黄淮海平原区土地利用变化对地下水资源量变化的影响

doi:10.18402/resci.2017.06.10

Abstract

Abstract:

Impacts of land use on hydrologic processes and environmental problems caused by land use are hot research topics in global. Facing water shortages in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain,a method of grid water balance principle is presented here based on a 1km grid geographic information database. The grid water balance model was applied to simulate groundwater storage of 310 863 grids in 1990 and 2010. The result of grid water balance effectively simulated the groundwater storage of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in 1990 and 2010. The reduction of groundwater storage from 1990 to 2010 has a close link with land use change and the water consumption intensity of land. The trend of land use change is that construction land occupies cultivated land and cultivated land occupies ecological land in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain from 1990 and 2010. The rank for water consumption strength of land use grid is:Construction land > Cultivated land > Grassland and Unused land. Low water consumption strength land type turns to high water consumption rate land type in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain,which means less groundwater storage in 20 years. Grid construction land water consumption increased by 1.07 million m³/km² in 2010 from 1.66 million m³/km² in 1990,grid cultivated land water consumption changed from 519 thousand m³/km² in 1990 to 575 thousand m³/km² in 2010. The water consumption rate of construction land and cultivated land increased consecutively. The rule of land use change is important for Huang-Huai-Hai Plain ground water decline.

Key words: groundwater storage, water balance, land use change, Huang-Huai-Hai Plain

Ming LEI, Xiangbin KONG, Xueliang ZHANG, Fangfang WU. Land use change and impact on groundwater storage in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J].Resources Science, 2017, 39(6): 1099-1116.

Figures/Tables 18

Figure 1

Table 1

Study data description"

数据名称	数据描述	数据来源
土地利用数据	空间分辨率为1km $×$ 1km,分别为1990年、2010年两期	中国科学院资源环境科学数据中心^[17]
降水量	空间分辨率为1km $×$ 1km,1990-2010年	中国气象数据网中国地面累年值年值数据集^[18]
蒸散发数据	1980-2006年由IBIS（Input Buffer Information Specificati-on）模型输出的全球蒸散发数据,空间分辨率为0.5 $° ×$ 0.5 $°$ 栅格;由于缺少2010年蒸散发数据,2001-2010年是MOD16全球蒸散发数据产品,空间分辨率为1km $×$ 1km;两套数据时间分辨率为年	1980-2006年数据来源于国家地球系统数据共享平台-全球变化模拟集成科学数据中心^[19];2001-2010年数据来源于用NASA（National Aeronautics and Space Administration）全球蒸散发数据产品^[20]
出入境水资源流量	1998-2010年外调水量和入海水量	外调水量和入海水量来源于海河流域水资源公报,黄河流域水资源公报以及淮河流域水资源公报^[21-23]
地下水侧向补给量测算所需参数	潜流入渗系数,垂直于剖面的水力坡度,单位长度剖面面积,计算长度等	《河北省地下水资源勘查报告》^[24]
不透水系数 $α$	透水系数 $α$ 为0.633,林地的不透水系数 $α$ 为0.291,水域的不透水系数 $α$ 为1,草地的不透水系数 $α$ 为0.369,未利用土地的不透水系数 $α$ 为0.369	不透水系数 $α$ 参考了钱建等的模拟结果^[25]
地表水供给系数 $β$	建设用地、耕地以及水域的地表水供给系数 $β$ 数据	由于缺乏建设用地、耕地以及水域的地表水供给系数 $β$ 数据,通过海河流域水资源公报,黄河流域水资源公报以及淮河流域水资源公报的农业部门、工业部门以及生态耗水对地表水的消耗占比近似替代
统计数据	县域工业产值、人口数据以及粮食产量数据	据王静爱的研究^[26],300~600mm降水带的居民每天耗水量在40~60L之间,年平均的耗水量为18.25m³,工业耗水数据主要依据全国万元工业产值耗水量进行计算;统计数据来源于中国经济与社会发展统计数据库中各县市统计年鉴^[27]

Table 1

Figure 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Figure 3

Figure 4

Table 5

Figure 5

Figure 6

Table 6

Groundwater storage calculation of ecological land in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain from 1990 to 2010（亿m3）"

生态用地地下水蓄变量计算		北四河下游	子牙河	徒骇马颊河	大清河	漳卫河	黑龙港运东	黄河下游	淮河上游	淮河中游	淮河下游	南四湖
1990年	水域有效降水	0.98	0.17	0.32	0.74	0.06	0.19	0.87	0.87	0.75	2.93	0.22
	水域蒸散量	7.57	1.59	2.83	6.22	0.54	1.56	7.29	6.41	5.00	19.95	1.71
	河流补给量	8.51	1.74	2.96	6.76	0.57	1.76	11.08	7.62	6.22	15.93	3.13
	山前侧向补给	0.08	0.05	-	0.19	0.01	-	0.08	0.04	-	-	-
	水域蓄变量	2.00	0.37	0.45	1.47	0.10	0.39	4.74	2.12	1.97	-1.09	1.64
	草地有效降水	3.28	1.59	0.97	2.65	3.10	0.29	4.43	3.24	2.18	2.57	0.35
	草地蒸散量	3.01	1.57	0.93	2.46	3.04	0.26	4.14	3.14	2.13	2.34	0.38
	山前侧向补给	0.03	0.06	-	0.09	0.09	-	0.06	0.02	-	-	-
	草地蓄变量	0.30	0.08	0.04	0.28	0.15	0.03	0.35	0.12	0.05	0.23	-0.03
	林地有效降水	9.27	0.45	0.95	0.67	2.85	0.03	1.19	6.77	2.02	7.84	0.62
	林地蒸散量	10.93	0.59	1.16	0.80	3.76	0.03	1.45	6.81	1.93	7.21	0.68
	山前侧向补给	0.10	0.02	-	0.02	0.08	-	0.01	0.04	-	-	-
	林地蓄变量	-1.56	-0.12	-0.21	-0.11	-0.83	0.00	-0.25	0.00	0.09	0.63	-0.06
	未利用土地有效降水	2.03	0.00	3.12	0.22	0.12	0.55	3.28	0.10	0.00	0.09	0.28
	未利用土地蒸散量	2.33	0.00	4.57	0.28	0.11	0.76	3.56	0.13	0.01	0.13	0.32
	山前侧向补给	0.02	0.00	-	0.01	0.00	-	0.04	0.00	-	-	-
	未利用土地蓄变量	-0.28	0.00	-1.45	-0.05	0.01	-0.21	-0.24	-0.03	-0.01	-0.04	-0.04
	生态用地总蓄变量	0.46	0.33	-1.17	1.59	-0.57	0.21	4.60	2.21	2.10	-0.27	1.51
2010年	水域有效降水	1.03	0.16	0.38	0.68	0.06	0.21	0.78	0.82	0.77	2.93	0.22
	水域蒸散量	8.37	1.59	3.12	5.55	0.45	1.96	6.94	6.04	5.39	20.91	1.79
	河流补给量	9.46	1.83	3.56	6.28	0.51	2.25	8.23	7.58	6.71	19.59	4.27
	山前侧向补给	0.08	0.05	0.00	0.18	0.01	0.00	0.07	0.04	0.00	0.00	0.00
	水域蓄变量	2.20	0.45	0.82	1.59	0.13	0.50	2.14	2.40	2.09	1.61	2.70
	草地有效降水	2.55	1.45	0.90	2.44	2.89	0.00	2.31	2.24	2.28	2.27	0.25
	草地蒸散量	2.90	1.91	1.12	2.88	3.76	0.00	2.70	2.35	2.32	2.10	0.28
	山前侧向补给	0.03	0.06	0.00	0.09	0.09	0.00	0.03	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.00
	草地蓄变量	-0.32	-0.40	-0.22	-0.35	-0.78	0.00	-0.36	-0.10	-0.04	0.17	-0.03
	林地有效降水	8.42	0.42	0.85	0.70	2.43	0.04	1.21	7.06	2.08	7.63	0.58
	林地蒸散量	11.61	0.62	1.26	0.99	3.55	0.05	1.64	7.02	1.98	6.70	0.70
	山前侧向补给	0.09	0.02	0.00	0.03	0.07	0.00	0.02	0.04	0.00	0.00	0.00
	林地蓄变量	-3.10	-0.18	-0.41	-0.26	-1.05	-0.01	-0.41	0.08	0.10	0.93	-0.12
	未利用土地有效降水	1.65	0.00	2.53	0.17	0.05	0.47	1.50	0.03	0.00	0.03	0.23
	未利用土地蒸散量	1.96	0.00	4.12	0.25	0.07	0.65	1.86	0.04	0.00	0.02	0.30
	山前侧向补给	0.02	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.02	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	未利用土地蓄变量	-0.29	0.00	-1.59	-0.07	-0.02	-0.18	-0.34	-0.01	0.00	0.01	-0.07
	生态用地总蓄变量	-1.51	-0.13	-1.40	0.91	-1.72	0.31	1.03	2.37	2.15	2.72	2.48

Table 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Table 7

Table 8

Figure 10

References 38

[1]	Varosmarty C J,Green P,Salisbury J,et al.Global water resources:Vulnerability from climate change and population growth[J]. Science,2000,289(5477):284-288.
[2]	Defries R,Eshleman N K.Land-use change and hydrologic processes:A major focus for the future[J]. Hydrological Pro-cesses,2004,18(11):2183-2186.
[3]	夏军,左其亭. 国际水文科学研究的新进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2006,21(3):256-261.
	[Xia J,Zuo Q T.Advances in international hydrological science research[J]. Advances in Earths Science,2006,21(3):256-261.]
[4]	郝晋珉. 黄淮海平原土地利用[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2013.
	[Hao J M.Land Use in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2013.]
[5]	费宇红,苗晋祥,张兆吉,等. 华北平原地下水降落漏斗演变及主导因素分析[J]. 资源科学,2009,31(3):394-399.
	[Fei Y H,Miao J X,Zhang Z J,et al.Analysis on evolution of ground-water depression cones and its leading factors in North China Plain[J]. Resources Science,2009,31(3):394-399.]
[6]	Grafton R Q.Addressing China's water scarcity:Recommend-ations for selected water resource management issues[J]. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature,2009,23(2):124-125.
[7]	Yu C,Gong P,Yin Y.China's water crisis needs more than words[J]. Nature,2011,470(7334):307-307.
[8]	谢高地,甄霖,陈操操,等. 流域宏观尺度降雨-景观-径流变化的相互作用[J]. 资源科学,2007,29(2):156-163.
	[Xie G D,Zhen L,Cheng C C,et al.The changes and their interactions of precipitation-landscape-runoff in Jinghe Watershed[J]. Re-sources Science,2007,29(2):156-163.]
[9]	Tong S T Y,Sun Y,Ranatunga T,et al. Predicting plausible impacts of sets of climate and land use change scenarios on water resources[J]. Applied Geography,2012,32(2):477-489.
[10]	Zhang Xueliang, Li Ren,and Xiangbin Kong. Estimating spatio-temporal variability and sustainability of shallow groundwater in a well-irrigated plain of the Haihe River basin using SWAT model[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2016,541:1221-1240.
[11]	Freeze R A,Harlan R L.Blueprint for a physically-based digi-tally-simulated hydrological response model[J]. Journal of Hydronautics,1969,9(3):237-258.
[12]	Wang B,Jin M,Nimmo J R,et al.Estimating groundwater re-charge in Hebei Plain,China under varying land use practices using tritium and bromide tracers[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2008,356(1-2):209-222.
[13]	张光辉,费宇红,刘春华,等. 华北平原灌溉用水强度与地下水承载力适应性状况[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(1):1-10.
	[Zhang G H,Fei Y H,Liu C H,et al.Adaptation between irrigation intensity and groundwater carrying capacity in North China Plain[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricul-tural Engineering,2013,29(1):1-10.]
[14]	Mantoudi K,Mamassis N,Koutsoyiannis D.Simple Water Balance Model Using a Geographical Information System[R]. Nice:26th General Assembly of the European Geophysical Society,2001.
[15]	曾维华,孙强,杨志峰. 基于Grid的流域动态水平衡模型研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(5):73-77.
	[Zeng W H,Sun Q,Yang Z F.Research on GRID-based dynamic water balance model of Jin river basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2005,19(5):73-77.]
[16]	张雪靓,孔祥斌. 黄淮海平原地下水危机下的耕地资源可持续利用[J]. 中国土地科学,2014,28(5):90-96.
	[Zhang X L,Kong X B.Cropland sustainable use impacted by groundwater deple-tion in China’s HHH Plains[J]. China Land Sciences,2014,28(5):90-96.]
[17]	中国科学院资源环境科学数据中心. 土地利用数据[EB/OL]. (2012-02-20)[2016-06-06]. .
	[Resources and Environment Science Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Land-use Data[EB/OL]. (2012-02-20)[2016-06-06]. .]
[18]	中国气象数据网. 中国地面累年值年值数据[EB/OL]. (2012-08-28)[2016-06-06]. http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0029.0005.html.
	[China Meteorological Data Network. China Ground Annual Data[EB/OL].(2012-08-28)[2016-06-06]. http://data.cma.cn/data/detail/dataCode/A.0029.0005.html.]
[19]	国家地球系统数据共享平台-全球变化模拟集成科学数据中心. IBIS模型输出的全球蒸散发数据集[EB/OL]. (2016-11-05)[2016-12-06].
	[Earth System National Sharing Data Platform-Changing Global Data Center. Global Evapor-ation Data Set of IBIS Model[EB/OL]. (2016-11-05)[2016-12-06]. .]
[20]	美国国家航空航天局. MODIS全球蒸散发产品[DB/OL](2017-03-04)[2016-12-06].
	[National Aeronautics and Space Administration. MODIS Global Evacuation Products[DB/OL](2017-03-04)[2016-12-06]. .]
[21]	水利部海河水利委员会. 海河流域水资源公报[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-12-06].
	[Haihe River Conservancy Commission of Ministry of Water Resources. Water Resources Bulletin of Haihe River Basin[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-12-06]. .]
[22]	水利部黄河水利委员会. 黄河流域水资源公报[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-06-06].
	[Yellow River Conservancy Commission of Ministry of Water Resources. Water Resources Bulletin of Yellow River Basin[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-06-06]. .]
[23]	水利部淮河水利委员会. 淮河流域水资源公报[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-06-06]. .
	[Huaihe River Conservancy Commission of Ministry of Water Resources. Water Resources Bulletin of Huaihe River Basin[EB/OL]. (2011-04-01)[2016-06-06]. .]
[24]	河北省环境地质勘查院. 河北省地下水资源勘查报告[EB/OL]. (2016-09-26)[2016-12-06].
	[The Environmental Geological Prospect-ing Institute in Hebei Province. Groundwater Resources Explor-ation Report[EB/OL]. (2016-09-26)[2016-12-06].
[25]	钱健,赵智杰. 基于简单水平衡模型的流域Lucc水文效应模拟研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2009,16(3):11-15.
	[Qian J,Zhao Z J.Simulation research of hydrological response on watershed land use and land cover change based on a simple water balance model[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(3):11-15.]
[26]	王静爱,毛睿,周俊菊,等. 基于入户调查的中国北方人口生活耗水量估算与地域差异[J]. 自然资源学报,2006,21(2):231-237.
	[Wang J A,Mao R,Zhou J J,et al.Estimation of domestic water consumption and its regional disparity in northern China based on household survey[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2006,21(2):231-237.]
[27]	中国经济与社会发展统计数据库. 县市统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2011-12-01)[2016-06-06].
	[China Economic and Social Development Statistical Database. Counties Statistical Yearbook[EB/OL]. (2011-12-01) [2016-06-06]. ]
[28]	中国人民共和国国土资源部. TD/T 1010-2015土地利用动态遥感监测规程[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
	[Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China. TD/T 1010-2015Regulaitons for Land Use Dynamic Monitoring by Remote Sensing[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2015.]
[29]	朱会义,李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J]. 地理学报,2003,58(5):643-650.
	[Zhu H Y,Li X B.Discussion on the index method of regional land use change[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2003,58(5):643-650.]
[30]	Long H,Tang G,Li X,et al.Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan,the Yangtze River delta economic area of China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2007,83(3):351-364.
[31]	吴炳方,闫娜娜,蒋礼平,等. 流域耗水平衡方法与应用[J]. 遥感学报,2011,15(2):281-297.
	[Wu B F,Yan N N,Jiang L P,et al.A method of water consumption balance and application[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing,2011,15(2):281-297.]
[32]	吴喜芳,沈彦俊,张丛,等. 基于植被遥感信息的作物蒸散量估算模型-以华北平原冬小麦为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2014,22(8):920-927.
	[Wu X F,Shen Y J,Zhang C,et al.Modeling crop evapotranspiration using remotely sensed vegetation data:A case study of winter wheat in the North China Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2014,22(8):920-927.]
[33]	胡兴林,肖洪浪,蓝永超,等. 黑河中上游段河道渗漏量计算方法的试验研究[J]. 冰川冻土,2012,34(2):460-468.
	[Hu X L,Xiao H L,Lan Y C,et al.Experimental study of calculating method of river seepage in middle and upper reaches of the Heihe River[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2012,34(2):460-468.]
[34]	王淑华. 介绍几种计算河流渗漏补给量的公式[J]. 地下水,1985,(1):52-54.
	[Wang S H.Introduce a few kinds formula of leakage recharge[J]. Ground Water,1985,(1):52-54.]
[35]	尹军,杨志勇,袁喆,等. 1961-2011年黄淮海地区极端降水时空变化特征[J]. 灾害学,2015,(3):71-75.
	[Yin J,Yang Z Y,Yuan J,et al.Temporal and spatial variation of extreme precipit-ation in Huang-Huai-Hai Area,1961-2011[J]. Journal of Cata-strophology,2015,(3):71-75.]
[36]	赵林,武建军,吕爱锋,等. 黄淮海平原及其附近地区干旱时空动态格局分析-基于标准化降雨指数[J]. 资源科学,2011,33(3):468-476.
	[Zhao L,Wu J J,Lv A F,et al.Spatial and temporal analysis of drought over the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain and its surroundings based on the standardized precipitation index[J]. Resources Science,2011,33(3):468-476.]
[37]	张宗祜,李烈荣. 中国地下水资源与环境图集[M]. 北京:中国地图出版社,2004.
	[Zhang Z H,Li L R.The Atlas of Ground-water Resources and Environment of China[M]. Beijing:Sino Map Press,2004.]
[38]	全国地下水动态信息网. 地下水蓄变量实际监测数据[EB/OL]. (2011-09-05)[2016-06-06].
	[National Groundwater Dynamic Information Network. Groundwater Storage Monitoring Data[EB/OL]. (2011-09-05)[2016-06-06]. .]

1990年	2010年							2010年变化百分比/%
1990年	耕地	建设用地	草地	水域	林地	未利用土地	总量	2010年变化百分比/%
耕地	197 528	35 360	1 170	4 025	1 151	617	239 851	-2.80
建设用地	27 506	16 364	312	782	205	111	45 280	18.28
草地	2 020	333	2 415	106	444	11	5 329	-17.77
水域	3 667	935	135	6 339	270	86	11 432	0.83
林地	1 343	239	333	143	4 252	52	6 362	0.33
未利用土地	1 071	328	17	132	61	1 000	2 609	-28.06
总量	233 135	53 559	4 382	11 527	6 383	1 877	310 863

土地利用类型	2010年变化百分比	耕地	建设用地	草地	水域	林地	未利用土地	净变化量
耕地	-2.80	-	-7 854	850	-358	192	454	-6 716
建设用地	18.28	7 854	-	21	153	34	217	8 279
草地	-17.77	-850	-21	-	29	-111	6	-947
水域	0.83	358	-153	-29	-	-127	46	95
林地	0.33	-192	-34	111	127	-	9	21
未利用土地	-28.06	-454	-217	-6	-46	-9	-	-732

流域	1990年建设用地地下水蓄变量计算							2010年建设用地地下水蓄变量计算
流域	山前侧向补给	地表水供给量	有效降水	地面蒸发量	生活耗水量	工业耗水量	1990年地下水蓄变量	山前侧向补给	地表水供给量	有效降水	地面蒸发量	生活耗水量	工业耗水量	2010年地下水蓄变量
北四河下游	0.22	14.71	10.45	4.31	3.79	15.28	2.00	0.30	12.82	14.16	10.97	6.43	29.39	-19.51
子牙河流域	0.27	14.46	3.53	1.17	2.61	5.94	8.54	0.37	14.04	4.80	2.87	2.82	9.22	4.30
徒骇马颊河	-	46.00	8.87	1.37	2.85	4.31	46.34	-	45.10	10.48	4.10	3.38	10.94	37.16
大清河流域	0.33	12.31	4.65	1.24	2.49	8.80	4.76	0.45	12.12	6.09	3.93	3.50	19.59	-8.36
漳卫河流域	0.15	13.77	2.54	1.13	1.32	1.89	12.12	0.18	13.29	3.02	2.15	1.34	3.11	9.89
黑龙港运东	-	4.33	4.90	0.67	1.87	5.52	1.17	-	4.19	6.20	1.68	3.51	11.81	-6.61
黄河下游	0.20	21.43	8.79	1.27	2.38	4.13	22.64	0.24	27.85	9.52	2.82	2.90	8.79	23.10
淮河上游	0.32	21.47	24.76	2.57	3.30	11.58	29.10	0.35	30.10	26.19	6.24	4.57	24.44	21.39
淮河中游	-	32.95	18.40	2.21	2.75	3.99	42.40	-	34.23	19.43	3.19	3.36	8.81	38.30
淮河下游	-	23.14	24.79	3.91	4.03	7.27	32.72	-	24.82	25.38	4.95	4.80	19.25	21.20
南四湖	-	30.92	5.93	0.73	1.48	1.59	33.05	-	37.20	6.77	1.94	1.76	5.92	34.35

流域	1990年耕地地下水蓄变量计算					2010年耕地地下水蓄变量计算
流域	山前侧向补给	有效降水量	地表水供给量	农作物蒸散发量	1990年地下水蓄变量	山前侧向补给	有效降水量	地表水供给量	农作物蒸散发量	2010年地下水蓄变量
北四河下游	0.82	75.58	4.92	80.39	0.93	0.74	66.14	4.28	82.81	-11.65
子牙河流域	2.13	53.58	4.83	71.60	-11.06	2.03	49.97	4.69	83.30	-26.61
徒骇马颊河	-	99.37	15.37	126.86	-12.12	-	93.80	15.07	146.88	-38.01
大清河流域	2.43	64.09	4.11	79.49	-8.86	2.32	59.83	4.05	89.61	-23.41
漳卫河流域	1.12	28.02	4.60	33.87	-0.13	1.10	26.00	4.44	37.82	-6.28
黑龙港运东	-	74.84	1.45	90.75	-14.46	-	70.48	1.40	101.74	-29.86
黄河下游流域	0.91	81.03	83.20	96.84	68.30	0.91	78.68	84.37	107.64	56.32
淮河上游	1.68	250.79	35.25	259.67	28.05	1.65	240.80	49.42	275.49	16.38
淮河中游	-	193.86	63.65	188.41	69.10	-	187.01	68.12	191.17	63.96
淮河下游	-	168.29	38.00	151.61	54.68	-	157.78	40.75	154.12	44.41
南四湖	-	60.37	55.77	67.58	48.56	-	55.92	58.07	71.45	42.54

流域	地下水蓄变量变化计算			地下水蓄变量变化贡献度
流域	1990年蓄变量	2010年蓄变量	地下水蓄变量变化	建设用地	耕地	生态用地
北四河下游	3.39	-32.67	-36.06	59.65	34.89	5.46
子牙河	-2.19	-22.44	-20.25	20.94	76.79	2.27
徒骇马颊河	33.05	-2.25	-35.30	26.01	73.34	0.65
大清河	-2.51	-30.86	-28.35	46.28	51.32	2.40
漳卫河	11.42	1.89	-9.53	23.40	64.53	12.07
黑龙港运东	-13.08	-36.16	-23.08	33.71	66.72	-0.43
黄河下游	95.54	80.45	-15.09	-3.05	79.39	23.66
淮河上游	59.36	40.14	-19.22	40.11	60.72	-0.83
淮河中游	113.60	104.41	-9.19	44.61	55.93	-0.54
淮河下游	87.13	68.33	-18.80	61.28	54.63	-15.90
南四湖	83.12	79.37	-3.75	-34.67	160.53	-25.87

Land use change and impact on groundwater storage in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 38

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

1990年土地利用类型	2010年土地利用类型
1990年土地利用类型	耕地	建设用地	草地	水域	林地	未利用土地
耕地	-105.89	-65.30	0.67	33.45	0.68	0.40
建设用地	37.54	-76.36	0.62	6.61	0.41	0.23
草地	-1.25	-1.24	0.03	2.60	0.01	0.00
水域	-32.00	-7.19	-0.08	-10.16	-0.16	-0.06
林地	-0.82	-0.89	0.01	1.15	0.13	0.01
未利用土地	-1.06	-2.27	0.00	1.62	0.00	-0.05

[1]	LIU Qihang, HUANG Chang. Spatiotemporal change of water balance components in the inland region of Northwest China, 1998-2017 [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1175-1187.
[2]	CHEN Qiong, ZHANG Yili, LIU Fenggui, ZHOU Qiang, WANG Shengzhen, CHENG Yi, GUO Rong, ZHI Zemin, XU Huange. A review of land use change and its influence in the source region of the Yellow River [J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(3): 446-459.
[3]	GAO Yang,ZHAO Duanyang,YU Lili. Family farms’ policy preferences and willingness to accept compensation on green pest control techniques [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(10): 1837-1848.
[4]	Wenhui KUANG. Issues regarding on spatial pattern change of national land space and its overall implementation onbeautiful vision in new era [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(1): 23-32.
[5]	Xiang HAN, Yunhe YIN, Shaohong WU, Haoyu DENG. Evapotranspiration simulation and its spatio-temporal variation characteristics in Fenqin Region [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(8): 1658-1671.
[6]	Zhengwei LIU, Meichen FU, Qian DING. Driving force evolution of land use change in a border trade area of China [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(4): 729-736.
[7]	Bin LI, Yueyan LIU, Bin ZHANG, Jincheng HUANG, Xiaoyu GUO. Multi-scenario land use change simulation in Caidian using CLUE-S based on Tietenberg Modeling [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(9): 1739-1752.
[8]	Guanglong DONG, Erqi XU, Hongqi ZHANG. The spatial distribution and evolution of different types of rural settlements on Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(7): 1248-1258.
[9]	Yang GAO, Xiao ZHANG, Jiao LU, Lei WU. Research on adoption behavior of green control techniques by family farms [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(5): 934-944.
[10]	CHEN Li,HAO Jinmin,WANG Feng,YIN Yuying,GAO Yang,DUAN Wenkai,YANG Jun. Carbon sequestration function of cultivated land use system based on the carbon cycle for the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(6): 1039-1053.
[11]	XU Zhiying,ZHONG Taiyang. Relationship between changes in revenue sharing policy for land conveyance and arable land loss [J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 73-82.
[12]	WANG Yurong,LONG Kaisheng. A review of the impact of payments for ecosystem services on land use change：appearance,factors and mechanisms [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1807-1815.
[13]	YANG Yongfang, ZHU Lianqi. The Theory and Diagnostic Methods of Land Use Conflicts [J]. , 2012, 34(6): 1134-1141.
[14]	HUANG Ming, RU Hao, ZHANG Jianjun, ZHANG Xuexia, ZHAO Ziyang. A Multi-Scale Simulation of Land Use Change in Luoyugou Watershed Based on CLUE-S Model [J]. , 2012, 34(4): 769-776.
[15]	SHAN Fuzheng, QIAN Guangren, YU Jia, ZHAO Jun. Land Use Change in the Suburb Area and Its Impacts on Carbon Emissions in the Process of Industrialization: A Case Study of Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Shanghai [J]. , 2011, 33(8): 1600-1607.