Resources Science ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 441-450.doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.03.06
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2016-09-12
Revised:
2016-12-12
Online:
2017-03-20
Published:
2017-03-20
Dan QIAO, Qian LU, Tao XU. Social network,extension service and farmers water-saving irrigation technology adoption in Minqin County[J].Resources Science, 2017, 39(3): 441-450.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Variable definitions and statistical descriptions"
潜变量 | 显变量 | 变量定义及赋值 | 均值 | 标准差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
节水灌溉 | 采用意愿 | 农户采用节水灌溉技术意愿:很不愿意=1;不愿意=2;一般=3;愿意=4;很愿意=5 | 2.715 | 1.095 |
技术采用 | 支付意愿 | 农户愿意投资节水灌溉的比例:<20%=1;20%~39%=2;40%~59%=3;60%~79%=4; | 1.574 | 1.060 |
采用面积 | 农户实际采用节水灌溉技术面积:0hm2=1;0~0.33hm2=2;0.33~1hm2=3;1~2.67hm2=4; | 2.068 | 1.369 | |
社会网络 | 网络学习 | 农户是否与他人交流技术问题:从不=1;偶尔=2;一般=3;经常=4;频繁=5 | 3.310 | 1.011 |
网络互动 | 农户是否和他人一起解决日常问题:从不=1;偶尔=2;一般=3;经常=4;频繁=5 | 2.884 | 0.990 | |
网络互惠 | 农户是否能从周围人获得有用信息:从不=1;偶尔=2;一般=3;经常=4;频繁=5 | 3.004 | 0.965 | |
网络信任 | 农户是否觉得周围人信守承诺:都不是=1;很少是=2;一般=3;很多是=4;都是=5 | 3.667 | 0.677 | |
推广服务 | 推广强度 | 农技部门提供的推广服务多少:很少=1;比较少=2;一般=3;比较多=4;很多=5 | 3.669 | 0.738 |
推广质量 | 农技部门推广内容作用大小:很小=1;较小=2;一般=3;较大=4;很大=5 | 3.601 | 0.786 | |
推广水平 | 农技人员指导的技术水平如何:很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 3.037 | 1.029 | |
推广态度 | 农技人员技术指导的态度如何:很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 2.853 | 1.157 | |
农户认知 | 稀缺认知 | 农户感知灌溉水的短缺程度:很短缺=1;短缺=2;一般=3;充足=4;很充足=5 | 3.880 | 0.825 |
技术认知 | 农户对节水灌溉的了解程度:很不了解=1;不了解=2;一般=3;了解=4;很了解=5 | 3.260 | 1.000 | |
水价认知 | 农户对灌溉水价的感知:很便宜=1;较便宜=2;一般=3;较贵=4;很贵=5 | 3.298 | 0.920 | |
作用认知 | 农户对节水灌溉作用的感知:没作用=1;作用小=2;一般=3;有作用=4;作用大=5 | 2.959 | 1.163 | |
社区环境 | 制度公开 | 农户是否清楚村庄规章制度:很不清楚=1;不清楚=2;一般=3;清楚=4;很清楚=5 | 3.322 | 0.956 |
制度运行 | 农户所在村庄规章制度运行如何:很不好=1;不好=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 3.347 | 0.806 | |
社会风气 | 农户所在村庄社会风气如何:很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 3.760 | 0.702 | |
人际关系 | 农户所在村庄人际关系如何:很差=1;较差=2;一般=3;较好=4;很好=5 | 3.812 | 0.610 |
Table 2
Total variance of the explaination and factor contribution rate"
成分 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | 旋转平方和载入 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
合计 | 方差的% | 累计% | 合计 | 方差的% | 累计% | 合计 | 方差的% | 累计% | |
1 | 5.065 | 26.657 | 26.657 | 5.065 | 26.657 | 26.657 | 2.390 | 12.577 | 12.577 |
2 | 1.876 | 9.876 | 36.533 | 1.876 | 9.876 | 36.533 | 2.344 | 12.338 | 24.915 |
3 | 1.753 | 9.226 | 45.759 | 1.753 | 9.226 | 45.759 | 2.229 | 11.733 | 36.648 |
4 | 1.533 | 8.069 | 53.828 | 1.533 | 8.069 | 53.828 | 2.165 | 11.396 | 48.044 |
5 | 1.059 | 5.573 | 59.401 | 1.059 | 5.573 | 59.401 | 2.158 | 11.358 | 59.401 |
6 | 0.981 | 5.163 | 64.565 | ||||||
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
19 | 0.255 | 1.343 | 100.000 |
Table 3
Rotated component matrix"
因子 | 因子1 | 因子2 | 因子3 | 因子4 | 因子5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
制度公开 | 0.091 | 0.166 | 0.022 | 0.485 | 0.445 |
制度运行 | 0.117 | -0.030 | -0.029 | 0.359 | 0.615 |
社会风气 | 0.097 | 0.082 | 0.121 | 0.031 | 0.824 |
人际关系 | 0.043 | 0.078 | 0.051 | 0.059 | 0.854 |
采用意愿 | 0.242 | 0.281 | 0.387 | 0.609 | 0.214 |
支付意愿 | 0.019 | -0.008 | 0.106 | 0.794 | 0.082 |
采用面积 | 0.127 | 0.164 | 0.243 | 0.614 | 0.173 |
推广强度 | 0.843 | 0.035 | 0.060 | 0.034 | 0.044 |
推广质量 | 0.815 | -0.046 | 0.005 | -0.035 | 0.067 |
推广水平 | 0.699 | 0.203 | 0.092 | 0.150 | 0.098 |
推广态度 | 0.585 | 0.200 | 0.103 | 0.308 | 0.150 |
网络学习 | 0.038 | 0.785 | 0.184 | -0.052 | 0.038 |
网络互动 | 0.138 | 0.676 | 0.021 | 0.258 | 0.013 |
网络互惠 | 0.168 | 0.676 | 0.004 | 0.212 | 0.021 |
网络信任 | 0.001 | 0.676 | 0.123 | 0.014 | 0.193 |
稀缺认知 | 0.009 | -0.070 | 0.748 | -0.075 | 0.043 |
技术认知 | 0.078 | 0.245 | 0.704 | 0.220 | 0.014 |
水价认知 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.684 | 0.165 | 0.064 |
作用认知 | 0.138 | 0.245 | 0.629 | 0.319 | 0.076 |
Table 4
Standardized path coefficients and test results of model Ⅰ"
路径 | 参数估计值 | 标准误差 | 临界比 | 标准化路径系数 | 显著性水平 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
技术采用←社会网络 | 0.285 | 0.065 | 4.369 | 0.260 | *** |
技术采用←推广服务 | 0.259 | 0.061 | 4.223 | 0.217 | *** |
技术采用←农户认知 | 0.565 | 0.061 | 9.211 | 0.663 | *** |
技术采用←社区环境 | 0.587 | 0.104 | 5.642 | 0.372 | *** |
网络学习←社会网络 | 1.000 | - | — | 0.666 | - |
网络互动←社会网络 | 0.965 | 0.102 | 9.441 | 0.656 | *** |
网络互惠←社会网络 | 0.892 | 0.094 | 9.443 | 0.622 | *** |
网络信任←社会网络 | 0.549 | 0.059 | 9.376 | 0.546 | *** |
推广强度←推广服务 | 1.000 | - | - | 0.837 | - |
推广质量←推广服务 | 0.940 | 0.062 | 15.288 | 0.740 | *** |
推广水平←推广服务 | 0.938 | 0.096 | 9.815 | 0.563 | *** |
推广态度←推广服务 | 0.915 | 0.107 | 8.576 | 0.489 | *** |
稀缺认知←农户认知 | 0.405 | 0.052 | 7.749 | 0.426 | *** |
技术认知←农户认知 | 0.831 | 0.068 | 12.156 | 0.720 | *** |
水价认知←农户认知 | 0.563 | 0.059 | 9.601 | 0.530 | *** |
作用认知←农户认知 | 1.000 | - | - | 0.746 | - |
制度公开←社区环境 | 1.038 | 0.128 | 8.122 | 0.507 | *** |
制度执行←社区环境 | 0.977 | 0.106 | 9.256 | 0.567 | *** |
社会风气←社区环境 | 1.088 | 0.078 | 13.936 | 0.724 | *** |
人际关系←社区环境 | 1.000 | - | - | 0.766 | - |
采用意愿←技术采用 | 1.128 | 0.089 | 12.620 | 0.835 | *** |
支付意愿←技术采用 | 0.648 | 0.067 | 9.650 | 0.466 | *** |
采用面积←技术采用 | 1.000 | - | - | 0.564 | - |
[1] | Watts D J,Strogatz S H.Collective dynamics of small-world networks[J]. Nature,1998,393(4):440-442. |
[2] | Conley T G,Udry C R.Learning about a new technology:Pineapple in Ghana[J]. American Economic Review,2010,100(1):35-69. |
[3] | Fukuyama F.Social Capital and Civil Society[R]. IMF Working Paper,2000. |
[4] | Griliches Z.Hybrid corn:An exploration in the economics of tech-nological change[J]. Econometrica,Journal of the Econometric Society,1957,25(4):501-522. |
[5] | Feder G,Just R E,Zilberman D.Adoption of agricultural inno-vations in developing countries:A survey[J]. Economic Develop-ment and Cultural Change,1985,33(2):255-298. |
[6] | Rogers E M.Diffusion of Innovations[M]. New York:The Free Press,1995. |
[7] | 曹建民,胡瑞法,黄季焜. 技术推广与农民对新技术的修正采用:农民参与技术培训和采用新技术的意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国软科学,2005,(6):60-66. |
[Cao J M,Hu R F,Huang J K.Agricultural technology extension and farmers modification of new technology:Study on influence factors in farmers partici-pating in technologies training and their willingness to adopt[J]. China Soft Science,2005,(6):60-66.] | |
[8] | 方松海,孔祥智. 农户禀赋对保护地生产技术采纳的影响分析-以陕西、四川和宁夏为例[J]. 农业技术经济,2005,(3):35-42. |
[Fang S H,Kong X Z.Effect of farmers’ endowment on pro-duction protecting technology adoption-taking Shaanxi,Sichuan and Ningxia Province as an example[J]. Journal of Agro-technical Economics,2005,(3):35-42.] | |
[9] | Besley T,Case A.Modeling technology adoption in developing countries[J]. The American Economic Review,1993,83(2):396-402. |
[10] | Foster A D,Rosenzweig M R.Learning by doing and learning from others:Human capital and technical change in agriculture[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1995,103(6):1176-1209. |
[11] | Bandiera O,Rasul I.Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique[J]. The Economic Journal,2006,116(514):869-902. |
[12] | Fafchamps M,Lund S.Risk-sharing networks in rural Phili-ppines[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2003,71(2):261-287. |
[13] | 付少平. 农民采用农业技术制约于哪些因素[J]. 经济论坛,2004,(1):104-105. |
[Fu S P.Constraints for farmers’ using agri-cultural techniques[J]. Economic Forum,2004,(1):104-105.] | |
[14] | 曾明彬,周超文. 社会网络理论在技术传播研究中的应用[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报,2010,(6):44-49. |
[Zeng M B,Zhou C W.The application of social network theory into technology transfer research[J]. The Journal of Gansu Administration Institute,2010,(6):44-49.] | |
[15] | Barham B L,Foltz J D,Jackson-Smith D,et al.The dynamics of agricultural biotechnology adoption:Lessons from series rBST use in Wisconsin,1994-2001[J]. American Journal of Agricul-tural Economics,2004,86(1):61-72. |
[16] | 王格玲,陆迁. 社会网络影响农户技术采用倒U型关系的检验-以甘肃省民勤县节水灌溉技术采用为例[J]. 农业技术经济,2015,(10):92-106. |
[Wang G L,Lu Q.Inverted u-shaped relationship between social network and farmers’ technology adoption-an example of water-saving irrigation technology in the Minqin County,Gansu province[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2015,(10):92-106.] | |
[17] | Feder G,Slade R.A comparative analysis of some aspects of the training and visit system of agricultural extension in India[J]. The Journal of Development Studies,1986,22(2):407-428. |
[18] | Goyal M,Netessine S.Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty[J]. Management Science,2007,53(2):192-207. |
[19] | Mobarak A M,Rosenzweig M R.Informal risk sharing,index insurance,and risk taking in developing countries[J]. The American Economic Review,2013,103(3):375-380. |
[20] | Duflo E,Dupas P,Kremer M.Peer effects,teacher incentives,and the impact of tracking:Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya[J]. American Economic Review,2011,101(5):1739-1774. |
[21] | Genius M,Koundouri P,Nauges C,et al.Information trans-mission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion:Social learning,extension services,and spatial effects[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2014,96(1):328-344. |
[22] | Brennan D.Policy interventions to promote the adoption of water saving sprinkler systems:The case of lettuce on the Gnangara Mound[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2007,51(3):323-341. |
[23] | 许朗,黄莺. 农业灌溉用水效率及其影响因素分析-基于安徽省蒙城县的实地调查[J]. 资源科学,2012,34(1):105-113. |
[Xu L,Huang Y.Measurement of irrigation on water efficiency and analysis of influential factors:An empirical study of Mengcheng County in Anhui Province[J]. Resources Science,2012,34(1):105-113.] | |
[24] | 朱月季,周德翼,游良志. 非洲农户资源禀赋、内在感知对技术采纳的影响-基于埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州的农户调查[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(8):1629-1638. |
[Zhu Y J,Zhou D Y,You L Z.Impact of farmers’ resource endowment and inner perception on technology adoption in Oromia,Ethiopia[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(8):1629-1638.] |
|