城市低效工业用地研究进展——基于供给侧结构性改革的思考

doi:10.18402/resci.2018.06.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在供给侧结构性改革的背景下,城市低效工业用地研究日趋受到学者们的关注。本文基于“内涵界定—效率评价—成因分析—处置研究”这一分析路线,总结城市低效工业用地的科学内涵,梳理城市工业用地利用效率评价的指标体系、评价尺度和评价方法,探寻城市低效工业用地的形成原因,系统分析城市低效工业用地处置的模式和障碍因素,并提出现有研究存在的问题和解决设想。研究表明：①城市低效工业用地内涵和基础理论研究需要深入,厘清城市低效工业用地的产生机理、处置动力机制和主体间利益博弈机制是研究的关键;②城市低效工业用地效率评价方法选择的科学性有待提高,指标体系的内容应注重对技术创新、环境保护和可持续利用的关注;③城市低效工业用地处置模式较为单一,当前大多局限于政府主导的处置模式,如何发挥市场机制在低效工业用地配置中的决定性作用,引导各种主体参与并实现利益共享是研究的重点;④城市低效工业用地处置顶层制度供给远落后于地方实践,应尽快总结改革经验,创新顶层制度设计,同时,探索城市低效工业用地处置与新兴产业用地支持政策的融合。

关键词: 城市低效用地, 工业用地, 供给侧结构性改革, 效率评价, 研究进展

Abstract:

Under the background of supply side structural reform, there has been increasing focus on urban inefficient industrial land. This paper is based on the route of connotative definition—efficiency evaluation—cause analysis—disposal research. We summarize the connotation of inefficient urban industrial land and analyze the index system, scale and methods of efficiency evaluation to explore reasons for the formation of inefficient urban industrial land, disposal modes and obstacles. We found that the connotation and basic theory research into urban inefficient industrial land needs to be further studied to clarify the mechanism of production, disposal mechanism and mechanism of interest game among stakeholders. The scientific method of selecting evaluation methods needs to be improved, the contents of the index system should focus on technological innovation, intellectual property rights, environmental protection and sustainable utilization. The disposal modes of inefficient urban industrial land are relatively unitary, and most of them are limited to the government-led disposal mode. Therefore, future research should focus on how to give full play to the decisive role of market mechanisms in the allocation of inefficient industrial land, guide all kinds of subjects to participate in and realize benefit sharing. The supply of top-level institutions for urban inefficient industrial land is far behind local practice. Therefore, the reform experience should be summarized, top-level institutional design should be innovative; we need to integrate the disposal of urban inefficient industrial land and support emerging industry land policy.

Key words: inefficient land, urban industrial land, supply side structural reform, efficiency, research progress

罗遥, 吴群. 城市低效工业用地研究进展——基于供给侧结构性改革的思考[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(6): 1119-1129.

Yao LUO, Qun WU. Research progress on inefficient urban industrial land based on supply side structural reform[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(6): 1119-1129.

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

参考文献 69

[1]	陈伟, 李阳, 吴群, 等. 基于产业差异修正的工业行业土地集约利用评价研究-以江苏省为例[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(12): 2256-2264.
	[Chen W, Li Y, Wu Q, et al. Evaluation of intensive industrial land use based on modification of industrial differences in Jiangsu Province[J]. Resources Science, 2012, 34(12): 2256-2264. ]
[2]	国务院发展研究中心. 新一轮改革的战略和路径[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2013.
	[Development Research Center of the State Council. The Strategy and Path of the New Round of Reform[M]. Beijing: China Citic Press, 2013. ]
[3]	郭贯成, 温其玉. 环境约束下工业用地生产效率研究-基于中国33个典型城市非期望产出的考量[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(6): 121-127.
	[Guo G C, Wen Q Y.Industrial land productivity research under the environmental restriction based on unexpected outputs of 33 typical cities in China[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(6): 121-127. ]
[4]	赵小风, 黄贤金, 马文君, 等. 闲置土地的认定思路及处置建议[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(9): 3-7.
	[Zhao X F, Huang X J, Ma W J, et al. Identification method and treatment suggestion for idle land[J]. China Land Sciences, 2011, 25(9): 3-7. ]
[5]	谢花林, 王伟, 姚冠荣, 等. 中国主要经济区城市工业用地效率的时空差异和收敛性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(8): 1327-1338.
	[Xie H L, Wang W, Yao G R, et al. Spatial and temporal differences and convergence of China's main economic zones[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(8): 1327-1338. ]
[6]	曹康, 金涛. 国外“棕地再开发”土地利用策略及对我国的启示[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2007, 17(6): 124-129.
	[Cao K, Jin T.A discussion on brownfield redevelopment strategies in western countries and its inspiration to China[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2007, 17(6): 124-129. ]
[7]	张赛赛, 冯秀丽, 马仁锋, 等. 镇域尺度城镇低效用地空间格局分析-以宁波市为例[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 51(4): 542-547.
	[Zhang S S, Feng X L, Ma R F, et al. Spatial pattern analysis of urban inefficient land in the town scale-a case study of Ningbo[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University(Nat. Sci. ), 2017, 51(4): 542-547. ]
[8]	Li X D, Yang H, Li W J, et al. Public-private partnership in residential brownfield redevelopment: Case studies of Pittsburgh[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 145: 1534-1540.
[9]	Fred E.Brownfields: Risk, property, and community value[J]. Local Environment, 2006, 11(5): 559-575.
[10]	Sau K L, Loo L S, Lai C M.Market-led policy measures for urban redevelopment in Singapore[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(1): 1-19.
[11]	刘伟. 经济新常态与供给侧结构性改革[J]. 管理世界, 2016, (7): 1-9.
	[Liu W.New normal of economy and structural reform of supply side[J]. Management World, 2016, (7): 1-9. ]
[12]	胡鞍钢, 周绍杰, 任皓. 供给侧结构性改革-适应和引领中国经济新常态[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 31(2): 17-22.
	[Hu A G, Zhou S J, Ren H.The strategic innovations towards adapting to and leading China's new normal status[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2016, 31(2): 17-22. ]
[13]	胡智超, 彭建, 杜悦悦, 等. 基于供给侧结构性改革的空心村综合整治研究[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(12): 2119-2128.
	[Hu Z C, Peng J, Du Y Y, et al. Reconstructing hollow villages in the view of structural reform of the supply side[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(12): 2119-2128. ]
[14]	王克强, 郑旭, 张冰松, 等. 土地市场供给侧结构性改革研究-基于“如何推进土地市场领域的供给侧结构性改革研讨会”的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(12): 3-9.
	[Wang K Q, Zhen X, Zhang B S, et al. Research on supply-side reform in the land market: based on the seminar of how to promote the supply-side reform of land market[J]. China Land Sciences, 2016, 30(12): 3-9. ]
[15]	陈伟. 城市工业用地利用效率的区域与行业差异研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
	[Chen W.Regional and Industrial Sector Difference of the Use Efficiency of Urban Land[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. ]
[16]	赵爱栋, 马贤磊, 曲福田. 市场化改革能提高中国工业用地利用效率吗?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(3): 118-126.
	[Zhao A D, Ma X L, Qu F T.Does market reform increase industrial land use efficiency in China?[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(3): 118-126. ]
[17]	赵爱栋, 马贤磊, 曲福田, 等. 基于资源价值显化视角的中国工业用地市场发育水平及其影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(2): 217-227.
	[Zhao A D, Ma X L, Qu F T, et al. Marketization level of industrial land in China and its impacting factors from the perspective of resource value manifesting[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(2): 217-227. ]
[18]	何芳, 王怡昕, 代兵, 等. 低效工业用地类型划分与认定标准研究-以上海为例[J]. 中国房地产, 2017, (21): 3-11.
	[He F, Wang Y X, Dai B, et al. Research on classification and identification criteria of inefficiency industrial land under poly-department coordination-a case study of Shanghai[J]. China Real Estate, 2017, (21): 3-11. ]
[19]	王成新, 刘洪颜, 史佳璐, 等. 山东省省级以上开发区土地集约利用评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(6): 128-133.
	[Wang C X, Liu H Y, Shi J L, et al. Evaluation on intensive land use in development zones of Shandong Province[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(6): 128-133. ]
[20]	李广东, 方创琳. 中国县域国土空间集约利用计量测度与影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(12): 1739-1752.
	[Li G D, Fang C L.Quantitative measure and influencing mechanism of land intensive use in China at the county level[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(12): 1739-1752. ]
[21]	张雪靓, 孔祥斌, 赵晶, 等. 我国建设用地集约利用水平时空变化规律[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(5): 156-165.
	[Zhang X L, Kong X B, Zhao J, et al. Spatial-temporal changes of China's construction land intensive use[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2013, 18(5): 156-165. ]
[22]	赵可, 张安录. 城市建设用地扩张驱动力实证研究-基于辽宁省14市市辖区数据[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(5): 928-934.
	[Zhao K, Zhang A L.Driving forces behind urban land expansion based on panel data for 14 cities in Liaoning[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(5): 928-934. ]
[23]	尹海伟, 张琳琳, 孔繁花, 等. 基于层次分析和移动窗口方法的济南市建设用地适宜性评价[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(3): 530-535.
	[Yin H W, Zhang L L, Kong F H, et al. Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Jinan City based on AHP and moving window methods[J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(3): 530-535. ]
[24]	张舟, 谭荣, 吴次芳, 等. 走出政府治理下土地二次开发的实践困境-以深圳市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(10): 41-47.
	[Zhang Z, Tan R, Wu C F, et al. The practical dilemma and institutional improvement of land readjustment: an empirical study from Shenzhen City[J]. China Land Sciences, 2012, 26(10): 41-47. ]
[25]	李伟芳, 吴迅锋, 杨晓平. 宁波市工业用地节约和集约利用问题研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(5): 23-27.
	[Li W F, Wu X F, Yang X P.Study on economical and intensive use of industrial land in Ningbo[J]. China Land Sciences, 2008, 22(5): 23-27. ]
[26]	Gao X L, Yasushi A.Influence of lot size and shape on redevelopment projects[J]. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 212-222.
[27]	Barrie N, Erik L, Paul M.An economic theory for industrial land policy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33(4): 227-234.
[28]	Zuzana K.Brownfield topic in the Czech Legislation[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 161: 290-293.
[29]	Tomáš K, Ivo D, Marek H.Exploring the hidden potential of sugar beet industry brownfields (case study of the Czech Republic)[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 46: 284-297.
[30]	Lubomir J, Milan H.From planning to smart management of historic industrial brownfield regeneration[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 161: 2282-2289.
[31]	Erika R, Marco P, Lisa P.Brownfield regeneration in Europe: Identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 48: 437-453.
[32]	Sousa C D.Greening the Industrial District: Transforming Milwaukee's Menomonee Valley from a Blighted Brownfield into a Sustainable Place to Work and Play[A]. Slavin M I. Sustainability in America’s Cities[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2011.
[33]	Gareth T, Martin F, David E.The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe[J]. Environmental Science Policy, 2007, 10(2): 116-134.
[34]	陈伟, 彭建超, 吴群. 基于容积率指数和单要素DEA方法的工业用地利用效率区域差异研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6): 903-916.
	[Chen W, Peng J C, Wu Q.Regional differences of industrial land use efficiency based on volume rate index and sub-factor DEA method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(6): 903-916. ]
[35]	陈士银, 周飞, 吴雪彪. 基于绩效模型的区域土地利用可持续性评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 249-253.
	[Chen S Y, Zhou F, Wu X B.Evaluation of regional land use sustainability based on performance model[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(6): 249-253. ]
[36]	孙平军, 吕飞, 修春亮, 等. 新型城镇化下中国城市土地节约集约利用的基本认知与评价[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(8): 178-183.
	[Sun P J, Lv F, Xiu C L, et al. Basic cognition and evaluation of urban economical and intensive land use under the new urbanization[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(8): 178-183. ]
[37]	陈伟, 彭建超, 吴群. 中国省域工业用地利用效率时空差异及影响因素研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(10): 2046-2056.
	[Chen W, Peng J C, Wu Q.Spatial and temporal differences in industrial land use efficiency in China[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(10): 2046-2056. ]
[38]	郭贯成, 任宝林, 吴群. 基于ArcGIS的江苏省金坛市工业用地集约利用评价研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(8): 24-30.
	[Guo G C, Ren B L, Wu Q.Study on assessment on intensive use of industrial land based on ArcGIS in Jintan City, Jiangsu Province[J]. China Land Sciences, 2009, 23(8): 24-30. ]
[39]	郑新奇, 王筱明, 王爱萍, 等. 城市宗地集约利用潜力评价方法研究-以济南市城区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(6): 71-75.
	[Zheng X Q, Wang X M, Wang A P, et al. Estimation method of potentials for intensive use of urban parcels: a case of Jinan City[J]. Resources Science, 2005, 27(6): 71-75. ]
[40]	王广洪, 黄贤金, 姚丽. 国家级园区用地相对集约度及其时空分异研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2007, 21(4): 18-25.
	[Wang G H, Huang X J, Yao L.Research on relative intensity degree of land use and its spatial-temporal differentiation of national development zones[J]. China Land Sciences, 2007, 21(4): 18-25. ]
[41]	班茂盛, 方创琳, 刘晓丽, 等. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.
	[Ban M S, Fang C L, Liu X L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184. ]
[42]	吴一洲, 吴次芳, 罗文斌, 等. 浙江省城市土地利用绩效的空间格局及其机理研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(10): 41-46.
	[Wu Y Z, Wu C F, Luo W B, et al. Research on the performance of urban land use in terms of spatial pattern and mechanism in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Sciences, 2009, 23(10): 41-46. ]
[43]	马琳. 基于数据包络分析的上海郊区土地利用效率评价研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2010.
	[Ma L.Study on the Evaluation of the Shanghai Suburbs Land-Using Based on the DEA Method[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2010. ]
[44]	鲁春阳, 文枫, 杨庆媛, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断-以重庆市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(3): 535-541.
	[Lu C Y, Wen F, Yang Q Y, et al. An evaluation of urban land use performance based on the improved TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: a case study of Chongqing[J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(3): 535-541. ]
[45]	周晓飞, 雷国平, 徐珊. 城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断-以哈尔滨市为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2): 126-130.
	[Zhou X F, Lei G P, Xu S.An evaluation of urban land use performance and diagnosis of its obstacle degree-a case study of Harbin City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 19(2): 126-130. ]
[46]	李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(5): 217-227.
	[Li C, Zhang F R, Zhu T F, et al. Evaluation and correlation analysis of land use performance based on entropy-weight TOPSIS method[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(5): 217-227. ]
[47]	李伦, 郝前进. 上海市工业园区土地利用相对绩效实证研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(2): 53-58.
	[Li L, Hao Q J.Empirical study on the relative efficiency of industrial land use in Shanghai City[J]. China Land Sciences, 2014, 28(2): 53-58. ]
[48]	陈伟, 彭建超, 吴群. 城市工业用地利用损失与效率测度[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(2): 15-22.
	[Chen W, Peng J C, Wu Q.Research on use loss and use efficiency of urban industrial land[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(2): 15-22. ]
[49]	张雄, 张安录, 邓超. 基于用地企业视角的土地资源配置效率研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(8): 90-97.
	[Zhang X, Zhang A L, Deng C.Study on allocation efficiency of land recourses from the perspective of industry enterprises[J]. China Land Sciences, 2016, 30(8): 90-97. ]
[50]	郭文华, 郝晋珉, 覃丽, 等. 中国城镇化过程中的建设用地评价指数探讨[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 66-72.
	[Guo W H, Hao J M, Tan L, et al. Discussion on the index of appraisal on constructive land of China during urbanization[J]. Resources Science, 2005, 27(3): 66-72. ]
[51]	崔娟敏, 季文光. 基于AHP的土地集约利用水平模糊综合评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(4): 122-125.
	[Cui J M, Ji W G.AHP-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluating for land intensive use level[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(4): 122-125. ]
[52]	黄金升, 陈利根, 张耀宇. 基于评价指标性状差异的工业用地集约利用评价研究-以义乌市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(4): 680-689.
	[Huang J S, Chen L G, Zhang Y Y.Evaluation of industrial land intensive use based on evaluation indicator character difference in Yiwu City[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(4): 680-689. ]
[53]	白如山, 姜玉培, 曾承. 江淮城市群土地利用空间结构的多尺度研究[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 39(6): 561-567.
	[Bai R S, Jiang Y P, Zeng C.Multi-scale analysis on land use spatial structure of Jianghuai urban[J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University(Natural Science), 2016, 39(6): 561-567. ]
[54]	林瑜. 开发(园)区低效用地的界定与分类[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2013.
	[Lin Y.Research on the Definition and Classification of the Development Zones' Inefficient Land-a Case of Changsha[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2013. ]
[55]	曹飞. 城市存量建设用地低效利用问题的解决途径-以工业用地为例[J]. 城市问题, 2017, (11): 72-77.
	[Cao F.Resolution ways for low efficient utilization of urban stock industrial land: taking industrial land for example[J]. Urban Problems, 2017, (11): 72-77.]
[56]	张兰. 徐州高新技术产业开发区低效工业用地评价与再开发研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2017.
	[Zhang L.Study on Evaluation and Redevelopment of Inefficient Industrial Land in Xuzhou Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2017. ]
[57]	乔帅. 城镇低效住宅用地再开发拆迁补偿标准量化研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2017.
	[Qiao S.Research on the Compensation Standard Quantifying of the Redevelopment of the Urban Inefficient Land [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2017. ]
[58]	洪惠坤, 廖和平, 曾彦, 等. 集约导向的重庆市低效工业用地退出机制研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(5): 128-135.
	[Hong H K, Liao H P, Zeng Y, et al. Intensive-oriented evaluation and exit mechanism analysis of the inefficient industrial land in Chongqing City[J]. Journal of Southwest University(natural science edition), 2015, 37(5): 128-135. ]
[59]	谭术魁, 张路, 王斯亮, 等. 土地二次开发中政府分享土地增值收益研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(3): 436-441.
	[Tan S K, Zhang L, Wang S L, et al. Government-shared land increment income in the process of land redevelopment[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(3): 436-441. ]
[60]	岳隽. 深圳原农村土地二次开发模式统筹研究-基于土地增值收益合理分配的视角[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2015, 34(5): 153-156.
	[Yue J.Research on co-ordination model of land re-development of the original rural collective land in Shenzhen: on the perspective of land value increase allocation[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2015, 34(5): 153-156. ]
[61]	王亮. 泰州市姜堰区低效用地潜力释放模式及对策[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
	[Wang L.Model and Countermeasures to Release the Potential of Inefficient Land in Jiangyan District Taizhou City[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. ]
[62]	刘红梅, 孟鹏, 马克星, 等. 经济发达地区建设用地减量化研究-基于“经济新常态下土地利用方式转变与建设用地减量化研讨会”的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(12): 11-17.
	[Liu H M, Meng P, Ma K X, et al. Study on reduction of construction land in the developed area: reviews of the workshop on “Land use pattern changing and construction land reduction in the new normal”[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(12): 11-17. ]
[63]	刘新平, 严金明, 王庆日. 中国城镇低效用地再开发的现实困境与理性选择[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(1): 48-54.
	[Liu X P, Yan J M, Wang Q R.Practical dilemma and rational choice of underused urban land readjustment in China[J]. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(1): 48-54. ]
[64]	赖文浩. 城镇低效用地改造的实践与思考-以珠三角地区为例[J]. 中国土地, 2016, (9): 4-7.
	[Lai W H.Practice and thinking of inefficient land use reconstruction-a case study of Pearl River Delta[J]. China Land, 2016, (9): 4-7. ]
[65]	龙开胜, 秦洁, 陈利根. 开发区闲置土地成因及其治理路径-以北方A市高新技术产业开发区为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(1): 126-131.
	[Long K S, Qin J, Chen L G.Causes and governance solutions of idle land in development zone: a case of new＆high-tech industry development zone of city “A” in north China[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(1): 126-131. ]
[66]	何书金, 苏光全. 开发区闲置土地成因机制及类型划分[J]. 资源科学, 2001, 23(5): 17-22.
	[He S J, Su G Q.Causal mechanism and classification of idle land in China's development areas[J]. Resources Science, 2001, 23(5): 17-22. ]
[67]	周科界. “城镇低效用地再开发”中的地方政府角色研究[D]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2016.
	[Zhou K J.Research of the Local Government Role in the Underused Urban Land Re-Development: Wenzhou Case[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Political Science and Law, 2016. ]
[68]	中国国土资源部. 关于深入推进城镇低效用地再开发的指导意见(试行)[EB/OL]. (2016-11-11)[2017-11-08]. .
	[Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding Opinions on Further Promoting the Redevelopment of Inefficient Land Use [EB/OL]. (2016-11-11)[2017-11-08]. ]
[69]	中国国土资源部. 关于支持新产业新业态发展促进大众创业万众创新用地的意见[EB/OL]. (2015-09-18)[2017-11-08]. .
	[Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions on Supporting the Development of New Industries and New Formats and Promoting the Creation of Innovative Land for the Masses[EB/OL]. (2015-09-18)[2017-11-08]. ]

时间	代表性研究者及文章	评价方法	评价重点
2007年	王广洪等^[40]	基于比较优势理论的评价方法	园区用地相对集约度
2008年	班茂盛等^[41]	改进的土地利用绩效模型	效率综合评价
2009年	吴一洲等^[42]	空间相关分析法、GIS技术	城市土地利用效率
2010年	马琳^[43]	DEA模型	郊区土地利用效率
2011年	鲁春阳等^[44]	改进TOPSIS方法和障碍度模型	土地利用效率与障碍
2012年	周晓飞等^[45]	改进的功效系数法和熵权法	土地利用效率障碍诊断
2013年	李灿等^[46]	熵权TOPSIS模型	土地利用效率关联分析
2014年	李伦等^[47]	索洛残差法	工业用地相对效率
2015年	陈伟等^[48]	随机前沿分析方法	工业用地利用损失与效率
2016年	张雄等^[49]	数据包络分析方法	企业土地资源配置效率

模式类型	处置主体	操作方式	适用条件
强度提升模式	政府、原产权人	按要求提高土地投入产出强度	土地使用者有能力和意愿继续投资
效能提升模式	政府、原产权人、第三方	政府确定产业门类,原土地使用者和第三方协商交易土地	重点发展高端制造业、创新产业和研发总部等
用途调整模式	政府、原产权人、第三方	政府调整土地用途,原土地使用者和第三方协商交易土地	土地区位条件较优,适宜调整为商、办用地
全面改造模式	政府、原产权人、第三方	产权改变,用途调整,强度提升	“三旧”改造
产权转移模式	原产权人、第三方	全部或部分转移产权,由第三方进行开发利用	土地使用者无能力或意愿继续投资
置换模式	原产权人	土地使用者之前协商置换产权	符合政府和企业利益
退出模式	政府、原产权人	无偿回收、有偿回购	符合闲置土地收回条件的无偿回收,其他土地有偿回购