采样点数量对黄河三角洲垦利县土壤盐分空间变异的影响

doi:10.18402/resci.2016.12.16

资源科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 2375-2382.doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.12.16

采样点数量对黄河三角洲垦利县土壤盐分空间变异的影响

张晓光^1,²(), 王志刚³, 宋祥云¹, 刘佩茹¹, 李士美¹(), 杨霞⁴

1.青岛农业大学资源与环境学院,青岛 266109
2. 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室,南京 210008
3. 长江水利委员会长江科学院,武汉 430010
4. 东营市农业局,东营 257091

收稿日期:2016-06-23 修回日期:2016-09-22 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2016-12-20
作者简介:
作者简介：张晓光,男,山东济南市人,博士,讲师,目前从事土壤属性预测和资源环境遥感方面研究。zhangxg_66@sina.com
基金资助:
青岛农业大学高层次人才启动基金项目（1114344）;土壤与农业国家重点实验室开放基金项目（Y20160007）;国家自然科学基金项目（41601211）

Effect of sampling on spatial variability in soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta Area

ZHANG Xiaoguang^1,²(), WANG Zhigang³, SONG Xiangyun¹, LIU Peiru¹, LI Shimei¹(), YANG Xia⁴

1. College of Resource and Environment,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao 266109,China
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China
3. Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission,Wuhan 430010,China
4. Agricultural Bureau of Dongying City,Dongying 257091,China

Received:2016-06-23 Revised:2016-09-22 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2016-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对土壤盐渍化的监测是合理利用盐渍化土壤的前提,采样点数量不同会影响土壤盐分空间变异的表达。本文以黄河三角洲典型地区垦利县为研究区,采用地统计学方法,抽取了12个样本子集,探讨不同的采样点数量对土壤盐分空间变异表达的影响。研究结果表明,黄河三角洲地区土壤盐分变异程度较大,随着样点数量的减少,对于细节的刻画能力也在减弱,样点数量过小时（<150个）,不能很好地表达空间变异结构。不同采样点数量下的预测值均方根误差（RMSE）随样本量的增大而减少,说明克里格插值的准确度随样本量的减少呈现降低趋势,平均误差（ME）则随样本量的减小而没有明显的趋势。综合ME、RMSE和ASE 3个指标可以得出,满足黄河三角洲地区县域尺度土壤盐分空间变异表达的土壤样点数量不能小于150个,相当于每1000km²需采集107个样点。

关键词: 采样数量, 土壤盐分, 空间变异, 县域尺度, 黄河三角洲垦利县

Abstract:

The monitoring of spatial variation in soil salinization forms the premise of the rational use of saline soil. The number of sampling points will affect the expression of spatial variation of soil salinity. Here,geostatistical methods were used to extract 12 soil sample subsets for Kenli County in the Yellow River Delta,China. The effect of different sampling numbers on the expression of soil salinity spatial variation was explored. The results showed that a great degree of variability in soil salinity. Effective ranges of most sample sets were between 13.47km and 16.77km. When the sampling number was less than 150 sample points,effective range was decreased （< 6.10km）,small samples were better in indicating the variation characteristics at small scales （< 6.10km）. With a reduction in sampling numbers,the capacity for describing details was weakened. Spatial variation structure was not expressed well,especially when the number was small（<150）. With increasing sampling numbers,the root mean square error （RMSE）was reduced,indicating that the accuracy of the kriging interpolation method was reduced. With increasing sampling numbers,the mean error（ME）had no obvious reduced trend. In summary,the samples number to meet the spatial variability of soil salinity should not be less than 150. We conclude that,in evaluating kriging prediction accuracy the single evaluation index may not be able to completely evaluate predicted results. Combined with the actual fact,a variety of comprehensive indexes may be needed to evaluate predicted results. These findings are applicable to other areas with similar environmental conditions to Kenli County.

Key words: sampling numbers, soil salinity, spatial variability, county scale, Kenli County of the Yellow River Delta Area

张晓光, 王志刚, 宋祥云, 刘佩茹, 李士美, 杨霞. 采样点数量对黄河三角洲垦利县土壤盐分空间变异的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(12): 2375-2382.

ZHANG Xiaoguang,WANG Zhigang,SONG Xiangyun,LIU Peiru,LI Shimei,YANG Xia. Effect of sampling on spatial variability in soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta Area[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(12): 2375-2382.

图/表 5

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

参考文献 18

[1]	姚荣江,杨劲松,姜龙. 黄河三角洲土壤盐分空间变异性与合理采样数研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(6):84-94.
	[Yao R J,Yang J S,Jiang L.Study on spatial variability and appropriate sampling quantity of soil salinity in Yellow River Delta[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,20(6):84-94.]
[2]	Cambardella C A,Moorman T B,Novak J M,et al. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal,1994,58(5):1501-1511.
[3]	Zhang Z Q,Yu D S,Shi X Z,et al. Effect of sampling classification patterns on SOC variability in the red soil region,China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2011,110(1):2-7.
[4]	苏晓燕,赵永存,杨浩,等. 不同采样点数量下土壤有机质含量空间预测方法对比[J]. 地学前沿,2011,18(6):34-40.
	[Su X Y,Zhao Y C,Yang H,et al. A comparison of predictive methods for mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic matter content with different sampling densities[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2011,18(6):34-40.]
[5]	海南,赵永存,田康,等. 不同样点数量对土壤有机质空间变异表达的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(4):783-791.
	[ Han N,Zhao Y C,Tian K,et al. Effect of number of sampling sites on characterization of spatial variability of soil organic matter[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2015,52(4):783-791.]
[6]	吴春生,刘高焕,刘庆生,等. 蒙古高原中北部土壤有机质空间分布研究[J]. 资源科学,2016,38(5):994-1002.
	[Wu C S,Liu G H,Liu Q S,et al. The spatial distribution of soil organic matter on north-central Mongolian Plateau[J]. Resources Science,2016,38(5):994-1002.]
[7]	Yu D S,Zhang Z Q,Yang H,et al. Effect of soil sampling density on detected spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a red soil region of China[J]. Pedosphere,2011,21(2):207-213.
[8]	张志霞,许明祥,刘京,等. 黄土高原不同地貌区土壤有机碳空间变异与合理取样数研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2103-2113.
	[Zhang Z X,Xu M X,Liu J,et al. Spatial variation and reasonable sampling number of soil organic carbon under different geomorphic types on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(12):2103-2113.]
[9]	赵倩倩,赵庚星,姜怀龙,等. 县域土壤养分空间变异特征及合理采样数研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2012,27(8):1382-1391.
	[Zhao Q Q,Zhao G X,Jiang H L,et al. Study on spatial variability of soil nutrients and reasonable sampling number at county scale[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2012,27(8):1382-1391.]
[10]	王志刚,赵永存,黄标,等. 采样点数量对长三角典型地区土壤肥力指标空间变异解析的影响[J]. 土壤,2010,42(3):421-428.
	[Wang Z G,Zhao Y C,Huang B,et al. Effects of sample size on spatial characterization of soil fertility properties in an agricultural area of the Yangtze River delta region,China[J]. Soils,2010,42(3):421-428.]
[11]	张贝尔,黄标,赵永存,等. 采样数量与空间插值方法对华北平原典型区土壤质量评价空间预测精度的影响[J]. 土壤,2013,45(3):540-547.
	[Zhang B E,Huang B,Zhao Y C,et al. Effects of sampling sizes and spatial interpolation method on spatial prediction accuracy of soil fertility quality index in the major grain-producing region of the north China plain[J]. Soils,2013,45(3):540-547.]
[12]	史海滨,陈亚新,朝伦巴根,等. 表层土壤盐分空间变异性及合理采样数与信息估计[J]. 内蒙古农牧学院学报,1996,17(4):74-81.
	[Shi H B,Chen Y X,Chao L B G,et al. Spatial variability of soil salt on the upper layer and its rational sampling number[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry,1996,17(4):74-81.]
[13]	王遵亲. 中国盐渍土[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1993.
	[Wang Z Q.Saline Soil of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1993.]
[14]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
	[Lu R K.Analytical Methods for Soil and Agrochemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,1999.]
[15]	Webster R,Welham S J,Potts J M,et al. Estimating the spatial scales of regionalized variables by nested sampling,hierarchical analysis of variance and residual maximum likelihood[J]. Computers & Geosciences,2006,32(9):1320-1333.
[16]	姜成晟,王劲峰,曹志冬. 地理空间抽样理论研究综述[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(3):368-380.
	[Jiang C S,Wang J F,Cao Z D.A review of geo-spatial sampling theory[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2009,64(3):368-380.]
[17]	Ding Y L,Ge Y,Hu M G,et al. Comparison of spatial sampling strategies for ground sampling and validation of MODIS LAI product[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2014,35(20):7230-7244.
[18]	Wang J F,Zhuang D,Li L F.Spatial sampling design for monitoring the area of cultivated land[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2002,13(2):263-284.

样点个数	最小值 /（g/kg）	最大值 /（g/kg）	平均值 /（g/kg）	标准差 /（g/kg）	偏度系数	峰度系数	中值 /（g/kg）	变异系数 /%
926	0.20	8.60	1.43	1.15	2.45	11.00	1.10	80.85
801	0.20	8.60	1.41	1.12	2.36	10.43	1.10	79.43
704	0.20	8.60	1.41	1.11	2.40	10.97	1.10	78.72
598	0.20	8.60	1.41	1.09	2.30	10.18	1.10	77.31
502	0.20	8.60	1.42	1.12	2.36	10.25	1.10	78.87
401	0.20	8.60	1.41	1.10	2.43	11.10	1.10	78.01
300	0.20	8.60	1.42	1.11	2.51	12.10	1.10	78.17
201	0.20	8.60	1.45	1.09	2.48	12.64	1.10	75.17
150	0.20	8.60	1.49	1.15	2.50	12.57	1.10	77.18
100	0.30	4.40	1.31	0.87	1.64	5.52	1.05	66.41
75	0.30	8.60	1.61	1.30	2.64	12.77	1.20	80.75
50	0.30	4.40	1.19	0.86	1.99	6.92	1.00	72.27

样点数	模型	块金值C₀	基台值Sill	块基比（C₀/Sill）/%	有效变程 /km	决定系数	残差
926	指数模型	0.42	1.01	42.60	14.76	0.66	0.10
801	指数模型	0.44	0.98	44.30	14.04	0.60	0.11
704	指数模型	0.44	0.99	44.70	14.04	0.63	0.09
598	指数模型	0.45	0.97	46.10	13.65	0.61	0.08
502	指数模型	0.47	1.00	47.20	15.66	0.66	0.08
401	指数模型	0.47	0.94	49.90	13.47	0.60	0.07
300	指数模型	0.41	0.89	45.80	16.77	0.66	0.08
201	指数模型	0.39	0.82	47.30	14.04	0.58	0.07
150	球状模型	0.38	0.82	45.90	6.10	0.36	0.01
100	指数模型	0.25	0.69	35.80	5.94	0.31	0.05
75	指数模型	0.16	0.63	25.50	3.72	0.32	0.10
50	指数模型	0.75	0.79	95.10	2.00	0.01	0.22

采样点数量对黄河三角洲垦利县土壤盐分空间变异的影响

Effect of sampling on spatial variability in soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 18

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	谭力, 王占岐, 薛志斌, 杨斌. 南水北调中线核心水源区土壤氟空间变异特征与污染风险评价[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(2): 368-379.
[2]	孙国军, 李卫红, 朱成刚, 杨玉海, 王非. 新疆伊犁河谷表层土壤容重的空间变异性分析[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(7): 1222-1228.
[3]	阿布都外力·吉力力, 甘容, 罗毅, 孙林, 吴娜, 杨传杰, 张艳. 灌溉水矿化度对玛纳斯流域棉花生长影响的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 34(4): 660-667.
[4]	蔡典雄, 胡育骄, 华珞, 王小彬, 吴会军, 武雪萍, 赵全胜, 郑妍, 左余宝. 海冰水灌溉配合农艺措施对棉田土壤水盐动态的影响[J]. , 2010, 32(3): 457-465.
[5]	董新光, 李霞, 石瑞花, 尹业彪. 孔雀河流域天然植物多样性与地下水关系[J]. , 2009, 31(9): 1553-1560.
[6]	石瑞香, 王立新, 杨小唤. 伊犁新垦区土壤养分特征与土地开垦的方向探讨[J]. , 2009, 31(12): 2016-2023.
[7]	陈曦, 郭全军, 闫金凤, 周可法. 新疆三工河流域绿洲地下水水质空间变异特征分析[J]. , 2009, 31(10): 1710-1716.
[8]	荆玉平, 李颖, 张树文. 城乡交错带景观格局及多样性空间结构特征——以长春净月开发区为例[J]. , 2007, 29(5): 43-49.
[9]	黄妙芬, 刘绍民, 刘素红, 邢旭峰. 红外辐射计遥测地表温度空间变异特征[J]. , 2007, 29(2): 97-103.
[10]	谷树忠, 胡克林, 李玲. 都市地价空间分析方法及其应用——以北京市为例[J]. , 2003, 25(4): 85-92.
[11]	黄绍文, 金继运. 乡（镇）级区域土壤养分空间变异与分区管理技术研究[J]. , 2002, 24(2): 76-82.
[12]	白由路, 李保国, 石元春. 基于GIS的黄淮海平原土壤盐分分布与管理研究[J]. , 1999, 21(4): 66-70.