农村宅基地“三权分置”的制度逻辑及使用权资本化路径

doi:10.18402/resci.2021.07.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“三权分置”制度改革打破旧有宅基地制度壁垒,并与乡村振兴、新型城镇化战略互为起承,放活宅基地使用权有助于盘活乡村沉睡资产;在“三权分置”制度逻辑下实现宅基地使用权资本化是加速建立城乡统一建设用地市场、全面提升乡村聚落功能和实现乡村多元主体利益共享的重要手段。本文运用时间序列法梳理了宅基地改革阶段与产权细分过程,明晰宅基地属性外延,分析宅基地资源资产化与资产资本化的内在机制;从宅基地“三权分置”制度的缘起和内涵解析、制度的外部环境、制度的多元主体和制度的绩效4个维度,解构农村宅基地“三权分置”制度逻辑;梳理“三权分置”制度下宅基地使用权资本化的选择逻辑和现实困境,提出了宅基地使用权的资本化路径。宅基地使用权的资本化需要匹配不同地域乡村的不同发展阶段,才能真正提升农村社会经济效益与发展活力。

关键词: “三权分置”, 多元主体, 制度逻辑, 使用权资本化路径, 乡村振兴

Abstract:

The institutional reform of “Three Rights Separation” breaks down the barriers of the old homestead system, synergizes with the strategies of rural revitalization and new urbanization, and makes the right to use homestead flexible, which helps to revitalize the unused assets of rural areas. Under the institutional arrangement of the separation of three rights, capitalization of rural residential land use right is an important means to accelerate the establishment of unified urban and rural construction land market, comprehensively enhance the function of rural settlements, and realize the benefit sharing of rural multiple subjects. With the help of the time series method, this study examined the stage of homestead reform and the subdivision process of property rights, explored the extension of homestead attributes, and deconstructed the internal mechanism of homestead from the perspectives of resource capitalization and asset capitalization. This study analyzed the institutional arrangement of the separation of three rights of rural residential land in four dimensions: the origin and connotation, external environment, multiple subjects, and performance of the system; examined the choice and practical dilemma of the capitalization of the right to use rural residential land under the separation of three rights system, and put forward the capitalization path of the right to use rural residential land. The capitalization of rural residential land use right needs to match the different stages of rural development in different regions, in order to truly enhance the social and economic benefits and development vitality of rural areas.

Key words: Three Rights Separation, multiple subjects, institutional arrangement, capitalization path of use right, rural revitalization

王成, 徐爽. 农村宅基地“三权分置”的制度逻辑及使用权资本化路径[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(7): 1375-1386.

WANG Cheng, XU Shuang. Institutional arrangement of “Three Rights Separation” of rural homestead and the capitalization path of use right[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(7): 1375-1386.

图/表 3

参考文献 48

[1]	Zhu F K, Zhang F R, Li C, et al. Functional transition of the rural settlement: Analysis of land-use differentiation in a transect of Beijing, China[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 41(1):262-271. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.011
[2]	杨忍, 张菁, 徐茜, 等. 城乡融合视角下农村闲置建设用地拆旧复垦的资本化效应: 以广东省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1):114-123. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.011
	[ Yang R, Zhang J, Xu X, et al. Capitalization effect of rural land reclamation from the perspective of rural-urban integration: A case study of Guangdong Province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1):114-123.]
[3]	刘锐, 贺雪峰. 从嵌入式治理到分类管理: 宅基地制度变迁回顾与展望[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, (3):47-56.
	[ Liu R, He X F. From embedded governance to classified management: The past and future of the homestead system[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2018, (3):47-56.]
[4]	李婷婷, 龙花楼, 王艳飞. 中国农村宅基地闲置程度及其成因分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(12):64-71.
	[ Li T T, Long H L, Wang Y F. Analysis of idleness of rural residential land and its causes in China[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(12):64-71.]
[5]	宿瑞, 王成. 基于网络中心点辐射导向的农村居民点体系重组与优化: 以重庆市江津区燕坝村为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(5):958-966.
	[ Su R, Wang C. Rural settlement spatial layout optimization using network center radiation guidance for Yanba Village in Chongqing[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(5):958-966.]
[6]	周翼虎, 方婷婷, 李丽. 基于TAM-TPB 框架的农户宅基地退出决策机理研究[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(1):148-160.
	[ Zhou Y H, Fang T T, Li L. Decision-making mechanism of farmers’ homestead exit based on the TAM-TPB framework[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(1):148-160.]
[7]	Li T T, Long H L, Liu Y Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis of rural housing land transition under China’s rapid urbanization: The case of Bohai Rim[J]. Habitat International, 2015, 48:227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.04.002
[8]	赵茜宇, 张占录. “三权分置”下大城市郊区宅基地退出与再利用优化路径[J]. 农村经济, 2020, (12):9-16.
	[ Zhao X Y, Zhang Z L. Optimized path for exit and reuse of homesteads in suburbs of big vities under the reform of “Three Rights Separation”[J]. Rural Economy, 2020, (12):9-16.]
[9]	贺雪峰. 农村宅基地“三权分置”改革能收获什么[J]. 决策, 2018, (7):13.
	[ He X F. What can be gained from the reform of “Three Rights Separation” of rural homestead?[J]. Decision-Making, 2018, (7):13.]
[10]	Li Y R, Li Y, Fan P C, et al. Impacts of land consolidation on rural human-environment system in typical watershed of the Loess Plateau and implications for rural development policy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 86:339-350. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.026
[11]	阿布都热合曼·阿布迪克然木, 石晓平, 饶芳萍, 等. “三权分置”视域下产权完整性与安全性对农地流转的影响: 基于农户产权认知视角[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9):1643-1656.
	[ Abudureheman A, Shi X P, Rao F P, et al. Tenure integrity, security, and farmland transfer under the background of “Three Rights Separations”: Based on farmers’ perception of land tenure[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9):1643-1656.]
[12]	Hadipour M, Roumaini A, Azizpour F, et al. Barriers to the promotion of agricultural land consolidation in rural areas from farmers’ point of view (Case study: Fash Dehedtan of Kangavar County)[J]. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 2019, DOI: 10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.68007. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.68007
[13]	董祚继. “三权分置”: 农村宅基地制度的重大创新[J]. 中国土地, 2018, (3):4-9.
	[ Dong Z J. “Three Rights Separation”: A major innovation of rural homestead system[J]. China Land, 2018, (3):4-9.]
[14]	胡大伟. 宅基地“三权分置”的实施瓶颈与规范路径: 基于杭州宅基地制度改革实践[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 21(1):49-55.
	[ Hu D W. The implementation bottleneck and normalization path of the “Three Rights Separation” of homestead: Based on the practice of Hangzhou homestead system reform[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2020, 21(1):49-55.]
[15]	钱龙, 高强, 陈会广. 论宅基地“三权分置”的权属特征及目标指向: 兼与承包地“三权分置”比较[J]. 农村经济, 2020, (1):24-31.
	[ Qian L, Gao Q, Chen H G. On the ownership characteristics and goal orientation of “Three Rights Separation” of homestead: A comparison with “Three Rights Separation” of contracted land[J]. Rural Economy, 2020, (1):24-31.]
[16]	江帆, 李苑玉. 宅基地“三权分置”的利益衡量与权利配置: 以使用权为中心[J]. 农村经济, 2019, (12):57-65.
	[ Jiang F, Li Y Y. Benefit measurement in homestead’ “Three Rights Separation” and its rights allocation[J]. Rural Economy, 2019, (12):57-65.]
[17]	田逸飘, 廖望科. “三权分置”背景下农村宅基地相关主体性关系变化与重构[J]. 农业经济, 2020, (3):89-91.
	[ Tian Y P, Liao W K. Change and reconstruction of rural homestead related subjectivity under the background of “Three Rights Separation”[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2020, (3):89-91.]
[18]	Ma X L, Heerink N, Feng S Y, et al. Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42(1):293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.020
[19]	夏敏, 林庶民, 郭贯成. 不同经济发展水平地区农民宅基地退出意愿的影响因素: 以江苏省7个市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(4):728-737.
	[ Xia M, Lin S M, Guo G C. Influential factors of farmers’ willingness in rural residential land quittance in different economic developed areas in Jiangsu Province[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(4):728-737.]
[20]	李国正, 王浩宇, 查紫振, 等. 可资本化下宅基地禀赋对农户异地创业影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(9):146-155.
	[ Li G Z, Wang H Y, Zha Z Z, et al. Study on the influence of capitalization of homestead endowment on rural households’ entrepreneurship in different places[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(9):146-155.]
[21]	刘升. 宅基地的资本化运作及政治社会后果[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(4):29-36.
	[ Liu S. Capital operation on residential lands and its’ political and social consequences[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2015, 14(4):29-36.]
[22]	朱新华, 王晗. 不同农村宅基地资本化模式中农户参与意愿及其影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(9):1702-1710.
	[ Zhu X H, Wang H. Farmer willingness to participate in rural housing land capitalization reform and influence factors in different models[J]. Resource Science, 2016, 38(9):1702-1710.]
[23]	Hartvigsen M. Land reform and land fragmentation in Central and Eastern Europe[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, (36):330-341.
[24]	刘同山. 资产化与直接处置: 农民宅基地退出意愿研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2016, 33(6):42-47.
	[ Liu T S. Capitalization and direct disposal: The research of farmer’ willingness of homestead usufruct abdication[J]. Economic Survey, 2016, 33(6):42-47.]
[25]	张雨榴, 杨雨濛, 严金明. 福利多元主义视角下宅基地资格权的性质与实现路径: 以北京市魏善庄镇试点为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(1):17-24.
	[ Zhang Y L, Yang Y M, Yan J M. Attribute and realization of qualification right of rural residential land from the perspective of welfare pluralism: A case study on Weishanzhuang Town, Beijing City[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(1):17-24.]
[26]	Zhou Y P, Shi X P, Ji D Y, et al. Property rights integrity, tenure security and forestland rental market participation: Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Natural Resources Forum, 2019, 43(2):95-110. doi: 10.1111/narf.2019.43.issue-2
[27]	董欢, 段维, 孙瑜琪. 宅基地制度改革研究: 现状、热点与前沿: 基于2008年以来CSSCI来源期刊论文的文献计量分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, (1):1-15.
	[ Dong H, Duan W, Sun Y Q. Research on the homestead system reform: Present situation, research focus and fronts: Based on Bibliometrics analysis of CSSCI source journals since 2008[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (1):1-15.]
[28]	韩高峰, 袁奇峰, 温天蓉. 农村宅基地: 从资源、资产到资本[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(11):20-30.
	[ Han G F, Yuan Q F, Wen T R. Rural homestead: From resources, assets to capital[J]. Urban Planning Review, 2019, 43(11):20-30.]
[29]	李怀. 农村土地资本化的理论基础与实现路径[J]. 新视野, 2015, (2):94-97.
	[ Li H. The theoretical basis and realization path of rural land capitalization[J]. Expanding Horizons, 2015, (2):94-97.]
[30]	沈镭, 钟帅, 胡纾寒. 新时代中国自然资源研究的机遇与挑战[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8):1773-1788.
	[ Shen L, Zhong S, Hu S H. Opportunities and challenges of natural resources research of China in the new era[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8):1773-1788.] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200802
[31]	胡新艳, 许金海, 陈卓. 中国农村宅基地制度改革的演进逻辑与未来走向[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, (1):26-32.
	[ Hu X Y, Xu J H, Chen Z. The evolution and direction of China’s rural homestead system reform[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (1):26-32.]
[32]	Riedland R, Alford R. Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[33]	Alford R, Friedland R. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State and Democracy[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[34]	杜焱强, 王亚星, 陈利根. 中国宅基地制度变迁: 历史演变、多重逻辑与变迁特征[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2020, (5):90-99.
	[ Du Y Q, Wang Y X, Chen L G. Institutional change of rural residential land in China: Evolution, multiple logic and characteristics[J]. Comparison Economic and Social Systems, 2020, (5):90-99.]
[35]	李国祥. 全面把握“三权分置” 深化农村宅基地制度改革[J]. 中国党政干部论坛, 2020, (8):63-66.
	[ Li G X. Comprehensively grasp the “Three Rights Separation” and deepen the reform of rural homestead system[J]. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 2020, (8):63-66.]
[36]	严金明, 迪力沙提, 夏方舟. 乡村振兴战略实施与宅基地“三权分置”改革的深化[J]. 改革, 2019, (1):5-18.
	[ Yan J M, Di L S T, Xia F Z. The implementation of the rural revitalization strategy and the deepening of the reform of the “Three Rights Separation” of rural homesteads[J]. Reform, 2019, (1):5-18.]
[37]	于水, 王亚星, 杜焱强. 农村空心化下宅基地三权分置的功能作用、潜在风险与制度建构[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020, (2):80-87.
	[ Yu S, Wang Y X, Du Y Q. Function, risk and realization of the separation of the three tights in the homestead under rural hollowing out[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2020, (2):80-87.]
[38]	牛星. “三权分置”视角下宅基地使用权放活的多主体联动机制: 基于上海市L村的试点案例[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(5):85-95.
	[ Niu X. A study on multi-agent linkage mechanism for the transfer of right to use rural house site from the perspective of three-right separation: The case of L Village in Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020, 35(5):85-95.]
[39]	岳永兵, 刘向敏. 宅基地农户资格权探讨[J]. 中国土地, 2018, (10):21-23.
	[ Yue Y B, Liu X M. Discussion on farmers’ qualification right of homestead[J]. China Land, 2018, (10):21-23.]
[40]	唐雲, 王英. 主客观视角下的制度绩效、政治效能感与政治信任[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2020, (5):170-180.
	[ Tang Y, Wang Y. Institutional performance, political efficacy and political trust from subjective and objective perspectives[J]. Comparison of Economic and Social Systems, 2020, (5):170-180.]
[41]	唐健, 王庆宾, 谭荣. 宅基地制度改革绩效评价: 基于全国5省土地政策实施监测[J]. 江汉论坛, 2018, (2):36-41.
	[ Tang J, Wang Q B, Tan R. Performance evaluation of homestead system reform: Based on the implementation monitoring of land policy in five provinces of China[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2018, (2):36-41.]
[42]	张清勇, 杜辉, 仲济香. 农村宅基地制度: 变迁、绩效与改革: 基于权利开放与封闭的视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, (4):46-58.
	[ Zhang Q Y, Du H, Zhong J X. Institutional change, performance and reform of rural homestead system: An open and limited access property rights perspective[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, (4):46-58.]
[43]	朱新华, 张金明. 农村宅基地资本化及其收益分配研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2014, (5):73-76.
	[ Zhu X H, Zhang J M. Study on capitalization and income distribution of rural homestead[J]. Reform of Economic System, 2014, (5):73-76.]
[44]	陈振, 罗遥, 欧名豪. 宅基地“三权分置”: 基本内涵、功能价值与实现路径[J]. 农村经济, 2018, (11):40-46.
	[ Chen Z, Luo Y, Ou M H. Separation of three rights of homestead: Basic connotation, functional value and realization path[J]. Rural Economy, 2018, (11):40-46.]
[45]	郭贯成, 李学增, 王茜月. 新中国成立70年宅基地制度变迁、困境与展望: 一个分析框架[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(12):1-9.
	[ Guo G C, Li X Z, Wang X Y. Changes, dilemmas and prospects of the 70-year rural residential land institution in new China: An analytical framework[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(12):1-9.]
[46]	李怀, 陈享光. 乡村振兴背景下宅基地“三权分置”的权能实现与深化路径[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(6):28-34.
	[ Li H, Chen H G. The realization and deepening path of “Three Rights Separation” in homesteads under the background of rural revitalization[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 20(6):28-34.]
[47]	蒋亚平. 建立城乡统一建设用地市场的若干问题研究[J]. 中国土地, 2019, (6):15-17.
	[ Jiang Y P. A study on the establishment of a unified market for urban and rural construction land[J]. China Land, 2019, (6):15-17.]
[48]	曾旭晖, 郭晓鸣. 传统农区宅基地“三权分置”路径研究: 基于江西省余江区和四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, (6):58-66.
	[ Zeng X H, Guo X M. The path of “Separation of Three Rights” on rural homestead in traditional rural areas: On the homestead system reform in Yujiang District and Luxian County[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019, (6):58-66.]