林业政策研究的发展及理论框架综述

doi:10.18402/resci.2018.06.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

由于学科发展旅程的断裂和重视程度不够,中国林业政策研究面临理论缺失的困境。为弥补这一不足,本文采用文献综述和专家咨询的研究方法,梳理了国内外林业政策科学研究的发展历程,分析中国林业政策研究滞后的原因,并归纳林业政策研究的特性。在此基础上,介绍了国际林业政策分析的常用理论框架并探讨了各理论模型间的关系及应用状况。研究表明：林业政策研究具有潜在复杂性、注重跨学科思考和问题导向性三种重要特性,这些特性决定中国林业政策分析必须建立更具开放性、包容性的研究体系;国际林业政策研究已形成较为成熟的理论分析框架,国内林业政策学界的研究内容亟待从深受政府决策影响的政策评论与绩效评价转向关注林业政策制定、执行、评估等政策过程的理论分析。根据中国林业政策研究的发展阶段和国情,指出可将分析中国林业政策变迁过程和紧跟国际研究前沿作为追赶西方学界的重要切入点,并强调应警惕西方理论检验中国实践时出现模型失真,同时要加强本土化的林业政策哲学研究。

关键词: 林业政策, 发展历程, 理论框架, 启示, 综述

Abstract:

Interruption to forest policy analysis and a lack of sufficient attention has meant that forest policy study in China lacks strong theoretical frameworks. Here, a literature review and Delphi approach were adopted to examine the historical process of forest policy analysis research, and understand why China’s forest policy research lags behind western countries. We summarized three important features shared by the forest policy research community: potential complexity, emphasize interdisciplinary thinking and stress issue-oriented study. We introduce six practicable theory frameworks: Policy Stages Model, Multiple Streams Approach, Punctuated Equilibrium Framework, Ambiguity—Conflict Model, Institutional Rational Choice, and Advocacy Coalition Framework. China’s forest policy research community should turn their attention from policy appraisal and comment, both highly affected by official authority, to theory analysis of forest policy processes such as policymaking, implementation and evaluation. Based on China’s development stage we anticipate that focus on historical forest policy change research and academic frontiers can act as two critical entry points for China’s forest policy research community integrated into the international research community. We should keep our eyes open on whether western theory frameworks fit China’s fact as these theories were established using a Western context and may need to be adapted for China. Policy philosophy should keep pace with theory application.

Key words: forest policy, developing progress, theory framework, implications, review

傅一敏, 刘金龙, 赵佳程. 林业政策研究的发展及理论框架综述[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(6): 1106-1118.

Yimin FU, Jinlong LIU, Jiacheng ZHAO. Review of forest policy research progress and theory frameworks[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(6): 1106-1118.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 87

[14]	[ Li J Q, Tian K, Chen S Z.British forestry laws and policy system and its revelation[J]. World Forestry Research, 2014, (2): 70-76. ]
[15]	李剑泉, 徐斌, 李智勇. 商品林采伐限额管理制度国别经验[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(1): 10-13.
	[ Li J Q, Xu B, Li Z Y.Foreign experiences on commercial forest cutting quota administration system[J]. World Forestry Research, 2009, 22(1): 10-13. ]
[16]	张煜星, 胡培兴, 何时珍. 美国的林业政策和制度[J]. 世界林业研究, 2005, (1): 65-67.
	[ Zhang Y X, Hu P X, He S Z.Forestry policy and system in American[J]. World Forestry Research, 2005, (1): 65-67. ]
[17]	和爱军. 二十世纪欧美七国森林与林业政策的变迁[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003, (3): 1-6.
	[ He A J.Review changes of the policy of forest and forestry of seven countries of the west in the twentieth century[J]. World Forestry Research, 2003, (3): 1-6. ]
[18]	刘金龙, 张译文, 梁茗, 等. 基于集体林权制度改革的林业政策协调与合作研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(3): 124-130.
	[Liu J L, Zhang Y W, Liang M, et al. Study on forest policy coordination and cooperation based on collective forest tenure reform in China[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(3): 124-130. ]
[19]	曹建华, 王红英. 林业政策模拟模型研究-一个分析的框架[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2005, 27(4): 602-606.
	[Cao J H, Wang H Y.A study on the simulation model of forestry policy-an analysis framework[J]. Academic Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2005, 27(4): 602-606. ]
[20]	贺东航, 孔繁斌. 公共政策执行的中国经验[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011, (5): 61-79.
	[He D H, Kong F B.China’s experience in public policy implementation[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2011, (5): 61-79. ]
[21]	刘金龙, 孙程艳, 徐飞. 参与式林业政策过程方法-一个新的林业政策形成路径[J]. 林业经济, 2011, (2): 82-86.
	[ Liu J L, Sun C Y, Xu F.Participatory forestry policy process: a new approach of forestry policy process[J]. Forestry Economics, 2011, (2): 82-86. ]
[22]	刘金龙, 孙程艳, 庞闽志. 参与式林业政策过程方法的运用-以福建三明市制定林木采伐管理规定为例[J]. 林业经济, 2010, (12): 103-107.
	[ Liu J L, Sun C Y, Pang M Z.Application of national forest programme in formulation-act of timber harvest and harvest quota in Sanming Prefecture of Fujian Province[J]. Forestry Economics, 2010, (12): 103-107. ]
[23]	贺东航, 朱冬亮. 集体林权制度改革实施及绩效评估-集体林权制度改革2014年监测观察报告[J]. 林业经济, 2015, (2): 13-27.
	[He D H, Zhu D L.The collective forest tenure reform implementation and performance evaluation-2014 monitoring observations of collective forest tenure reform[J]. Forestry Economics, 2015, (2): 13-27. ]
[24]	孔凡斌. 集体林权制度改革绩效评价理论与实证研究-基于江西省2484户林农收入增长的视角[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(10): 132-141.
	[Kong F B.Theoretical and empirical research of performance evaluation for the policy of collective forestry property rights system reform[J]. Forestry Science, 2008, 44(10): 132-141. ]
[25]	何尤刚, 孔凡斌. 天然林保护工程绩效评价: 现状、问题与研究展望[J]. 生态经济, 2008, 36(2): 147-150.
	[He Y G, Kong F B.Effectiveness evaluation on the natural forest protection project: status, problems and research prospects[J]. Ecological Economy, 2008, 36(2): 147-150. ]
[26]	刘伦武, 刘伟平. 试论林业政策绩效评价[J]. 林业经济问题, 2004, 24(6): 347-350.
[1]	中华人民共和国宪法[N]. 人民日报, 2018-03-22(01).
	[Constitution of the People's Republic of China[N]. People's Daily, 2018-03-22(01). ]
[2]	刘金龙. 迷茫中林业经济管理学科: 发展旅程的断裂和知识结构的困惑[J]. 林业经济问题, 2016, 36(1): 89-96.
[26]	[Liu L W, Liu W P.Appraisal on the performance of forestry policy[J]. Problems of Forestry Economics, 2004, 24(6): 347-350. ]
[27]	Worrel A C.Principles of forest policy[M]. Pennsylvania: McGraw Hill, 1970.
[2]	[Liu J L.Forest economics and management in the puzzling position: discontinuity of development process and unclear knowledge structure[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2016, 36(1): 89-96. ]
[3]	徐杰芳, 田淑英, 涂欣培. 林业政策的制定与创新文献综述[J]. 林业经济问题, 2016, 36(6): 481-488.
[28]	Wiersum K F.Social forestry: Changing perspectives in forestry science or practice? [D]. Netherlands: Wageningen University, 1999.
[29]	Birkland T A.An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
[3]	[Xu J F, Tian S Y, Tu X P.Literature review of forestry policy formulation and innovation[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2016, 36(6): 481-488. ]
[4]	胡运宏, 贺俊杰. 1949年以来我国林业政策演变初探[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 11(3): 21-27.
[30]	Krott M.Forest Policy Analysis[M]. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
[31]	de Jong W, Arts B, Krott M. Political theory in forest policy science[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012, 16(2): 1-6.
[4]	[Hu Y H, He J J.Evolution of forestry policy in China since 1949[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 2012, 11(3): 21-27. ]
[5]	刘平康. 论林业政策[J]. 福建论坛(经济社会版), 1990, (1): 16-17.
[32]	Arts B.Forests policy analysis and theory use: overview and trends[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012, 16(2): 7-13.
[33]	Howlett M, Rayner J, Goehler D, et al. Overcoming the challenges to integration: embracing complexity in forest policy design through multi-level governance[M]. Vienna: IUFRO Secretariat, 2010.
[34]	马爱国. 论多主体林业政策过程的构建[J]. 林业经济, 2003, (4): 30-32.
	[ Ma A G.Diversified participants involved in the process of forestry policy-making[J]. Forestry Economics, 2003, (4): 30-32. ]
[5]	[Liu P K.Forestry policy discuss[J]. Fujian Forum(Economics and Society Version), 1990, (1): 16-17. ]
[6]	刘凤彪. 关于我国林业政策学有关问题的初步探讨[J]. 林业经济, 1990, (4): 53-55.
[35]	Jinlong L.Forests in the Mist: Livelihoods and Responses to the Natural Forest Protection Program in China[D]. Netherland: Wageningen, 2006.
[36]	Arts B, Visseren-Hamakers I J. Forest governance: mainstream and critical views[J]. ETFRN News, 2012, 53: 3-10.
[6]	[Liu F B.Preliminary discussion on issues of forestry policy science in China[J]. Forestry Economics, 1990, (4): 53-55. ]
[7]	廖士义, 温亚力. 论林业政策研究之要义[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1992, (1): 1-6.
[37]	傅一敏, 龙贺兴, 刘博雅, 等. 整体性治理视阈下东洞庭湖湿地治理破碎化问题研究[J]. 林业经济, 2016, (3): 8-13.
	[ Fu Y M, Long H X, Liu B Y, et al. Under the perspective of holistic governance: study on fragmentation of wetland governance at East Dongting Lake Wetland[J]. Forestry Economics, 2016, (3): 8-13. ]
[7]	[ Liao S Y, Wen Y L.The essence of forestry policy analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1992, (1): 1-6. ]
[8]	张蕾, 谢晨. 日本的主要林业政策与改革[J]. 世界林业研究, 1999, 12(6): 48-54.
[38]	Iasswell H D.The Future of Political Science[M]. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers, 1962.
[39]	Lasswell H D.A Pre-View of Policy Sciences[M]. ‎Amsterdam: Elsevier publishing company, 1971.
[8]	[Lei Z, Chen X.Forestry policy and reform in Japan[J]. World Forestry Research, 1999, 12(6): 48-54. ]
[9]	鲁德. 印度尼西亚的林业政策[J]. 世界林业研究, 1991, (4): 88-89.
[40]	Hardin G.The tragedy of the commons[J]. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2009, 1(3): 243-253.
[41]	Humphreys D.Logjam: Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
[9]	[Lu D.Forestry policy in Indonesia[J]. World Forestry Research, 1991, (4): 88-89. ]
[10]	远海鹰. 演变中的世界林业政策[J]. 世界林业研究, 1996, (4): 78-80.
[42]	Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2009.
[43]	Sabatier P, Weible C.Theories of the Policy Process[M]. Boulder: Westview Press, 2014.
[10]	[Yuan H Y. Yuan H Y.The evolution of the world's forest policy[J]. World Forestry Research, 1996,(4): 70-80. 1992, (11): 4-6. ]
[11]	吕继光. 德国林业历史教训在中国重演的忧思-林业持续发展障碍因素探索[J]. 世界林业研究, 1994, (4): 62-67.
[44]	Easton D.A Systems Analysis of Political Life[M]. New York: John Wiley, 1965.
[45]	Barnard C, Simon H. Administrative Behavior.A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization[M]. New York: Free Press, 1947.
[11]	[L J G.Discuss the factors restricting sustainable development of China's forest-reflection on Germany's historical lessons[J]. World Forestry Research, 1994, (4): 62-67. ]
[12]	远海鹰. 美国振兴林业的基本政策初探[J]. 国际科技交流, 1992, (11): 4-6.
[46]	Nakamura R T.The textbook policy process and implementation research[J]. Review of Policy Research, 1987, 7(1): 142-154.
[47]	Jenkins-Smith H C, Sabatier P A. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework[J]. Journal of public policy, 1994, 14(2): 175-203.
[12]	[Yuan H Y.Basic inquiry of American's forest prosper[J]. Global Technology Communication, 1992, (11): 4-6. ]
[13]	陈根长. 中国林业政策的回顾与展望[J]. 中国林业, 2000, (1): 15-17.
[48]	Howlett M, Cashore B.Conceptualizing public policy[A]. Engeli et al. Comparative Policy Studies[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[49]	Wu X, Ramesh M, Howlett M, et al. The Public Policy Primer: Managing the Policy Process[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
[50]	Cubbage F W, O'laughlin J, Bullock C S. Forest resource policy[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. , 1993.
[51]	Rayner J, Howlett M, Wilson J, et al. Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2001, 2(3): 319-332.
[13]	[Chen G C, Review and outlook of China's forestry policy[J]. China Forestry, 2000, (1): 15-17. ]
[14]	李剑泉, 田康, 陈绍志. 英国林业法规政策体系及启示[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, (2): 70-76.
[52]	Cohen M D, March J G, Olsen J P.A garbage can model of organizational choice[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17(1): 1-25.
[53]	Kingdon J W, Thurber J A.Agendas, alternatives, and public policies[M]. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984.
[54]	Kingdon J W.The policy window and joining the streams[A].Kingdon J W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies[M]. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995.
[55]	Zahariadis N.Ambiguity and multiple streams[J]. Theories of the policy process, 2014(3): 25-59.
[56]	Zahariadis N.The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects[A]. PA. Sabatier. Theories of the Policy Process[M]. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007.
[57]	Zahariadis N.Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies[M]. Washington, D. C Georgetown University Press, 2003.
[58]	Gould N E J. Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism[J]. 1972(5): 82-155.
[59]	Baumgartner Frank R, Jones Bryan D.Agendas and Instability in American Politics[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
[60]	True J L, Jones B D, Baumgartner F R.Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking[A]. PA. Sabatier. Theories of the Policy Process[M]. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007.
[61]	Baumgartner F R, Jones B D.Policy Dynamics[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
[62]	Jones B D.Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
[63]	Jones M D, Jenkins Smith H C. Trans-subsystem dynamics: policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2009, 37(1): 37-58.
[64]	O'Toole Jr L J. Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2000, 10(2): 263-288.
[65]	Matland R E.Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1995, 5(2): 145-174.
[66]	冉冉. 中国环境政治中的政策框架特征与执行偏差[J]. 教学与研究, 2014, 48(5): 55-63.
	[Ran R.The policy framework characteristics and implementation deviation in Chinese environmental politics[J]. Teaching and Research, 2014, 48(5): 55-63. ]
[67]	Simon H A.Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason[M]. Boston: MIT press, 1982.
[68]	Ostrom E.Collective action and the evolution of social norms[J]. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2014, 6(4): 235-252.
[69]	Ostrom E.Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework[A]. PA Sabatier. Theories of the Policy Process[M]. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007.
[70]	王群. 奥斯特罗姆制度分析与发展框架评介[J]. 经济学动态, 2010, (4): 137-142.
	[Wang Q.Evaluation and analysis of institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework[J]. Economics Information, 2010, (4): 137-142. ]
[71]	毛寿龙. 公共事物的治理之道[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2010, (1): 100-105.
	[Mao S L.Governing the commons[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute, 2010, (1): 100-105. ]
[72]	Clement F.For Critical social-ecological system studies: Integrating power and discourses to move beyond the right institutional fit[J]. Environmental Conservation, 2013, 40(1): 1-4.
[73]	Sabatier P A, Weible C M.A guide to the advocacy coalition framework[A]. Fischer, F. and Miller, G. J. Handbook of public policy analysis[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.
[74]	Sabatier P A.An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein[J]. Policy Sciences, 1988, 21(2): 129-168.
[75]	Storch S, Winkel G.Coupling climate change and forest policy: a multiple streams analysis of two German case studies[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2013, 36: 14-26.
[76]	Cashore B, Howlett M.Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in pacific northwest forestry[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 2007, 51(3): 532-551.
[77]	Speth J G.Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of US Environmental Policy[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
[78]	Agrawal A.Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: some concluding thoughts[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014, 36(3): 86-91.
[79]	Gibson C C, Mckean M A, Ostrom E.People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2000.
[80]	蔡晶晶, 毛寿龙. 复杂“社会-生态系统”的适应性治理: 扩展集体林权制度改革的视野[J]. 农业经济问题, 2011, 32(6): 82-88.
	[Cai J J, Mao S L.Adaptive governance of complicated "society-ecosystem": expanding the field of vision for the reform of collective forest tenure system[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2011, 32(6): 82-88. ]
[81]	龙贺兴, 林素娇, 刘金龙. 成立社区林业股份合作组织的集体行动何以可能?-基于福建省沙县X村股份林场的案例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017, (8): 2-17.
	[Long H X, Lin S J, Liu J L.What drives collective action to establish collective forestry shareholding cooperative organizations? An analysis based on a case study in X Village, Sha County, Fujian Province, China[J]. China Agricultural Economics, 2017, (8): 2-17. ]
[82]	Jinlong L.Forests in the Mist: Livelihoods and Responses to the Natural Forest Protection Program in China[D]. Netherland: Wageningen University, 2006.
[83]	Elliott C, Schlaepfer R.The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden[J]. Journal of European Public Policy, 2001, 8(4): 642-661.
[84]	Villamor G B.The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy: an analysis from the perspective of advocacy coalition framework (ACF)[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006, 9(2): 162-178.
[85]	Arts B, Buizer M.Forests, discourses, institutions: a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2009, 11(5): 340-347.
[86]	Jinlong L.Contextualizing forestry discourses and normative frameworks towards sustainable forest management in contemporary China[J]. International Forestry Review, 2007, 9(2): 653-660.
[87]	丁煌. 发展中的中国政策科学[J]. 管理世界, 2003, (2): 27-57.
	[Ding H.China's policy science on the progress[J]. Management World, 2003, (2): 27-57. ]

		冲突性
		低	高
模糊性	低	行政执行资源	政治执行权力
模糊性	高	试验性执行情境状况	象征性执行联合的力量