资源科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 621-635.doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.04.03

• 研究综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国自然资源核算评估研究知识图谱量化分析

蓝曼, 林爱文(), 金添, 罗丽婷   

  1. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院/地理信息系统教育部重点实验室,武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-08 修回日期:2020-01-14 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 林爱文
  • 作者简介:蓝曼,女,湖北武汉人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为生态补偿与自然资源核算评估。E-mail: lanman@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA040)

Quantitative analysis of knowledge maps of natural resources accounting and assessment research in China based on CiteSpace

LAN Man, LIN Aiwen(), JIN Tian, LUO Liting   

  1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences / The Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System,Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2019-10-08 Revised:2020-01-14 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-06-25
  • Contact: LIN Aiwen

摘要:

为理清自然资源核算评估领域的研究线索、研究动态,本文基于WOS和CNKI数据,利用CiteSpace文献计量软件,分析了国际自然资源核算评估研究的国家分布、国际热点及国内研究的核心作者分布、研究机构分布,并重点探析了国内自然资源核算评估研究的热点变迁。结果表明:①在该研究领域,美国是发文量第1的国家,中国次之,中国、澳大利亚的国际合作影响力高;②国际研究主要涵盖各类资源要素的估测方法、开发利用、管理保护等方面;③国内研究涉及了多个学科领域,仍未形成稳定的核心作者网络,各机构的合作关系受地域限制较大;④国内研究热点围绕具体政策的编制要求,经历了建立、发展、完善3个阶段;⑤除国内外普遍关注的不可再生资源及清洁能源外,国内关于渔业资源的研究颇多,并对中国特有的中药资源进行了调研;“生态系统服务”已经构成国际研究的一个重要方面,国内则是近几年才把生态价值纳入探讨。本文成果有助于全面认识中国自然资源核算评估领域的整体发展阶段特征、学科前沿,并为未来自然资源核算评估研究的理论和方法实践提供参考。

关键词: 自然资源核算评估, 研究热点演变, 知识图谱, 文献计量, CiteSpace

Abstract:

Using the literature from the Web of Science (WOS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases and the CiteSpace software as an analytical tool, this study analyzed the national distribution and hotspots of the publications from international natural resources accounting and assessment research, and core author distribution and research institution distribution of the research in China, with a special focus on the hotspot changes of natural resources accounting and assessment research in China. The following results were derived: (1) In this field, America is the country with the highest number of research articles, followed by China. China and Australia have high influence in international cooperation. (2) International research mainly covered the estimation methods, development and utilization, management and protection of various resource elements. (3) Domestic research involved many fields. A stable core author network has not been formed. The cooperation relationship of each institution was greatly restricted by the region. (4) According to the requirements of specific policies, Chinese research hotspots can be divided into three stages including establishment, development, and improvement. (5) In addition to the non renewable resources and clean energy that are generally concerned at home and abroad, China has done a lot of researches on fishery resources, and studied the unique resources of traditional Chinese medicine; “ecosystem services” has become an important aspect of international research, while it is only in recent years that the ecological value has been included in the discussion in China. The results are helpful for a comprehensive understanding of the overall developing stages and the frontiers of the natural resources accounting and assessment research in China, providing a reference for the theoretical and methodological developments of future research.

Key words: natural resources accounting and assessment, research hotspot changes, knowledge map, bibliometrical method, CiteSpace