Resources Science ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1329-1338.doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.07.13
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2018-12-20
Revised:
2019-04-01
Online:
2019-07-25
Published:
2019-07-25
Wenxiong WANG, Zhiqiang LIU. Differences in farming households’ cognition of ownership adjustment benefits in rural land consolidation and causes[J].Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1329-1338.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of farmers’ cognition of the benefits of land consolidation"
认知维度 | 序号 | 相关指标 | 均值 | 标准差 | 认知维度 | 序号 | 相关指标 | 均值 | 标准差 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
行为 态度 | 经济 效益 | A1 | 提高耕地利用率 | 4.09 | 0.73 | 主观 规范 | 外界 主张 | B4 | 亲朋邻里主张开展 | 3.11 | 0.98 |
A2 | 降低劳动成本 | 4.14 | 0.79 | B5 | 村委会主张开展 | 3.00 | 1.10 | ||||
A3 | 促进现代农业发展 | 3.89 | 0.79 | B6 | 地方政府主张开展 | 2.97 | 1.06 | ||||
生态 效益 | A4 | 丰富景观类型 | 3.45 | 0.91 | 外界 行动 | B7 | 亲朋邻里正积极行动 | 2.74 | 1.16 | ||
A5 | 优化景观格局 | 3.48 | 0.86 | B8 | 村委会正积极行动 | 2.66 | 1.22 | ||||
A6 | 改善生态环境 | 3.34 | 0.85 | B9 | 地方政府正积极行动 | 2.68 | 1.11 | ||||
社会 效益 | A7 | 减少地界冲突 | 3.34 | 1.05 | 行为 控制 知觉 | 感知 强度 | C1 | 认为权属调整的 难度不大 | 2.75 | 1.20 | |
A8 | 减少农业生产冲突 | 3.33 | 1.06 | C2 | 认为积极开展权属调整就能取得成功 | 3.29 | 0.99 | ||||
A9 | 提高村集体凝聚力 | 3.45 | 0.98 | 控制 信念 | C3 | 认为了解获取相关信息的渠道与方式 | 2.47 | 0.98 | |||
外界 影响 | B1 | 受亲朋邻里影响 | 3.36 | 0.94 | C4 | 认为掌握了权属调整相关知识和技能 | 2.33 | 1.02 | |||
B2 | 受村委会影响 | 3.71 | 0.87 | C5 | 认为自身拥有充足时间参与权属调整 | 3.40 | 0.96 | ||||
B3 | 受地方政府影响 | 3.67 | 0.91 | C6 | 认为自身有能力 支付必要的成本 | 3.34 | 0.97 |
Table 3
Cognition of different types of farming households after weighting"
认知维度 | 农户类型 | 完全不赞同 | 基本不赞同 | 不一定 | 基本赞同 | 完全赞同 | 合计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
行为态度 | 纯农业型 | 0(0.00%) | 1(0.56%) | 65(36.52%) | 110(61.80%) | 2(1.12%) | 178(100%) |
低度兼业型 | 1(0.87%) | 8(6.96%) | 24(20.86%) | 80(69.57%) | 2(1.74%) | 115(100%) | |
高度兼业型 | 0(0.00%) | 22(3.88%) | 225(39.69%) | 280(49.38%) | 40(7.05%) | 567(100%) | |
非农业型 | 0(0.00%) | 9(4.89%) | 77(41.85%) | 80(43.48%) | 18(9.78%) | 184(100%) | |
主观规范 | 纯农业型 | 2(1.12%) | 34(19.10%) | 78(43.83%) | 58(32.58%) | 6(3.37%) | 178(100%) |
低度兼业型 | 1(0.87%) | 26(22.61%) | 53(46.08%) | 29(25.22%) | 6(5.22%) | 115(100%) | |
高度兼业型 | 4(0.71%) | 132(23.28%) | 267(47.09%) | 128(22.57%) | 36(6.35%) | 567(100%) | |
非农业型 | 2(1.09%) | 39(21.20%) | 98(53.25%) | 32(17.39%) | 13(7.07%) | 184(100%) | |
感知行为控制 | 纯农业型 | 1(0.56%) | 44(24.72%) | 90(50.56%) | 43(24.16%) | 0(0.00%) | 178(100%) |
低度兼业型 | 1(0.87%) | 22(19.13%) | 60(52.17%) | 32(27.83%) | 0(0.00%) | 115(100%) | |
高度兼业型 | 13(2.29%) | 157(27.69%) | 282(49.74%) | 108(19.05%) | 7(1.23%) | 567(100%) | |
非农业型 | 4(2.17%) | 48(26.09%) | 102(55.43%) | 28(15.22%) | 2(1.09%) | 184(100%) |
Table 4
Definition of variables and description statistics"
因素 | 因子 | 代码 | 变量含义 | 变量类型 | 均值 | 标准差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个体 特征 | 户主年龄 | X1 | 40岁及以下=1;41~55岁=2;56~65岁=3;65岁以上=4 | 虚拟 | 2.86 | 0.88 |
户主文化程度 | X2 | 小学及以下=1;初中=2;高中或中专=3;大专及以上=4 | 虚拟 | 1.47 | 0.64 | |
是否当过村干部 | X3 | 否=0;是=1 | 虚拟 | 0.09 | 0.29 | |
是否农村社会经济组织成员 | X4 | 否=0;是=1 | 虚拟 | 0.12 | 0.13 | |
家庭 特征 | 家庭人口总数 | X5 | 家庭总人数/人 | 连续 | 5.04 | 2.13 |
家庭女性人口比例 | X6 | 家庭女性人口占总人口的比例/% | 连续 | 0.39 | 0.16 | |
家庭老龄人口比例 | X7 | 家庭60岁以上人口占总人口的比例/% | 连续 | 0.28 | 0.30 | |
家庭劳动力人数 | X8 | 家庭中劳动力人口数/人 | 连续 | 3.93 | 1.41 | |
非农收入水平 | X9 | 非农收入占总收入的比例/% | 连续 | 0.75 | 0.34 | |
耕地 资源 特征 | 承包地总面积 | X10 | 家庭承包地的总面积/亩 | 连续 | 7.45 | 7.52 |
承包地破碎度 | X11 | 每公顷耕地块数/块 | 虚拟 | 48.75 | 1.28 | |
承包地质量 | X12 | 很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 虚拟 | 3.27 | 0.88 | |
村庄 特征 | 距离城镇远近 | X13 | 很远=1;较远=2;一般=3;较近=4;很近=5 | 虚拟 | 3.17 | 1.12 |
本村经济发展水平 | X14 | 很低=1;较低=2;一般=3;较高=4;很高=5 | 虚拟 | 2.94 | 0.72 | |
是否成立农村社会经济组织 | X15 | 否=0;是=1 | 虚拟 | 0.14 | 0.34 |
Table 5
Regression results of agricultural and heavily agricultural-oriented households"
因素 | 代码 | 纯农业型 | 低度兼业型 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | SN | PBC | ATT | SN | PBC | |||
个体特征 | X1 | -0.098(0.937) | 0.097(1.276) | 0.145(2.110) | -0.051**(4.130) | -0.100(0.054) | -0.109(1.970) | |
X2 | 0.078**(5.555) | 0.099**(5.629) | 0.055***(9.052) | 0.069(1.588) | 0.002(0.503) | 0.130(1.208) | ||
X3 | 0.163**(4.025) | 0.109(2.376) | 0.147**(4.928) | 0.073**(4.415) | 0.052*(3.162) | 0.113**(4.128) | ||
X4 | 0.074(0.327) | -0.007(0.582) | 0.121**(5.592) | -0.026(0.247) | 0.018(0.005) | 0.231(0.408) | ||
家庭特征 | X5 | -0.163(1.586) | 0.156(2.177) | 0.087(0.471) | 0.052(0.556) | -0.056(1.987) | -0.060(1.473) | |
X6 | -0.115(1.452) | -0.083(1.935) | 0.045(0.001) | -0.107(0.518) | -0.185(0.455) | -0.013***(9.289) | ||
X7 | -0.110(1.362) | 0.167(0.244) | 0.024(0.165) | -0.012**(4.508) | -0.008**(5.434) | -0.009*(3.460) | ||
X8 | 0.081(0.727) | 0.092(0.283) | -0.026(0.200) | -0.053(0.122) | 0.048(0.131) | 0.043(0.568) | ||
X9 | -0.034(0.196) | 0.025(0.582) | 0.018(0.126) | -0.016(0.331) | 0.101(0.541) | 0.232(0.641) | ||
耕地资源 禀赋特征 | X10 | 0.043(1.049) | 0.035(0.191) | 0.027(0.302) | 0.013*(3.044) | 0.011*(3.045) | 0.010***(10.602) | |
X11 | -0.012(1.457) | -0.188(2.570) | -0.144(2.408) | 0.032*(3.354) | 0.073(0.699) | -0.017**(5.601) | ||
X12 | -0.035*(3.530) | -0.006(0.762) | -0.012(0.794) | -0.169(1.403) | 0.121(1.202) | -0.199(1.292) | ||
村庄特征 | X13 | -0.240(0.525) | -0.087(0.765) | -0.083(1.574) | 0.081(0.111) | -0.208(0.895) | 0.208(2.121) | |
X14 | 0.051***(12.679) | 0.112**(4.626) | 0.124*(3.434) | -0.098(0.043) | -0.049(0.722) | -0.069(0.945) | ||
X15 | -0.073(1.317) | 0.119(0.840) | 0.105**(4.733) | 0.136(1.563) | -0.020(1.047) | -0.050(0.914) |
Table 6
Regression results of lightly agricultural-oriented and nonagricultural households"
因素 | 代码 | 高度兼业型 | 非农业型 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | SN | PBC | ATT | SN | PBC | |||
个体特征 | X1 | -0.035(1.870) | 0.037(1.460) | -0.050(0.221) | 0.111(2.312) | -0.061(1.912) | -0.020(1.748) | |
X2 | -0.036*(3.289) | -0.048**(6.469) | -0.037*(3.006) | -0.045*(3.236) | -0.067*(3.239) | -0.049**(4.826) | ||
X3 | -0.123(0.417) | -0.006(0.033) | -0.155(1.431) | -0.198(1.492) | -0.055(0.404) | -0.190(0.088) | ||
X4 | 0.004(0.007) | -0.026(0.256) | -0.047(0.723) | 0.025(0.321) | 0.177(0.473) | 0.010(0.281) | ||
家庭特征 | X5 | -0.076(0.703) | 0.047(1.473) | -0.040(0.556) | 0.023(0.297) | 0.025(0.361) | 0.030(0.423) | |
X6 | -0.007(0.018) | 0.100(1.448) | 0.007(0.341) | 0.030(0.148) | 0.140(0.321) | -0.045(0.008) | ||
X7 | 0.065(0.212) | 0.058(1.948) | 0.022(0.402) | 0.215(0.661) | 0.020(0.138) | 0.098(1.651) | ||
X8 | 0.040(1.302) | 0.029(0.659) | -0.012(0.005) | -0.180(1.521) | -0.197(0.474) | -0.012(1.485) | ||
X9 | 0.002(0.001) | 0.034(0.850) | 0.037(0.733) | -0.047(1.780) | 0.005(0.012) | 0.115(0.869) | ||
耕地资源 禀赋特征 | X10 | 0.026(0.285) | 0.073(0.346) | 0.113(0.413) | -0.063(0.638) | 0.082(0.385) | -0.016(0.436) | |
X11 | 0.021**(5.208) | 0.057(1.374) | -0.019***(7.301) | 0.099(1.973) | 0.067(0.127) | 0.145(0.684) | ||
X12 | 0.056*(3.803) | 0.056(0.869) | 0.001(1.962) | 0.048**(5.247) | -0.040(0.349) | 0.123(0.965) | ||
村庄特征 | X13 | 0.069(0.441) | -0.030(1.176) | 0.100(1.769) | 0.040(1.346) | 0.102(0.902) | 0.051(0.726) | |
X14 | -0.159(1.115) | 0.075(2.115) | 0.130(0.405) | -0.073**(5.681) | 0.197(1.583) | -0.204(1.063) | ||
X15 | 0.117*(3.071) | 0.102**(4.017) | 0.135*(3.002) | 0.126*(3.027) | 0.118**(4.106) | 0.158**(4.498) |
[1] | 胡昱东, 吴次芳. 我国农村土地整理中土地权属调整问题研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(1): 6-10. |
[Hu Y D, Wu C F.Study on land ownership adjustment in rural land consolidation in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2009, 9(1): 6-10.] | |
[2] | 高世昌. 关于土地整治权属调整与现代农业发展的思考[A]. 中国土地学会: 2010年中国土地学会学术年会论文集[C], 2010. |
[Gao S C.Thoughts on the Ownership Adjustment of Land Consolidation and the Development of Modern Agriculture[A]. China Land Science Society: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Lands[C], 2010.] | |
[3] | 汪文雄, 杨海霞. 农地整治权属调整中农户参与的行为机理研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, (5): 108-116. |
[Wang W X, Yang H X.Study on the behavior mechanism of farmers' participation in property right adjustment in land consolidation[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, (5): 108-116.] | |
[4] | 赵谦. 基于农民认知的土地整理监管共治式建构[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(4): 56-61. |
[Zhao Q.Co-governance’s construction of land consolidation supervision system: Based on perspective of farmers' cognitive status[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition), 2016, 16(4): 56-61.] | |
[5] | 邓正华, 张俊飚, 许志祥, 等. 农村生活环境整治中农户认知与行为响应研究: 以洞庭湖湿地保护区水稻主产区为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013, (2): 72-79. |
[Deng Z H, Zhang J B, Xu Z X, et al.Study on farmers' cognition and behavior response in rural environment improvement project: Taking the main rice producing areas in Dongting Lake wetland reserve as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2013, (2): 72-79.] | |
[6] | 韩璐, 鲍海君. 不同利益群体认知行为对农村居民点整治的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(3): 159-166. |
[Han L, Bao H J.Effect of different interest groups’ cognitive behavior on rural residential renovation[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(3): 159-166.] | |
[7] | 刘燕, 杨庆媛, 何春燕, 等. 农户对土地整治项目管理的认知与响应研究: 基于重庆市6个区县22个村的调查[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 40(7): 143-150. |
[Liu Y, Yang Q Y, He C Y, et al.On cognition and response of rural land consolidation projects management based on farmers’ willingness: A case study of 22 typical villages in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition) , 2015, 40(7): 143-150.] | |
[8] | 韩立达, 王艳西. 城乡建设用地增减挂钩中土地权属调整研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(4): 21-27. |
[Han L D, Wang Y X.Study on the readjustments of land property rights in “Linkage between Urban-land Taking and Rural-land Giving”(LUTRG) project[J]. China Land Science, 2016, 30(4): 21-27.] | |
[9] | Sproule K, Kieran C, Quisumbing A R, et al.Gender, headship, and the life cycle: Landownership in four Asian countries[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2015, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2741111. |
[10] | Levin G, Nainggolan D.The significance of spatial fragmentation of land ownership for occurrence of scrubs on semi-natural grasslands[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31(9): 2031-2044. |
[11] | 赵婷婷, 王永刚. 土地整治视角下的耕地权属调整[J]. 中国土地, 2013, (6): 54-55. |
[Zhao T T, Wang Y G.Adjustment of cultivated land ownership from the perspective of land consolidation[J]. China Land, 2013, (6): 54-55.] | |
[12] | 王梅, 汪文雄. 农地整治权属调整中农户认知与行为的一致性研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(1): 53-63. |
[Wang M, Wang W X.Consistency of farmers’ cognition and behavior in the adjustment of land ownership under farmland consolidation[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(1): 53-63.] | |
[13] | 王兆林, 杨庆媛. 重庆市不同类型农户土地退出决策的影响因素分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(9): 32-38. |
[Wang Z L, Yang Q Y.The impact factors on returning their contractual land of different farmers’ households in Chongqing City[J]. China Land Science, 2014, 28(9): 32-38.] | |
[14] | Hao H G, Li X B, Zhang J P.Impacts of part-time farming on agricultural land use in ecologically-vulnerable areas in Northern China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013, 4(1): 70-79. |
[15] | 段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论评述[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(2): 315-320. |
[Duan W T, Jiang G R.A review of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(2): 315-320.] |
|