办公厅. 关于开展第一批农村生活垃圾分类和资源化利用示范工作的通知[EB/OL]. ( 2017- 06- 06) [2019-01-28]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201706/t20170609_232148.html.
	[ Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the First Batch of Demonstration Work on the Classification and Utilization of Rural Household Garbage [EB/OL]. ( 2017- 06- 06) [2019-01-28]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201706/t20170609_ 232148. html.]

支付意愿（WTP）/元	绝对频次/人	相对频度/%	调整频度/%	累计频度/%
WTP<10	141	27.59	37.60	37.60
10≤WTP<20	96	18.79	25.60	63.20
20≤WTP<30	40	7.83	10.67	73.87
30≤WTP<40	26	5.09	6.93	80.80
40≤WTP<50	38	7.44	10.13	90.96
50≤WTP<60	19	3.72	5.07	96.03
60≤WTP<70	14	2.74	3.73	99.73
WTP≥70	1	0.20	0.27	100.00

	模型1		模型2		模型3
	参与意愿	支付意愿	参与意愿	支付意愿	参与意愿	支付意愿
性别	-0.137 （0.141）	-9.262 （6.209）	-0.119 （0.142）	-8.965 （6.068）	-0.120 （0.142）	-9.372 （5.947）
年龄	0.011 （0.007）	0.517 （0.377）	0.009 （0.008）	0.427 （0.364）	0.009 （0.008）	0.370 （0.353）
受教育年限	0.125*** （0.028）	0.409 （1.281）	0.138*** （0.029）	0.799 （1.254）	0.136*** （0.029）	0.794 （1.218）
是否党员或村干部	-0.139 （0.222）	-2.909 （9.159）	-0.176 （0.225）	-4.464 （8.976）	-0.170 （0.225）	-4.356 （8.736）
家庭人口数	0.187*** （0.058）	2.895 （2.743）	0.179*** （0.059）	4.295 （2.829）	0.181*** （0.058）	4.632* （2.772）
家庭年收入	0.035 （0.055）	14.547*** （3.366）	0.037 （0.056）	14.079*** （3.232）	0.037 （0.056）	13.620*** （3.106）
关中地区	-0.001 （0.154）	0.933 （6.689）	0.008 （0.156）	0.987 （6.512）	0.010 （0.156）	1.335 （6.341）
陕北地区	-0.157 （0.157）	1.948 （6.974）	-0.176 （0.159）	2.002 （6.786）	-0.175 （0.159）	2.455 （6.610）
环境关心	0.299*** （0.083）	34.228*** （7.373）	0.305*** （0.084）	34.134*** （7.173）	0.303*** （0.084）	32.298*** （6.745）
制度信任			0.182*** （0.059）	5.418** （2.742）	0.183*** （0.059）	1.812 （3.131）
环境关心′制度信任					-0.040 （0.079）	7.559* （4.348）
对数似然值	-1673.3031		-1666.3324		-1664.6599
Wald卡方值	53.22***		59.89***		60.43***
样本数	511

The influence of environmental concern and institutional trust on farmers’ willingness to participate in rural domestic waste treatment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 61

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HUANG Zhigang, LI Jie. Influence of land acquisition for rural tourism on the well-being of landless farmers based on the empirical analysis of PSM model [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(1): 171-184.
[2]	LI Hongwei, ZHONG Zhangbao. Impact of confirmation of land right on farmers’ willingness to transfer land: The moderating effect based on institutional credibility of land confirmation system [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1657-1667.
[3]	LI Jingmei, SHAN Jingzhu, DENG Yuncheng, XU Handuo. Uncertainty bias and its correction in contingent valuation method: A case study of marine biodiversity valuation in Pingtan County [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1338-1347.
[4]	XU Tao, Ni Qi, Qiao Dan, YAO Liuyang, ZHAO Minjuan. Distance effect on the willingness of rural residents to participate in watershed ecological restoration: Evidence from the Shiyang River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1395-1404.
[5]	SHE Qunzhi, WU Xiaoli, PAN An. Effects of climate finance on carbon emissions in recipient countries [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1015-1026.
[6]	HE Siyuan, LI Heyao, MIN Qingwen. Value and conservation actors of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) from the perspective of rural households [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(5): 870-880.
[7]	WEI Hao, XIA Ying, LI Yun, LV Kaiyu, WANG Haiying. Effects of farmers’ credit demand rationing on the adoption of agricultural technologies that improve cultivated land quality：An analysis based on the moderating effect of farmer differentiation [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 217-231.
[8]	LI Jingmei, DING Zhongxian, XU Wanting, XU Zhihua, SHAN Jingzhu. National park ticket pricing based on double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation method for the Jiaozhou Bay National Marine Park [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 232-241.
[9]	LIU Xiao, XU Jianhua. Public willingness to pay for cleaner power sources [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2328-2340.
[10]	YANG Hua, RUI Yang, LI Julin, LI Tongsheng. Spatiotemporal characteristics of agricultural modernization level and obstacles in Shaanxi Province [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 172-183.
[11]	Zhenmin DING, Shunbo YAO. Effects of cultivated land transition on ecosystem service value in Shaanxi Province of China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1070-1081.
[12]	YU Yanli, LI Hua, XUE Caixia. Influence of government regulation and community governance on tea farmers’ behavior of reducing pesticide use [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2227-2236.
[13]	Haoyue PENG, Guohao ZHAO. The behavior options for energy terminal consumption: flexible driving force of environmental concern [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(1): 132-141.
[14]	Wenlue WANG, Rui GUAN, Masara KAGATSUME, Jin YU. Poverty alleviation effect of ecological migrants in southern Shaanxi Province [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(8): 1572-1582.
[15]	Hui JIA, Hai CHEN, Nanzhao MAO, Xia NIE. Landscape sustainable development in highly sensitive ecological fragile areas [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(6): 1277-1286.