平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析

doi:10.18402/resci.2017.10.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

三生空间冲突的定量研究可为三生空间的利用管控及合理布局提供理论支撑,并为区域可持续发展提供科学依据。基于土地利用的主导功能及其多功能性质,将福建省平潭岛2000年、2009年和2015年三期土地利用数据划分为生活生产空间、生产生态空间、生态生产空间和生态空间;借鉴景观生态指数方法构建空间冲突指数,对平潭岛“生态-生产-生活”空间冲突进行分析。研究结果表明,平潭岛2000-2015年间生态生产空间均占主导地位,其次是生产生态空间,这两种空间类型的比重均呈下降趋势,而生活生产空间比重则不断增高,生态空间比重趋于平稳;15年间平潭岛空间冲突水平呈上升趋势,并在芦洋乡、中楼乡和敖东镇出现集聚现象,至2015年失控冲突的面积比重已占研究区的41.77%,空间冲突态势已非常严峻;不同空间类型的空间冲突存在一定差异,冲突程度从大到小依次为,生产生态空间>生态空间>生态生产空间>生活生产空间。

关键词: 三生空间, 空间冲突, 冲突指数, 城市化, 平潭岛

Abstract:

Quantitative research into the conflict between ecological-production-living spaces provides support for space use allocation,conflict management and sustainable development. Based on dominant function and multifunction of land use,we divided land use data （from remote sensing images）for three years（2000,2009 and 2015）into four space types （living-production space,production-ecological space,ecological-production space and ecological space）on Pingtan Island. The comprehensive index（SSCI）of spatial conflict was conducted by constructing a comprehensive calculation model （based on the theory of landscape ecological and landscape metrics）,then assessing the level of ecological-production-living spaces’ spatial conflict for Pingtan Island. We found that ecological-production space occupied a dominant position,followed by production-ecological space from 2000 to 2015;the proportion of the two space types was over 50% in the study area and showed a downward trend. But the proportion of living- production space was increased and ecological space was in a stable state. The development of spatial conflict evolved from 0.42 to 0.53 for Pingtan Island over the 15 years,and the concentration phenomenon occurs in Luyang,Zhonglou and Aodong. The spatial conflict situation is serious because the proportion of out of control conflict already accounted for 41.77% of the study area in 2015. There are some differences between various spatial conflicts,and space conflicts grade followed the order：production-ecological space > ecological space > ecological-production space > living-production space. Production-ecological space,living-production space （except 2015）,ecological space and ecological-production space （except 2000）were all dominated by stable controllable conflict and the proportion was more than 70%. Followed by basically controllable conflict,the proportion of uncontrollable conflict was small.

Key words: ecological-production-living spaces, spatial conflict, conflict index, urbanization, Pingtan Island

廖李红, 戴文远, 陈娟, 黄万里, 江方奇, 胡秋凤. 平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833.

Lihong LIAO, Wenyuan DAI, Juan CHEN, Wanli HUANG, Fangqi JIANG, Qiufeng HU. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan Island during rapid urbanization[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

表2

表3

表4

表5

图3

图4

参考文献 30

[1]	刘贵利,严奉天,许顺才,等. 城市发展中内外空间冲突与协调的战略选择:以石家庄市为例[J]. 地理研究,2006,25(4):701-709.
	[Liu G L,Yan F T,Xu S C,et al.The strategic disposition between the conflict and coordination from internal and external space in urban development:taking Shijiazhuang city as a case[J]. Geographical Research,2006,25(4):143-151.]
[2]	Zhao L Y,Peng Z R.Land system:An agent-based cellular auto-mata model of land use change developed for transportation analysis[J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2012,25(3):35-49.
[3]	叶玉瑶. 城市群空间演化动力机制初探:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 城市规划,2006,30(1):61-66.
	[Ye Y Y.Spatial evolution mechanism of urban conglomeration:a case study of the Pearl River delta[J]. City Planning Review,2006,30(1):61-66.]
[4]	周国华,彭佳捷. 空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应-以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(6):717-723.
	[Zhou G H,Peng J J.The evolution characteristics and influence effect of spatial conflict:a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Progress in Geography,2012,31(6):717-723.]
[5]	Campbell D J,Gichohi H,Mwangi A,et al.Land use conflict in Kajiado District,Kenya[J]. Land Use Policy,2000,17(4):337-348.
[6]	于伯华,吕昌河. 土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2006,25(3):106-115.
	[Yu B H,Lv C H.The progress and prospect of land use conflicts[J]. Progress in Geography,2006,25(3):106-115.]
[7]	李占军,刁承泰. 西南丘陵地区土地资源利用的冲突与协调-以重庆江津区为例[J]. 水土保持研究,2009,16(2):239-244.
	[Li Z J,Diao C T.Land resource conflicts and coordination in Hilly Area of Southwestern China-a case study of Jiangjin district,Chongqing[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(2):239-244.]
[8]	杨永芳,安乾,朱连奇. 基于PSR模型的农区土地利用冲突强度的诊断[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(11):1552-1560.
	[Yang Y F,An Q,Zhu L Q.Diagnosis based on the PSR model of rural land-use conflicts intensity[J]. Progress in Geography,2012,31(11):1552-1560.]
[9]	彭佳捷,周国华,唐承丽. 基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度-以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1507-1519.
	[Peng J J,Zhou G H,Tang C L,et al.The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region based on ecological security:a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2012,27(9):1507-1519.]
[10]	王海鹰,秦奋,张新长. 广州市城市生态用地空间冲突与生态安全隐患情景分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1304-1318.
	[Wang H Y,Qin F,Zhang X C.The scenario analysis on urban ecological land spatial conflict and ecological security hidden danger in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(8):1304-1318.]
[11]	周德,徐建春,王莉. 环杭州湾城市群土地利用的空间冲突与复杂性[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(9):1630-1642.
	[Zhou D,Xu J C,Wang L.Land use spatial conflicts and complexity:a case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay,China[J]. Geographical Research,2015,34(9):1630-1642.]
[12]	贺艳华,唐承丽,周国华. 基于地理学视角的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度-以长株潭城市群地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2014,29(10):1660-1674.
	[He Y H,Tang C L,Zhou G H.The analysis of spatial conflict measurement in fast urbanization region from the perspective of geography:a case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(10):1660-1674.]
[13]	陈婧,史培军. 土地利用功能分类探讨[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(5):536-540.
	[Chen J,Shi P J.Dis-cussion on functional land use classification system[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science),2005,41(5):536-540.]
[14]	念沛豪,蔡玉梅,张文新,等. 面向综合区划的国土空间地理实体分类与功能识别[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(12):7-14.
	[ Nian P H,Cai Y M,Zhang W X,et al.Geographic entity division and functions identification oriented comprehensive regionalization[J]. Economic Geography,2014,34(12):7-14.]
[15]	张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义. 中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
	[Zhang H Q,Xu E Q,Zhu H Y.An ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(7):1332-1338.]
[16]	扈万泰,王力国,舒沐辉. 城乡规划编制中的“三生空间”划定思考[J]. 城市规划,2016,(5):21-26.
	[ Hu W T,Wang L G,Shu M H.Reflections on delimiting the three basic spaces in the compilation of urban and rural plans[J]. City Planning Review,2016,(5):21-26.]
[17]	于莉,宋安安,郑宇,等. “三生用地”分类及其空间格局分析-以昌黎县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(2):89-96.
	[Yu L,Song A A,Zheng Y,et al.The ecological-living-industrial land classification system and the analysis of its spatial distribution-a case of Changli county[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2017,38(2):89-96.]
[18]	李广东,方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
	[Li G D,Fang C L.Quan-titative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2016,71(1):49-65.]
[19]	陶慧,刘家明,罗奎,等. 基于三生空间理念的旅游城镇化地区空间分区研究-以马洋溪生态旅游区为例[J]. 人文地理,2016,(2):153-160.
	[Tao H,Liu J M,Luo K,et al.The study of spatial division of tourism urbanization area based on the conception of Production-Living-Ecological space:a case study of Mayangxi ecotourism area[J]. Human Geography,2016,(2):153-160.]
[20]	唐承丽,贺艳华,周国华,等. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(10):1459-1472.
	[Tang C L,He Y H,Zhou G H,et al.The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2014,69(10):1459-1472.]
[21]	席建超,王首琨,张瑞英. 旅游乡村聚落“生态-生产-生活”空间重构与优化-河北野三坡旅游区苟各庄村的案例实证[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(3):425-435.
	[Xi J C,Wang S K,Zhang R Y.Restructuring and optimizing Production-Living-Ecology space in rural settlements:a case study of Gougezhuang village at Yesanpo tourism attraction in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(3):425-435.]
[22]	胡兴定. 基于人居环境的采矿复垦区“三生”空间优化研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2016.
	[Hu X D. Optimization for the Production,Living and Ecological Space Based on Human Settlements in Reclamation Area of Coal Mine [D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing),2016.]
[23]	李伟松,李江风,姚尧,等. 三生空间重构视角下的镇域农村居民点整治分区-以湖北省荆门市沙洋县官垱镇为例[J]. 地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):139-143.
	[Li W S,Li J F,Yao Y,et al.Consolidation division of rural residential areas based on reconstruction of Production,Living and Ecology space:a case Study of Guandang town of Shayang county in Jingzhou city of Hubei Province[J]. Areal Research and Development,2016,35(1):139-143.]
[24]	龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间优化[J]. 地理学报,2013,22(8):164-169.
	[Long H L.Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2013,22(8):164-169.]
[25]	福州统计局,国家统计局福州调查队. 福州统计年鉴2001-2016[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2001-2016.
	[Fuzhou Statistics Bureau.Fuzhou Statistical Yearbook 2001-2016[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2001-2016.]
[26]	Nelson E,Mendoza G,Regetz J,et al.Modeling multiple eco-system services,biodiversity conservation,commodity pro-duction,and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2009,7(1):4-11.
[27]	Bennett E M,Peterson G D,Gordon L J.Understanding relation-ships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology letters,2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[28]	杨国安,甘国辉. 基于分形理论的北京市土地利用空间格局变化研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(10):131-137.
	[Yang G A,Gan G H.Landscape pattern change research of land use in Beijing based on fractal theory[J]. Systems Engineering:Theory & Practice,2004,24(10):131-137.]
[29]	裴彬,潘韬. 土地利用系统动态变化模拟研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2010,29(9):1060-1066.
	[Pei B,Pan T.Land use system dynamic modeling:literature review and future research direction in China[J]. Progress in Geography,2010,29(9):1060-1066.]
[30]	陈彦光. 分形城市系统:标度·对称·空间复杂性[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2008.
	[Chen Y G.Fractal Urban Systems:Scaling Symmetry Spatial Complexity[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2008.]

	生活生产空间		生产生态空间		生态生产空间		生态空间
	面积	占比	面积	占比	面积	占比	面积	占比
2000年	4 195.35	12.94	9 447.03	29.15	11 499.33	35.48	7 270.59	22.43
2009年	4 852.91	14.97	9 226.32	28.47	11 158.93	34.43	7 174.15	22.13
2015年	6 859.52	21.13	8 371.95	25.79	10 243.93	31.55	6 991.07	21.53

2000年	2009年
2000年	生产生态空间	生活生产空间	生态空间	生态生产空间
生产生态空间	7 711.51	720.29	212.89	802.33
生活生产空间	493.56	3 454.48	58.05	189.26
生态空间	93.84	205.84	6 425.96	544.95
生态生产空间	927.40	472.29	477.25	9 622.39

2009年	2015年
2009年	生产生态空间	生活生产空间	生态空间	生态生产空间
生产生态空间	8 312.00	909.66	0.35	4.31
生活生产空间	4.13	4 846.73	0.47	1.58
生态空间	2.91	225.51	6 944.04	1.70
生态生产空间	52.91	867.57	2.10	10 236.34

冲突级别	冲突值	空间单元个数/个			空间单元百分比/%
冲突级别	冲突值	2000年	2009年	2015年	2000年	2009年	2015年
稳定可控	0.00~0.40	247	193	146	45.91	35.87	26.99
基本可控	0.40~0.60	228	239	169	42.38	44.42	31.24
基本失控	0.60~0.80	60	103	172	11.15	19.14	31.79
严重失控	0.80~1.00	3	3	54	0.56	0.56	9.98
总计		538	538	541	100.00	100.00	100.00
冲突平均值（SSCI）		0.42	0.46	0.53	—	—	—