资源科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 607-620.doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.04.02

• 研究综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

国际生态系统服务研究动态与地域差异评价

黄利, 周密()   

  1. 沈阳农业大学经济管理学院,沈阳 110866
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-19 修回日期:2019-10-24 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 周密
  • 作者简介:黄利,女,四川岳池人,讲师,研究方向为农业资源与环境。E-mail:lilyhuang@syau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71903133);国家自然科学基金项目(71973100);辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题(2020lslktjdyb-030)

International ecosystem service research dynamics and regional differences: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science data

HUANG Li, ZHOU Mi()   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
  • Received:2019-07-19 Revised:2019-10-24 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-06-25
  • Contact: ZHOU Mi

摘要:

生态系统服务研究已得到国内外学者广泛关注,揭示当前国际研究热点与发展趋势,将为国内生态系统服务研究与实践提供借鉴与参考。本文以“Web of Science核心合集”的SCI-E和SSCI数据库为样本数据源,借助CiteSpace可视化科学计量工具,对国际上生态系统服务研究领域的4208篇文献进行了系统分析,利用活力指数(AI)和吸引力指数(AAI)对不同国家或地区在该领域的研究效率和学术影响力进行了评价,探讨国际上生态系统服务研究进展和动态变化规律。研究结果表明:①国际上生态系统服务研究的文献数量和被引次数随着年份变化增长显著,尤其在2012年以后,关注该问题的学者不断增加;②发文期刊集中性强,排名前10位的期刊发文数量占到全部期刊发文总数的40%;③中国近年来在生态系统服务领域研究实力不断增强,但仍低于全球平均水平;④生态系统服务评估框架和方法框架是当前热点研究领域,尤其应注重将社会需求、人类福祉、生态系统调节服务纳入到生态系统服务分析框架,同时重点关注文化生态系统服务的价值和作用,以及充分运用机器学习和大数据挖掘等创新方法解决复杂社会生态问题。

关键词: 文献计量, 生态系统服务, 知识图谱, CiteSpace, 可视化分析

Abstract:

Ecosystem service research has been widely concerned by the Chinese and international scholars. Revealing the current international research hotspots and development trends will provide a reference for ecosystem service research and practice in China. Based on bibliometric analysis and CiteSpace, this study took the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) databases of the Web of Science Core Collection as sample data sources to systematically analyze the basic characteristics, main research impacts, and research hotpots in the field of ecosystem service research. The activity index (AI) and the attraction index (AAI) were used to evaluate the research efficiency and academic influence of different countries or regions in this field over time. The research results show that: (1) The number of publications and citations of international ecosystem service research increased significantly with time, especially after 2012, and the number of scholars focusing on this issue has continued to increase; (2) The concentration of published articles in relevant journals is strong; the number of published articles in the top 10 journals accounts for 40% of the total number of published articles; (3) In recent years, China’s research strength in ecosystem services has been continuously enhanced, but it is still lower than the global average. (4) The assessment framework and research method framework of ecosystem services are currently hot topics in this research field. Particular attention should be paid to integrating social needs, human well-being, and ecosystem regulation services into the analysis framework of ecosystem services while focusing on the value and role of cultural ecosystem services, and making full use of innovative methods such as machine learning and big data mining to solve complex social and ecological problems.

Key words: bibliometric analysis, ecosystem services, knowledge mapping, CiteSpace, visualized analysis