农地整治权属调整中农户认知与行为的一致性研究

doi:10.18402/resci.2018.01.06

Abstract

Abstract:

The consistency relationship between the cognition and behavior of farmers to the adjustment of land ownership is not only an important part of the theory of farmland ownership adjustment, but also an important reference for policy formulation for land ownership. In order to explore consistency of farmer cognition and behavior in the adjustment of farmland regulation, we examined consistency using correlation analysis, and analyzed difference in the partial effect of the influence of factors about individual and family characteristics, cultivated land resources and village characteristics to farmer cognition and behavior under the Theory of Planned Behavior. We used questionnaire data from 644 households in seven cities (counties) in Hubei. Results show that the cognitive status of farmers was unbalanced within the cognitive mechanism, and that behavioral motivation was lacking. From the perspective of consistency, correlation analysis and modeling showed that consistency Between Subjective Norms and behavior was high, while Attitude Toward The behavior and Perceived behavior Control basically had no consistency with behavior. On the basis of the results of this study, we propose strengthening information publicity and consultation, paying attention to propaganda and mobilization, and giving full play to the role of rural social and economic organizations to promote the smooth implementation of farmland ownership adjustment.

Key words: land ownership adjustment, farmers' cognition and behavior, theory of planned behavior, correlation test, Logistic Regression

Mei WANG, Wenxiong WANG. Consistency of farmers' cognition and behavior in the adjustment of land ownership under farmland consolidation[J].Resources Science, 2018, 40(1): 53-63.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Figure 1

Table 5

Figure 2

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

References 8

[8]	[Liu Y, Yang Q Y, He C Y, et al. Farmers' cognition and response to land consolidation project management-based on the investigation of 22 villages in 6 districts and counties of Chongqing City[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Edition), 2015, (7): 143-150. ]
[9]	赵微, 周惠, 杨钢桥, 等. 农户参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究: 以河南邓州的调查为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(3): 56-57.
	[Zhao W, Zhou H, Yang G Q, et al. Research on the willingness and behavior transformation of farmers' participation after constmction of land consolidation project: take the survey in Henan, Dengzhou as an example[J]. Chinese Land Science, 2016, 30(3): 56-57. ]
[10]	汪萍, 汪文雄, 杨海霞, 等. 农民有效参与对农地整治项目绩效的影响效应研究-基于项目管理行为的中介效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(3): 395-406.
	[Wang P, Wang W X, Yang H X, et al. The effect of farmers' effective participation on the performance of rural land consolidation project-mediating effect analysis based on project management behavior[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(3): 395-406. ]
[11]	汪文雄, 钱圣, 杨钢桥. PPP模式下农地整理项目前期阶段效率影响机理研究[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(2): 341-352.
	[Wang W X, Qian S, Yang G Q.Study on the efficiency influencing mechanism of land consolidation project during the early stage of PPP model[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(2): 341-352. ]
[12]	王文玲, 阚酉浔, 汪文雄, 等. 公众参与土地整理的研究综述[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, (3): 71-75.
	[Wen W L, Kan Y X, Wang W X, et al. Review of public participation in land consolidation[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University Social Sciences Edition, 2011, (3): 71-75. ]
[13]	石峡. 土地整治公众参与机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
	[Shi X.Study on the Mechanism of Public Participation in Land Consolidation[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. ]
[14]	李宴. 土地整理公众参与权及其法律实现[J]. 农村经济, 2015, (7): 35-39.
	[Li Y.Public participation right of land consolidation and its legal realization[J]. Rural Economy, 2015, (7): 35-39. ]
[15]	王瑷玲, 李占军, 张建国, 等. 农民参与土地整理现状及政策建议[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(5): 47-50.
	[Wang A L, Li Z J, Zhang J G, et al. The present situation and policy suggestions of farmers participation in land consolidation[J]. Chinese Land Science, 2008, 22(5): 47-50. ]
[16]	汪文雄, 李敏, 余利红, 等. 农地整治项目农民有效参与的实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(7): 128-137.
	[Wang W X, Li M, Yu L H, et al. Empirical study on farmers' effective participation in land consolidation projects[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(7): 128-137. ]
[17]	汪文雄, 汪萍, 罗冰, 等. 农户有效参与提升农地整治项目绩效的机理研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(7): 159-168.
	[Wang W X, Wang P, Luo B, et al. Study on the mechanism of farmers' effective participation and farmland remediation project performance improvement[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(7): 159-168. ]
[18]	余振国, 吴茨芳. 我国土地整理权属调整的机制建设研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2003, 26(2): 118-120.
	[Yu Z G, Wu C F.Study on the mechanism construction of ownership adjustment in land consolidation in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 26(2): 118-120. ]
[19]	胡昱东, 吴次芳. 我国农村土地整理中土地权属调整问题研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报( 社会科学版), 2009, 9(1): 7-9.
	[Hu Y D, Wu C F.Study on the adjustment of land rights in rural land consolidation in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition), 2009, 9(1): 7-9. ]
[20]	关江华, 张术. 基于主成分的土地整理权属调整影响因素研究-以湖北省沙洋县为例[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2010, 27(5): 90-92.
[1]	关江华. 土地整理权属调整研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2008.
	[Guan J H.Study on Adjustment of Land Consolidation Ownership[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008. ]
[20]	[Guan J H, Zhang S.Study on the influencing factors of ownership adjustment land consolidation based on principal component analysis-taking Shayang County of Hubei Province as an example[J]. Scientific Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2010, 27(5): 90-92. ]
[21]	韩立达, 王艳西. 城乡建设用地增减挂钩中土地权属调整研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(4): 21-27.
[2]	陈晓军. 国内外农村土地整治权属调整研究进展[J]. 国土科技管理, 2012, 29(5): 25-26.
	[Chen X J.Research progress of ownership adjustment of rural land regulation in domestic and foreign[J]. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2012, 29(5): 25-26. ]
[21]	[Han L D, Wang Y X.Study on the adjustment of land rights in the link between urban and rural construction land increase and decrease[J]. Chinese Land Science, 2016, 30(4): 21-27. ]
[22]	王沿军. 如何制定土地开发整理项目中的土地权属调整方案[J]. 资源·产业, 2005, 7(2): 44-45.
[3]	邓正华, 张俊彪, 许志祥, 等. 农村生活环境整治中农户认知与行为响应研究-以洞庭湖湿地保护区水稻主产区为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013, (2): 72-78.
	[Deng Z H, Zhang J B, Xu Z X, et al. Study on Farmers' cognition and behavior response in rural environment improvement project-taking the main rice producing areas in Dongting Lake wetland reserve as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2013, (2): 72-78. ]
[22]	[Wang Y J.How to formulate land ownership adjustment program in land development and consolidation projects?[J]. Resources＆Industries, 2005, 7(2): 44-45. ]
[23]	段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论评述[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008, 16(2): 315-320.
	[Duan W T, Jiang G R.A review of Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(2): 315-320. ]
[24]	Ajzen I.The Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[4]	张董敏, 齐振宏, 李欣蕊, 等. 农户两型农业认知对行为响应的作用机制-基于TPB和多群组SEM的实证研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1482-1484.
	[Zhang D M, Qi Z H, Li X R, et al. The mechanism of farmers' two type agricultural cognition behavior responses-empirical research based on TPB and multi-group SEM[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1482-1484. ]
[25]	赵建欣, 张忠根. 基于计划行为理论的农户安全农产品供给机理探析[J]. 财贸研究, 2007, 18(6): 40-45.
	[Zhao J X, Zhang Z G.An analysis of farmers' agricultural products supply mechanism based on Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2007, 18(6): 40-45. ]
[5]	宋言奇. 发达地区农民环境意识调查分析-以苏州市714个样本为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010, (1): 53-62.
	[Song Y Q.Investigation and analysis of farmers' environmental awareness in developed areas-taking 714 samples from Suzhou city as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2010, (1): 53-62. ]
[6]	王常伟, 顾海英. 农户环境认知、行为决策及其一致性检验-基于江苏农户调查的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1205-1207.
	[Wang C W, Gu H Y.Farmer's environmental cognition, behavior decision and their consistency test-an empirical analysis based on the survey of farmers in Jiangsu[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(10): 1205-1207. ]
[26]	王建华, 马玉婷, 晁熳璐. 农户农药残留认知及其行为意愿影响因素研究-基于全国五省986个农户的调查数据[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(9): 134-138.
	[Wang J H, Ma Y T, Chao M L.Study on farmers' cognition of pesticide residues and the factors affecting their behavioral-based on the survey data of 986 farmers in five provinces of China[J]. Soft Science, 2014, 28(9): 134-138. ]
[7]	陈江婴. 农村环境连片整治工程中公众参与行为的影响机理研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2013.
	[Chen J Y.Study on the Mechanism of Public Participation in Rural Environmental Improvement Project[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2013. ]
[27]	侯博, 应瑞瑶. 分散农户低碳生产行为决策研究-基于TPB和SEM的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015, (2): 4-13.
	[Hou B, Ying R Y.Decision making of low carbon production behavior of decentralized farmers: an empirical analysis based on TPB and SEM[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015, (2): 4-13. ]
[28]	房凯. 不同生计类型农户土地流转研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2010.
	[Fang K.Study on Land Transfer of Farmers with Different Livelihood Types [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2010. ]
[29]	陈晓红, 汪朝霞. 苏州农户兼业行为的因素分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2007, (4): 25-31.
	[Chen X H, Wang C X.Factor analysis of rural household Part-time behavior in Suzhou[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2007, (4): 25-31. ]
[30]	张婷, 吴燕燕, 李来好, 等. 咸鱼品质的质构与感官相关性分析[J]. 水产学报, 2013, 37(2): 305-306.
	[Zhang T, Wu Y Y, Li L H, et al. Texture and sensory correlation analysis of salted fish quality[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2013, 37(2): 305-306. ]
[31]	杨存建, 刘纪远, 黄河, 等. 热带森林植被生物量与遥感地学数据之间的相关性分析[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(3): 476-478.
	[Yang C J, Liu J Y, Huang H, et al. Correlation analysis between biomass of tropical forest vegetation and remote sensing geological data[J]. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(3): 476-478. ]
[32]	散鋆龙, 刘旋峰, 牛长河, 等. 杏果实成熟度特性参数与果柄分离力的相关性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(23): 64-65.
	[San J L, Liu X F, Niu C H, et al. Correlation analysis between fruit maturity parameters and fruit stalk separation ability in apricot[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(23): 64-65. ]
[33]	田甜, 杨钢桥, 汪文雄, 等. 农地整治项目农民参与行为机理研究-基于嵌入性社会结构理论[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015, (7): 16-26.
	[Tian T, Yang G Q, Wang W X, et al. Study on the mechanism of farmers' participation in land consolidation project-based on the Theory of Embedded Social Structure[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015, (7): 16-26. ]
[34]	汪文雄, 王文玲, 朱欣, 等. 农地整理项目实施阶段农户参与程度的影响因素研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2013, (7): 62-68.
	[Wang W X, Wang W L, Zhu X, et al. Study on the influencing factors of farmers' participation degree in the implementation stage of land consolidation project[J]. Chinese Land Science, 2013, (7): 62-68. ]
[8]	刘燕, 杨庆媛, 何春燕, 等. 农户对土地整治项目管理的认知与响应研究-基于重庆市6个区县22个村的调查[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, (7): 143-150.

受访者及家庭特征					耕地资源特征					村集体特征
项目		分组		样本数	比例/%	项目	分组	样本数	比例/%	项目	分组	样本总数	比例/%
性别	男	341	52.95		耕地面积 /hm²	≤0.33	323	50.16		村经济发展水平	很低	25	3.88
性别	女	303	47.05			0.33~0.67	179	27.80			较低	127	19.72
年龄/岁	≤40	40	6.21			0.67~1.33	93	14.44			一般	348	54.04
	40~55	219	34.01	>1.33			49	7.61		较高		130	20.19
	55~65	228	35.40	耕地破碎化程度		很低	127	19.72		很高		14	2.17
	>65	157	24.38			较低		118	18.32		距城镇距离	很远	27	4.19
户主受教育程度	小学及以下	349	54.19			一般	109	16.93		较远	距城镇距离	150	23.29
	初中	245	38.04	较高			233	36.18		一般		106	16.46
	高中	46	7.14	很高			57	8.85		较近		244	37.89
	大专及以上	4	0.62	耕地质量		很低	13	2.02		很近		117	18.17
农业收入比重/%	≤10	352	54.66	耕地质量		较低	83	12.89		成立农村社会经济组织	是	116	18.01
	10~50	204	31.68	一般			254	39.44		成立农村社会经济组织	否	528	81.99
	50~90	9	1.40	较高			245	38.04		—	—	—	—
	>90	79	12.27	很高		49	7.61		—	—	—	—

行为态度（ATT）			主观规范（SN）			认知控制（PBC）
代码		指标		代码	指标	代码	指标
Att₁	提高耕地利用率		Sn₁	邻居对自己开展权属调整的态度		Pbc₁	对权属调整困难度认知
Att₂	降低劳动成本		Sn₂	村精英对自己开展权属调整的态度		Pbc₂	对权属调整成功结果的预判
Att₃	降低灌溉成本		Sn₃	村委会对自己开展权属调整的态度		Pbc₃	对相关信息的掌握程度
Att₄	提高农机生产率		Sn₄	乡政府对自己开展权属调整的态度		Pbc₄	对相关技能的掌握程度
Att₅	提高作物产量		Sn₅	权属调整行为受邻居的影响程度		Pbc₅	对自身拥有参与权属调整时间的评价
Att₆	促进现代农业发展		Sn₆	权属调整行为受村精英的影响程度		Pbc₆	对自身参与权属调整支付能力的评价
Att₇	丰富景观类型		Sn₇	权属调整行为受村委会的影响程度		—	—
Att₈	优化景观格局		Sn₈	权属调整行为受乡政府的影响程度		—	—
Att₉	改善生态环境		Sn₉	邻居积极开展权属调整的程度		—	—
Att₁₀	减少地界冲突		Sn₁₀	村精英积极开展权属调整的程度		—	—
Att₁₁	减少农业生产冲突		Sn₁₁	村委会积极开展权属调整的程度		—	—
Att₁₂	提高农村和谐程度		Sn₁₂	乡政府积极开展权属调整的程度		—	—
—	—		Sn₁₃	村合作组织积极开展权属调整的程度		—	—

	ATT	SN	PBC
KMO	0.82	0.83	0.88
Sig.	0.00	0.00	0.00

行为态度（ATT）					主观规范（SN）					认知控制（PBC）
指标		初始		提取	权重	指标	初始	提取	权重	指标	初始	提取	权重
Att₁	1	0.536	0.06		Sn₁	1	0.572	0.06		Pbc₁	1	0.795	0.16
Att₂	1	0.697	0.08		Sn₂	1	0.698	0.07		Pbc₂	1	0.757	0.15
Att₃	1	0.676	0.08		Sn₃	1	0.633	0.06		Pbc₃	1	0.900	0.18
Att₄	1	0.649	0.08		Sn₄	1	0.713	0.07		Pbc₄	1	0.899	0.18
Att₅	1	0.555	0.06		Sn₅	1	0.774	0.08		Pbc₅	1	0.818	0.17
Att₆	1	0.656	0.08		Sn₆	1	0.800	0.08		Pbc₆	1	0.812	0.16
Att₇	1	0.815	0.09		Sn₇	1	0.751	0.08		—	—	—	—
Att₈	1	0.823	0.09		Sn₈	1	0.848	0.09		—	—	—	—
Att₉	1	0.787	0.09		Sn₉	1	0.817	0.08		—	—	—	—
Att₁₀	1	0.887	0.10		Sn₁₀	1	0.848	0.09		—	—	—	—
Att₁₁	1	0.908	0.10		Sn₁₁	1	0.701	0.07		—	—	—	—
Att₁₂	1	0.762	0.09		Sn₁₂	1	0.873	0.09		—	—	—	—
—	—	—	—		Sn₁₃	1	0.788	0.08		—	—	—	—

选项	分值	频数	比重/%
没有参与权属调整	1	420	65.22
消极地参与权属调整	2	8	1.24
被动地参与权属调整	3	25	3.88
较积极地参与权属调整	4	58	9.01
非常积极地参与权属调整	5	133	20.65
小计	—	644	100

Consistency of farmers' cognition and behavior in the adjustment of land ownership under farmland consolidation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 8

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

类别	变量	赋值规则
受访者及家庭特征	受访者的年龄（Age）	1=40岁及以下;2=41~55岁;3=56~65岁;4=65岁以上
	户主受教育程度（Edu）	1=小学及以下;2=初中;3=高中或中专;4=大专及以上
	家庭农业收入比重（Aip）	农业收入占家庭总收入的比例
耕地资源特征	耕地面积（Acr）	家庭承包耕地的总面积
	耕地质量（Qua）	1=很差;2=较差;3=一般;4=较好;5=很好
	耕地破碎化程度（Fra）	1=很低;2=较低;3=一般;4=较高;5=很高
村集体特征	村经济发展水平（Eco）	1=很低;2=较低;3=一般;4=较高;5=很高
	距城镇距离（Dis）	1=很远;2=较远;3=一般;4=较近;5=很近
	成立社会经济组织（Ass）	1=是;2=否

		卡方	DF	P值
认知	ATT	99.400	84	0.119
	SN	93.051	84	0.234
	PBC	133.855	112	0.078
行为	Behavior	91.303	75	0.097

	自变量	因变量
		认知ATT		认知SN		认知PBC		行为Behavior
		Estimate	p	Estimate	p	Estimate	p		Estimate	p
受访者及家庭特征	受访者年龄	-0.281**	0.017	0.324***	0.007	-0.074	0.522		1.406***	0
	户主受教育程度	-0.280	0.090	0.267	0.193	-0.114	0.620		-0.011	0.070
	家庭农业收入比重	0.019	0.090	0.027**	0.049	0.012	0.291		-0.037***	0.002
耕地资源特征	承包耕地的面积	-0.020	0.128	0.006	0.662	-0.036***	0.006		0.227***	0
	承包耕地的质量	0.139	0.400	-0.372	0.066	-0.236	0.159		0.033	0.097
	农地破碎化程度	-0.010	0.134	0.176	0.077	-0.003	0.693		0.520	0.130
村集体特征	村经济发展水平	-0.104***	0	1.563***	0	1.181***	0.001		-4.020	0.970
	距城镇的距离	1.115**	0.013	-1.107***	0.004	-1.129***	0.001		0.435	0.160
	成立社会经济组织	0.793	0.134	-0.636***	0.003	0.807***	0		-0.244***	0.010

[1]	ZHOU Yihu, FANG Tingting, LI li. Decision-making mechanism of farmers’ homestead exit based on the TAM-TPB framework [J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(1): 148-160.
[2]	LI Min, CHEN Yao, TANG Peng, FENG Yue. Influence of family life cycle on farming households’ willingness to exit rural residential land [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1692-1703.
[3]	Wenxiong WANG, Zhiqiang LIU. Differences in farming households’ cognition of ownership adjustment benefits in rural land consolidation and causes [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(7): 1329-1338.
[4]	Zhengwei LIU, Meichen FU, Qian DING. Driving force evolution of land use change in a border trade area of China [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(4): 729-736.
[5]	Zhen CHEN, Jie GUO, Minghao OU. Characterization of the differences between farmers' intentionfor farmland transfer and their circulation behavior [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 2039-2047.
[6]	Yasheng WAN, Jiumiao CHENG, Jiuxing WU, Luocheng FEI, Yuting XU. Differences between rural homestead exit intention and exit behavior based on theory of planned behavior [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(7): 1281-1290.
[7]	Jian CHENG, Jiumiao CHENG, Luocheng FEI, Yuting XU, Yihu ZHOU. Modeling of farmer household psychological decision-making in farmland transfer [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(5): 818-826.
[8]	Qin GAO, Changlin AO, Biqi MAO, Yuxuan LU. Analysis of willingness to pay for ecosystem services and influence factors based on the TPB [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(5): 893-901.
[9]	ZHU Xinhua,WANG Han. Farmer willingness to participate in rural housing land capitalization reform and influence factors in different models [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(9): 1702-1710.
[10]	ZHAO Wenjuan,YANG Shilong,WANG Xiao. The relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy based on logistic regression model in Xinping County of Yuanjiang dry-hot valley [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 136-143.
[11]	LI Cuimei,LIU Ying,ZHONG Weiyu. Influencing factors of rural households' willingness for rights of contractual land management mortgage loans based on surveys in Changsha County [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(8): 1571-1577.
[12]	LI Bohua,LIU Yan,ZHANG Anlu,DOU Yindi. Farm households’ perception and responses to homestead：A case study of 2 typical village in Linhu County, Hengyang City [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(4): 654-662.
[13]	GAO Ran,ZHANG Zhen. The lock-in effect of residential energy consumption：A case study in Shanghai City [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(4): 733-743.
[14]	ZHOU Xiaoping,WANG Qing,GU Xiaokun,QIAN Hui. Factors influencing the effect of rural residence replacement based on Logistic regression modeling for Waigang,Shanghai [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(2): 258-264.
[15]	HAN Feng,WANG Changhai,ZHAO Zheng,REN Yanmei,WEN Yali. The combined influence of nature reserves from the perspective of farmer households in Shaanxi [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(1): 102-111.