生态系统服务分类综述与流域尺度重分类研究

doi:10.18402/resci.2019.07.01

Abstract

Abstract:

Application of ecosystem service theory to management practice is an important trend of research. Such application depends on the classification system of ecosystem services that meets human management needs. This article reviewed international and Chinese classifications of ecosystem services, and found that current works focus on the characteristics of ecosystem output and its correspondence to human benefits, but lack a system specific to a certain management target and conducive to human management decision. Therefore, based on water environment problems and management demands, this study developed a new classification system of ecosystem services suitable to water environment management at watershed scale, and discussed the similarities and differences with several other classifications. This proposed classification system took water environment health as the management target. According to the relationships with this target, ecosystem services were divided into three categories: direct services, indirect services, and ecological benefits. Direct services were defined as the ecosystem processes and functions that directly reflect the management target, and were measured by physical quantity. Indirect services were the processes and functions that support the achievement of the management target, and were quantified using multidisciplinary methods. Ecological benefits indicate the final effect of the management target and were calculated by valuation methods. This classification system can help identify and analyze critical ecosystem services in watersheds, which lays a foundation for subsequent simulation, mapping, and evaluation of ecosystem services.

Key words: ecosystem services, classification system, water environment management, water environmental health, watershed, benefit

Yang LIU, Jun BI, Jianshu LV. Classification of ecosystem services and a reclassification framework of watershed ecosystem services[J].Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1189-1200.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Figure 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 55

[1]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.
	[Fu B J, Yu D D.Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.]
[2]	李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.
	[Li Y, Li S C, Gao Y, et al.Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.]
[3]	Daily G C, Matson P A.Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(28): 9455-9456.
[4]	McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillmann P, et al. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: Lessons from international experiences of spatial planning[J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2014, 32(2): 320-340.
[5]	La Notte A, D’Amato D, Mäkinen H, et al. Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 74: 392-402.
[6]	Guerry A D, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, et al.Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(24): 7348-7355.
[7]	Daily G C.Nature’s Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington: Island Press, 1997.
[8]	Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R, et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[9]	United Nations Environmental Program. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Summary for Decision Makers[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2005.
[10]	Pandeya B, Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, et al.A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 22: 250-259.
[11]	Mcdonough K, Hutchinson S, Moore T, et al.Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 82-88.
[12]	Costanza R, Groot R D, Braat L, et al.Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28: 1-16.
[13]	谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 生态系统服务研究: 进展、局限和基本范式[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.
	[Xie G D, Xiao Y, Lu C X.Study on ecosystem services: Progress, limitation and basic paradigm[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.]
[14]	Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V, et al.A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48(3): 630-636.
[15]	Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26(1): 152-158.
[16]	Wallace K J.Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions[J]. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139(3): 235-246.
[17]	欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 19-25.
	[Ouyang Z Y, Wang X K, Miao H.A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 19-25.]
[18]	张彪, 谢高地, 肖玉, 等. 基于人类需求的生态系统服务分类[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(6): 64-67.
	[Zhang B, Xie G D, Xiao Y, et al.Classification of ecosystem services based on human demand[J]. China Populaion, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(6): 64-67.]
[19]	Brauman K A, Daily G C, Duarte T K, et al.The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2007, 32: 67-98.
[20]	Haines-Young R, Potschin M.Methodologies for Defining and Assessing Ecosystem Services[R]. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management Report, 2009.
[21]	Boyd J W, Banzhaf S.What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(2): 616-626.
[22]	Fisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M, et al.Ecosystem services and economic theory: Integration for policy-relevant research[J]. Ecological Applications, 2008, 18(8): 2050-2067.
[23]	Hein L, Van Koppen K, De Groot R S, et al. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57(2): 209-228.
[24]	曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111.
	[Cao Q W, Wei X M, Wu J S.A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111.]
[25]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P.Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(3): 643-653.
[26]	Johnston R J, Russell M.An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 70(12): 2243-2249.
[27]	Nahlik A M, Kentula M E, Fennessy M S, et al.Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 77: 27-35.
[28]	Landers D H, Nahlik A M.Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System(FEGS-CS)[R]. Washington: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013.
[29]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 341-348.
	[Fu B J, Yu D D, Lv N.An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 341-348.]
[30]	Landers D H, Nahlik A M, Rhodes C R.The Beneficiary Perspective: Benefits and Beyond[A]. Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Fish R, et al. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services[C]. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
[31]	Sinha P, Van H G.National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS): Framework Design and Policy Application[R]. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency Report, 2015.
[32]	De Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408.
[33]	TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Ecological and Economic Foundations[M]. London: Earthscan, 2010.
[34]	杜乐山, 李俊生, 刘高慧, 等. 生态系统与生物多样性经济学(TEEB)研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(6): 686-693.
	[Du L S, Li J S, Liu G H, et al.Progress in the researches on the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity(TEEB)[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2016, 24(6): 686-693.]
[35]	Haines-Young R, Potschin M.Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): 2011 Update[R]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 2011.
[36]	Haines-Young R, Potschin M.Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services(CICES, Version 4. 1)[R]. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2012.
[37]	Potschin M, Haines-Young R.Defining and Measuring Ecosystem Services[A]. Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Fish R, et al. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services[C]. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
[38]	Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F.Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 21: 39-53.
[39]	Mononen L, Auvinen A P, Ahokumpu A L, et al.National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social-ecological sustainability[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 27-37.
[40]	Albert C, Bonn A, Burkhard B, et al.Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: Insights from Germany[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61(1): 38-48.
[41]	Costanza R.Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
[42]	王玲慧, 张代青, 李凯娟. 河流生态系统服务价值评价综述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(S1): 10-14.
	[Wang L H, Zhang D Q, Li K J.A survey of river ecosystem services value evaluation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(S1): 10-14.]
[43]	Turner R K, Van den Bergh J C, Söderqvist T, et al. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 35(1): 7-23.
[44]	张苹, 马涛. 湿地生态系统服务价值评估的国内研究评述[J]. 湿地科学, 2011, 9(2): 203-208.
	[Zhang P, Ma T.A comment on studies on evaluation of service value of wetland ecosystem in China[J]. Wetland Science, 2011, 9(2): 203-208.]
[45]	Zhang W, Ricketts T H, Kremen C, et al.Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2): 253-260.
[46]	吴绍华, 虞燕娜, 朱江, 等. 土壤生态系统服务的概念、量化及其对城市化的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(5): 970-978.
	[Wu S H, Yu Y N, Zhu J, et al.Soil ecosystem services: Concept, quantificaion and response to urbanization[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(5): 970-978.]
[47]	赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 草地生态系统服务功能分析及其评价指标体系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(6): 155-160.
	[Zhao T Q, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, et al.Analyses on grassland ecosystem services and its indexes for assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(6): 155-160.]
[48]	王其翔, 唐学玺. 海洋生态系统服务的内涵与分类[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2010, 29(1): 131-138.
	[Wang Q X, Tang X X.Connotation and classification of marine ecosystem services[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2010, 29(1): 131-138.]
[49]	尹飞, 毛任钊, 傅伯杰, 等. 农田生态系统服务功能及其形成机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(5): 929-934.
	[Yin F, Mao R Z, Fu B J, et al.Farmland ecosystem service and its formation mechanism[J]. Chinses Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(5): 929-934.]
[50]	毛齐正, 黄甘霖. 城市生态系统服务研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 1023-1033.
	[Mao Q Z, Huang G L.Urban ecosystem services: A review[J]. Chinses Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(4): 1023-1033.]
[51]	韩会庆, 苏志华. 喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 中国岩溶, 2017, 36(3): 352-358.
	[Han H Q, Su Z H.Research progress and prospects of karst ecosystem services[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3): 352-358.]
[52]	De Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3): 260-272.
[53]	Dodds W K, Perkin J S, Gerken J E.Human impact on freshwater ecosystem services: A global perspective[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(16): 9061-9068.
[54]	Trabucchi M, Ntshotsho P, O'Farrell P, et al. Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 111: 18-23.
[55]	Wright W C C, Eppink F V, Greenhalgh S. Are ecosystem service studies presenting the right information for decision making?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 128-139.

环境层面				受益者层面
水生环境	陆地环境	大气环境		农业	工商业	政府市政	交通	生存	娱乐	灵感	学习	感知	人文
河流溪水、湿地、湖泊坑塘、海湾、海洋、地表水	森林、农业生态系统、人工绿地系统、草地、沼泽、岩石裸砾地、苔原、冰川雪地	空气、天气、风、其他大气环境		农民、灌溉者、养殖户、渔业户等	木工、资源、能源生产等相关人员	饮用水厂或污水处理厂的操作员、护卫等	食物运输者、客运员	对水、食物、木材、燃料、建筑物等有生存需求的人	采摘者、狩猎者、垂钓者、游泳者、划船人等	表彰仪式参与者、庆典参与者、艺术家等	教育者、学生、研究者等	关注选举、遗产等实际生活问题的人群	所有人类

分类依据	分类结果
全球非邻近性	气候调节、碳封存、碳储存、存在价值
当地邻近性	干扰调节或风暴防护、废物处置、生物控制、栖息地或避难所
定向流动性	水流调节或洪峰消减、水量供给、沉积物调节或侵蚀控制、营养盐调节
原位不动性	土壤形成、食物生产或非木材林生产、原材料
用户位置变动性	基因资源、娱乐潜力、文化或审美

	排他性	非排他性
竞争性	竞争性市场的产品和服务（多数供给服务）	开放性资源（少数供给服务）
非竞争性	非竞争性团体的产品（少数娱乐服务）	公共产品或服务（多数调节和文化服务）

类别	种类	类型
直接服务	过滤过程及功能	总氮、总磷等营养盐的净化服务
	分解过程及功能	碳氢化物、除草剂等其他污染物的净化服务
	储存过程及功能	地表水、地下水的储存服务
间接服务	维持过程及功能	土壤形成、土壤保持服务
	消减过程及功能	水流调节、洪水调蓄服务
	传递过程及功能	氮、磷、钾等物质循环服务
生态收益	物质供给功能	淡水、能源、水产品、粮产品、运输通道的供给服务
	抵御风险功能	疾病防控、栖息地保障的防护服务
	文化供给功能	休闲娱乐、美学信息、科学教育、地方感的精神享受服务

生态系统服务类型	本研究的分类体系	MA的分类体系	CICES分类体系	FEGS/NESCS分类体系
水质净化	直接服务类	调节服务类	调节服务类	湿地、林地等环境对用水者、旅游者、污水处理厂等人的利益
水量储存	直接服务类	供给服务类	供给服务类	地表环境对灌溉者、养殖户、旅游者等人的利益
土壤保持	间接服务类	调节服务类	调节服务类	林地、草地、湿地等环境对农民、林户等种植者的利益
土壤形成	间接服务类	支撑服务类	调节服务类	—
水流调节	间接服务类	调节服务类	调节服务类	河流、湖泊或坑塘等环境对水利、发电部门的利益
洪水调蓄	间接服务类	调节服务类	调节服务类	林地、草地、湿地等地表植被环境对居民、市政部门的利益
物质循环	间接服务类	支撑服务类	调节服务类	—
农产品	生态收益	供给服务类	供给服务类	农业环境对农户、居民的利益
疾病防控	生态收益	调节服务类	调节服务类	—
休闲娱乐	生态收益	文化服务类	文化服务类	地表林地、草地、水体等景观环境对旅游者、居民的利益
科学教育	生态收益	文化服务类	文化服务类	地表水体、植被、农业等环境对学生、教师、科研工作者的利益

Classification of ecosystem services and a reclassification framework of watershed ecosystem services

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 55

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HAO Min, CHEN Weiqiang, MA Zijie, ZHANG Chao, GAN Jianbang. Benefits and risks of China’s copper waste and scrap trade during 2000-2015 [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(8): 1515-1526.
[2]	XU Tao, Ni Qi, Qiao Dan, YAO Liuyang, ZHAO Minjuan. Distance effect on the willingness of rural residents to participate in watershed ecological restoration: Evidence from the Shiyang River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1395-1404.
[3]	HUANG Li, ZHOU Mi. International ecosystem service research dynamics and regional differences: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science data [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 607-620.
[4]	GENG Aixin, PAN Wenqi, YANG Hongqiang. Quantifying the mitigating effects and benefits from substituting wood biomass for coal in energy production in China [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 536-547.
[5]	YANG Liwen, WANG Dayong, WANG Yongzhi, LIANG Ze, WU Shuyao, LI Shuangcheng. Quantitative assessment of the supply-demand relationship of soil conservation service in the Sushui River Basin [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(12): 2451-2462.
[6]	SUN Xingli, LIU Xiaohuang, LIU Xiaojie, GAO Juan, ZHU Zhangliu, ZHENG Wenyi. Classification system of natural resources for integrated management [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(10): 1860-1869.
[7]	XU Ziwei, LIU Shaomin, CHE Tao, ZHANG Yang, REN Zhiguo, WU Adan, TAN Junlei, ZHU Zhongli, XU Tongren, MA Tao. Operation and maintenance and data quality control of the Heihe integrated observatory network [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(10): 1975-1986.
[8]	YANG Lei, FENG Qingyu, CHEN Liding. Ecosystem services of soil and water conservation measures on the Loess Plateau [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 87-95.
[9]	LI Yanmei,NIU Miaomiao,ZHANG Hongli. Comparison of economic benefits and embodied carbon emissions of intraregional value-added trade in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1619-1629.
[10]	Qingchun GUAN, Jinmin HAO, Yueqing XU, Guoping REN, Lei KANG. Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1359-1373.
[11]	Yiqi WANG, Guoping LI, Buqing YAN. Sharing of watershed ecosystem service value horizontal compensation burden by downstream cities [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1013-1023.
[12]	Yangyang WANG, Yu XIAO, Gaodi XIE, Jie XU. Sand-fixing function of the grassland ecosystem in Ningxia based on the revised wind erosion model [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 980-991.
[13]	Guilan SHAO, Haizheng KONG, Chen LI. Net amount of mariculture carbon sink and its coupling relationship with economics growth of China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 277-288.
[14]	Cong GUAN, Shuwen ZHANG, Ranghu WANG, Jiuchun YANG, Shuping YUE, Lingxue YU, Wenjuan WANG. Coupling analysis between ridge direction and gully erosion of sloping cultivated lands in the Sancha River watershed [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 394-404.
[15]	Ruijia YUAN. Location-weighted landscape index of non-point source pollution in Songhuaba Reservoir watershed [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(2): 405-413.