基于生态系统服务供需关系的农业生态管理分区

doi:10.18402/resci.2019.07.16

Abstract

Abstract:

Ecosystem services are the basis for human survival and development. Clarifying the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and applying differentiated management and control can contribute to human well-being. This research aimed at characterizing the relationship between supply and demand of agroecosystem services and their spatial heterogeneity. It used ecosystem service matrix based on land use and cover change data to obtain ecosystem service capability in different spaces. Two indices—supply and demand matching degree and coordination degree—were formulated to evaluate the agroecosystem service status and sustainability of administrative village units in Quzhou County in 2015. Based on the characteristics of local spatial agglomeration, the agroecosystem management areas of Quzhou County were divided, and the management measures for the districts were put forward by using local spatial autocorrelation analysis. The results show that: (1) Supply and demand matching degree and coordination degree can realize the overall evaluation of natural resources in the region. (2) The spatial differences of the supply and demand matching degree and coordination degree of agroecosystem services in Quzhou County in 2015 were obvious. The matching degree of Quzhou County was 1.0647, which was at the general equilibrium level, indicating that the supply and demand of agroecosystem services was in an equilibrium state. The coordination degree of Quzhou County was 0.8977, which was in a state of good coordination, indicating that the sustainability of regional ecosystem services was high. (3) The 339 administrative village units in Quzhou County can be divided into four primary agroecological management areas and 12 secondary agroecological management subareas. Differential management measures are proposed for the ecological areas: Ecological conservation area shall be protected strictly and large-scale construction is prohibited. Ecological protection area shall be protected comprehensively to improve production efficiency. Ecological improvement area should implement comprehensive improvement measures in order to improve the ecosystem. Ecological reconstruction area should implement overall ecological rehabilitation and targeted ecological reconstruction. This study can provide some references for the fine management and differential protection of regional ecosystem services.

Key words: agroecosystem, ecosystem services, supply and demand matching degree, supply and demand coordination degree, spatial autocorrelation, zoning, Quzhou County, Hebei Province

Qingchun GUAN, Jinmin HAO, Yueqing XU, Guoping REN, Lei KANG. Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services[J].Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1359-1373.

Figures/Tables 12

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Table 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Table 5

Table 6

Zoning of ecological management based on local spatial autocorrelation in Quzhou County"

一级分区	二级分区	局部空间自相关类型		管理措施	典型区域
一级分区	二级分区	供需匹配度	供需协调度	管理措施	典型区域
生态保育区	核心保育区	HH型	HH型	严格保护,禁止大规模开发	河南疃镇北部郑韩村、宁屯村等和依庄乡东南部的曹庄村、宋庄村等区域
	优先保育区	HH型	NN型	保护和维持现有的自然生态环境	河南疃镇东部的马屯村、连珠村等和依庄乡南部的西路庄村、牛疃村等区域
	一般保育区	NN型	HH型	维持现有的供需水平条件	第四疃镇北部的巩村、焦庄村、李庄村等区域
生态培育区	优先培育区	HL型	HL型	综合保护生态系统服务高值地类,提高利用产出能力和管理水平	大河道乡北部的孔庄村、赵逯庄村、西河道村等区域
	重点培育区	HL型	NN型	重点保护生态系统服务高值地类,提升投入产出效益	侯村镇东部的东王堡村、戚寨村、堤上村等区域
	适度培育区	NN型	HL型	重点保护生态系统服务高值地类,提高利用管理水平	安寨镇北部的后公城堡村、前公城堡村、南马店村、东屯村等区域
生态改良区	优先改良区	LH型	LH型	综合改善生态系统服务低值地类,利用水平和投入产出效益	白寨镇东北部的王村、东陈庄村、西陈庄村等区域
生态改良区	重点改良区	LH型/NN型	LH型/NN型	重点改良生态系统服务低值地类,增加投入,挖掘潜能	槐桥乡西部的小秦庄村、陈袁庄村、西漳头村、乔堡村等区域
生态重构区	优先重构区	LL型	LL型	生境斑块连通和修复	曲周镇中部的后河东村、陈庄村、袁庄村、北甫村、南甫村、前河东村等区域
	重点重构区	LL型	NN型	生态修复和潜在节点重构	南里岳乡西北的史寨村、安上村、炒寨村、北里岳村、马兰村等区域
	适度重构区	NN型	LL型	生态廊道修复和生态网络重构	南里岳乡的东南部的杨军寨村、刘大寨村、封庄村等和侯村镇西北部的西高胡寨村、东高胡寨村等区域
	综合重构区	NN型	NN型	生态基质修复和生态退耕	非显著型区域

Table 6

References 47

[1]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being[R]. Washington: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[2]	Owuor M A, Icely J, Newton A, et al.Mapping of ecosystem services flow in Mida Creek, Kenya[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017, 140: 11-21.
[3]	付梦娣, 肖能文, 赵志平, 等. 北京城市化进程对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(5): 235-239.
	[Fu M D, Xiao N W, Zhao Z P, et al.Effects of urbanization on ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(5): 235-239.]
[4]	彭建, 胡熠娜, 吕慧玲, 等. 基于要素-结构-功能的生态功能分区: 以大理白族自治州为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(8): 2251-2259.
	[Peng J, Hu Y N, Lv H L, et al.Ecological function zoning based on element-structure-function: A case study in Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(8): 2251-2259.]
[5]	柯新利, 刘曼, 邓祥征. 湖泊营养物生态分区: 中国东北的分区试验[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 789-800.
	[Ke X L, Liu M, Deng X Z.Ecoregion of lake nutrients: A case study of northeast China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(5): 789-800.]
[6]	杨文治, 马玉玺, 韩仕峰, 等. 黄土高原地区造林土壤水分生态分区研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1994, 8(1): 1-9.
	[Yang W Z, Ma Y X, Han S F, et al.Soil water ecological regionalization of afforestation in Loess plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1994, 8(1): 1-9.]
[7]	郭澎涛, 李茂芬, 林钊沐, 等. 基于多源环境变量的橡胶园土壤管理分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12): 96-104.
	[Guo P T, Li M F, Lin Z M, et al.Delineating soil management zones in rubber plantation using multisource data of environmental variables[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(12): 96-104.]
[8]	王玲玲, 张斌, 李扬, 等. 三峡库区水生态分区初探[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2013, 36(5): 193-196.
	[Wang L L, Zhang B, Li Y, et al.Preliminary study on aquatic ecoregion in Three Gorges area[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 36(5): 193-196.]
[9]	张云路, 李雄, 田野. 基于景观生态学“源-汇”理论的市域尺度生态功能分区: 以内蒙古通辽市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1): 65-72.
	[Zhang Y L, Li X, Tian Y.Study on ecological function zoning in the Municipal Administrative Area based on the landscape ecology source-sink theory: A case study of Tongliao, Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(1): 65-72.]
[10]	吴建寨, 赵桂慎, 刘俊国, 等. 生态修复目标导向的河流生态功能分区初探[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(9): 1843-1850.
	[Wu J Z, Zhao G S, Liu J G, et al.River eco-regionalization oriented by ecological restoration[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011, 31(9): 1843-1850.]
[11]	刘星才, 徐宗学, 徐琛. 水生态一、二级分区技术框架[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(17): 4804-4814.
	[Liu X C, Xu Z X, Xu C.A framework for aquatic ecoregion zoning[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(17): 4804-4814.]
[12]	李慧蕾, 彭建, 胡熠娜, 等. 基于生态系统服务簇的内蒙古自治区生态功能分区[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2657-2666.
	[Li H L, Peng J, Hu Y N, et al.Ecological function zoning in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region based on ecosystem service bundles[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2657-2666.]
[13]	刘星才, 徐宗学, 张淑荣, 等. 流域环境要素空间尺度特征及其与水生态分区尺度的关系: 以辽河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(11): 3613-3620.
	[Liu X C, Xu Z X, Zhang S R, et al.Scale analysis of environmental factors and their relationship with the size of hierarchical aquatic ecoregion: A case study in the Liao River basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(11): 3613-3620.]
[14]	樊灏, 黄艺, 曹晓峰, 等. 基于水生态系统结构特征的滇池流域水生态功能三级分区[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(4): 1447-1456.
	[Fan H, Huang Y, Cao X F, et al.Level III aquatic ecological function regionalization in Dianchi Lake basin based on the aquatic ecosystem structure[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2016, 36(4): 1447-1456.]
[15]	王传辉, 吴立, 王心源, 等. 基于遥感和GIS的巢湖流域生态功能分区研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18): 5808-5817.
	[Wang C H, Wu L, Wang X Y, et al.RS and GIS based study on ecological function regionalization in the Chaohu Lake Basin Anhui Province China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(18): 5808-5817.]
[16]	高俊刚, 吴雪, 张镱锂, 等. 基于等级层次分析法的金沙江下游地区生态功能分区[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(1): 134-147.
	[Gao J G, Wu X, Zhang Y L, et al.Ecological function regionalization in the lower Jinsha River Basin using analytic hierarchy process method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(1): 134-147.]
[17]	高永年, 高俊峰. 太湖流域水生态功能分区[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1): 111-117.
	[Gao Y N, Gao J F.Delineation of aquatic ecoregions in Taihu lake basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(1): 111-117.]
[18]	胡圣, 夏凡, 张爱静, 等. 丹江口水源区水生态功能一二级分区研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(8): 1208-1217.
	[Hu S, Xia F, Zhang A J, et al.Level Ⅰ and Ⅱ aquatic eco-regionalization in the water source area of Danjiangkou reservoir[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(8): 1208-1217.]
[19]	盖力强, 谢高地, 陈龙, 等. 基于水足迹的中国水生态功能分区[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(9): 1622-1628.
	[Gai L Q, Xie G D, Chen L, et al.Water eco-function zoning in China based on water footprints[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(9): 1622-1628.]
[20]	柯新利, 刘曼, 邓祥征. 基于遥感反演参数与双约束空间聚类算法的湖泊营养物生态分区[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 315-323.
	[Ke X L, Liu M, Deng X Z.Lake nutrient concentration oriented ecological division based on remote sensing inversion parameters and dual-constraint spatial clustering algorithm[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(3): 315-323.]
[21]	Müller F.Indicating ecosystem and landscape organization[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2005, 5(4): 280-294.
[22]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, et al.Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 17-29.
[23]	Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, et al.Ecosystem service potential, flows and demands: Concepts for spatial localization, indication and quantification[J]. Landscape Online, 2014, 34(1): 1-32.
[24]	Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, et al.Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments[J]. Landscape Online, 2009, 15(1): 1-22.
[25]	Li J H, Jiang H W, Bai Y, et al.Indicators for spatial-temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: A case study of the Taihu River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 1008-1016.
[26]	白杨, 王敏, 李晖, 等. 生态系统服务供给与需求的理论与管理方法[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5846-5852.
	[Bai Y, Wang M, Li H, et al.Ecosystem service supply and demand: Theory and management application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(17): 5846-5852.]
[27]	刘颂, 杨莹, 王云才. 基于矩阵分析的水文调节服务供需关系时空分异研究: 以嘉兴市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1189-1202.
	[Liu S, Yang Y, Wang Y C.Mapping supply and demand differentiation of hydrological regulation service based on matrix analysis: A case study of Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1189-1202.]
[28]	Kaiser G, Burkhard B, Römer H, et al.Mapping tsunami impacts on land cover and related ecosystem service supply in Phang Nga, Thailand[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2013, 13(12): 3095-3111.
[29]	Nedkov S, Burkhard B.Flood regulating ecosystem services-mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 67-79.
[30]	Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[31]	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
[32]	Wallace K J.Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions[J]. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139(3-4): 235-246.
[33]	Costanza R.Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
[34]	Ma L, Jin F J, Song Z Y, et al.Spatial coupling analysis of regional economic development and environmental pollution in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013, 23(3): 525-537.
[35]	Anselin L.Local indicators of spatial association-LISA[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1995, 27(2): 93-115.
[36]	马晓冬, 马荣华, 徐建刚. 基于ESDA-GIS的城镇群体空间结构[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 1048-1057.
	[Ma X D, Ma R H, Xu J G.Spatial structure of cities and towns with ESDA-GIS framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6): 1048-1057.]
[37]	熊昌盛, 谭荣, 岳文泽. 基于局部空间自相关的高标准基本农田建设分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(22): 276-284.
	[Xiong C S, Tan R, Yue W Z.Zoning of high standard farmland construction based on local indicators of spatial association[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(22): 276-284.]
[38]	韦仕川, 熊昌盛, 栾乔林, 等. 基于耕地质量指数局部空间自相关的耕地保护分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(18): 249-256.
	[Wei S C, Xiong C S, Luan Q L, et al.Protection zoning of arable land quality index based on local spatial autocorrelation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(18): 249-256.]
[39]	张晗, 赵小敏, 欧阳真程, 等. 基于空间自相关的耕地质量空间差异特征及耕地保护分区: 以江西省上高县为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1): 304-312.
	[Zhang H, Zhao X M, Ouyang Z C, et al.Spatial disparity features and protection zoning of cultivated land quality based on spatial autocorrelation: A case study of Shanggao County, Jiangxi Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(1): 304-312.]
[40]	孙英君, 王劲峰, 柏延臣. 地统计学方法进展研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(2): 268-274.
	[Sun Y J, Wang J F, Bai Y C.Study on progress of methods in geostatistics[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2004, 19(2): 268-274.]
[41]	Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J, et al.Multivariate Data Analysis[M]. London: Prentice Hall, 2008.
[42]	姜广辉, 何新, 马雯秋, 等. 基于空间自相关的农村居民点空间格局演变及其分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(13): 265-273.
	[Jiang G H, He X, Ma W Q, et al.Rural settlements spatial pattern evolution and zoning district based on spatial autocorrelation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(13): 265-273.]
[43]	朱英明, 姚士谋. 国外区域联系研究综述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2001, 10(2): 16-24.
	[Zhu Y M, Yao S M.Overview of studies of regional linkages in foreign countries[J]. World Regional Studies, 2001, 10(2): 16-24.]
[44]	葛莹, 姚士谋, 蒲英霞, 等. 运用空间自相关分析集聚经济类型的地理格局[J]. 人文地理, 2005, (3): 21-25.
	[Ge Y, Yao S M, Pu Y X, et al.Application of spatial autocorrelation for the spatial patterns of urbanization and localization economy[J]. Human Geography, 2005, (3): 21-25.]
[45]	Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K, et al.Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(19): 7565-7570.
[46]	韩晔, 周忠学. 西安市农业生态系统服务间关系及空间分异[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(5): 1447-1458.
	[Han Y, Zhou Z X.Relationship among agro-ecosystem services and their spatial differentiation in the area of Xi’an City[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(5): 1447-1458.]
[47]	周丁扬, 安萍莉, 姜广辉, 等. 泰安市农村居民点整理分区研究[J]. 资源科学, 2011. 33(3): 497-504.
	[Zhou D Y, An P L, Jiang G H, et al.Sub-zoning in rural residential land consolidation in Taian City[J]. Resources Science, 2011. 33(3): 497-504.]

自相关类型	供需匹配度			供需协调度
自相关类型	行政村个数	面积/hm²	面积占比/%	行政村个数	面积/hm²	面积占比/%
HH型	87	13764.27	20.34	75	11865.75	17.54
HL型	21	3616.41	5.34	42	7232.82	10.69
LH型	32	6055.04	8.95	39	7379.58	10.91
LL型	98	15435.98	22.81	67	10553.17	15.60
NN型	101	28796.39	42.56	116	30636.77	45.28
总计	339	67668.09	100.00	339	67668.09	100.00

Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 47

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

序号	局部空间自相关类型		行政村个数	面积/hm²	面积占比/%
序号	供需匹配度	供需协调度	行政村个数	面积/hm²	面积占比/%
1	HH型	HH型	36	6667.56	9.85
2	HH型	NN型	13	2328.43	3.44
3	NN型	HH型	15	2869.80	4.24
4	HL型	HL型	39	6795.36	10.04
5	HL型	NN型	24	4058.64	6.00
6	NN型	HL型	19	3450.97	5.10
7	LH型	LH型	35	6168.40	9.12
8	LH型	NN型	4	581.68	0.86
9	NN型	LH型	3	597.48	0.88
10	LL型	LL型	44	6787.02	10.03
11	LL型	NN型	21	3731.47	5.51
12	NN型	LL型	19	3500.56	5.17
13	NN型	NN型	67	20130.72	29.75

[1]	WANG Jie, BAI Wanqi, TIAN Guohang. Spatiotemporal characteristics of landscape ecological risks on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1739-1749.
[2]	ZHENG Defeng, WANG Yanyan, CAO Yongqiang, WANG Yanhui, HAO Shuai, LV Leting. Classification and spatiotemporal patterns of ecological well-being based on ecosystem services: Taking China’s prefecture-level and above cities for example [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1110-1122.
[3]	HUANG Li, ZHOU Mi. International ecosystem service research dynamics and regional differences: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science data [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 607-620.
[4]	ZHANG Baifa, MIAO Changhong. Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of land use in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 460-473.
[5]	YANG Liwen, WANG Dayong, WANG Yongzhi, LIANG Ze, WU Shuyao, LI Shuangcheng. Quantitative assessment of the supply-demand relationship of soil conservation service in the Sushui River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2451-2462.
[6]	LI Hongyi, WU Rulian, TIAN Fengjun. A review of research on national park recreation in the past 20 years [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(11): 2210-2223.
[7]	QIAO Jiajun, ZHU Qiankun, XIN Xiangyang. Spatial characteristics and influencing factors of rural poverty in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 184-196.
[8]	YANG Lei, FENG Qingyu, CHEN Liding. Ecosystem services of soil and water conservation measures on the Loess Plateau [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 87-95.
[9]	Yang LIU, Jun BI, Jianshu LV. Classification of ecosystem services and a reclassification framework of watershed ecosystem services [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1189-1200.
[10]	Jianshuang FAN, Lin ZHOU. Spatiotemporal distribution and provincial contribution decomposition of carbon emissions for the construction industry in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 897-907.
[11]	Yangyang WANG, Yu XIAO, Gaodi XIE, Jie XU. Sand-fixing function of the grassland ecosystem in Ningxia based on the revised wind erosion model [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 980-991.
[12]	DING Zhenmin, YAO Shunbo. Model and measurement of payment for ecosystem services at small scale [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(12): 2182-2192.
[13]	LI Mu,HAO Jinmin,CHEN Li,GU Tianwei,GUAN Qingchun,CHEN Aiqi. Decoupling of urban and rural construction land and population change in China at the prefectural level [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(10): 1897-1910.
[14]	MENG Lijun,HUANG Can,CHEN Xin,JIANG Li,ZHANG Guoliang,HAO Jinmin,AN Pingli. Evaluation of cultivated land system resilience of Quzhou County [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(10): 1949-1958.
[15]	Yuhan ZHANG, Huali HOU, Yue SHEN, Yantao DONG. Study on the functional division of mineral resources development and poverty alleviation policy in Wumeng Mountain Area [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(9): 1716-1729.