生态移民政策对农户收入影响机理研究——基于形成型指标的结构方程模型分析

doi:10.18402/resci.2018.02.19

Abstract

Abstract:

Policy assessment of ecological migration is a heated issue in a multidisciplinary context, and the impact mechanism lies on the key position. By constructing the analytical framework of Ecological migration policy → livelihood capital → income and using Structural Equation Modeling with Formative Indicators, a structural equation model with livelihood capitals as mediator variables was adopted to explore the impact mechanism of ecological migration policy on household income. Through the Partial Least Squares regression method, path coefficients were calculated to estimate the direct, indirect and total effects between the ecological migration policy and income, and then verify the effectiveness of the mechanism. As the representatives of urban community and new village resettlement, the migration households in southern Shaanxi and Ningxia were selected as sampling to conduct an empirical analysis of the mechanism of ecological migration, and to put forward optimization measures to improve farmer livelihood capital and increase household income. We found that ecological migration policy in southern Shaanxi and Ningxia has a positive effect on the improvement of farmer income through human capital, social capital, financial capital and physical capital, with a slight difference in each path. In southern Shaanxi, the most important way to improve household income is using social capital, the second is human capital; financial capital and physical capital are relatively small. In Ningxia, the sequence of importance is financial capital, human capital, social capital physical capital, while natural capital plays a negative role. In general, ecological migration policy can effectively accumulate the stock of farmer livelihood capital and then produce a stable and sustainable income flow.

Key words: ecological migration policy, livelihood capital, income, impact mechanism, formative indicator, Structural Equation Model

Zhigang HUANG, Xiaonan CHEN, Jianyu LI. Research on the impact mechanism of ecological migration policy on rural household income based on the Structural Equation Model with formative indicators[J].Resources Science, 2018, 40(2): 439-451.

Figures/Tables 7

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Indicators of ecological migration policy,farmers'livelihood capital and income"

变量	指标	指标描述
自然资本（NC）	户有耕地面积（NC₁）	农户家庭所拥有的耕地数量
	退耕还林还草面积（NC₂）	农户实际参与退耕还林还草工程的耕地或林地面积
金融资本（FC）	家庭存款（FC₁）	1=小于1万;2=1万~3万;3=3万~5万;4=5万~10万;5=10万以上
	借贷难度（FC₂）	1=非常难;2=比较难;3=一般;4=比较容易;5=非常容易
物质资本（PC）	家庭耐用消费品得分（PC₁）	16项家庭耐用消费品（电视、冰箱、洗衣机、三轮车等）中所拥有的数量
	家庭设施配套得分（PC₂）	六项（水、电、厨房、厕所、供暖设备和网络）生活设施配套总得分;1=不配套;2=不完全配套;3=完全配套
人力资本（HC）	家庭成员受教育水平总得分（HC₁）	0=文盲;0.25=小学;0.5=初中;0.75=高中或中专;1=大学及以上
	家庭总体劳动能力（HC₂）	0=年纪太小而不能劳动的儿童以及残疾人或长期患病者;0.3=可以做一些简单家务的儿童;0.5=只能从事部分劳动的成年人;0.6=能够成为成人的助手的孩子;1=能够从事全部劳动的成年人
	家庭中是否具有成年男性劳动力（HC₃）	18~65周岁能从事正常生产劳动的健康成年男性劳动力：0=没有;1=有
社会资本（SC）	亲朋好友的职业得分（以职业得分最高为标准）（SC₁）	1=电工,农技推广员,厨师,出租车司机,邮递员;2=小学幼儿园教师,护士,包工头,保险业务员,村干部;3=医生,政府普通员工,警察,乡长,私企老板;4=中级领导干部（科长到局长,企业总经理和厂长,中学教师,记者,律师;5=高级领导干部（处级以上）
	逢年过节亲朋好友联系的人数（SC₂）	1=0~10人;2=10~20人;3=20~30人;4=30人以上
	邻里交往（SC₃）	村内经常往来的户数
生态移民政策（POL）	基础设施投资（POL₁）	农户所在区有并且对农户有帮助的基础设施数目
	就业培训投入（POL₂）	政府开展培训并且农户是否参加：1=有;0=没有
	迁移补偿（POL₃）	政府对农户所发放的货币补偿和非货币补偿
移民户收入（IN）		工资性收入、经营性收入、财产性收入、转移性收入

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Figure 2

References 32

[1]	贾耀锋. 中国生态移民效益评估研究综述[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(8): 1550-1560.
	[Jia Y F.Review of benefit evaluation research on ecological migration in China[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(8): 1550-1426. ]
[2]	包智明. 关于生态移民的定义、分类及若干问题[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006, 33(1): 27-31.
	[Bao Z M.The definition, category and some other issues about ecological migration[J]. Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 33(1): 27-31. ]
[3]	东梅, 王桂芬. 双重差分法在生态移民收入效应评价中的应用-以宁夏为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2010, (8): 87-93.
	[Dong M, Wang G F.The application of difference-in-differences model in the evaluation of the income effect of ecological migration: taking Ningxia as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2010, (8): 87-93. ]
[4]	荣金凤, 闵庆文, 郑林. 贫困地区的生态旅游资源及其可持续利用探讨[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(1): 112-117.
	[Rong J F, Min Q W, Zheng L.Sustainable utilization of ecotourism resources in poverty stricken areas[J]. Resources Science, 2007, 29(1): 112-117. ]
[5]	曹诗颂, 赵文吉, 段福洲. 秦巴特困连片区生态资本与经济贫困的耦合关系[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(7): 1295-1309.
	[Cao S S, Zhao W J, Duan F Z.Coupling relation analysis between ecological value and economic poverty of contiguous destitute areas in Qinling-Dabashan region[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(7): 1259-1309. ]
[6]	Du Y, Park A, Wang S G.Migration and rural poverty in China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2005, 33(4): 688-709.
[7]	Kothari S P, Laguerre T E, Leone A J.Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2002, 7(4): 355-382.
[8]	Cernea M M, Kai S S.Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement[J]. World Development, 2006, 34(10): 1808-1830.
[9]	冯伟林, 李树茁, 李聪. 生态移民经济恢复中的人力资本与社会资本失灵-基于对陕南生态移民的调查[J]. 人口与经济, 2016, (1): 98-107.
	[Feng W L, Li S Z, Li C.A study on the failure of human capital and social capital in economic recovery of the ecological migrants: a survey of the ecological migrants in southern shaanxi[J]. Population＆Economics, 2016, (1): 98-107. ]
[10]	Mao X F, Wei X Y, Xia J X.Evaluation of ecological migrants’ adaptation to their new living area in Three-River Headwater wetlands, China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13: 1346-1353.
[11]	Ellis F A.Livelihood Approach to Migration and Poverty Reduction[R]. Paper Commissioned by the Department for International Development (DFID) Contract No: CNTR034890, 2003.
[12]	Robert M, Alan B, Pradeep K, et al. Climate and rural income[J]. Climatic Change, 2007, 81(1): 101-118.
[13]	王凯, 李志苗, 易静. 生态移民户与非移民户的生计对比-以遗产旅游地武陵源为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(8): 1621-1633.
	[ Wang K, Li Z M, Yi J.Contrasting the livelihoods of immigrants and non-immigrants in the Wulingyuan world heritage area[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(8): 1621-1633. ]
[14]	Li C, Zheng H, Li S, et al. Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(24): 7396-7401.
[15]	黎洁. 陕西安康移民搬迁农户的生计适应策略与适应力感知[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(9): 44-52.
	[Li J.Livelihood adaptation strategy and perceived adaptive capacity of rural relocated households in Southern Shaanxi Province, China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(9): 44-52. ]
[16]	李聪, 柳玮, 黄谦. 陕南移民搬迁背景下农户生计资本的现状与影响因素分析[J]. 当代经济科学, 2014, 36(6): 106-112.
	[Li C, Liu W, Huang Q.The current situation and influencing factor analysis on rural households' livelihood capitals in the background of migrates' relocation of Southern Shanxi[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2014, 36(6): 106-126. ]
[17]	Bebbington A.Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty[J]. World Development, 1999, 27(12): 2021-2044.
[18]	Caroline M.Asset-Based Approaches to Poverty Reduction in a Globalized Context[R]. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 2006.
[19]	Sen A.Editorial: Human capital and human capability[J]. World Development, 1997, 25(12): 1959-1961.
[20]	Deere C D.Assets, livelihoods, and social policy[J]. Feminist Economics, 2008, 16(2): 151-153.
[21]	赵文娟, 杨世龙, 王潇. 基于Logistic回归模型的生计资本与生计策略研究-以云南新平县干热河谷傣族地区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 136-143.
	[Zhao W J, Yang S L, Wang X.The relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy based on logistic regression model in Xinping County of Yunnan dry-hot valley[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 136-143. ]
[22]	迈克尔·谢若登. 美国及世界各地的资本建设[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, (1): 23-29.
	[ Herraden M.Asset building in the United States and the rest of the world[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2005, (1): 23-29. ]
[23]	汪德根, 王金莲, 陈田, 等. 乡村居民旅游支持度影响模型及机理-基于不同生命周期阶段的苏州乡村旅游地比较[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426.
	[Wang D G, Wang J L, Chen T, et al. Influence model and mechanism of the rural residents for tourism support: a comparison of rural destinations of Suzhou in different life cycle stages[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1413-1426. ]
[24]	Chin W W.Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling[J]. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1998, 22(1): 7-16.
[25]	Jarvis C B, MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff P M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003, 30(2): 199-218.
[26]	刘军, 富萍萍. 结构方程模型应用陷阱分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2007, 26(2): 268-272.
	[Liu J, Fu P P.Analyses of application traps of SEM[J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 2007, 26(2): 268-272. ]
[27]	李小云, 董强, 饶小龙, 等. 农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J]. 中国农村经济, 2007, (4): 32-39.
	[Li X Y, Dong Q, Rao X L, et al. Method and application of household's vulnerability[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2007, (4): 32-39. ]
[28]	乌云花, 苏日娜, 许黎莉, 等. 牧民生计资本与生计策略关系研究-以内蒙古锡林浩特市和西乌珠穆沁旗为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017, (7): 71-77.
	[Wu Y H, Su R N, Xu L L, et al. Study on the relationship between herdsman's livelihood capital and livelihood strategy-case study of Xilinhot and Xiwuzhumuqin Banner in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017, (7): 71-77. ]
[29]	李春玲. 当代中国社会的声望分层-职业声望与社会经济地位指数测量[J]. 社会学研究, 2005, (2): 74-102.
	[Li C L.Prestige stratification in the contemporary China: occupational prestige measures and socio-economic index[J]. Sociological Studies, 2005, (2): 74-102. ]
[30]	Bagozzi R P.Principles of Marketing Research[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
[31]	Diamantopoulos A.The error term in formative measurement models: interpretation and modeling implications[J]. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2006, 1(1): 7-17.
[32]	Chin W W.The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling[A]. Marcoulides G A. Modern Methods for Business Research[M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.

区域	区县	样本数	样本比例/%
陕南	汉滨区	175	28.3
	镇安县	129	20.9
	商南县	52	8.4
	石泉县	82	13.3
宁夏	红寺堡区	67	10.8
	海原县	61	9.9
	西吉县	52	8.4

路径	权重
路径	陕南	宁夏	全样本
NC₁→NC	0.853**	0.151	0.998**
NC₂→NC	0.505	0.962	0.016
FC₁→FC	0.822***	0.955***	0.850***
FC₂→FC	0.420***	0.103	0.354***
PC₁→PC	0.887***	0.643***	0.700***
PC₂→PC	0.370***	0.670***	0.638***
HC₁→HC	0.216***	0.107	0.260***
HC₂→HC	0.855***	0.893***	0.794***
HC₃→HC	0.009	0.097	0.079
SC₁→SC	0.779***	0.789***	0.760***
SC₂→SC	0.376***	0.397***	0.411***
SC₃→SC	0.415***	0.029	0.296***
IN→IN	1.000***	1.000***	1.000***
POL₁→POL	0.462***	0.342***	0.390***
POL₂→POL	0.620***	0.664***	0.600***
POL₃→POL	0.443***	0.416***	0.500***

变量	R²（R²_adj）
变量	陕南	宁夏	全样本
NC	0.008（0.006）	0.005（-0.001）	0.011（0.009）
FC	0.136（0.134）	0.312（0.308）	0.171（0.169）
PC	0.153（0.151）	0.218（0.214）	0.224（0.223）
HC	0.119（0.117）	0.323（0.320）	0.190（0.189）
SC	0.166（0.164）	0.266（0.261）	0.209（0.208）
IN	0.654（0.649）	0.837（0.831）	0.689（0.686）

效应	路径	陕南			宁夏			全样本
效应	路径	系数		f²		系数	f²	系数	f²
直接效应	POL→NC	-0.089*	0.008		0.068	0.005		-0.104**	0.011
	POL→FC	0.369***	0.158***		0.559***	0.454***		0.413***	0.206***
	POL→PC	0.391***	0.181***		0.467***	0.279***		0.473***	0.289***
	POL→HC	0.345***	0.135***		0.569***	0.478***		0.436***	0.235***
	POL→SC	0.408***	0.199***		0.515***	0.362***		0.458***	0.265***
	NC→IN	-0.015	0.001		-0.025	0.004		-0.046**	0.007
	FC→IN	0.206***	0.096**		0.417***	0.452***		0.197***	0.089***
	PC→IN	0.184***	0.065**		0.082**	0.024		0.201***	0.079***
	HC→IN	0.296***	0.179***		0.341***	0.324***		0.291***	0.169***
	SC→IN	0.269***	0.143***		0.100**	0.031		0.223***	0.099***
	POL→IN	0.173***	0.063**		0.147***	0.078		0.187***	0.073***
间接效应	POL→NC→IN	0.001	-		-0.002	-		0.005	-
	POL→FC→IN	0.076	-		0.233	-		0.081	-
	POL→PC→IN	0.072	-		0.038	-		0.095	-
	POL→HC→IN	0.102	-		0.194	-		0.127	-
	POL→SC→IN	0.110	-		0.050	-		0.102	-
总效应	POL→IN	0.534	-		0.660	-		0.597	-

Research on the impact mechanism of ecological migration policy on rural household income based on the Structural Equation Model with formative indicators

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XIE Xianxiong, DENG Yue, LIU Jiyao, LU Weinan, ZHAO Minjuan. Impact of fallow on off-farm employment of farmers [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 280-292.
[2]	ZHOU Yihu, FANG Tingting, LI li. Decision-making mechanism of farmers’ homestead exit based on the TAM-TPB framework [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(1): 148-160.
[3]	SHAN Yuhong, WANG Linna. Path analysis of farming household differentiation on the diversification of farmland function supply [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1405-1415.
[4]	SHE Qunzhi, WU Xiaoli, PAN An. Effects of climate finance on carbon emissions in recipient countries [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1015-1026.
[5]	GUO Qinghui, LI Shiping, NAN Ling. Farming households’ proenvironmental behaviors from the perspective of environmental literacy [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(5): 856-869.
[6]	HU Yingen, YANG Chunmei, DONG Wenjing, QI Qi, ZHANG Ye, LIN Shuda. Farmers’ homestead exit behavior based on perceived value theory：A case of Jinzhai County in Anhui Province [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 685-695.
[7]	GUAN Rui, WANG Qian, YU Jin. Research on the promotion of poverty alleviation resources input to the distribution justice of poverty-stricken areas [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 735-748.
[8]	ZHAO Minyan, DONG Suocheng, WU Homer C, LI Yu, MA Hong, SHAO Dan, GAO Ning, XIA Bing. Influence of forest experience education on urban public’s environmentally responsible behavior [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 583-592.
[9]	REN Li, WU Meng, GAN Chenlin, CHEN Yinrong. Decision-making mechanism simulation of farmers’ land investment behavior in suburbs based on structural equation modeling-system dynamics [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(2): 286-297.
[10]	Man CHEN,Chenlin GAN,Yun MEI,Yinrong CHEN. Farmland transfer performance and obstacles from the perspective of farmers’ livelihood:Based on rural household survey of greater Wuhan Metropolitan Area [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(8): 1551-1562.
[11]	Xiaoyan MENG. Analysis on residents’ behavior of domestic solid waste source separation based on structural equation [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1111-1119.
[12]	Lingyun MI, Jinqiu CONG, Chaoqiong DING, Lijie QIAO, Ting XU. Why urban residents’ deeds do not match their attitude?A dual mediation model of knowledge-behavior in low-carbon consumption [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 908-918.
[13]	Lihong YU. Effects of rural pro-poor tourism on farming households’ income: A study based on the PSM-DID method [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(5): 955-966.
[14]	SI Ruishi, LU Qian, ZHANG Shuxia, ZHANG Qiangqiang. Effect of prohibition policy of livestock and poultry on alternative livelihood strategies and family income:Based on the evidence of pig farmers’ in Hebei, Henan, and Hubei provinces [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 643-654.
[15]	ZHANG Lanting, HAN Limin, YANG Yiwu. Effect of fishery technology progress on fishermen’s income: Based on tests of provincial panel data in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 655-668.