政治地理学视角下的海南自由贸易港发展解读

doi:10.18402/resci.2021.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前国内外态势正在发生深刻变化,中国需要积极主动地参与经济全球化进程,推动更高层次的开放型经济。本文基于政治地理学视角,分析在此背景下的海南自贸港建设涵义和发展前景。海南自贸港的政策实践背后,有其海岛区位的地理必然性,也有环南海地区地缘政治经济共同作用的背景因素。在全球层面,海南自贸港是中国构建“一带一路”的战略支点,凸显了中国参与全球地缘政治经济的战略;在国家层面,海南自贸港是国家分级主权的海岛实践,是中国主动实施国家再尺度化的发展策略;在地方层面,海南自贸港建设是优化海南岛屿开发空间治理的手段,也是协调海南主岛与三沙离岛之间关系的调控对策。从政治地理学视角看,海南是岛屿经济体,也是岛屿地缘体,自贸港正是对海南岛屿区位条件的完整诠释。

关键词: 岛屿, 政治地理, 分级主权, 海南自贸港, 海南岛

Abstract:

The current situation in China and internationally is undergoing profound and complex changes, under which China needs to actively participate in and promote the process of economic globalization and the development of a higher level of open economy. Based on the political geography theories, this article discussed the theoretical basis of the establishment of a free trade port (FTP), used the concept of island to explore the geographical nature, situation, and extension of the construction of the Hainan FTP, and gave a preliminary consideration to the development prospect of the Hainan FTP. The research results show that the Hainan FTP has three goals and strategies: economic integration, regional influence, and global geopolitical competition, and its development processes reflect the integration of geopolitics and geostrategy. The Hainan FTP is a new development in the economic field of hierarchical sovereign management policies, as well as a conscious and proactive national re-scaling spatial development strategy in China, which has the dual processes of removing/reexpanding sideways. At the local level, the construction of the free trade port is an opportunity for Hainan Province to realize the spatial governance of urban areas in the future. At the national level, the Hainan FTP is an important strategic fulcrum for China to implement the “Belt and Road” initiative. Finally, the importance of the concepts of scale and island meta-geography to the study of island economy is reiterated.

Key words: island, political geography, graduated sovereignty, Hainan Free Trade Port, Hainan Island

刘云刚, 刘玄宇. 政治地理学视角下的海南自由贸易港发展解读[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(2): 209-216.

LIU Yungang, LIU Xuanyu. Perspective on the development of Hainan Free Trade Zone (Port) from a political geography approach[J]. Resources Science, 2021, 43(2): 209-216.

参考文献 46

[1]	Harrison M, Hong W, Lam S, et al. The promise of China’s free trade zones: The case of Hainan[J]. Asian Education and Development Studies, 2019,9(3):2046-3162.
[2]	胡剑波, 任香. 自由贸易港: 我国自由贸易试验区深化发展的方向[J]. 国际经济合作, 2019, (3):62-69.
	[Hu J B, Ren X. Free trade port: Future development orientation of Chinese pilot free trade zones[J]. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 2019, (3):62-69.]
[3]	孟广文, 杨开忠, 朱福林, 等. 中国海南: 从经济特区到综合复合型自由贸易港的嬗变[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(12):2363-2382. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201812001
	[Meng G W, Yang K Z, Zhu F L, et al. Hainan of China: The evolution from a special economic zone to a comprehensive and compound free trade port[J]. Geographical Research, 2018,37(12):2363-2382.]
[4]	张尔升, 李雪晶. 中国特色自由贸易港建设与构建南海海洋共同体互动研究[J]. 亚太安全与海洋研究, 2019, (2):85-97.
	[Zhang E S, Li X J. Research on the interaction between the construction of Free Trade Port with Chinese characteristics and the construction of maritime community in the South China Sea[J]. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Affairs, 2019, (2):85-97.]
[5]	李金波, 窦勇. 高质量建设中国特色自由贸易港的思考[J]. 全球化, 2020, (3):53-66.
	[Li J B, Dou Y. Thinking of building high quality Free Trade Port with Chinese characteristics[J]. Globalization, 2020, (3):53-66.]
[6]	迟福林, 夏锋, 甘露, 等. 海南探索建设中国特色自由贸易港的初步设想[J]. 改革, 2019, (4):27-38.
	[Chi F L, Xia F, Gan L, et al. Preliminary thoughts on building Hainan Free Trade Port with Chinese characteristics[J]. Reform, 2019, (4):27-38.]
[7]	Blanchard J M F, Ripsman N M. Economic Statecraft and Foreign Policy: Sanctions, Incentives, and Target State Calculations[M]. London: Routledge, 2013.
[8]	Pugh J. Relationality and island studies in the Anthropocene[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2018,13(2):93-110. doi: 10.24043/isj
[9]	Nicolson A. The islands[J]. Geographical Review, 2007,97(2):153-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00395.x
[10]	Glissant É. Poetics of Relation[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
[11]	Sidaway J D. ‘One island, one team, one mission’: Geopolitics, sovereignty, ‘race’ and rendition[J]. Geopolitics, 2010,15(4):667-683. doi: 10.1080/14650040903501120
[12]	Corbett J. Territory, islandness, and the secessionist imaginary: Why do very small communities favour autonomy over integration?[J]. Nations and Nationalism, 2020,26(4):1087-1103. doi: 10.1111/nana.v26.4
[13]	Vine D. What if you can’t protest the base? The Chagossian exile, the struggle for democracy, and the military base on Diego Garcia[J]. South Atlantic Quarterly, 2012,111(4):847-856. doi: 10.1215/00382876-1724228
[14]	Teerling J, King R. Of hubs and hinterlands: Cyprus as an insular space of overlapping diasporas[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2012,7(1):19-48.
[15]	Baldacchino G. How it feels ‘on the ground’? The experiences of residents from a subnational island jurisdiction[J]. Small States & Territories, 2020,3(1):123-126.
[16]	Baldacchino G, Tsai H M. Contested enclave metageographies: The offshore islands of Taiwan, China[J]. Political Geography, 2014,40:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.02.002
[17]	Yu T, Li B Y. Island territorial disputes and China’s ‘Shelving Disputes and Pursuing Joint Development’ policy[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2020,15(2):37-54. doi: 10.24043/isj
[18]	Mcglashan D J, Duck R W. Who owns the sand? The Ayre of Cara, Orkney Islands, Scotland[J]. Geographical Journal, 2011,177(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/geoj.2011.177.issue-1
[19]	Mountz A. The enforcement archipelago: Detention, haunting, and asylum on islands[J]. Political Geography, 2011,30(3):118-128. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.005
[20]	Mountz A. Political geography II: Islands and archipelagos[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2015,39(5):636-646. doi: 10.1177/0309132514560958
[21]	Gregory D. The everywhere war[J]. The Geographical Journal, 2011,177(3):238-250. doi: 10.1111/geoj.2011.177.issue-3
[22]	Christian D. The challenge of nissology: A global outlook on the world archipelago part I: Scene setting the world archipelago[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2008,3(1):3-16.
[23]	Cuttitta P. Borderizing’ the island setting and narratives of the Lampedusa’ border play[J]. ACME, 2014,13(2):196-219.
[24]	郭越, 黄友星, 杨宇, 等. 外商直接投资对小岛屿国家经济增长的影响: 基于旅游业门槛效应的分析[J]. 资源科学, 2020,42(11):2132-2144.
	[Guo Y, Huang Y X, Yang Y, et al. Impact of foreign direct investment on Small Island States’ economic growth: An analysis based on the threshold effect of tourism[J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(11):2132-2144.]
[25]	Ferdinand M, Oostindie G, Veenendaal W. A global comparison of non-sovereign island territories: The search for ‘true equality’[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2020,15(1):43-66. doi: 10.24043/isj
[26]	Stratford E, Godfrey B, McMahon E, et al. Envisioning the archipelago[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2011,6(2):113-130.
[27]	Pigou B E, Grydehøj A. Accidental and ideal island cities: Islanding processes and urban design in Belize City and the urban archipelagos of Europe[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2014,9(2):259-276.
[28]	Grydehøj A, Nadarajah Y, Markussen U. Islands of indigeneity: Cultural distinction, indigenous territory and island spatiality[J]. Area, 2020,52(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/area.v52.1
[29]	Pugh J. Island movements: Thinking with the archipelago[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2013,8(1):9-24.
[30]	Pugh J. The relational turn in island geographies: Bringing together island, sea and ship relations and the case of the Landship[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2016,17(8):1040-1059.
[31]	Sheng N, Tang U W, Grydehøj A. Urban morphology and urban fragmentation in Macau, China: Island city development in the Pearl River Delta megacity region[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2017,12(2):199-212. doi: 10.24043/isj
[32]	黄旭峰. 关于 “界点” 型海岛的地缘定位研究: 以海南岛和济州岛的比较研究为中心[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019,28(1):32-39.
	[Huang X F. Geographical research on boundary-point island: A comparative study between Hainan Island and Jeju Island[J]. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(1):32-39.]
[33]	许桂灵, 司徒尚纪. 海南建省的地缘政治意义[J]. 新东方, 2018, (3):1-5.
	[Xu G L, Situ S J. The geopolitical significance of the founding of Hainan Province[J]. The New Orient, 2018, (3):1-5.]
[34]	周绍杰, 王有强, 殷存毅. 区域经济协调发展: 功能界定与机制分析[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010,25(2):141-148.
	[Zhou S J, Wang Y Q, Yin C Y. Regional collavorative development in China: Functional definition and mechanism analysis[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2010,25(2):141-148.]
[35]	Ngo T W, Yin C Y, Tang Z L. Scalar restructuring of the Chinese state: The subnational politics of development zones[J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2017,35(1):57-75. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16661721
[36]	Yang J, Li Y, Hay I, et al. Decoding national new area development in China: Toward new land development and politics[J]. Cities, 2019,87:114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.030
[37]	Hong G. Locating Zhuhai between land and sea: A relational production of Zhuhai, China, as an island city[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2017,12(2):7-24. doi: 10.24043/isj
[38]	MacLeavy J, Harrison J. New state spatialities: Perspectives on state, space, and scalar geographies[J]. Antipode, 2010,42(5):1037-1046. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00792.x
[39]	Wu F. China’s emergent city region governance: A new form of state spatial selectivity through state orchestrated rescaling[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2016,40(6):1134-1151. doi: 10.1111/ijur.v40.6
[40]	Allen M G. Islands, extraction and violence: Mining and the politics of scale in Island Melanesia[J]. Political Geography, 2017,57:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.004
[41]	孟广文. 建立中国自由贸易区的政治地理学理论基础及模式选择[J]. 地理科学, 2015,35(1):19-29.
	[Meng G W. Establishment and model selection of free trade zones in China based on graduated sovereignty and policy geographical differentiation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(1):19-29.]
[42]	Xie B X, Zhu X L, Grydehøj A. Perceiving the Silk Road Archipelago: Archipelagic relations within the ancient and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road[J]. Island Studies Journal, 2020,15(2):1-18.
[43]	Flint C, Zhu C P. The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Geoforum, 2019,99:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.008
[44]	张衔春, 杨宇, 单卓然, 等. 珠三角城市区域治理的尺度重构机制研究: 基于产业合作项目与交通基础设施项目的比较[J]. 地理研究, 2020,39(9):2095-2108.
	[Zhang X C, Yang Y, Shan Z R, et al. Rescaling of global city-regional governance in the Pearl River Delta: A comparative study on industrial project and transportation infrastructure project[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(9):2095-2108.]
[45]	Li L Y. State rescaling and national new area development in China: The case of Chongqing Liangjiang[J]. Habitat International, 2015,50:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.009
[46]	游长江, 侯佩旭, 邓灿芳, 等. 西沙群岛旅游资源调查与评价[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(8):1609-1620.
	[You C J, Hou P X, Deng C F, et al. Investigation of tourism resources in Xisha Islands[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(8):1609-1620.]