农地经营规模与财政支农政策对农业碳排放的影响

doi:10.18402/resci.2020.06.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文利用2000—2016年中国省级动态面板数据,构建有调节的中介效应检验模型,对农地经营规模影响农业碳排放的作用机制进行了实证检验。研究结果表明：①农地经营规模对农业碳排放既具有直接影响,也产生间接影响;②直接影响体现在“规模效应”：农地经营规模与农业碳排放之间呈现“U”型变化趋势;间接影响是通过影响农地利用方式来体现的：农地经营规模与种植结构、化肥投入强度之间均呈现“U型”关系,与农业机械投入强度之间呈现“倒U型”关系,种植结构、农业机械投入强度的提高抑制了农业碳排放,化肥投入强度的提高促进了农业碳排放;③财政支农政策在种植结构、化肥投入强度对农业碳排放的影响中起到显著的调节作用,较高的财政支农支出水平加强了粮食种植比例与农业碳排放之间的负向关系,削弱了化肥投入强度与农业碳排放之间的正向关系。因此,为促进农业低碳发展,一方面要适度扩大农地经营规模,加强对农地利用方式的科学管理;另一方面要持续加大对农业的财政支持,进一步优化调整农业财政补贴结构。

关键词: 农地经营规模, 财政支农政策, 种植结构, 化肥, 农业机械, 农业碳排放

Abstract:

Based on the dynamic panel data of the provinces in China’s mainland from 2000 to 2016, this study constructed a model of regulated mediating effects, and tested the impact of farmland management scale on agricultural carbon emissions. The results show that farmland management scale has both direct and indirect effects on agricultural carbon emissions. The direct impact is embodied in the “scale effect,” that is a U-shaped trend between farmland management scale and agricultural carbon emissions. The indirect influence is reflected by farmland utilization mode. The relationship between farmland management scale and planting structure or fertilizer input intensity is U-shaped, and that between the former and mechanical input intensity is inverted U-shaped. Planting structure and mechanical input intensity restrain agricultural carbon emissions while fertilizer input intensity promote that. Agricultural finance plays a significant regulatory role in the impact of planting structure or fertilizer input intensity on agricultural carbon emissions. Higher level of fiscal expenditure positively regulates the negative relationship between planting structure and agricultural carbon emissions, and negatively regulated the positive relationship between fertilizer input intensity and the latter. Therefore, in order to promote the low-carbon development of agriculture, on the one hand, it is necessary to appropriately expand the scale of farmland management and strengthen the scientific management of farmland utilization; on the other hand, it is advised to continuously increase the financial support for agriculture and further optimize the structure of agricultural financial subsidies.

Key words: farmland management scale, fiscal policy for supporting agriculture, planting structure, chemical fertilizer, agricultural machinery, agricultural carbon emissions

刘琼, 肖海峰. 农地经营规模与财政支农政策对农业碳排放的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(6): 1063-1073.

LIU Qiong, XIAO Haifeng. The impact of farmland management scale and fiscal policy for supporting agriculture on agricultural carbon emission[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1063-1073.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

图3

参考文献 32

[1]	刘汉成, 关江华. 适度规模经营背景下农村土地流转研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, (8):59-64.
	[ Liu H C, Guan J H. Study on the problem of farmland transfer on the background of moderate scale management[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019, (8):59-64.]
[2]	李玉红. 农业规模化经营的外部性分析: 一个生态环境角度的考察[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2016,30(7):37-43.
	[ Li Y H. Externality analysis of agricultural scale management: an ecological environment perspective[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science), 2016,30(7):37-43.]
[3]	王珊珊, 张广胜. 非农就业对农户碳排放行为的影响研究: 来自辽宁省辽中县的证据[J]. 资源科学, 2013,35(9):1855-1862.
	[ Wang S S, Zhang G S. The impact of off-farm employment on the agricultural carbon emission behavior of farmers: Evidence from Liaozhong County, Liaoning Province[J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(9):1855-1862.]
[4]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001-2018.
	[National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001-2018.]
[5]	叶初升, 惠利. 农业财政支出对中国农业绿色生产率的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,69(3):48-55.
	[ Ye C S, Hui L. The impact of agricultural public financial expenditure on China’s agricultural green productivity[J]. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Science), 2016,69(3):48-55.]
[6]	张小洁, 张忠潮. 土地规模化经营对农业碳排放的影响机制[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012,39(20):176-179.
	[ Zhang X J, Zhang Z C. The effect mechanism of large-scale management to agricultural carbon emissions[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012,39(20):176-179.]
[7]	曲福田, 卢娜, 冯淑怡. 土地利用变化对碳排放的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011,21(10):76-83.
	[ Qu F T, Lu N, Feng S Y. Effects of land use change on carbon emissions[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011,21(10):76-83.]
[8]	李波, 刘雪琪, 王昆. 中国农地利用结构变化的碳效应及时空演进趋势研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018,32(3):43-51.
	[ Li B, Liu X Q, Wang K. Study on carbon effects and spatial-temporal evolution trend based on the changes of agricultural land use in China[J]. China Land Science, 2018,32(3):43-51.]
[9]	张丰翠, 陈英, 谢保鹏, 等. 农村空心化对农地流转及农地利用方式变化的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(10):72-78.
	[ Zhang F C, Chen Y, Xie B P, et al. Impact of rural hollowization on circulation farmland and changes in agricultural land use patterns[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019,33(10):72-78.]
[10]	张宗毅, 杜志雄. 土地流转一定会导致“非粮化”吗? 基于全国1740个种植业家庭农场监测数据的实证分析[J]. 经济学动态, 2015, (9):63-69.
	[ Zhang Z Y, Du Z X. Will land transfer lead to “nonbgrain” ? An empirical analysis based on the monitoring data of 1740 family farms in China[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2015, (9):63-69.]
[11]	田红宇, 祝志勇. 农村劳动力转移、经营规模与粮食生产环境技术效率[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,17(5):69-81.
	[ Tian H Y, Zhu Z Y. Rural labor migration, scale of operation and environmental technical efficiency of grain production[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2018,17(5):69-81.]
[12]	钟甫宁, 陆五一, 徐志刚. 农村劳动力外出务工不利于粮食生产吗: 对农户要素替代与种植结构调整行为及约束条件的解析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2016(7):36-47.
	[ Zhong F N, Lu W Y, Xu Z G. Is it not conducive to grain production for rural labor force to go out to work: Analysis on the behavior and constraints of farmers’element substitution and planting structure adjustment[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016(7):36-47.]
[13]	杨秀玉, 乔翠霞. 农业补贴对生态环境的影响: 从化肥使用角度分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(7):47-53.
	[ Yang X Y, Qiao C X. The impact of agricultural subsidies on ecological environment: Analysis from the perspective of chemical fertilizer use[J]. Agricultural resources and Regionalization in China, 2018,39(7):47-53.]
[14]	刘莉, 刘静. 基于种植结构调整视角的化肥减施对策研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(1):17-25.
	[ Liu L, Liu J. Countermeasures of reducing fertilizer application based on the perspective of plant structure adjustment[J]. Agricultural resources and Regionalization in China, 2019,40(1):17-25.]
[15]	易小燕, 袁梦, 尹昌斌. 我国种植业化学品投入状况与转变路径研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2017,19(4):124-129.
	[ Yi X Y, Yuan M, Yin C B. Research on the status and transformation path of chemical input in China’s planting industry[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2017,19(4):124-129. ]
[16]	金书秦, 沈贵银. 中国农业面源污染的困境摆脱与绿色转型[J]. 改革, 2013(5):79-87.
	[ Jin S Q, Shen G Y. The dilemma and green transformation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China[J]. Reform, 2013(5):79-87.]
[17]	杨进, 向春华, 张晓波. 中国农业的劳动分工: 基于生产服务外包的视角[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,33(2):45-55.
	[ Yang J, Xiang C H, Zhang X B. The division of labor in Chinese agriculture: Based on production service outsourcing perspective[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2019,33(2):45-55.]
[18]	孔祥智, 张琛, 张效榕. 要素禀赋变化与农业资本有机构成提高: 对1978年以来中国农业发展路径的解释[J]. 管理世界, 2018,34(10):147-160.
	[ Kong X Z, Zhang C, Zhang X R. Change of factor endowment and improvement of agricultural capital organic composition: An explanation of China’s agricultural development path since 1978[J]. Management World, 2018,34(10):147-160.]
[19]	张露, 罗必良. 农业减量化: 农户经营的规模逻辑及其证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(2):81-99.
	[ Zhang L, Luo B L. Agricultural reduction: the scale logic and evidence of farmers’ management[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(2):81-99.]
[20]	王嫚嫚, 刘颖, 蒯昊, 等. 土地细碎化、耕地地力对粮食生产效率的影响: 基于江汉平原354个水稻种植户的研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(8):1488-1496. doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.08.06
	[ Wang M M, Liu Y, Kuai H, et al. The effects of land fragmentation and land quality on the technical efficiency of grain production based on 354 rice planters on the Jianghan Plain[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(8):1488-1496.]
[21]	胡雯, 张锦华, 陈昭玖. 小农户与大生产: 农地规模与农业资本化: 以农机作业服务为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019, (6):82-96.
	[ Hu W, Zhang J H, Chen Z J. Small farmer and large scale production: Farmland scale and agricultural capital deepening: Taking agricultural machinery operation service as example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019, (6):82-96.]
[22]	刘英基. 粮食生产的能源投入及技术变动趋势[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015,14(3):104-113.
	[ Liu Y J. Energy input and technology change trend of grain production[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2015,14(3):104-113.]
[23]	邓悦, 陈儒, 徐婵娟, 等. 低碳农业技术梳理与体系构建[J]. 生态经济, 2017,33(8):98-104, 123.
	[ Deng Y. Chen R, Xu C J, et al. Low carbon agricultural technology carding and system construction[J]. Ecological economy, 2017,33(8):98-104, 123.]
[24]	薛彩霞, 姚顺波, 李卫. 我国环境友好型农业施肥技术补贴探讨[J]. 农机化研究, 2012,34(12):244-248.
	[ Xue C X, Yao S B, Li W. Discussion on subsidy of fertilization technology for environment friendly agriculture in China[J]. Research on Agricultural Mechanization, 2012,34(12):244-248.]
[25]	唐汉, 王金武, 徐常塑, 等. 化肥减施增效关键技术研究进展分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019,50(4):1-19.
	[ Tang H, Wang J W, Xu C S, et al. Analysis on the key technology of reducing fertilizer application and increasing benefit[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2019,50(4):1-19. ]
[26]	熊冬洋. 促进低碳农业发展的财政政策研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2017, (5):112-117.
	[ Xiong D Y. A study on fiscal policy to promote the development of low-carbon agriculture[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2017, (5):112-117.]
[27]	张天佐, 郭永田, 杨洁梅. 基于价格支持和补贴导向的农业支持保护制度改革回顾与展望[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018(11):4-10.
	[ Zhang T Z, G Y T, Yang J M. Review and prospect of agricultural support and protection system reform based on price support and subsidy orientation[J]. Issuesin Agricultural Economy, 2018(11):4-10.]
[28]	Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 pmid: 3806354
[29]	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补?[J]. 心理学报, 2014,46(5):714-726. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714
	[ Wen Z L, Ye B J. Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014,46(5):714-726.]
[30]	李波, 张俊飚, 李海鹏. 中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011,21(8):80-86.
	[ Li B, Zhang J B, Li H P. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and affecting factors decomposition of agricultural carbon emission in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011,21(8):80-86.]
[31]	李谷成, 李烨阳, 周晓时. 农业机械化、劳动力转移与农民收入增长: 孰因孰果?[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(11):112-127.
	[ Li G C, Li Y Y, Zhou X S. Agricultural mechanization, labor transfer and farmers’ income growth: Which is the cause and effect?[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(11):112-127.]
[32]	国家统计局. 中国农村统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001-2017.
	[ National Bureau of Statistics. China Rural Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001-2017.

	模型（1）被解释变量： lnTC	模型（2）被解释变量： lnTC	模型（3）被解释变量： lnTC	模型（4）被解释变量： lnTC
L.lnTC	0.0152 （0.4）	0.0372 （0.67）	0.0059 （0.17）	0.0041 （0.11）
lnscale	-0.2357*** （-2.95）	-0.1617** （-2.05）	-0.2240*** （-3.01）	-0.2377*** （-2.65）
(lnscale)²	0.0494** （2.26）	0.0372* （1.72）	0.0569* （1.85）	0.0472** （2.29）
lnstru		-0.8436* （-1.7）
lnfert			0.8514*** （7.69）
lntect				-0.3001* （-1.73）
控制变量	YES	YES	YES	YES
_cons	2.4502*** （4.15）	5.5136*** （2.84）	1.6335*** （2.93）	4.4523*** （3.3）
N	465	465	465	465
Wald检验P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000
AR(2)检验P值	0.5457	0.2596	0.9700	0.7685
Sargan检验P值	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000

	模型（5）被解释变量： lnstru	模型（6）被解释变量： lnfert	模型（7）被解释变量： lntect
L.lnstru	0.6070*** （14.29）
L.lnfert		0.6784*** （4.12）
L.lntect			0.6366*** （7.57）
lnscale	-0.0425 （-1.13）	-0.1089* （-1.79）	0.0541* （1.74）
(lnscale)²	0.0095* （1.83）	0.0230** （2.10）	-0.0098* （-1.74）
控制变量	YES	YES	YES
_cons	0.5339*** （1.64）	0.5339 （1.64）	2.0413*** （2.77）
N	465	465	465
Wald检验P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000
AR(2)检验P值	0.3017	0.514	0.6062
Sargan检验P值	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000

	模型（8）被解释变量： lnTC	模型（9）被解释变量： lnTC	模型（10）被解释变量： lnTC
L.lnTC	-0.0002 （-0.00）	0.0057 （0.18）	0.0156 （0.32）
lnscale	-0.1693* （-1.75）	-0.1089* （-1.79）	-0.2016* （-1.95）
(lnscale)²	0.0373* （1.89）	0.0230** （2.10）	0.0356** （2.03）
fesa	2.7559* （1.96）	2.6396*** （3.89）	0.1985 （0.67）
lnstru	-0.7000* （-1.91）
fesa×lnstru	1.3350* （1.89）
lnfert		0.9059*** （6.22）
fesa×lnfert		-0.8559*** （-4.14）
lntect			-0.2765* （-1.77）
fesa×lntect			-0.0638 （-0.52）
控制变量	YES	YES	YES
_cons	5.1281*** （2.97）	1.0313** （2.10）	4.0630*** （3.53）
N	465	465	465
Wald检验P值	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000
AR(2)检验P值	0.9080	0.8926	0.5713
Sargan检验P值	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000