钱江源国家公园体制试点区管理措施的社区居民感知研究

doi:10.18402/resci.2017.01.05

资源科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 40-49.doi: 10.18402/resci.2017.01.05

• 专栏：中国国家公园体制试点研究 • 上一篇下一篇

钱江源国家公园体制试点区管理措施的社区居民感知研究

周睿^{1, 2}, 钟林生^{1, 3}, 虞虎^{1, 3}

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101；
2. 中国科学院资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室,北京 100101；
3. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京100101

收稿日期:2016-09-10 修回日期:2016-12-03 出版日期:2017-01-20 发布日期:2017-01-20
通讯作者: 钟林生,E-mail：zhongls@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:周睿,女,内蒙古呼和浩特人,博士,主要从事生态旅游、国家公园、可持续发展研究。E-mail：catherine-rui@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41671527）; 浙江省发展和改革委员会项目（钱江源国家公园体制试点方案与总体规划编制）

Community perception towards Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area administrative measures

ZHOU Rui^{1, 2}, ZHONG Linsheng^{1, 3}, YU Hu^{1, 3}

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;
3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China

Received:2016-09-10 Revised:2016-12-03 Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 钱江源国家公园体制试点区涉及3处保护地与4个乡镇,其国家公园相关管理政策与措施已开始实施,然而社区居民的感知状况尚不得知。基于实地调研获取的376份问卷数据,借助因子分析得到7项管理政策,其中,社区居民对共同管理政策感知最强,对功能分区政策感知最弱。由方差分析结果得知,7项管理政策的感知强度与4个乡镇具有关联关系,其中,4个乡镇分别对功能分区、发展定位、社区发展和共同管理政策最为敏感,可分别归因于原属地的功能分区、社区参与、产业发展和资源保护程度因素。未来,试点区管理部门应从不同地域社区居民的发展诉求出发,分别侧重居民福利保障、旅游特许经营、社区发展规划和共同参与管理政策,从而充分体现国家公园的公益性。

关键词: 保护地, 管理措施, 钱江源国家公园体制试点区, 社区居民感知

Abstract: Certain protected areas in China are transitioning to National Park System Pilot Areas,in which local community perception is a key issue. Based on three types of protected areas and four towns,Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area is one such transitional area. However,the local communities have little knowledge about new administrative measures and communities in different regions （including original protected areas and townships）have a long and complicated relationship with park administrative measures. It is inferred that community clusters at different regional scales may have different perceptions of the park and its transition. Based on data from 376 questionnaires,we used exploratory factor analysis to acquire seven basic administrative measures consisent with current international national park administrative measures. The perception towards co-management and zoning are respectively the strongest and weakest. The result of ANOVA test showed that the seven basic administrative measures are relevant to four towns’ administrative policies. For instance,communities from Suzhuang Town are the most sensitive to zoning policy,which could be attributed to strict protection of nearby Gutian Mountain Nature Reserve. In contrast,communities from Changhong Town perceives the strongest functioning policy,which is the result of their high involvement in tourism. For future policy making,the management committee of the Pilot Area should consider communities' appeal based on different regions and development conditions. For example,Suzhuang and Changhong Town should respectively pay attention to resident welfare and tourism concession policy to achieve coordinated development between the national park and local community.

Key words: administrative measures, community perception, protected area, Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area

周睿, 钟林生, 虞虎. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区管理措施的社区居民感知研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(1): 40-49.

ZHOU Rui, ZHONG Linsheng, YU Hu. Community perception towards Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area administrative measures[J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(1): 40-49.

参考文献

[1] 孟宪民. 美国国家公园体系的管理经验：兼谈对中国风景名胜区的启示[J]. 世界林业研究,2007,20（1）：75-79. [Meng X M. Management experience of American national park system：And connotation to scenic areas in China[J]. World Forestry Research ,2007,20（1）：75-79.]
[2] 罗金华. 中国国家公园设置及其标准研究[D]. 福州：福建师范大学,2013. [Luo J H. Setting and Criteria Study on Chinese National Park[D]. Fuzhou：Fujian Normal University,2013.]
[3] 张海燕. 紫鹊界梯田景区核心利益相关者利益冲突表现及分析[J]. 消费导刊,2009,（8）：32-34. [Zhang H Y. Key stake-holders of Ziquejie terrace scenic area：Benefit problems and analysis[J]. Consume Guide ,2009,（8）：32-34.]
[4] Daim M S,Bakri A F,Kamarudin H, et al . Being neighbor to a national park：Are we ready for community participation?[J]. Asia Pacific International Conference on Environment Behaviour Studies , Salamis Bay Conti Resort Hotel , Famagusta , North Cyprus ,2012,36：211-220.
[5] Anthony B P,Swemmer L. Co-defining program success：Identifying objectives and indicators for a livestock damage com-pensation scheme at Kruger National Park,South Africa[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation ,2015,26：65-77.
[6] Thouless C. New tourism concessions in national parks to benefit community conservancies in Namibia[J]. Oryx ,2014,48（3）：327-328.
[7] Strickland-Munro J K,Moore S A,Freitag-Ronaldson S. The impacts of tourism on two communities adjacent to the Kruger National Park,South Africa[J]. Development Southern Africa ,2010,27（5）：663-678.
[8] 王丽丽. 国外国家公园社区问题研究综述[J]. 云南地理环境研究,2009,21（1）：73-77. [Wang L L. An overview of the topic on local community in national park in foreign countries[J]. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research ,2009,21（1）：73-77.]
[9] 刘少和. 旅游转型研究综述及我国旅游转型发展的探讨[J]. 旅游论坛,2008,6（3）：322-325. [Liu S H. Study on peasant’s participation mechanism in tourism planning and development of underdeveloped areas[J]. Tourism Forum ,2008,6（3）：322-325.]
[10] 徐广才,康慕谊,贺丽娜,等. 生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2009,29（5）：2578-2588. [Xu G C,Kang M Y,He L N, et al . Advances in research on ecological vulnerability[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica ,2009,29（5）：2578-2588.]
[11] 卢松,张捷,苏勤. 旅游地居民对旅游影响感知与态度的历时性分析-以世界文化遗产西递景区为例[J]. 地理研究,2009,28（2）：536-547. [Lu S,Zhang J,Su Q. The temporally comparative study of residents 'perceptions and attitudes in ancient villages：A case study of Xidi Village,one of the world cultural heritage sites[J]. Geographical Research ,2009,28（2）：536-547.]
[12] 史春云,张捷,李东和. 基于个体视角下的旅游地居民感知与态度研究-以九寨沟为例[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报,2007,（11）：11-17. [Shi C Y,Zhang J,Li D H. Study of the resident perception and attitudes in destination from individual pers-pective：A case study on Jiuzhaigou[J]. Journal of Beijing Inter-national Studies University ,2007,（11）：11-17.]
[13] 胥兴安,王立磊,张广宇. 感知公平、社区支持感与社区参与旅游发展关系-基于社会交换理论的视角[J]. 旅游科学,2015,29（5）：14-26. [Xu X A,Wang L L,Zhang G Y. Relationships among perceived justice,perceived community support and community participation in tourism development：From the perspective of social exchange theory[J]. Tourism Science ,2015,29（5）：14-26.]
[14] Reimann M,Lamp M L,Palang H. Tourism impacts and local communities in Estonian national parks[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ,2011,58（11）：87-99.
[15] 黄玉理,龙良富,王玉琼. 我国世界遗产地居民对旅游影响感知与态度的比较研究-以平遥、丽江古城为例[J]. 人文地理,2008,（2）：91-94. [Huang Y L,Long L F,Wang Y Q. A comparative study on residents’ perception and attitudes on tourism impacts of world heritage destinations：A case study of Pingyao and Lijiang Ancient Cities[J]. Human Geography ,2008,（2）：91-94.]
[16] 程绍文,张捷,徐菲菲,等. 自然旅游地社区居民旅游发展期望与旅游影响感知对其旅游态度的影响-对中国九寨沟和英国NF国家公园的比较研究[J]. 地理研究,2010,29（12）：2179-2188. [Cheng S W,Zhang J,Xu F F, et al . Effect of residents' tourism development expectation and tourism impacts perception on their attitude towards tourism in natural tourist destination：A comparative study between China's Jiuzhaigou and the UK's New Forest National Parks[J]. Geographical Research ,2010,29（12）：2179-2188.]
[17] 卢松,张捷,李东和,等. 旅游地居民对旅游影响感知和态度的比较-以西递景区与九寨沟景区为例[J]. 地理学报,2008,63（6）：646-656. [Lu S,Zhang J,Li D H, et al . Comparison of resort residents' perceptions and attitudes：Case studies in Xidi village and Jiuzhaigou[J]. Acta Grographica Sinica ,2008,63（6）：646-656.]
[18] 尹寿兵,刘云霞. 景区毗邻社区居民旅游感知和态度的差异及机制研究-以黄山市汤口镇为例[J]. 地理科学,2013,33（4）：427-434. [Yin S B,Liu Y X. Difference and mechanism of residents' perceptions and attitudes adjacent to scenic spot：A case study of Tangkou Town,Huangshan City[J]. Scientia Geo-graphica Sinica ,2013,33（4）：427-434.]
[19] 崔晓明,Chris Ryan. 欠发达地区居民对旅游影响的感知和态度的实证研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报（人文社科版）,2010,31（8）：187-191. [Cui X M,Chris R. Case studies on residents’ perception and attitude towards tourism in undeveloped area[J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities （ Humanities and Social Science ）,2010,31（8）：187-191.]
[20] 王凯,欧艳,葛全胜. 世界遗产地居民对生态移民影响的感知-以武陵源3个移民安置区为例[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23（6）：1663-1670. [Wang K,Ou Y,Ge Q S. Perception of residents in world heritage site to the effects of ecological migration：A case study of three migrant resettlement spots in Wulingyuan Hunan Province of South-central China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ,2012,23（6）：1663-1670. ]
[21] 赵玉宗,李东和,黄明丽. 国外旅游地居民旅游感知和态度研究综述[J]. 旅游学刊,2005,20（4）：85-92. [Zhao Y Z,Li D H,Huang M L. On the Residents’ perceptions and attitudes towards tourism development in tourist destinations overseas：A review[J]. Tourism Tribune ,2005,20（4）：85-92.]
[22] Bennett N J,Dearden P. Why local people do not support conservation：Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts,governance and management in Thailand[J]. Marine Policy ,2014,44（1）：107-116.
[23] Mastura J,Kalsom K,Tania-Maria T, et al . Nature-based rural tourism and its economic benefits：A case study of Kinabalu National Park[J]. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes ,2013,5（4）：342-352.
[24] 张进伟. 云南省国家公园与社区旅游利益分配制度必要性研究[J]. 经济研究导刊,2012,（34）：163-164. [Zhang J W. The necessity study on Yunnan Province national park and community benefit distribution[J]. Economic Research Guide ,2012,（34）：163-164.]
[25] 陈耀华,黄丹,颜思琦. 论国家公园的公益性：国家主导性和科学性[J]. 地理科学,2014,34（3）：257-264. [Chen Y H,Huang D,Yan S Q. Discussions on public welfare,state dominance and scientificity of national park[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica ,2014,34（3）：257-264.]
[26] 张文彤,邝春伟. SPSS统计分析基础教程（第2版）[M]. 北京：高等教育出版社,2011. [Zhang W T,Kuang C W. SPSS Statistical Analysis of Basic Tutorial（2ed Edition）[M]. Beijing：High Education Press,2011.]
[27] 刘宇,汪邦军,金春华. 项目评估中信度与效度测定模型的构建与应用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2009,（11）：128-140. [Liu Y,Wang B J,Jin C H. Method and empirical study on reliability and validity analysis for bid evaluation in engineering projects[J]. Journal of Quantitative& Technical Economics ,2009,（11）：128-140.]
[28] 片峰,栾维新,孙战秀,等. 基于铁路距离的环渤海铁矿石中转港腹地划分[J]. 经济地理,2015,35（4）：99-107. [Pian F,Luan W X,Sun Z X, et al . A rail distance based measurement for urban hinterland area of the iron ore transshipment port in the Bohai rim region[J]. Economic Geography ,2015,35（4）：99-107.]
[29] Hair J F,Black W C,Babin B J, et al . Multivariate Data Analysis：A Global Perspective（7th edition）[M]. New Jersey（USA）：Prentice Hall,2010.
[30] 杨朝飞. 澳大利亚、新西兰有关遗传资源管理的启示[J]. 世界环境,2001,（1）：38-41. [Yang C F. Reflection on genetic re-sources management of Australia and New Zealand[J]. World Environment ,2001,（1）：38-41.]
[31] 贾丽奇,杨锐. 澳大利亚世界自然遗产管理框架研究[J]. 中国园林,2013,（9）：20-24. [Jia L Q,Yang R. Research on the management framework of world natural heritage in Australia[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture ,2013,（9）：20-24.]
[32] 王应临,杨锐,埃卡特·兰格. 英国国家公园管理体系评述[J]. 中国园林,2013,（9）：11-19. [Wang Y L,Yang R,Eckart L. Review on the management system of national parks in Great Britain[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture ,2013,（9）：11-19.]
[33] 束晨阳. 对风景名胜区规划中有关分区问题的讨论[J]. 中国园林,2007,23（4）：13-17. [Shu C Y. Discussion of the zoning issues in famous scenic sites planning[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture ,2007,23（4）：13-17.]
[34] Niekerk M V. Advocating community participation and integrated tourism development planning in local destinations：The case of South Africa[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management ,2014,3（2）：1-3.
[35] Reid H. Contractual national parks and the Makuleke community[J]. Human Ecology ,2001,29（2）：135-155.
[36] 刘鸿雁. 加拿大国家公园的建设与管理及其对中国的启示[J]. 生态学杂志,2001,20（6）：50-55. [Liu H Y. The development and management of Canada’s national parks and its implication in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology ,2001,20（6）：50-55.]
[37] Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences （2nd edition）[M]. Hillsdale：Lawrence Earlbaum Asso-ciates,1988.

钱江源国家公园体制试点区管理措施的社区居民感知研究

Community perception towards Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area administrative measures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李寒冰,金晓斌,杨绪红,徐伟义,周寅康. 不同农田管理措施对土壤碳排放强度影响的Meta分析[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(9): 1630-1640.
[2]	田野, 李江风, 汤晓吉. 中国国际保护地资源代表性与国家公园建设[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 484-493.
[3]	虞虎, 陈田, 钟林生, 周睿. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(1): 20-29.
[4]	张海霞, 钟林生. 国家公园管理机构建设的制度逻辑与模式选择研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(1): 11-19.
[5]	孙琨, 钟林生, 马向远. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区扩源增效融资策略研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(1): 30-39.
[6]	周睿, 钟林生, 刘家明, 唐承财, 孙雷刚. 中国国家公园体系构建方法研究——以自然保护区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(4): 577-587.
[7]	龚建周, 郗风江, 夏北成. 广州市饮用水源保护地土地利用格局与水安全[J]. , 2009, 31(1): 101-109.
[8]	陈能汪, 张玉珍, 洪华生, 曹文志. 南方丘陵地区农业小流域最佳管理措施模拟评价[J]. , 2005, 27(6): 151-155.
[9]	张秀刚. 达拉特旗保护地黄瓜—西红柿复种技术要点和经济效益分析[J]. , 1995, 17(5): 73-77.
[10]	成升魁, 张秀刚. 我国保护地农业及其若干问题研究[J]. , 1994, 16(2): 27-33.