资源科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 593-606.doi: 10.18402/resci.2020.04.01

• 研究综述 •    下一篇

区域经济增长与资源环境压力的关系研究进展

彭红松1, 郭丽佳1, 章锦河2, 钟士恩1(), 虞虎3, 韩娅4   

  1. 1. 南京财经大学工商管理学院,南京 210046
    2. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,南京 210023
    3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
    4. 南京财经大学红山学院,南京 212413
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-03 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 钟士恩
  • 作者简介:彭红松,男,安徽宿松人,讲师,博士,研究方向为生态经济与区域旅游业可持续发展。E-mail: penghongsongahsd@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41801129);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC790124);江苏省第十六批“六大人才高峰”高层次人才选拔培养项目(YJ-020)

Research progress and implication of the relationship between regional economic growth and resource-environmental pressure

PENG Hongsong1, GUO Lijia1, ZHANG Jinhe2, ZHONG Shien1(), YU Hu3, HAN Ya4   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210046, China
    2. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    4. School of Hongshan, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 212413, China
  • Received:2019-07-03 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-06-25
  • Contact: ZHONG Shien

摘要:

经济增长与资源环境压力的关系是区域可持续发展研究的重要方向,然而却很少有研究在不同理论脉络下系统梳理相关成果,并比较不同理论、方法、模型、指标与评价体系的优劣势与应用范围,以至于难以确定理论贡献。本文综述了相关的5类理论模型与实证研究,并比较其理论内涵、模型方法、评价体系及适用性,在此基础上提出二者关系分析的基本框架和重点内容,以期为相关研究提供理论参考与技术支持。结果发现:①二者关系研究的理论、方法与指标各具优劣势与应用范围,相关研究应遵循“检验因果关系方向→识别环境库兹涅茨曲线拐点/脱钩状态→评估生态效率强度→判定耦合协调阶段”的基本框架,并按照“方向调控→拐点/状态调控→强度调控→系统调控”的思路制定区域可持续发展政策;②未来应重点开展方法、模型与评价体系的适用性及优化研究,关注驱动因子、作用机制及路径选择研究,探索多案例对比、远程耦合及关联研究。

关键词: 经济增长, 资源环境压力, 格兰杰因果, 环境库兹涅茨曲线, 脱钩, 生态效率, 耦合协调, 研究进展

Abstract:

The relationship between economic growth and resource-environmental pressure is an important research area for regional sustainable development. However, few studies have systematically summarized relevant research results within different theoretical contexts, and few have compared the pros and cons of different theories, methods, models, indicators, and evaluation systems. Therefore, it is difficult to determine their theoretical contributions. This article reviewed five kinds of theoretical models and empirical studies in this field. It also compared their theoretical connotations, methods, evaluation systems, and applicability. In addition, this article proposed the basic framework and key content of analysis on the relationship between regional economic growth and resource-environmental pressures. We aimed to provide some theoretical reference and technical support for advancing related research. The results show that: (1) The theories, methods, and indicators of this field have different advantages, disadvantages, and application scope. Relevant research should be carried out under the basic framework of testing the direction of causality → identifying the EKC turning point/decoupling state → assessing the eco-efficiency intensity → determining the coupling coordination phase. Regional sustainable development policies should be developed based on the idea of “direction regulation → turning point/state regulation → intensity regulation → system regulation.” (2) We should focus on method, model, and evaluation system optimization. Studies on discovering driving factors, mechanisms, and path selection should be emphasized. Furthermore, it is necessary to implement research on multi-case comparison, remote coupling, and theoretical association in the future.

Key words: economic growth, resource-environmental pressure, Granger causality, Environmental Kuznets Curve, decoupling, eco-efficiency, coupling coordination, research progress